930°

Sony Confirms Next-Generation PlayStation Hardware Is "Necessary," Surprising No One

Sony's Kenichiro Yoshida confirmed that the release of a next-generation hardware platform is necessary for the PlayStation business.

Read Full Story >>
dualshockers.com
Obscure_Observer2018d ago

@PhoenixUp

"Water is wet?"

You wouldn´t belive how many people think that major companies like Sony and Microsoft would leave the console business for an all digital streaming services and games distribution.

jimbost792018d ago

Eventually they will tho mate. Maybe not for 20 years but eventually there will be no need to produce consoles.

JaguarEvolved2018d ago

I can't wait to buy a ps5 day one. Next generation gaming starts when the ps5 is released

2018d ago
2018d ago
Highlife2018d ago

Just go back to the articles before this gen. Mobile gaming, streaming, oya where all the doom of traditional gaming consoles.

neutralgamer19922018d ago

Holiday 2019

February-March 2019 reveal than full reveal E3 2019

Make way too much sense for them not to release it next year. Business wise 2020 nes no sense as that's when nevt Xbox would launch too

Sony put itself in great position to launch in 2019 by launching ps4 pro a year before Xbox x. If yall think launching early doesn't have the best affect than look at Xbox 360. By launching the Ps5 in holiday 2019 Sony will have all the market to itself and ms would play catch up while next Gen

I know I will get a lot of disagrees but I have facts backing up my claims

Sony went out of its way to announce before this year's E3 of no new hardware announcement

Sony cancelled PSX because whatever they wanted to show on ps4 has been shown meaning no new exclusives to announce

Sony could have delayed the pro and matched or surpassed Xbox x specs but longterm business wise it made no sense

Ps5 could launch at $499 and won't make a big difference because that's next Gen and by the time next Xbox comes drop the price to undercut

Vizigoth042018d ago

Yeah that's just dumb. The answer should be, if Mobile platform is indeed the way ahead then Sony or Microsoft for that matter should be smart enough to make sure the user base of their platform and software is well established on on their own specific mobile device before cutting off the console. But at the same time if even with the existence of a Mobile device if console sales are still strong they should remain. I mean I really don't want to play the next God of War, Horizon Zero Dawn, Spider-Man sequel or The Last of Us 2 on my cellphone. That does not sound immersive what so ever.

darthv722018d ago (Edited 2018d ago )

Next generation for PlayStation gaming starts when the ps5 is released.

To be fair, "next generation" already started... for Nintendo anyways.

DarXyde2018d ago

JaguarEvolved,

There are good reasons to not buy a console on day one. You don't know if there will be hardware issues, the launch software is very likely not going to be great, and you don't know the asking price.

Don't be a Guinea pig. Even if it's waiting 2-3 weeks to scope out about issues/ reviews.

CptDville2018d ago

Well, there are many people who think earth is flat. That does not make the argument reasonable.

S2Killinit2018d ago (Edited 2018d ago )

He is saying that because he wants to bundle Sony up with MS even though nobody says Sony is leaving consoles behind, only MS with their focus on services, Gaas, PC, play anywhere, and PR rhetoric leads people to believe that MS doesn’t see the “Console” to be all that integral to their plans for gaming.

Christopher2018d ago

***Next-generation starts when the first console is released***

It's already started. Nintendo put out the Switch.

2018d ago
darthv722018d ago

@gumby... uhh, that wasn't "highlife"... that was "neutralgamer" that said those things.

agent45322018d ago

It makes business sense for one less costs and able to target everyone not just say 40 million but 1 billion people through a Netflix like service that's readily available on tv, PC, and mobile. The hardware of consoles is dead. Smartphones hardware is as good as latest consoles plus PC hardware is way ahead of what consoles can offer hardware wise.

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 2018d ago
n1kki62018d ago

Water makes things wet. Wetness describes our interaction with the water. Water is technically not considered wet.
Source: http://scienceline.ucsb.edu...

TastyTostada2018d ago

You only addressed answer 1. It's a subjective question which relies on how one chooses to approach and perceive the concept. In your own source you just posted, answer 2 says it is:

"If we define "wet" as a sensation that we get when a liquid comes in contact with us, then yes, water is wet to us."

If we define "wet" as "made of liquid or moisture", then water is definitely wet because it is made of liquid, and in this sense, all liquids are wet because they are all made of liquids. I think that this is a case of a word being useful only in appropriate contexts."

It's semantics really. A pointless response.

UltraNova2017d ago

Otter,

Molten metal is liquid as well, molten iron for example...I wouldn't call it "wet" right?. It actually burns everything it comes to contact with so its the far opposite of "wet".

Basically all the definitions you guys mentioned regarding liquids and wet-ness are, well crap in the general scale of things.

sinspirit2017d ago

1. Science explains things differently as science requires different view points and explanations to explain things more precisely, just like medical terminology meaning something other than the general meaning.

2. The first definition on Google - "covered or saturated with water or another liquid". Guess what is saturated with water? Any body of water.

3. Referring back to 1. The bottom of your link gives you the basic run down of three ways of viewing "wet". Even though the other uses of the word exist, one of them still says that water is indeed "wet". So, yes. It is.

4. The fact many are saying water is not wet just shows you how bad social engineering gets. Suddenly everyone starts seeing something differently, second guessing what they knew, and find a reason to believe what they think is the new mass consensus rather than upholding their prior thoughts.

5. Why are we so off topic for no reason?

@UltraNova

Wet doesn't mean pleasing, relaxing, or a specified temperature and composition. Just because water is 99% of the time the only liquid you deal with in some form doesn't make the most common word to describe it solely used for it.

If you're referring to an object that gets one of the more extreme liquids poured onto itself. Because of the temperature difference, something hot will cool down, or melt the object. Metal would be too thick to actually soak into something so probably not. And, liquid nitrogen would generally just repel off an object because of the temperature difference. The Leidenfrost effect. You can pour liquid nitrogen on your hand(don't try it) and it will just bounce off and you'll barely feel the cold. But, if you submerge your hand then it's a whole different story. The extreme temperature difference brings in many other factors that tend to prevent wetness but technically those liquids themselves are wet even though they won't soak into everyday materials

TastyTostada2017d ago

@Ultranova "Basically all the definitions you guys mentioned regarding liquids and wet-ness are, well crap in the general scale of things."

The University of California, Santa Barbara has a partnership with the National Science Foundation. ( https://www.nsf.gov/)

n1kki6's article wasn't bad, he only highlighted a portion of it though.

If you're saying that UCSB and the NSF don't know what they're talking about, but you do, well.... okay then...

(sinspirit- well said.)

*And yes, this has gotten WAY off topic, lol.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2017d ago
Army_of_Darkness2018d ago

I don't think consoles will ever go away just like PC gaming will always need a powerful rig to play current games at their best... Streaming is good for convenience, but definitely not the definitive way to play in terms of achieving highest resolution and performance (fps).

agent45322018d ago

How about downloading games that seems to work very well. Just picture the latest tv set with 8 core processor with built-in thunderbolt port; turn on tv log in to PSN or Xbox Live via the tv app. Boom! Instant gaming and then just download say games to external hard drive or usb stick. See there is no need for consoles. PC gaming still alive due to there is no way to create games right now without a PC.

RobertDsouza2018d ago

They are even "Rumored To be Working on a Tablet Designed for Games and Streaming Multimedia Content" - https://gametransfers.com/s...

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2017d ago
Obscure_Observer2018d ago

Glad to know that console hardware will still play the major role for both Sony and Microsoft.

lxeasy2018d ago

Yeah remember Pacther and others saying this will be the last gen. Lol I knew it wouldn't.

Monkeycan82018d ago

He also said Last Gen (PS3,XB360) would be the last console gen ever in 2007 I believe.

SuperSonic912018d ago

I remeber that . Cliffy B too said mobile is the future and PS4 is DOA. LoL

rainslacker2018d ago

Consoles will easily be around for another 2-3 generations. Maybe more depending on what new techs come to enable home gaming.

Practically speaking, technology always moves forward, and new things to do with those technologies will always be worked on. Just think of how much time console gaming has been on the market. In the grand scheme of things, it has been a relatively short period of time. Just like cell phones, most of us probably can't remember a time where they weren't ubiquitous, yet they have only been in their current state of popularity for less than two decades. That technology itself has changed, and brought new things to the market, which are now expected or wanted. Same will happen with consoles.

Who knows what another 40 years will bring. Whether Sony, Nintendo, and MS will still bel in the console race, or who may join the fray. But I have little doubt that there will always be something akin to a console for the consumer market. At least until we have mandated always connected chips in our brain....which I hopefully won't be around to see.

agent45322017d ago

Oh my god! Game developers have failed to utilize the full potential of PC gaming. Is a shame really for PC gaming already offers the future of gaming. From HDR, VR, high fidelity visuals, next-gen special effects, etc. The mod community has shown time and again the true power of PC gaming. Console hardware is dead and buried and smart tvs already offer the consoles multimedia features. If a smart tv comes with a 8 core processor and built-in thunderbolt then consoles will become irrelevant.

rainslacker2017d ago

Not sure why the power of the PC will somehow have some effect on the console market. And a TV with a built in console? I don't see that happening anytime soon. The cost alone would be really high, and chances are, it won't gain enough market share.

Streaming makes more sense for TV's, and Sony stopped doing that, presemadly since it just wasn't really worth supporting on anything other than console or PC. Maybe the time wasn't right, but as of right now, we can't even get all apps on all TV's, which already segments the market.

Console hardware is still going strong. The idea that it'll disappear anytime soon, or is already "dead and buried" as you say, is a fallacy.

As far as PC, the reason that the devs don't take advantage of it is because it takes a lot of effort to support the wide variety of hardware out there, and the lowest common denominator has always had an effect on the software for it. Developers taking advantage of the PC's power don't see the sales in the software, because they limit their user base. This is why consoles are so popular with developers, because it's a set standard to build to....something MS and Sony have changed with the mid-gens, and they haven't bothered to take full advantage of those mid-gens.

It's not about if they'll take advantage of the hardware though, it's about where people are willing to buy those products, and for the foreseeable future, that's going to be on PC and consoles. There are other gaming markets for mobile or other devices, but they're different markets, and developers and publishers aren't goign to give up a lucrative market of PC and consoles just because there is a bigger market elsewhere....otherwise, this whole gen, and PC would already be dead. Kind of like how last gen we kept hearing how mobile was going to kill the console.

agent45322017d ago

I hope Microsoft shows Sony by coming in with say Xbox Live tv app. All there needs to be done is a tv with a built-in thunderbolt port plus 8 core processor and 4gbs of DDR4 ram. Today's tvs have a 4 core processor not sure about the RAM but everything a console can do minus the games is already possible on a smart tv

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2017d ago
TheGamez1002018d ago

Sweet, course we all knew itd be coming. Just nice to have official word on it.

gigoran2018d ago

biased “writers” make for the worst reading

DreadGara2018d ago

He must be creative to make something out of it.

2018d ago
Show all comments (100)
70°

Tomb Raider is coming to Evercade!

The first three Tomb Raider games are coming to an Evercade Cartridge!

Read Full Story >>
evercade.co.uk
darthv721d 12h ago

Their newer giga cart tech should make for even bigger games coming to the platform. I'm hoping for a Resident Evil collection with the first 3 games.

140°

With Larian Out Of The Picture, Will The Baldur's Gate IP Be In Safe Hands?

Huzaifah from eXputer: "With Larian Studios washing their hands of the IP, what is the ultimate fate of the legendary Baldur's Gate series?"

RaidenBlack13h ago

If anybody's gonna mention BioWare, then look at Archetype Entertainment, they're the new BioWare
or else
Obsidian is still a good choice but not independent anymore.

anast12h ago(Edited 12h ago)

No, WoTC is pivoting to mobile. They can use Larian's work to justify DnD Go and everyone will accept it.

RiseNShine12h ago

Short answer, nope. Long answer, f*ck nope.

Christopher12h ago

Honestly, we're talking completely new engine and none of Larian's built-in stuff with regard to environments and the like that they had from their past divinity game. No one is going to have that just ready to go. So, they need to shop for a dev studio that has a past game that shows what they want.

Obsidian doesn't have that, maybe the closest being Dungeon Siege 3 or Pillars of Eternity, but those are very basic, not as open, very little environment related and altering capabilities. So, we're talking a step way back on what Larian delivered. Zero scene experience to line up with what was done in BG3. Okay conversation tree designs, but still needs more complexity.

inXile has Wasteland 3 as a base model engine, and I think that's better than Pillars of Eternity from Obsidian. But, still needs to be more open world, more environmental effects, and a much heavier rules set adaptation. But, not a bad overall engine as a base, but still a ton of work. Zero scene experience to line up with what was done in BG3. Needs a ton of work on that entirely.

Tactical Adventure did the Solasta game. Really good and more accurate as far as 5e rules than BG3. But, again, if the expectation is similar to what made BG3 a big hit, engine isn't designed for moving the camera, is a bit outdated in graphics, doesn't have in-game scene elements, and needs much better writers/voice actors.

Owlcat of pathfinder games is another choice, even though they've recently moved on to WH40k licensed games. Again, though, the engine is the biggest issue here to match up, but it's a much better option overall than Tactical Adventure. Another question is writers/story telling, as much of their overall story telling bits are very limited with a lot of random worldbuilding elements that are just +\- of some attributes.

TBH, no matter who takes over, it's just not going to be like BG3 much like how BG3 isn't at all like BG1/2. And BG3 was so successful because of how much Larian was able to put in with their engine and how focused they were on players having ridiculous control over the story being told. I just don't see the next BG being the same and depending on what it is, it might be good but I'm not as big of a reach as BG3. It's way more likely players are going to go into BG4 (or its spiritual successor if it moves away from Baldur's Gate and into Neverwinter or something like Plansescape) expecting much of what is in BG3 with more options, new and older characters, and the same level of control over what they're doing. If it doesn't have that, regardless of who makes it, it won't be as successful, IMHO.

CrimsonWing6911h ago

Probably not, but maybe… just maybe…

Show all comments (6)
70°

New hardware, new lower price! Introducing Evercade EXP-R and Evercade VS-R

We’re delighted to announce a refresh of the Evercade line of retro gaming consoles that not only provides a simpler and more accessible way to get into Evercade and its physical cartridge ecosystem but also brings the price of the products down to under £100/$100.

Read Full Story >>
evercade.co.uk
darthv721d 12h ago

Evercade is a great little platform. Im surprised more dont know about it.

Vits1d 11h ago

It's a great idea, but I feel the execution could have been better, particularly concerning the quality of the consoles themselves and the fact that those carts are likely not going to last long, given the cheap, bottom-of-the-barrel flash memory they use.