An idiot and a senile old man duke it out about whether or not console manufacturers are undermining a traditional console gaming strength by cluttering their line-up and forcing iterative upgrades...
Microsoft just posted the third quarter of its 2024 fiscal financial results. The software maker made $61.9 billion in revenue and a net income of $21.9 billion during Q3. Revenue is up 17 percent, and net income has increased by 20 percent.
Xbox content + services up 62% while hardware down 31%... seems about right with the way they tout you don't need the hardware to play. People can play on their phones or smart tv or other means. I don't hardly play on my consoles directly since getting devices like the logitech g-cloud and ps portal. Which is to also say I have been playing more digital than physical because of these devices.
Too expensive hardware when others offer the same or more for less? Good work, Green Team.
"Despite some early successes for Xbox games on rival platforms, Xbox hardware is down by a massive 31 percent this quarter."
"Without Activision Blizzard, Microsoft’s overall gaming revenue would have actually declined this quarter."
"Xbox content and services would have only been up a single percent without Activision Blizzard..."
"It looks like next quarter is going to be a similar story for gaming at Microsoft, too."
That is crazy... so A/B/K is carrying the whole Xbox gaming.
Oh and Microsoft will be fine. Windows, Office and Cloud are growing with each pc purchase.
You'll know of EGX. You'll know of MCM Comic Con. Today the two events have confirmed that they'll be coming together under one roof
Sony has launched the PlayStation Store "May Savings" sale, and this one has over 2,000 items! Read on for the complete list of games.
As long as they don't come too often, I don't mind. I honestly would probably rather upgrade every 3-4 years instead of waiting 7-8. Means we get access to better tech and games sooner.
Mid-gen upgrades, the console market's way of dipping their toes into the mobile way of thinking, in my opinion, is already on thin ice.
I don't mind mid-cycle upgrades, as people seem to like them, but I draw the line on exclusives for those 2.0 systems. That's taking advantage of the community and unacceptable if it came to pass.
Slim models and actual tech upgrades are a totally different thing. I have to admit I'm a little pissed off ps4 pro turned up to be honest. But it is what it is, hopefully next gen I would like to see ps5 have some sort of modular upgrade I can buy and plug in to give it that extra juice. Not a fully fledged mid cycle console where I have to shell out another £350 to get extra benefits.
I don't really mind the upgraded consoles. I mainly got mine to experience the best console VR.
PS1 - 1995 (Dec 1994), PS2 - 2000, PS3 - 2006, PS4 - 2013
I really don't see the problem with a 5/6 year cycle myself, but these days with generation "I want the latest greatest everything now and am stupid and will throw my money at you for anything" on us, well, this is what we end up with.
Iterative console releases, and yes, they do suck. The P4P and X1X are both hilariously underwhelming for their cost, versus what the original systems offer.
Miniaturization, is nothing new. It's been around since the Atari 2600 days. They were merely that though, same system, in a smaller form factor. Not this "Pay us more to get a minute amount of performance increase" garbage.