170°

Far Cry 5 Cracked by CPY; Available to Download on Torrents

Far Cry 5 Cracked by CPY; Available to Download on Torrents, it seems that Denuvo 5.0 has finally met its match, perhaps we are in for a Denuvo 6?

Read Full Story >>
thenerdmag.com
Kostche2589d ago

yes lets bloatware our games with even more DRM and instabilty so they get few extra copies sold, fc5 had like 3 layers of drm aids and still it got cracked, if its made by man, it can be cracked by man, instead of trying block it just accept some people are not going buy it, and work on better ways to entice people to buy and not pirate instead of punishing legit players with this garbage within there games

kevnb2588d ago (Edited 2588d ago )

I don't think the drm earned them a whole lot of extra sales, pirates all know it will get cracked eventually.

cleft52588d ago

Exactly right. Besides, several of the best selling games only have one thin layer of drm and was cracked before the game even released. I am talking about Skyrim and Fallout 4. Oh and the Witcher 3 is one of the top selling games and it has no drm if you buy it on GoG.

Instead of wasting time, money, and resources on drm that just makes the game run worse, invest in making the game more appealing to consumers. Its like Publishers look at games like Skyrim, Fallout 4, and The Witcher 3 and just gloss over the fact that if DRM meant a damn then these games would not be selling so well. DRM literally made Assassin's Creed Origins worse and that game was amazing.

These Publishers are so concerned/afraid of their game being pirated that they forget that if they make a great game then people will buy it. Far Cry 5 in particular should have double down on Arcade mode and mods. But no, instead they slap on draconian DRM, that of course gets pirated, which makes the game run worse on PC.

These Publishers just don't get it, you can put Denuvo 1 million on your game, eventually it will be pirated. Oh and guess what, that DRM doesnt make anyone new go out and buy your game. People who had no intention of buying Far Cry 5 still didnt buy Far Cry 5. Instead of trying to strong arm people into buying the game, just make an amazing game with the freedom to grow. Do that and it will sale. Yes, it will be pirated but it was going to be pirated in the first place. Nothing you as Publishers can do will ever stop your game from being pirated. Simply because their are people who have ZERO intention of ever buying your game in the first place. Those same people may pirated the game and like it enough to actually buy the game on sale or for full price. Oh and people do have consoles, its not exact the hardest thing to rent a game, borrow a game, or buy and return a game. Their are no shortage of ways for people to get their hands on any game they want without ever paying a penny for it.

supersonicjerry2588d ago

But the game is good. no matter what they do to entice people there will always be ones that will pirate

Servbot412588d ago

A proper online co-op mode goes a long way in preventing piracy, and most games stand to only benefit from it. Far Cry 5 almost did it right, but the stupid player tethering and no progress saved for player two really sucks.

Prince_TFK2588d ago

Even if it takes very long to crack, pirate can still buy denovu game very cheap elsewhere on a pirate site (believe it or not, FC5 costs around $5 there).

Drm (and Denovu for that matter) isn’t an effective way to stop pirate anymore.

TheDreamCorridor2588d ago

We need one of those super hardcore advanced AI systems to create anti-piracy.

Then no one will be able to crack games.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2588d ago
2pacalypsenow2589d ago

Just buy the game you cheap bastards

TheDreamCorridor2588d ago

All games should just be console-exclusive.

PC gaming is trash anyway.

nowitzki20042587d ago

I bet you dont know a thing about it

Doughhead2588d ago (Edited 2588d ago )

Piracy is the thorn in the side of the developer. I hate it. To those that spend all this time cracking DRM, you suck. I have a great idea for these cracked copies of the games, they can tell who cracked the game or who has a pirated copy, just make it so their entire game is littered with the words "Cheater, Kill me" or "Pirated game, Kill me" over their characters. They wont have a moments peace when playing online.

I know it wont work for all games, but it would be hysterical to see it with the games they have to be online for.

CodeNameTBW22588d ago

The pirates always get the last Laugh.

2588d ago Replies(1)
Show all comments (26)
150°

Alex Hutchinson on Why Google Stadia Failed and What Cloud Gaming Needs to Succeed

Alex Hutchinson talks about Google Stadia, how Xbox compares, and what cloud gaming needs to move forward.

Read Full Story >>
clouddosage.com
Goodguy011d 6h ago

Cloud gaming still has too many flaws. Fast stable internet, extra costs/subscription services, not ideal for mobile data and why play over cloud via wifi when you have a console/pc that has no input delay and other issues, why buy a game on a cloud service (will always need online even if it's a single player game) when you can actually own it on console/pc...at the same price. Cloud gaming should only ever stay as an option to gaming and playing your games that you already own. Never as the only option.

Tacoboto7h ago

I disagree, in the sense that the flaws are and have been these same known quantities for some time. You know you need fast and stable internet for the best experience. You know it isn't just free beyond Remote Play. Ownership - you know what ecosystem you're in.

Cloud Gaming is awesome when it's there as the most viable option at the time and works. For me, it was like this morning on my laptop playing Pentiment waiting for my car service to finish. For others it's to quick demo a new game before thinking of hard drive space. Maybe Mac users with gigabit internet want to play GeForce Now and buy a game off Steam only to play it that way.

isarai23h ago

As long as latency exists, cloud gaming will never thrive no matter how much they advertise that there's low latency or no latency that always ends up being a load of crap

Terry_B15h ago

I will never support cloud gaming.

darthv7215h ago(Edited 15h ago)

I quite enjoy cloud streaming now. I find it the quickest way to testing if a game is worth committing download time or even $ to buy it. And using dedicated devices like the portal and gcloud makes it all the better.

But like Goodguy says... it's an option, and not the only one. If people understand that, they may start to appreciate this convenience.

lex-102012h ago

I think Xbox is doing Cloud Streaming right, even if I think its only because they're doing hardware wrong.

By enabling xCloud on The Xbox One and Series S they enable players to buy the cheaper console but play games in better resolutions through xCould.

Take the recent Oblivion release for instance. If you play it locally on a Series S it's rendered at 630P and upscaled using FSR to 1260P with a 30FPS cap.

But if you play it on xCloud on the Series S, it's at 1080P native 60 FPS.

So you can get better performance using xCloud then playing local (on the Series S and Xbox One).

CrimsonWing6915h ago

It shouldn’t have required a subscription service. Like do the Steam model and just take the % on software sales or have a sub tier where you pay monthly or annually and get perks.

I’m not opposed to the idea of being able to stream games in the highest quality, but Stadia was so poorly handled it turned into a massive sh*t show.

lex-102013h ago

"It shouldn’t have required a subscription service."

It didn't

"Like do the Steam model and just take the % on software sales or have a sub tier where you pay monthly or annually and get perks."

That's literally what it was. Stadia pro gave 2 free games a month (similar to PS+), 4K visuals, and 5.1 Surround Sound. But if you didn't want to pay you could simply buy the games and play them in 1080P. The core service was free.

But google massively screwed up the marketing which led to people thinking it needed a sub to use.

Show all comments (14)
80°

Valve Makes Up for Steam Deck Repair Delay by Gifting Free Game

Valve gave a user Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 for free as compensation for the long wait during their Steam Deck repair.

UltimateOwnage22h ago

I had a similar experience when I initially pre-ordered my Deck. There was an issue during shipping and they offered me a customer service perk for the hassle and let me pick any game on Steam. It was super nice of them. I got a copy of Rime.

170°

Sony Aims To Sell 15 Million PS5 Units This Year, but Is Shifting Focus to Monthly Active Users

Sony CEO Hiroki Totoki and CFO Lin Tao talked about the state of the PlayStation business and the strategy and targets going forward, including how they're responding to the tariffs.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
1Victor3d ago

I wonder how the USA tariffs war will affect that projection. 🤔

S2Killinit3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

I think they take that into consideration when they announce their projections. Currently, after the xbox price increase, the PRO is cheaper than the series x! That is ridiculous, and it can’t last.

darthv723d ago

you keep saying that but the price of a PS5 Pro is S699.99 (US) and the price of a Series X is $599.99 (US)

S2Killinit3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

The series x with 2 TB storage space is more expensive than PS5 PRO which also has 2 TB storage space.

darthv723d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Oh so you are pitting a regular Pro with a special edition X... got it. If you are going so far as trying to compare apples to apples... please add in the optical drive and stand to the Pro. Seeing as the X has both of those by default.

I will help you if you are unable to do so.
PS5 Pro 2tb: $699.99, Optical Drive: $79.99, Stand: $29.99 = $809.97
Xbox Series X Galaxy Black Special Edition 2TB: $729.99

3d ago
S2Killinit2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

The PS5 PRO has 2TB storage. The series X with 2TB storage and much weaker, is… more expensive! So yeah, Im pointing out that fact.

Also, the PRO does not require a stand.

Ps: regular series 2TB is $749 (where did u get 729?)

darthv722d ago

Its right here on the official XB site: https://www.xbox.com/en-US/...

Okay, so no stand for the Pro, but you might still want the optical drive. So $779.98 vs $729.99. A properly outfitted Pro is still more $$ than a 2tb X.

S2Killinit2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Do I need to mention that the series x is not nearly as powerful as the PS5 PRO?

And no, the PS5 PRO runs just fine without a drive, and people don’t have to buy the drive right away, assuming they want it.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2d ago
drivxr3d ago

I wonder why they are shifting focus to MAU.

RaiderNation3d ago

Because that's where the real money is made, in microtransactions.

Profchaos3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

People are spending less time playing is a typical trigger for this.

The less time spent playing the less likely you are to spend more money on games and services including subs or even the next console.

Increased engagement equals more money.

3d ago
DarXyde3d ago

Same reason Microsoft does it: it looks better to investors and it's a solution when unit sales slow down.

Personally, I'm not a fan of this metric; and by using it, you're kind of signaling that you're moving into the "This is a PlayStation" era.

Z5012d ago

Because the PS4 also has users and not necessarily sales

Obscure_Observer23h ago

"I wonder why they are shifting focus to MAU."

Because they´d finally realized that MS wasn´t wrong after all.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 23h ago
3d ago
3d ago