890°

Xbox One X To Allow Metro Exodus Developers To Do Things That May Not Be Possible on Other Hardware

Deep Silver's Huw Beynon said that the Xbox One X allows the developers of Metro Exodus to do things that may not be possible elsewhere on other hardware. He's also highly confident that the game will look better on the Xbox One X.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
2538d ago Replies(8)
ccgr2538d ago

On PC anything is possible

BLKxSEPTEMBER2538d ago (Edited 2538d ago )

I could have sworn the title said not possible on Hardware meaning consoles. I’m not sure why PC gets brought up in console articles. We all know PC is best when you have the funds to make it the best. This article is about CONSOLES and the X is the best hardware available. I’m still waiting on someone to build a PC that can do what the X does at 500....

bluefox7552538d ago

At non-inflated graphic card and memory prices, it's very doable, even with new parts. Graphic card prices are starting to level out again, but memory still isn't there. If you're willing to buy used, you can build a system that will easily outperform the X, even with inflated graphic card prices. There are dozens of videos demonstrating this on youtube.

Alexious2538d ago

Yes, obviously it means consoles, not counting PC.

JamesBondage2538d ago

But it doesn't say consoles, it says hardware. Poor word choice on the authors part

Aenea2538d ago

"... not possible on other hardware", what does a PC consist of? Only software?

Lon3wolf2538d ago

At what point does it mention only consoles it only says hardware, I have some that in my PC funnily enough.

@Alexious
"Yes, obviously it means consoles, not counting PC."

Yet you add a PC tag to the article.

2538d ago
nismo3702538d ago

A pc is not a console, it is much better and versatile.

2538d ago
ClanPsi12537d ago (Edited 2537d ago )

PC gets brought up because X fanboys keep forgetting that, regardless of how "powerful" their paperweight is, it will always be outclassed.
@NewUser101: It isn't the best console, it's the most powerful. One would have a very strong argument stating it's the second-worst console on the market right now after the S because of its complete lack of exclusive games.

CyberRekkr2537d ago

Well said!, Ps4 players all ways bring up PC because their system is so underpowered when compared to Xbox One X!

starchild2537d ago

Hardware in the gaming context is any device that can run games. The title is incorrect. While the Xbox One X is the most powerful console it can't do things that aren't possible on a good gaming PC.

Skull5212537d ago

It'll put a $500 PC to shame. Xbox One X is the most powerful console ever made.

DivineAssault 2537d ago

Heres hoping the devs do use the console to its fullest potential because nobody else is. Next gen machines are on the horizon to top it off.

nowitzki20042537d ago

And Im waiting for a console that can do everything a PC can do.

zerocarnage2537d ago

Because those pc guys can't take not being in on it all that they have to throw it in there no matter what because they don't get the publicity that the consoles do.

+ Show (13) more repliesLast reply 2537d ago
welly3002538d ago

Yeah if its costs over £1000 it might just be possible......

2538d ago Replies(1)
ILostMyMind2538d ago

Not according to "Huw Beynon". PC does not have enough power against XBX. 🤔

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2537d ago
XiNatsuDragnel2538d ago

PC best version, but this is a goid second

BLKxSEPTEMBER2538d ago

You cannot sat that the PC version is the best version when everyone doesn’t have a powerful PC. I have a 7970 in my PC and I can promise you that my PC is not as powerful as the X. So if I were to play Metro on my PC would it be the best version? Doubtful. The PC version can be the best IF you have enough the money thrown into your PC.

BehindTheRows2538d ago (Edited 2538d ago )

The PC will be the best version. Doesn't matter if one PC can do it or 1,000,000. The best versions of multiplats are on that platform. This isn't new and should require any discussion.

On top of that, the article states: "Of course, Beynon is clearly referring to the console market here. Metro Exodus will also launch on PC and there it should be the first game to implement NVIDIA’s RTX technology for real-time raytracing when it launches on February 22nd, 2019. NVIDIA’s upcoming GTX 1100 series will feature hardware support for RTX, presumably delivering optimized performance compared to earlier GPUs."

So, like people said, the PC version will the best version. On the flip side, it'll be interesting to see what they come up with for the X1, considering, well, it is the stronger hardware.

Imalwaysright2538d ago (Edited 2538d ago )

"You cannot sat that the PC version is the best version" Anyone can because it's the true. PC version will be superior. Whether or not your PC can run it on ultra is irrelevant as it doesn't change the fact that the best version will be experienced on PCs.

Razzer2538d ago

The PC version doesn’t have to be universally superior on every PC in existence for it to have the superior version of this game.

Razmiran2538d ago

Radeon 7970? Isnt that card like 8 years old?

JamesBondage2538d ago

For the price of the X you can get a new gpu

Rude-ro2538d ago

Not every Xbox player has the x... a majority to be technical play on Xbox one or s.
So is it the majority install base that gives a w then? If so, ps4 is the console for the win according to your logic.

Christopher2538d ago (Edited 2538d ago )

"You cannot say that the Xbox version is the best when everyone doesn't have the most powerful Xbox console."

See how that works?

mcstorm2538d ago

I love this site it's gone from the Xbox needs to be more powerful to well PlayStation exclusives look better and 3 party's is well pcs always have the best version of the game. Come on guys keep picking up the goal posts and move them.

Razzer2538d ago

@mcstorm

uh....that would make sense if N4g were a single entity expressing a single opinion.

ProjectVulcan2538d ago (Edited 2538d ago )

You do realise that only a million or so people own an Xbox One X but waaaaaaay more than a million people own a PC as capable or more capable than Xbox One X? Right? Riiiiiiight?

Therefore your post and argument is null, void, irrelevant and dimwitted.

PC has the best version.

It'll have it for millions more on launch, and millions more and more than that in a year as more people buy even more advanced new PC hardware far beyond the ability of Xbox One X.

2537d ago
DialgaMarine2537d ago (Edited 2537d ago )

By your logic, we can’t include X or Pro into hardware topics either because not every PS4/ Xbone owner has one of those. If you’re going to talk about X’s high end console status as if it’s somehow the standard, then it’s only fair to factor in PC as well, when talking about a game that’s on both. Even if only one single PC was more powerful than X, that would still mean that’s highest end version of any multiplat.

tontontam02537d ago

I'm pretty sure that only 10-100 people who will buy metro exodus owns an xbox one x.

starchild2537d ago

@ BLKxSEPTEMBER

"So if I were to play Metro on my PC would it be the best version?"

Maybe your PC isn't the best. But the PC version you bought is certainly the best version. The PC version has higher graphics settings and more flexibility. It has those things regardless of which you choose to use. On PC the level of hardware you have is always a choice.

If you buy a Blu-ray player and hook it up to an old 480p standard definition TV you won't enjoy much of what the Blu-ray movie you just bought offers, but the Blu-ray version of that movie is still superior to the DVD version. It doesn't stop being superior just because you choose to play it back on lower quality hardware.

Likewise, sales numbers really have no relevance in a discussion about quality. A superior thing is still superior whether it sold 10 or 10,000,000 units. And does anyone even have solid sales figures for the Xbox One X, the PS4 Pro and PC graphics cards at or above that level? Not that it would matter, but I would bet a heavy sum of money that there are more people with PCs with specs that outperform either upgraded console than there are people that own those consoles.

2537d ago
nowitzki20042537d ago (Edited 2537d ago )

So everyone has an Xbox One X?

+ Show (13) more repliesLast reply 2537d ago
gamer78042538d ago

you do realize that the same hardware components are in the xbox as a pc right? x86, just without the full windows os but a custom os both built by Microsoft. It's just a different box... show me for 450$ where I can get a pc that plays these games at this quality at this price.

Razzer2538d ago

What are you guys posting from? Your phone?

gamer78042538d ago

@razzer yes, almost always on my phone, don't use free time for n4g lol

Razzer2538d ago

Ok. But a PC does a lot more than play games. You can’t buy a console that does what a PC does. So if you are going to switch the discussion from power to cost then might as well include what comes with that cost.

gamer78042538d ago (Edited 2538d ago )

@razzer I already have a PC, got it years ago for 199$ w/ a monitor, it can do everything I need a pc (web, dev, adobe, email etc) for, just not games, so why spend 1200$+ on a pc when I can spend 450$?

Razzer2538d ago

Oh good. So what is the make and model of this $200 PC with monitor? What kind of “dev” are you doing? What adobe?

Razzer2538d ago (Edited 2538d ago )

Oh....to answer your question.

“ so why spend 1200$+ on a pc when I can spend 450$?”

Spend $500 more and upgrade that PC to one that puts Xbox One X to shame. Notice the difference there is exactly the price of X1.

gamer78042538d ago

@Razzer the pc isn't upgradeable its an all in one, my point is, neither of my pcs are upgradeable beyond ram. I don't have alot of free time anymore, I used to build pc's back in the day when I had more time. Right now its more cost effective and convenient to game on a console.

jmc88882538d ago (Edited 2538d ago )

You do realize that any decent PC built in the last 10 years, starting with an i7 920 which came out in 2008 is capable of a simple GPU upgrade to propel it far past an X1X right?

i7 920 still craps on the Jaguar in X1X and it isn't even close.

Let alone anyone that built/bought a decent PC in 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, etc.

People forget that you don't have to completely replace your PC to run games better. Maybe someone upgraded their ram from 6 or 8 to 12 /16 or 24/32 gb's somewhere along the way. Both console and PC's can use upgrade hard drives so that really doesn't figure in as they are the same.

This doesn't mean X1X isn't a good value for someone without a decent PC in the last 10 years, but it does mean anyone with a decent PC in the last 10 years that hasn't somehow gone bad has the option to relatively cheaply upgrade their PC.

Also when they do, their CPU will run circles around Jaguar and allow 60-120 FPS (or higher) on games even the X1X is running at 30.

starchild2537d ago

I agree, you can't quite do it for the same price. The XB1X is a good deal for what it offers. However, for not that much more money you can get a PC that gives you even better performance, is upgradeable, offers much more flexibility, broader and deeper mod support, backwards compatibility, the world of emulation, and can do a million other things besides that.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 2537d ago
corroios2538d ago

What is this title. Must be on the ps1 or mega drive.....

starchild2537d ago

Huh? You're not funny. This game, especially on PC, will easily be one of the best looking games yet. I won't be entirely surprised if in February when it comes out it happens to be the best looking game period. On PC it's one of the first games to use real time ray tracing.

81BX2537d ago

My beast box is going ready!

jznrpg2538d ago ShowReplies(1)
Show all comments (213)
70°

Warhammer 40,000: Boltgun 2 devs praise games like Space Marine 2 for "lowering the barrier"

Warhammer 40,000: Boltgun 2 developers discuss the huge success of Space Marine 2 and its effect on the series as a whole.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
Jingsing16h ago

How about an official level editor for Boltgun?

220°

Phil Spencer Teases 2026 As A "Really Special Year" For Xbox

2026 will mark the 25th anniversary of Xbox, and Phil Spencer has teased it as a "really special year" for the games division.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
TheEroica1d 8h ago (Edited 1d 8h ago )

You got downvotes by pathetic gamers for feeling hopeful about good games coming out next year. Imagine how small your brain must be to downvote someone excited for future gaming joy? It is pretty neat to see people's world view blow up in front of them as they realize Microsoft has put themselves in a driver's seat that Sony hasn't been able to touch all generation.... What's even more pathetic is the same people downvoting you are the same people wishlisting Microsoft games on their ps5s 😂

P_Bomb1d 5h ago

“Imagine how small your brain must be to downvote someone excited for future gaming joy?”

My dude your post history shits on EVERYTHING. You never have a good thing to say about anything lol! 🤣

PanicMechanic20h ago(Edited 20h ago)

“Getting ready for those GaaS reveals! Sony is a shadow of themselves this gen.”

You literally said this a couple of days ago. Start applying the clown make up, you hypocritical jester

derek1d 5h ago

Yep we'll see, they have alot releasing next year.

RaidenBlack1d 2h ago

NGL, next year might be one of the best years in gaming ... starting off with RE9 and GTA VI ...
and then all the good games that's been cooking
Pragmata, Sands of Time, Saros, Gears E-Day, 007 First Light, Blood of Dawnwalker,
Mortal Shell II, Onimusha, Marvel1943: Rise of Hydra
current-gen only Infinity Ward's CoD, Duskbloods
+ My guess: Wolverine, Exodus, Mudang, Crimson Desert, Clockwork etc ...
~ seems like it might get too stacked

1Victor1d ago

@rokos:”Hopefully “
I downvoted you not for been hopeful but because I have seen the same “NEXT YEAR WILL BE SPECIAL “ comment for the last 10+ and hasn’t seen anything special from Microsoft.
I hope next year will be the one that everyone been waiting for since the last 3 years of the Xbox 360, it have to be after over $80 billions spent on acquisitions.

Lightning771d ago

So the new excuse is they don't count because it's from the ABK now huh. I guess all those 3rd party games count even less because they don't own them. According to your always crappy logic.

InUrFoxHole15h ago

Lol. You haven't seen anything special? Do you even game?

OtterX1d 11h ago

Always with the "next year..."! 😂

neutralgamer19921d 10h ago

I don't know they have delivered this year and even last year. And they have a lot more content in the pipeline right now than anyone else. We can't just keep hating on MS

Indiana Jones
South of midnight
Avowed
Flight simulator
Hell Blade 2
Minecraft update
Gears of war reloaded
Indian Jones:expansion
Gears E day
Clockwork revolution
Fable
Doom the dark ages
The outer worlds 2
Grounded 2
Call of duty

OtterX1d 10h ago

How many of those titles were just buyouts of companies that were going about making their games anyways? *Throws cash - "Oh look what we made!"

dveio1d 10h ago (Edited 1d 10h ago )

This list, that's been posted again, and again, and again in every single topic like this, contains almost nothing, literally almost nothing from Microsoft's own creational thoughtprocess.

It's a bunch of former 3rd party IPs.

Now even slowly returning to Playstation in some cases like Indiana, Hellblade, probably Starfield soon too, after they were made exclusively to Xbox on purpose.

Due to Microsoft's lack for own IP material except Halo & Forza. Which, the lack of, was the sole reason for all of it to happen in the first place anyway. Please don't pretend it wasn't.

And just look at all the games that come from Obsidian alone.

You really think Obsidian wasn't already working on Avowed and South of Midnight even without Microsoft buying Zenimax?

Microsoft delivered nothing but cheques.

OtterX1d 10h ago (Edited 1d 10h ago )

@dveio THIS. Lol, this dude thinks Call of Duty wouldn't exist without Microsoft! smh 😂

neutralgamer19921d 9h ago (Edited 1d 9h ago )

Common narrative I see often — that Microsoft shouldn’t get credit for the games its studios release because they “just bought them.” But this viewpoint ignores key context and sets a double standard that other platform holders aren’t held to

No one is saying these games wouldn't exist at all without Microsoft. But let’s not pretend that having a trillion-dollar company backing a studio doesn’t make a massive difference. Obsidian never had AAA funding before the Xbox acquisition. Pillars of Eternity was crowdfunded, and their resources were always stretched thin. Now they’re working on Avowed, with proper support behind it.

Ninja Theory’s Hellblade: Senua’s Sacrifice was made by around 20 people, using borrowed equipment and doing mocap in a boardroom. It was a passion project held together by tape and willpower. Today, Hellblade II exists because they were given resources, time, and freedom — something many developers don’t get unless they’re owned by a company that believes in their vision.

ZeniMax (Bethesda’s parent company) was in real financial trouble before the Microsoft acquisition. Reports and insider accounts have pointed out how much they needed a cash infusion. And while some people want to write off Xbox’s ownership of Bethesda titles, they forget the alternative could have meant layoffs or even closures.

The same goes for Activision Blizzard. Would you really prefer the company to stay under Bobby Kotick, after all the documented workplace misconduct and toxic leadership issues? Say what you want about Microsoft, but their acquisition brought accountability and change to a company that desperately needed it.

At the same time, Xbox gets hated on for doing what every major company does. Sony bought Housemarque, Bluepoint, Insomniac — but no one says Spider-Man 2 “doesn’t count” because of that. Why does Xbox get treated differently for acquiring struggling or undervalued developers and giving them a chance to thrive?

And the idea that Xbox locks games away is outdated. They're pushing cross-platform releases, cloud gaming, Game Pass, and backward compatibility more than any other platform holder. They're not forcing all studios into live service. If anything, their upcoming lineup is less GAAS-heavy and more focused on narrative and creativity — Avowed, South of Midnight, Clockwork Revolution, Fable, Perfect Dark, Towerborne, and others show real variety.

Whether people like it or not, Xbox is now the biggest publisher in the industry and owns the most gaming IPs. But what matters more is how they treat their studios. Most of these teams were previously stuck making AA games with limited scope — now they’re getting the tools and support to aim higher.

So when people say “Microsoft didn’t make those games,” they’re missing the point. It’s not about who started the studio — it’s about who enabled them to do their best work. You don’t have to love Xbox to admit they’ve helped a lot of developers and are taking a player-first approach.

Instead of writing off everything they do, maybe try recognizing the good they’re doing for both devs and gamers. At the end of the day, we should want more studios to succeed — no matter who owns them

BeHunted1d 9h ago

I'm surprised Clockwork Revolution (BioShock meets Dishonored) isn't getting more media attention. The game looks interesting and reminds me of the old RPG games.

anast1d 8h ago

The only good game on that list is Flight sim. The rest are either average or will be average. It's not a good look for MS.

TheEroica1d 8h ago

My god.... Look how many comments are upset about microsoft's successes... 😂 This may be my new favorite thread. Not one gamer saying thanks for all the goodness coming their way, just bitter anger and downvoting the very games they themselves will purchase throughout 2026.... Sony really worked you guys over this generation.... Condolences.

DivineHand1251d 7h ago

@neutralgamer1992 You said what needed to be said.

I have heard for years from older gamers that fanboys are the biggest issue with any fanbase. They will defend or gloss over negative news as long as the correct logo is on the box and they bash the competing platform no matter how much good they are trying to bring.

Right now their advocacy for PlayStation is elevating that platform so high that Sony no longer believes they need to do anything to satisfy their loyal fanbase like they did in the PS4 days.

I just hope most of them will eventually start advocating for themselves and encourage others to do the same. No one should blindly support one platform because these companies do not care about anything other than profit.

neutralgamer19921d 7h ago

Hunted

And first proper game done by the studio with proper AAA budget and saying it will be released when ready

Anast

I believe we went through this before that you are objectively wrong. Meta critic, user reviews, game sales. In Playstation top 10 best selling games were 5 from Microsoft studios

Otter

No this dude is saying so many other studios wouldn't be thriving without MS money and people would be getting abused physically and mentally with Bobby kotick and his side kicks

Also maybe look up how the original founder of Bethesda and zenimax was kicked out of his own company by his best friend lawyer. So that was always a shady place and had been struggling financially before MS paid a premium of almost 7 billion

Eroica

I use to be a die hard Playstation fan and now I only have a Pc. I see how these fans are so toxic. They just can't handle any positive news regarding Xbox. When the best selling games on playstation are Xbox titles. Look at Forza horizon being best seller and that's years old game by MS. I guess ms don't deserve credit for that success too since they are the only company in gaming making acquisitions

Forget the fact Sony paid 3.6 billion for bungie and MS 6.9 for zenimax. Which investment has turned out better

Destiny and marathon with a lot of controversy

While zenimax output is nothing short of amazing compared to what bungie has released

crazyCoconuts1d 6h ago

Yeah it's tricky. "Xbox" has morphed to mean different things to different people.
Console, now Windows, GamePass, and the cross platform games. There's a mix of attitudes towards all those things individually, and maybe an overarching attitude towards MS. But can't argue that the game companies MS recently bought continue to flourish, and GamePass PC has been a great value over the last year.

InUrFoxHole15h ago

@OtterX
You're the dude mad at your exes new guy. She's with someone else... get over it.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 15h ago
Lightning771d 7h ago (Edited 1d 7h ago )

They've had good output so far. So waiting for those games shouldn't be a problem.

Who cares if they're buy outs of companies or whatever excuse you want to make. They're games that are being distributed to other console. Play the games and enjoy it instead of fanboying or complaining.

ocelot071d 9h ago

They going to be a he best and biggest publisher on Xbox, Playstation and PC next year. They not really said anything about Switch 2 though spite claiming to be big supporters.

quenomamen1d 9h ago

If you call making one last Xbox before going full Sega, as Great. Then yea.

TheEroica1d 7h ago

Doesn't feel like you're paying attention to what's happening.

RhinoGamer881d 8h ago

It will be, his net work will hit 50 million and he plans to buy a new mansion in Cape Cod. Thanks everyone! #failup

Show all comments (39)
80°

The Witcher 3 Immerse Gamepack — Product Introduction with Marcin Przybyłowicz

Join Marcin Przybyłowicz, Expert Composer at CD PROJEKT RED and the mind behind The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt OST, as he sets up Immerse Gamepack on PC and dives into Geralt's adventures like never before — with spatial audio powered by Embody.

3d ago