160°

Far Cry 2: GPU and CPU benchmarks

PCGH published Far Cry 2 benchmarks. They tested CPUs and middle-class as well as high-end graphics cards. According to them even with a Core 2 Duo E6600 or an Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and a Geforce 9800 GT/8800 GT or a Radeon HD 4850 you can play the highest settings.

Read Full Story >>
pcgameshardware.com
Fishy Fingers6097d ago

Much more accommodating than Crysis. I should be able to max this out with any cause for concern :)

CViper6097d ago

It went from looking like a cousin of crysis, to what looks like now.. Battlefield 3.

I'm kinda let down by the specs, and the graphics. I'm sure it will be a fine game, but remember this time last version Farcry was a game that you needed to upgrade for because it was pushing the visuals very hard.

This time around, it isn't at all.

solar6097d ago

i should be close to maxing it out. my CPU is still my bottle neck. need me an upgrade :D

6097d ago
xg-ei8ht6097d ago (Edited 6097d ago )

I guess it's no surprise they had to build it for xbox360 with limited space dvd9. ouch.

Thankfully, the ps3 version is much quicker then the 360 version:)

Spu's used for foilage movement,fire,interaction.
Spu's used for a.i
Spu's used for decals,fx. and vertex usage.

Take load of gpu.

Just wait:)

On pc:

I gotta say though, hope that's on low. The ground texture looks poor.

6097d ago
solar6097d ago

dont forget that both the consoles will probably max out at that amazingly sweet resolution of 720p!

BludoTheSmelly6097d ago

My hardware is more than capable of running dx 10. I guess this proves that cryengine isnt as efficient as dunia engine.

Shroomy6097d ago

Dunia is hardly more efficient, Crysis has much more detail than FarCry 2 as a wholl, it looks so plain and dull fire or not.

Dumbed down for consoles, would have looked so much better without them.

TheIneffableBob6097d ago

Crysis, liked Shroomy said, has far more detail than Far Cry 2. The fillrate required to render all that complex foliage is huge.

I Call 9MM6097d ago

Nice to see them bring the efficiency up with this new engine, and it's a game that actually uses quad core CPUs, thank you, now I don't feel like I completely wasted my money on my Q9450 (it's actually not too bad, but it doesn't overclock nearly as well as a dual core e8400 or e8500, those can hit well over 4 Ghz on air, mine can hit 3.4-3.5 maybe). Hopefully the radeon 4870X2 performance improves, but it's still the best single card solution on their (even if it is just 2 1 gig 4870s in crossfire). Nvidia has to win some benchmarks after all.

90°

Which Far Cry Should I Start With? - A Beginner's Guide 2023

If you’re new to this long-running franchise, we’ve got you covered.

Read Full Story >>
gameluster.com
masterfox836d ago

Farcry 3 and literally thats it! lol

GamingSinceForever834d ago (Edited 834d ago )

I recently tried 3 for the first time but the frame rate was a turnoff.

I liked 5 and 6 though.

banger88834d ago

If you have a Series X or S, the Xbox 360 version runs at 60 fps with fps boost. It's a shame the remaster doesn't.

isarai836d ago

2 and 3, pretty much the only ones i really enjoyed. 1 was amazing for the time but aged quite poorly. 4 has the elephant gun, all i can praise from any entry after 3 lol

cooperdnizzle834d ago

Ummmm 3 than stop.

Okay maybe two as well. But yeah probably 3 and then move on.

JEECE834d ago (Edited 834d ago )

Far Cry 2. People constantly rant about games now being too easy, holding your hand, having too many unnecessary RPG-lite leveling features, etc. People specifically complain about open world games being too focused on tons of collectibles and "checkmarks" that just waste time.

Far Cry 2 is an answer to all of those complaints. It was made by Ubisoft before they fell into all the traps discussed above (and before they started inserting towers into their games to defog the map). It has respawning enemies, weapons that degrade, and the collectible diamonds are very useful in the game (which you find in a similar way to the way you find shrines in BOTW with a radar system). The map you have is an in game item you pull out while playing, not a pause menu that is unnecessarily detailed. Also the enemy AI and physics are much better than later entries in the series.

It has a mixed reputation because people at the time said it was too hard, the weapon degradation was annoying, and then respawning enemies were annoying. FC2 came out in 2008, so this was before games like Dark Souls and BOTW had come out and made it cool to like these types of features.

XbladeTeddy833d ago

Far Cry 2, the one with the AI that find you through walls and trees, can one shot you from a mile away and have 100% accuracy? That was frustrating not fun because cheap AI.

JEECE833d ago (Edited 833d ago )

Uhh, I mean, it isn't one of these games where once the enemies have detected you they will magically forget you exist because you walked behind a wall or went into a bush. And yeah the AI isn't stormtrooper level accuracy. Again, these are positives, not negatives to me.

To be fair, I'm really directing this at the people most critical of "Modern Ubisoft" or "Modern Open World" design elements. Like the type of people who fawned all over Elden Ring because it had a clean UI because they are so burnt out by the "checkbox" type of open world design.

If you like those types of games, then a later FC game like 3 and especially 4-5 would be more your style.

Show all comments (11)
220°

10 Old Games With Outstanding Graphics

GF365: "There are some games with extraordinary visuals that impress us to this day. Here are old games with outstanding graphics."

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
ShwaaMan881d ago

Bioshock still looks fantastic, one of my all time favorites.

Yui_Suzumiya881d ago

Beyond: Two Souls on PS3 can compete with modern day graphics.

SonyStyled881d ago (Edited 881d ago )

Same as Killzone 2 and 3, uncharted 2 and 3, Infamous 2, Heavy Rain, Resistance 3

jasonismoney881d ago

I wish this was entirely true, but you might want to load up Killzone 2 and Resistance 3 again.

SonyStyled881d ago

@jason I watched some gameplay videos of KZ2 and R3 on my full screen. They are on par or succeed graphically to the first person shooters mentioned in the article that also launched on the seventh generation of consoles. Try the same and see what you think

cthulhucultist881d ago

Killzone 3 was super impressive! I could not believe the graphics back then as I was regularly pausing the game to stand in awe looking at the surroundings! Resistance however did not impress me that much. Heavy rain is also another amazing graphically speaking game. It almost felt next gen

Fist4achin881d ago

I always thought the first 3 Gears of War games looked great and still hold up for today.

SonyStyled881d ago

They did for their day. I recently played gears judgement with on the 360 and the draw distance was so blurry. The characters up close look great though

JEECE881d ago

Far Cry 2 was awesome. In addition to having demonstrably better physics and AI than later games in the series, it had a lot of design decisions that, criticized at the time, have since been praised in games like BOTW and Dark Souls.

iNcRiMiNaTi881d ago

It might not be super amazing by today's standard but I thought Mgs3 looked really good

JEECE881d ago

In terms of art style it still holds up.

Show all comments (13)
430°

Far Cry’s best game gets brutally realistic as mod remakes Ubisoft FPS

The Far Cry series’ best game – not Far Cry 6 – just got more brutal and realistic thanks a mod than revamps and remakes the classic Ubisoft open-world FPS

Read Full Story >>
pcgamesn.com
lonewolf101003d ago

Far Cry 2 where your guns never ever jammed until you got into a gunfight is their best? I disagree.

MIDGETonSTILTS171003d ago

I liked 3 more.

The malaria angle was more annoying than immersive.

And, the enemy AI had too good of eyesight to allow any stealth. They’d spot you a literal half mile away, I hated it.

lonewolf101003d ago

Yeah, some weird mechanics for sure, some did really enjoy it, I certainly didn't.

bloop1002d ago (Edited 1002d ago )

The map was designed badly and an absolute pain to navigate from what I can remember too. You ended up having to go to the same few places all the time and there was a huge inaccessible area between them that you had to go around.

It definitely had the best physics system of the entire franchise, but a lot of the mechanics took the enjoyment out of it.

LordoftheCritics1003d ago

It was fun for its time but a bunch of those systems today won't survive a launch weekend.

Profchaos1003d ago

I'd say it was their most ambitious and had the best setting to date next to the original island.

But gameplay wise it was clunky and maybe it was released to early if the teams had modern systems to build it on the game would have been much better less corridors more open and less gaurd outposts that auto regen

Knushwood Butt1003d ago

How do you use guns when not in a gunfight? Shooting trees?

lonewolf101003d ago

Yes and you could do that for hours in FC2 with a gun and it wouldn't jam, not hard to grasp is it.

Knushwood Butt1003d ago

I see.

I haven't spent hours shooting trees.

I must try it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1002d ago
MajorLazer1003d ago

Love Far Cry 2 on Infamous difficulty.

Hikoran1003d ago

This should be an opinion piece. Not news.

Gwiz1003d ago

Blood Dragon is much better.

Pedrof1003d ago

Far Cry 2 may certainly not be the most "fun" game in the series but from a narrative standpoint it definitely is the most interesting of the bunch. FC2 couldn't be further away from the pointless fragfests that the following episodes turned out to be.

Show all comments (29)