Approvals 7/3 ▼
ARESWARLORD (1) - 2889d ago Cancel
PhoenixUp (3) - 2889d ago Cancel
carlosduty (2) - 2888d ago Cancel
UletheVee31 (1) - 2889d ago Cancel
330°

The Big Interview With Michael Pachter: “I Doubt Microsoft Is Selling The Xbox One X At A Loss”

The gaming market hasn’t been as interesting in years as it is right now. Sony has asserted its dominance entirely, and shows no signs of stopping or even slowing down on the back of a hugely exciting lineup of exclusives. Nintendo has struck back with the Switch, and it looks on pace to reclaim its position in the market. And Microsoft is doubling down for the launch of the Xbox One X later this year.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (3)- Updates (3)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community2888d ago
Changed: content
FallenAngel19842889d ago
Changed: content
FallenAngel19842889d ago
2889d ago Replies(2)
narsaku2889d ago

There's an incredible amount of value in that box for that price. It's not just about the hardware and the video game graphical settings but the services as well.. 4k blueray for movies, backwards compatibility and a much improved UI/console online system.. It even has a true sata 3 interface for SSD nuts like me who really want those extra 6 seconds every time I walk into a house in a Bethesda game.

..Other than the switch it's the only console that's come out in the last few years that's been able to impress me. And yes, I do mean the pro was horrible and I really wish it ended up being more rather than an upscale box that didn't deliver a Bloodborne patch because it's obvious they want to make some sort of 100 dollar remaster for the ps5 more popular.

Goldby2888d ago

Sony making the pro had nothing to do with a pro patch for bloodborne. That's on From Software. Not Sony.

That's like being upset as MS when QB doesn't have an x patch

freshslicepizza2888d ago (Edited 2888d ago )

Who said QB won't have a patch in the future? Now please explain why Sony's own studios don't seem to be able to provide things like supersampling for 1080p owners? Even The Last of Us remastered had it then removed it. Other 1st party games don't even offer it like GT Sport and the MLB games. The fact is the XB1X is a lot better designed and will be quite a bit more powerful too. It will also improve existing games much more than the Boost mode provided on the PS4 Pro. Seems like Microsoft definitely knows how to upgrade properly.

LP-Eleven2888d ago (Edited 2888d ago )

Leave it to moldy to talk down about Sony. Never fails.

OT: Whether they're selling it at a loss or not, as long as the thing is a success, they should be happy with it. Just provide the necessary tools to make it a success.

Goldby2888d ago

@Moldy

Why dont you explain how Ms is putting all of their eggs in the X1X basket instead of diversifying with....

whats the word, more 1st party studios?

they may be making the X1X better then the pro becuase they dont have the game lineup that Playstation does so they want to beat them in terms of specs. Personally, seeing as most X1X games are being advertised at checkerboard rendering, i'd go with the less powerful pro over the X1x as the pro has a bigger lineup and more games that suit my taste.

and has cross play

freshslicepizza2888d ago (Edited 2888d ago )

@LP-Eleven
"Leave it to moldy to talk down about Sony. Never fails."

And yet you mysteriously ignored his attempt to defend Bloodborne and using a game he has no idea if it will be patched or not, and who also always talks down about MS. Also ask yourself, why would I or anyone else upsell the PS4 Pro compared to the XB1X when the XB1X is clearly more powerful and better designed? The fact is Sony has done a terrible job marketing the Pro and given very little reason for 1080p owners to upgrade. The XB1X may be advertised as a 4K console but Microsoft is clearly showing it's engineering skills and it will also benefit 1080p owners more than the Pro.

@Goldby
"Why dont you explain how Ms is putting all of their eggs in the X1X basket instead of diversifying with...."

Who says they won't in the future? The XB1X is a midcycle upgrade, your argument is changing the subject. How convenient. This is going to be your go to card every topic comparing multiplatform titles. It's what you guys do, change the discussion to fit your own agendas so that the Xbox can never be better at anything over the Playstation.

"they may be making the X1X better then the pro becuase they dont have the game lineup that Playstation does so they want to beat them in terms of specs. Personally, seeing as most X1X games are being advertised at checkerboard rendering, i'd go with the less powerful pro over the X1x as the pro has a bigger lineup and more games that suit my taste."

That's your choice. Do you ask PC gamers why they upgrade their parts over 1st party titles?

"and has cross play"

Sony only does it with the PC, how ironic when they created the PS4 Pro to try and curb its users from going to the PC.

Goldby2888d ago

How ironic that MS talks about cross play yet won't even make that mandatory for their windows 10/Xbox versions of games like infinite warefare.

You'd think if they would push that to make sure the windows 10 store become more attractive.

They are all talk and no action when it comes to cross play

freshslicepizza2888d ago (Edited 2888d ago )

@Goldby
"How ironic that MS talks about cross play yet won't even make that mandatory for their windows 10/Xbox versions of games like infinite warefare."

It's an Activision game, they have to enable the feature. Remote Play on the PS4 is not enabled for all games either, should we blame Sony for that too? Face it, Sony got called out on crossplay and they scambled and came across as anti-consumer more than 4theplayers. Now you guys want to deflect the negative attention they are getting, same old patterns.

"You'd think if they would push that to make sure the windows 10 store become more attractive. They are all talk and no action when it comes to cross play"

It's funny how you came into this topic to rant about everything you don't like about MS. Like I said, this is what you guys do. Any time something the Xbox may be better at you want to change the discussion to fit your own agendas or downplay it. The XB1X is better engineered, those are facts.

"They are all talk and no action when it comes to cross play"

That's hilarious given Sony's stance on crossplay for many years and when they get called on it they talk about how they were always for it but in reality it was just the PC, then suggest they will listen to developers, then say they want to protect its users, and finally admit it was all about stakeholders all aong. Go ask the makers of Rocket League about who talks and who actually delivers?

Godmars2902888d ago

@Goldby
'"Why dont you explain how Ms is putting all of their eggs in the X1X basket instead of diversifying with...."

Who says they won't in the future?'

Because you stated that same exact abuse victim's hope when the XB1 was announce while the 360 faced a game drought? The same with the X1X too.

You've repeatedly hoped that in the long term that MS fixed short as well as long term issues, and aside from making new systems when the issue is games, they haven't yet.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2888d ago
DaGreatOne2888d ago

So when Microsoft says it's up to developers to make full use of hardware it's fine. Sony says the same thing and it's bs. Gotcha.

trooper_2888d ago

Ah, but you didn't know already? It's only okay when it's Microsoft!/s

Bobafret2888d ago

I only have to read the first sentence of anyone's comment to know whether it will have tons of disagrees.

Godmars2902889d ago (Edited 2889d ago )

You know, or rather it's my experience, to bold the replies of the interviewed. Not the questions of the interviewer.

And Pachter's seems to be MS's: only looking at numbers. The big numbers.

Its not that one AAA sells 5 to 10 million making massive profit, cause those days are gone, but rather five sub-AAA sell a million each making enough of sequels or other projects. That's how a console, as a general gaming platform, has value.

Godmars2902889d ago

"And Pachter's *ISSUE* seems to be MS's: only looking at numbers. The big numbers."

How am i missing words?!

Miss_Weeboo2889d ago

Pachter says a lot of interesting things sometimes, all of them come true. He's never missed the mark, not once, but it's his job to make predictions, and predictions are... Well, not precise. Most of his predictions do have a lot of research backing them (there's a whole team behind him), so it's not like he's making baseless claims: Noooo! He's intelligent, friendly, and overall trustworthy (and good looking for a man of his age) , and he never ever would dare to state the obvious, (What's trendy at the time).

Show all comments (45)
240°

Sony is all-in on PlayStation Plus, says its most expensive tier is thriving

Sony kicks off PS Plus' 15th anniversary by chatting with Game File about the past, present and future of its gaming subscription service: Talking price, catalogue tweaks and where the PS3 games are.

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1d 9h ago
CrimsonWing691d 8h ago

Glad, I’m about to downgrade when they raise the price. For me, I don’t really access much or care about the games they have in the library and if I do, it’d be cheaper to just buy them over time rather than stick to some expensive subscription model.

crazyCoconuts1d 7h ago

When you're new to the service you've got an avalanche of games to play. After you catch up, I agree, it's not worth it beyond the Essential tier for me.
That being said, the Essential tier is the best deal in console gaming imo, based on the monthly games you get to keep.

Profchaos1d 1h ago

Yeah same will be downgrading $214 aud is insane and we don't even get the streaming capabilities in Australia which they said would make the top level subscription cheaper.

If i was to just buy the games I actually play that come to the service id be far better off.

Ill keep the essential tier to retain the games ive collected since the ps3 and for mp but I'm not convinced of the premium tiers value any more

victorMaje22h ago

Went back to essential a few months ago. I’m buying more physical and it has helped in finishing more games.

Profchaos12h ago

Tend to agree if i go to the trouble of buying a disc ill typically finish it

Alos881d 8h ago

Extra is probably the best value for money right now, Premium doesn't have anything special enough to justify paying the additional imo.

OtterX1d 8h ago

*unless you have a Portal & you catch Premium on discount during Days of Play or Black Friday.

Yea, I really do wish they'd up their effort on Premium titles, but allowing a large catalog of titles that can stream to your Portal without even having to use your PS5 is pretty awesome. We travel about 2 hours to stay with my inlaws from time to time, so it's been pretty killer to only need to take my Portal for that!

andy851d 7h ago

Yup if you have a portal premium is the best tier for sure

KyRo15h ago

Extra has been getting worse and worse each month. I've had it since it's launch and it's been great to play some games I may not have played but the selection has been declining rapidly for a while now. My sub runs out in August and I'll be going back to essential. They actually add games to that which are more appealing.

jznrpg1d 8h ago

Add some more classics with trophies. Vagrant Story first

OtterX1d 8h ago

Nice choice. I agree!

Jeanne D'Arc was my favorite PS+ catalog title from last year & I Platinumed it!

Eonjay1d 5h ago

I like Ridge Racer, Tekken and Grandia. Add Xenogears, digimon World 3, Classic GTA and ill be happy

jznrpg1d 4h ago

Jeanne D’Arc was great!

@Eonjay there is a Grandia collection available for PS4, I’m not sure if it’s been on plus already or not

darthv721d 8h ago

cloud streaming to the portal, without using the ps5, is the selling point of premium to me.

Obscure_Observer1d 8h ago

If the consumers are happy, Sony is even happier.

It is what it is.

Eonjay1d 5h ago

I tend to agree with you.

Show all comments (31)
60°

Hitoshi Sakimoto Celebrates 40 Years Of Game Composing With A Streaming Collection

The legendary composer celebrates forty years of game composing with a new collection.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1d 23h ago
220°

Yoshida claims PS believes Xbox is their only competitor, truth is they don’t have one any more

Former PlayStation boss Shuhei Yoshida claims PlayStation still believes Xbox is their only true competitor, not Nintendo.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community7d ago
9d ago
Terry_B7d ago

True, they have pretty different audiences..and some People just have both at home or a PS and a PC that emulates more or less everything from Nintendo.

Knightofelemia7d ago

Xbox hasn't been a competitor since the XB360. Last generation and this generation Sony has been running circles around Xbox. As for Sony vs Nintendo Sony runs circles yes but I don't really see Nintendo as competition. Nintendo does their own thing and it works.

7d ago Replies(1)
Lightning777d ago

Details are important. Console sales yes. Overall games Xbox seems to be doing fairly well in that department.

LoveSpuds6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

MS were doing so well that they had to start selling their games on their main competitors system which in turn results in around 30% of each sale going to Sony as the platform holder.

I do think tjat MS' fortunes will improve now that they are actually selling games rather than giving them away for pennies on the dollar.

Something that occurs to me is that the more success MS published games have elsewhere, the more stark it will become that selling games is much more profitable than renting them. If that becomes highly noticable, I wonder what the shareholders (who ultimately run the show) will make of a service which has stagnated for years?

crazyCoconuts6d ago

PlayStation doesn't compete with third party games, they compete on consoles. They profit from third party games. If you're not comparing consoles there's no point in comparing.

drivxr7d ago

Console wars are over.

Eventually, everyone else will catch up to this fact.

attilayavuzer7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

I think it's all PS fans have left at this point. Console wars were always a competition for fourth place behind Nintendo, PC and mobile. If Xbox evaporates into a hybrid virtual platform, then PS will be perennially left in last place.

Christopher7d ago

Strange, I recall all those FCC documents and witness testimonies saying the exact opposite... Guess Microsoft doesn't know what it's talking about?

PanicMechanic6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

Great analysis. Just joking.

Pretending like companies give a f about where they “rank” against each other is just super retarded. This isn’t the World Cup.

Tell me, how does “PC” compete against a brand like PlayStation? It just doesn’t make sense at all. What you just said, is complete and utter nonsense

BlaqMagiq16d ago

I don't think PS cares about being in this so-called "last place" you came up with when they're making profits hand over fist.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 6d ago
Destiny10807d ago

microsoft wanted to crush sony into dust and they had the money to do it, but with such weak leadership it was always going to fail

Reaper22_7d ago

Had the money? They still have the money but the industry has changed since xbox 360. Microsoft is the number one publisher in gaming. I'd hardly call that failing.

IRetrouk7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

The industry hasn't changed though, just ms, Microsoft was the no1 publisher for a month in december 2024, the actual no1 for fy2024 was tencent if game sales are all that's being counted.

Profchaos7d ago

Money doesn't mean you'll be successful large corporations have entered and failed before like Nec

Show all comments (23)