Approvals 12/10 ▼
JamieReleases (4) - 2403d ago Cancel
lelo2play (2) - 2403d ago Cancel
PrinceOfAnger (2) - 2403d ago Cancel
COGconnected (4) - 2403d ago Cancel
310°

Obsidian devs recreate Star Wars Mos Eisley spaceport in Unreal Engine 4

Unreal Engine 4 recreations are nothing new, however the Star Wars Mos Eisley spaceport project—which comes courtesy of a group of Obsidian developers—is pretty impressive. 

Headed by Jason Lewis, a total of 17 devs of varying rank are using the project to learn more about the engine, but of course being self-confessed “super Star Wars nerds” makes the undertaking that bit easier. Speaking to 80.lv, Lewis says he first started out with the desire to craft a three dimensional Millennium Falcon, however things quickly spiralled as the project grew in scope.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

Old
This is an article from 2016
Razzer2403d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(1)
+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community2403d ago
lelo2play2403d ago

Microsoft, what are waiting for?
Get in contact with Disney (or EA) and make a deal for a exclusive Star Wars RPG game made by Obsidian.

It's money in the bank.

Hungryalpaca2403d ago

They’d make more money going multiplat or ps exclusive.

lelo2play2403d ago

If so, then no company would ever make exclusives for Nintendo, Microsoft, PC, etc. Only PS would have exclusives.

Think ... before making a claim like that.

Razzer2403d ago (Edited 2403d ago )

@lelo2play

Most third party companies don't make exclusives for a single platform unless they are very small. And if they do then typically they would target the most popular platform. Especially when we are talking about a AAA franchise like Star Wars. So what Hungryalpaca said was actually entirely correct. Why Disney or EA (especially EA) would go to a Microsoft subsidiary to make a Star Wars game, I have no idea.

lelo2play2403d ago (Edited 2403d ago )

@Razzer

NO... 3rd party make exclusives to who ever pays them, and not specifically to the most successful console. If that was so, why is SEGA allowing Bayonetta 3 exclusive to Nintendo?... or Insomniac's Sunset Overdrive exclusive to Microsoft. SEGA or Insomniac aren't small companies. Those games are exclusive because Nintendo/Microsoft are paying the bill.

One other thing to take into account. EA already demonstrated they are not interested in making a single-player Star Wars game... so if another company came to them with some kind of deal for a single-player Star Wars game, I don't 't think they would be averse to the idea.

Razzer2403d ago (Edited 2403d ago )

None of those games are " a AAA franchise like Star Wars". That is exactly what I said in my post. But to your point, yes, some third party exclusives are commissioned. Not the point regardless.

Why would EA want Microsoft to make any game for them? They are a game publisher and they have their own dev teams. The fact that they are not crazy about single player games doesn't change anything. If they wanted a third party developer to make the game then it would still more than likely be multiplat. Not sure why Microsoft would be in the discussion except as one of the target platforms with Xbox.

King_Noctis2402d ago

Its like saying Naughty Dogs would make more money going multiplatform, which, you knkw, won’t happen in a million year.

Razzer2402d ago

"Its like saying Naughty Dogs would make more money going multiplatform, which, you knkw, won’t happen in a million year. "

Yes, about as much chance as a Star Wars game going exclusive to Xbox One. Pretty much nothing. Not that this article from 2016 even implies such a thing, but whatever. Folks can dream I guess.

conanlifts2402d ago

They are now owned by Microsoft, so i doubt they would do that with new projects.

TekoIie2402d ago

@Razzer

"Especially when we are talking about a AAA franchise like Star Wars."

You've made an assumption there. Star Wars development budgets only skyrocketed under EA. Before I'd say that Force Unleashed leaned more towards AA level than AAA. Not every Star Wars game needs to be this huge project with an absurd development budget of 60-80 million.

"None of those games are " a AAA franchise like Star Wars". That is exactly what I said in my post. But to your point, yes, some third party exclusives are commissioned. Not the point regardless."

No, the point is that it works because we've seen it work. You'd need to present a reason as to why the game has to be AAA for your argument to stand. Everything we're talking about is speculation, but you're trying to impose a limitation that you can't justify.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 2402d ago
gangsta_red2403d ago

A new KOTOR would be cool from Obsidian. Seems to be the franchise a lot folks want to see return from the old Bioware game on Xbox.

...Even though, I never saw the appeal when I played it...

2403d ago
Feriku2402d ago

Phil Spencer once said he'd like to see KotOR come back... *waits patiently*

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2402d ago
Dreamcatcher452403d ago

Luckily, whatever that'll be released is obtainable on PC.

starchild2403d ago

Yeah, thankfully it won't be stuck behind an artificial walled garden like it would be on certain platforms. If the PC hardware can run a game easily there's no point in preventing people from playing it there.

2402d ago
Razzer2402d ago (Edited 2402d ago )

PC is not a walled garden. The fact that you are describing multiple services on PC and calling them individual walled gardens is silly. Of course each store is a "walled garden". That's like wondering why you can't buy a Big Mac at Burger King. A walled garden is one such as PS4, Switch, and Xbox where you have a single store. This does not apply to PC at all.

Piracy hasn't stopped PC from growing in popularity. MS doesn't have a problem with supporting PC and obviously neither does most publishers outside of Sony and Nintendo. So you can discuss all the reasons in the world not to go to PC, but obviously the pros outweigh the cons.

2403d ago Replies(1)
timotim2403d ago

I needed to see this. I look forward to what Obsidian can bring to the table with a AAA budget and Microsoft's resources.

ApocalypseShadow2402d ago

Looks great....FOR TWO YEAR OLD NEWS.

Is this being posted to make the obsidian purchase look good for Microsoft?

timotim2402d ago

Lol...I mean...the Obsidian acquisition already looked good for Microsoft haha. They are a talented developer Studio. Two years old news or not, this shows that they were working with the Unreal Engine and visually look to be pretty good at it...should be even better with the engine now, no? They couldn't pull that supposed game off however without a big budget...enter Microsoft. Even under another IP, this UE work should help them either way. Is that not good news?

ApocalypseShadow2402d ago

2016 news. The mods are not on their job.

Razzer2402d ago

We are supposed to be impressed with Obsidian because they can use UE? This wasn't even a "supposed game". It was a learning exercise for a common tool in the industry.

timotim2402d ago

@Apocalype

I don't care which year this UE work began...that's not the issue for me and I suppose others here...its the fact that a small team of their was able to take UE and kick out something that visually looks AAA. That's what's stands out to me haha. That game will never see the light of day, because it wasn't even a game...it was Obsidian LEARNING and playing with the UE so that they may use it to actually produce a AAA in the future. They were just using the Star Wars IP because they love it so much.

Again, wouldn't they presumably be better with this engine now than they were then??? Couldn't Microsoft provide them with a budget to produce a full game with those visuals and thigh production values??? THAT is the news here...not the Star Wars stuff.

@Razzer
Exactly my point, which is why I said supposed game. It appears to me, based off the footage, that Obsidian was looking at using the UE on future AAA projects and wanted to have fun learning the engine...they chose Star Wars because they have a ton of knowledge on it and because it would be easier to learn with an IP you already like. However, I don't care about the Star Wars stuff...I care about the quality of their work visually here. They could take those same lessons learned doing this project and apply it to anything...that is what has me intrigued.

And just because a developer uses the UE doesn't mean all games that use it are visually of the same quality.

rainslacker2402d ago

May have been posted without the poster realizing it was old.

Obsidian was a good acquisition by MS either way though.

ApocalypseShadow2402d ago

Obsidian is cool. Old news is not.

rainslacker2402d ago

Wouldn't worry about it. It'll probably be failed when a mod comes around.

And yeah, I always liked Obsidian.

King_Noctis2402d ago

Why they need to make Obsidian look good? Everyone already know Obsidian is good.

ApocalypseShadow2402d ago

Yeah. Let's start posting 1995 news about Sony launching PS1. Or when they bought naughty dog. Should be great for the site.

Razzer2402d ago (Edited 2402d ago )

Obsidian is average at best. Sorry. I know cuz I've played their games. Microsoft could have done better. Kind of feels like they are buying for the sake of buying. Not wise.

King_Noctis2402d ago

@Raazer

Then why are their games such as PoE, South Park, and Fallout NV got so many praise from both critics and gamers?

Razzer2402d ago (Edited 2402d ago )

@Kiig_Nootis

PoE is their best work and it is just ok, imo. That game pales in comparison to Divinity. Larian Studios would have been a much better buy. South Park? Come on. What did they do besides program a game full of existing assets with an already written script? Are we to praise the graphics? lol. Actually they received criticism in that game for the frame rate stuttering so badly. Fallout NV. Again. This is what Obsidian typically has done. Taken existing franchises and make a subpar version of the previous game. Just like KOTOR, Fallout, and Neverwinter Nights. Try to do it on their own and they produce crap like Alpha Protocol. But like I said, PoE is their best, but I don't find it particularly well done. Thus, an average studio.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2402d ago
+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2402d ago
Show all comments (38)
50°

Rematch is "chasing credibility" but not realism like rival EA FC

Pocket Tactics sits down with Rematch’s creative director, Pierre Tarno, to discuss why Sloclap moved away from Sifu to chase something new.

Read Full Story >>
pockettactics.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community8h ago
660°

Microsoft planning “major” Xbox layoffs next week

The cuts are expected to be announced next week.

Microsoft is also planning thousands of job cuts that will impact other parts of it businesses

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1d 3h ago
Changed: credit url
MaximusPrime_1d 4h ago
1d 4h ago Replies(1)
1d 4h ago Replies(1)
Obscure_Observer1d 4h ago

MFs has been beating their chests over great quarterly results and big profits to shareholders while firing people by the thousands just like Sony.

I wonder if at the top of those rumored layoffs they´ll also cancel upcoming or unannounced games while shutting down more studios as well.

1d 4h ago
pwnmaster30001d 4h ago

Always got to throw shade at Sony smh.
Yes we get it,
MS good Sony bad
MS bad Sony is also bad lmao

1d 4h ago
Obscure_Observer1d 3h ago

F* them both!

Just for the record, I don´t care about your victim complex crap either. Find someone else who cares.

Terry_B1d 3h ago

Yeah..its super annoying.

blacktiger1d 2h ago

He was talking about both. Why you getting offended when he's using both names

pwnmaster30001d 2h ago (Edited 1d 2h ago )

@Blacktiger

Im not offended , that’s just his formula lol
He can’t help help himself, he needs to bring Sony down when the topic involves MS.
Whether is good news for MS or bad, it some how leads to Sony doing bad lmao.
It’s actually hilarious.

InUrFoxHole21h ago

He's not wrong but im tracking what youre saying. In this case is should just be MS bad. Thats a lot of people fired

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 21h ago
Tacoboto1d 3h ago

"just like Sony"

Gosh you're insufferable, not everything needs to be both-sides'd. Sony's had layoffs, but nothing like what Microsoft has been doing and is continuing to do.

CrimsonWing691d 3h ago (Edited 1d 3h ago )

I mean, no offense, but this is why you’re not some corporate business person running a major corporation. Big profits don’t mean jobs are safe. Do you understand why things like this happen:

Cutting jobs to maintain or increase profitability, especially in underperforming divisions like parts of Xbox like other gaming divisions.

Corporate restructuring and relocating resources for strategic stability in ever changing markets and consumer behaviors.

Investor expectations and optimizing operations to maintain investor confidence. Whatever boosts stock prices and improves future margins.

And there’s many other factors at play. It’s never as simple as business doing well, everyone’s safe. That’s just you not understanding at all how corporations work and have been working since the beginning. This isn’t something that’s specific to Xbox, you can bet your ass Sony and Nintendo do this and if it’s not clear by now, game development is not a stable job nor has it ever been for many. A lot of developers are contractors and guess what happens when a project is done?

Ganif1d 2h ago

Nintendo said they have no plans for layoffs, and you can't seriously claim that the scale of Sony's layoffs most of which involved Bungie which is self managed as even close to the same scale as what Microsoft has done since they purchased Zenimax. And that significantly less layoffs would have happened if those publishers had stayed independent. Keep in mind that much of these layoffs have been due to redundancies specifically related to these buyouts.

CrimsonWing691d 1h ago (Edited 1d 1h ago )

@Ganif

Nintendo:

https://gamerant.com/ninten...

Sony:

https://gamerant.com/playst...

https://techxplore.com/news...

I don’t think it’s realistic to treat Sony’s layoffs as somehow outside the norm for the industry right now. Even if Bungie is self-managed, Sony’s cuts went far beyond that like Naughty Dog, Insomniac, London Studio being shut down completely, and multiple teams across the globe took hits. These weren’t just minor adjustments.

Nintendo, I had to look up and you’re right. They seem to be an outlier, but rest assured at some point it happens. And even then there’s been layoffs, albeit a smaller amount and contractors.

Would fewer layoffs have happened if studios from acquisitions stayed independent? Maybe. But even independents have been hit hard and look at what’s happened with Embracer’s fallout, or smaller devs like Digic, Roll7, or Volition. This isn’t just a “Microsoft problem” or strictly tied to acquisitions; it’s a broader correction happening across the whole industry, and unfortunately, layoffs are a big part of that process right now.

Ganif1d 1h ago

From your article:

"According to reports, Nintendo of America restructured its testing operations, leading to layoffs of about 120 contractors, part of a strategy for global integration.

Nintendo of America, publisher of iconic franchises like Mario and Zelda, is shifting some contractors to full-time roles for better development integration."

Contractors are not employees, and even if you want to count them as that, it's 120 people vs around 7500 since Microsoft purchased Zenimax.

In an era of game industry layoffs, Nintendo is hiring more people
https://automaton-media.com...

Nintendo Announces 10 Percent Pay Raise For Devs Despite Lower Profits
https://kotaku.com/nintendo...

Nintendo CEO’s refusal to layoff staff goes viral following industry-wide cuts
"Satoru Iwata took pay cuts to ensure staff didn’t have to be let go"
https://www.nme.com/news/ga...

And as for Sony you're comparing less than 1000 total jobs to an estimated7500

Has the industry faced layoffs, yes, but that still doesn't account for the mass layoffs due to redundancies that was easily predictable, or that fact that at least 1/3 of Microsoft's layoffs and studio closures happened before the industry downturn.

thorstein1d ago (Edited 1d ago )

Take the L, Crimson.

People hate Nintendo, but Ganif proved why they deserve support.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d ago
-Foxtrot1d 2h ago

It's like banging your head off a wall, he just can't help himself.

Microsoft can do no wrong, Sony sucks at everything and Nintendo is bigged up because it's less hassle than trying to defend Microsoft all the time

What's going to happen when Microsoft finally turn completely third party, then what?

anast1d 2h ago

I enjoy Obscure. Obscure does good work.

crazyCoconuts1d 2h ago

Did you know that the first n4g was designed to be a perfect human world? Where none suffered, where everyone would be happy. It was a disaster. No one would accept the program.

Tacoboto1d 1h ago

I wouldn't be surprised at this point if anast and osbcure were both alts for the Admin.

We know how Obscure especially drums up additional comments and clicks with his spam-worthy remarks that somehow never get moderated

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d 1h ago
Profchaos23h ago

Thats business present a strong front to your shareholders while your company burns around you.

Keep shareholders happy at all costs andnif not happy keep them numb to the reality of you organisation

Angyobangyo14h ago

" Just for the record, I don´t care about your victim complex crap either. Find someone else who cares. "

Just for the record, you clearly you do if you have to vent this hard.

TheExecutioner11h ago

Basically you think like kids when it come to choose between candy or chocolate.

Sonic188110h ago(Edited 10h ago)

Are you and Anast the same person?

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 10h ago
1d 3h ago
Show all comments (86)
140°

Sony Faces Class Action in the Netherlands Over Allegedly Inflated PlayStation Store Prices

Mass Damage & Consumer Foundation in the Netherlands has filed a class action against Sony for inflating PlayStation Store prices.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1d 3h ago
dveio1d 2h ago (Edited 1d 2h ago )

My personal opinion:

Manufacturers and publishers have indeed inflated the industry.

From $700 million development costs for games like Call of Duty, to digital (store) prices for games and DLCs, online multiplayer fees on consoles (why can you play Helldivers 2 online for free on PC but not consoles?) or still preventing sell/lend digitally purchased games.

Sometime in the future, this bubble will collapse.

They should know better, but they just can't help themselves and suck even the last penny out of our wallets.

BeHunted1d ago

Because Sony knows people will be forced to pay those prices for single player and multiplayer games, not everyone prefers PC gaming. Sony also has a monopoly on PlayStation digital games. In 2019, they stopped allowing retailers and game key sellers to sell PlayStation digital games, making them available only through the official PlayStation Store

anast1d 2h ago

The Dutch gov. wants a piece of the pie.

Eonjay1d 2h ago

They should be suing the individual publishers increasing the prices to $80 instead of suing the store. There are plenty of publishers still selling game for like $50 with much success (like E33). But this proves that the publishers are the ones setting the prices.... so again nothing changes because they aren't even going after the main offender. How is suing Sony going to make Microsoft not charge $80 for the next COD? Sony being the number one store in the market doesn't mean that publisher have to charge us an arm and a leg. Again the industry is laughing at us because consumers never get real representation. Just these fake platitudes that are meaningless.

BeHunted1d ago

"How is suing Sony going to make Microsoft not charge $80 for the next COD"

Because Microsoft doesn't have a monopoly, I can purchase Call of Duty at a huge discount from CDKeys or other gaming retailers. The only way to purchase digital PlayStation games is through the PlayStation Store.

djl348523h ago

Weird, I swore GoW, Stellar Blade, Horizon Zero Dawn, TLoU, etc. were on the steam store....uh.....

BeHunted19h ago(Edited 19h ago)

@djI3485

I'm talking about PlayStation games that you can only purchase on PlayStation. I can purchase Steam and Epic games from 3rd party retailers and key stores.

"Sony to stop selling full-game download codes at retailers"

https://www.videogamer.com/...

Killer2020UK1d ago

About time. There is zero fair reason why digitally distributed products that you cannot recoup any value when you want to dispose of them, should be priced higher than that of physical copies that entail all of the costs and the benefits of owning.

Show all comments (12)