150°

Why You should Play Far Cry 3 From Your Backlog

BacklogCritic: "Far Cry 3 is a exceptional open world first person shooter with some really impressive mechanics and gameplay. The story is gripping and holds twists and plots sure to keep you coming back for more."

Read Full Story >>
backlogcritic.com
Yi-Long2657d ago

Played it a few years ago on the PS3 and REALLY enjoyed it. I'm usually not a fan of 1st person shooters, but considering this gives you freedom and a nice sandbox and toys, I had a lot of fun with it.

I have the Gold edition of FC4 on pre-order, so MIGHT play FC3 again, cause that comes with this game. However, I doubt I'll be playing it all the way through again, as I have far too many games in my backlog.

2657d ago Replies(1)
Xenophon_York2657d ago

If Far Cry 3 is in anyones' backlog then I doubt they enjoy gaming enough to go back and play it. Practically all avid gamers into this genre of titles have devoured this game. Just thinking about it makes me want to find a copy just so I can do some hang-gliding and play some shack blackjack.

ChrisW2657d ago

"I doubt they enjoy gaming enough"

I know you're being crass. I loved FC1... But I played FC2 and FC3 for only about 5+ hours each... There was something about them that I didn't care for. So much so, that I didn't even consider buying FC4 or Primal. However, I did buy Blood Dragon, but never installed it.

As for FC5... My interest has peaked enough to give it a try, but I'll wait until a couple patches have been released.

Xenophon_York2656d ago

"Crass?" That's kind of harsh. Maybe you should open a dictionary. [That's an example of being crass—which was just an example. Don't take it seriously.]

To be serious, though, the key parts of the phrase you quoted—but omitted—were, "...to go back and play it," and, "practically all avid gamers into this genre of titles have...".Plus I used the term, "I doubt." Which I purposely utilized in order to avoid an absolutism such as, 'I know.'

Yeah I played Far Cry 1 and 2 and was severely underwhelmed. So much so that I more-than-almost didn't give 3 a shot. If it weren't for a trailer I witnessed at E3 [?] of a shark attack in the game and the hang-glider I likely wouldn't had. Actually, I probably still would have quit after fifteen minutes if I weren't so determined to find that damned glider and fight one of those lions-of-the-sea.

Stay crassy. 🍸

ChrisW2656d ago

crass - /kras/ : adjective : 1. showing lack of sensitivity 2. having no intelligence

I've always used the word in lines with the 1st definition and didn't really concern myself too much with the latter. Obviously using it was a poor choice on my part. My apologies.

DivoJones2657d ago

Would hardly call the story 'gripping', but it is an excellent game!

madforaday2657d ago

They had one good character in the whole story who wasn't even the main villain. If you compare a game with an actual good story, Far Cry 3 would be so far behind. The game is a good/gripping compared to other Far Cry games.

gangsta_red2657d ago (Edited 2657d ago )

Far Cry 3 IMO was the best in the series. Was not a fan of part 4 mainly because it felt like a re-skin of 4 with a villain that wasn't as cool or threatening as Vaas.

kevnb2657d ago

I’m not even sure why I didn’t like 4 that much, maybe the missions just aren’t as good.

madforaday2657d ago

Vaas wasn't even the main villain. I actually liked 4 more because it was like 3 but better in every way.. besides story but Far Cry's aren't played for the story.

madforaday2657d ago

In every single way it was better besides story. Of course, if you wanted something different compared to 3, I can see how people didn't like it. A two year difference in the release date is usually enough for me.

Show all comments (19)
240°

Far Cry Has Become A Shadow Of Its Former Self

Following a series of repetitive games, a formulaic approach, and a disappointing last entry, the Far Cry series has been run into the ground.

Read Full Story >>
tech4gamers.com
JEECE335d ago

The trouble with most criticisms of this franchise is that they insist Far Cry 3 was the best game, but the things they claim to hate about the franchise are all the elements that 3 introduced.

Deeeeznuuuts335d ago

Couldn't agree with you more! I've always thought that, my personal favourite is two, the whole atmosphere, mystery, adrenaline, my vehicle steaming up because I've crashed too many times trying to escape and then getting in a shootout, having to pull a bullet out my arm while fire rages and bullets fly, can't beat it

JEECE335d ago

Yep, 2 is my favorite by far as well, and one of my favorite singleplayer games of all time. It was probably one of the last games Ubisoft made before they started homogenizing their franchises to be open world collect-a-thons with unnecessary RPG mechanics tacked on. I enjoyed 3 for what it was, but it was clearly an attempt to make the franchise appeal to a mass audience (which, in fairness, was successful).

LucasRuinedChildhood335d ago

That's not the issue. If Far Cry 3 never existed and they just made another 5 or 6 games that were increasingly generic copies of Far Cry 2 instead, would that make FC2 the real problem?

No. It's the lack of creativity and effort that followed that's the real issue.

And there are things that are genuinely different about FC3. Simple example - the story was easily the best. Best main villain by far too but it also has strong themes and wasn't afraid to explore controversial topics. The sequels are much blander.

Comparing the fun and creativity of Blood Dragon to the DLC in the sequels ... also says a lot about how Ubisoft fell off.

-Foxtrot335d ago

Yeah like even Far Cry 4 was decent, not as great as FC3 but they still gave us an interesting story, setting and villain. Pagan Min's random calls to Ajay were pretty funny.

They just got lazier and lazier, pumping them out while making it a little more streamlined each time. I mean Jesus, they gave us a silent protagonist with FC5 which really hurt the main story and are obsessed with pleasing everyone by trying to do two characters, male and female rather than just settling on one to tell the best story they can.

neutralgamer1992334d ago

I started FC6 and yes the game works fine but I just wssnt Fun. Do many Ubi games are huge playgrounds but feel empty and doesn't give the feeling of a world which is lived in

JEECE334d ago

I have found that the more recent FC games work better as what I call "background games." Basically what I mean is it's nice to have an active save in one of them going for those times you have 45 minutes to play games and just want to have fun and don't want to get bogged down playing a game online or starting a new game and spending all your time into an annoying tutorial. Like I haven't touched FC4 in years but I know if I had 30 minutes to an hour to play I could hop in and easily be back in the swing of things and attack an outpost and have a good time.

I think a lot of people use big RPGs like Skyrim or Cyberpunk in a similar way.

isarai334d ago

Yes because FC3 executed those aspects better. Every game since FC3 has just been Frankensteined off the bones of FC3 with half the effort.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 334d ago
Michiel1989335d ago

you could say it's a far cry from what it was

wesnytsfs335d ago

Ubisoft gets a lot of hate for their content filling of maps. Personally I enjoy the mechanic when i play an open world game I like revealing hte entire map and doing all the side mission stuff before i go into main missions. Far Cry and the RPG AC maps where a joy to play.

RaidenBlack335d ago

Far Cry 2 was soo unique ... it was ahead of its time and is often misunderstood (thank you Clint Hocking, can't wait for his next game Assassins Creed Hexe)
(yes, FC2 was a departure from from FC1, so in strictest sense, Crysis 1 & 3 are the truer successors)

JEECE335d ago

Yep. Unfortunately there has been so little since then that has scratched the same itch. Really the closest thing has been BOTW, which uses a lot of similar systems (though ironically FC2 came out before Ubisoft put the Assassin's Creed towers in Far Cry, while BOTW had Ubi towers). Obviously it isn't a shooter though. I keep hoping that that some indie dev will put an FC2-esque game out on Steam, but so far I've been left wanting.

Sircolby45335d ago

I actually enjoyed Far Cry 5 and New Dawn. Far Cry 6 was a joke. It was a step backwards in every way. That was probably the worst Far Cry I have ever played.

Show all comments (26)
80°

Why Far Cry 3 Was The Best Of The Franchise?

Far Cry 3, an open-world masterpiece that redefined the series. Gameplay and storyline makes it a timeless classic that still inspires today.

Read Full Story >>
tech4gamers.com
Deeeeznuuuts368d ago

It's gotta be Far Cry 2 for me, the feeling of that game I'm still yet to find again, just everything about it, I'd kill for a remaster, I'd even be happy with just a bump in resolution and frame rate, occasionally go back to it, think I'm gunna have to do just that now 😂

porkChop368d ago

A remaster of Far Cry 2 would be amazing, especially with the mods that fixed the broken stealth system and the dumb checkpoint respawns. Include those fixes and it would be a huge upgrade over the original.

JEECE368d ago

Enemies respawn in Far Cry 2? Terrible! It's a broken system! Make me a one-man army who can inexplicably hold an entire region!

Enemies respawn in Dark Souls and Zelda? Brilliant! So much more hardcore! Glad the devs took risks!

porkChop368d ago

The problem isn't them respawning. It's that they respawned after just 5 minutes. Like you'd still be in the area looking for diamonds, loot, exploring, etc, and the enemies would just respawn with you there.

70°

Our Favorite Villains in Gaming - Roundtable

There have been plenty of great villains in video games over the years. Now it's time for the VGU crew to name a few of their favorites.