180°

Crackdown 3 is like the original, but layered with big, fun, chaotic ideas

Crackdown 3 — an open-world crimefighting game in which you can leap over small apartment buildings in a single bound — isn’t the most graphically gobsmacking game on the Xbox One, nor is it the most technically refined. Melee attacks are a little floaty; the physics, unpredictable; and the sound of its rampant destruction hits the eardrums like a dump truck crushing another dump truck. But the game is scrappy and charming and unlike anything else on the show floor of E3 2017. A half-hour demo of super agents fighting supervillians was as enjoyable (if not more so) than many hours spent with Microsoft’s fancier, big-budget exclusives.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
Gazondaily2908d ago

It may not be visually impressive but if this nails the explosive sandbox fun from the first game with a much larger scale, then we're in for a treat

4Sh0w2908d ago (Edited 2908d ago )

Well yes, game looks like a cool cell shaded game, it's NEVER been about graphics, just like the first it's about over the top abilities, weapons, vehicles and
total chaos blowing shiii up.

That said it ALSO has to deliver on that 100% destruction they 1st promised. I understand they only showed SP and that it still supposedly exists in the online multiplayer like always...but come on now, it's been 3 yrs and they cant show it at E3 with a Nov 2017 launch date?...pffft, OK.

Edit vvvv -hmmm so Septic did they get shy all of a sudden, its E3 bro, and theyve shown short clips of it before so wtf? Either it's not as claimed or some other problem going on with it.

Gazondaily2908d ago

Well it's coming in November and we'll see whether the cloud tech works then.

gangsta_red2908d ago

Was never looking for this game to be a visually masterpiece. But I am glad to hear the actual gameplay is fun which imo is way more important for Crackdown.

Godmars2902908d ago

"Well it's coming in November and we'll see whether the cloud tech works then."

Expect we've already seen it, haven't we? By that I mean that regardless the end result will be compared to what was promised and, like most things MS have made claims on, one wont live up to the other. Which then won't matter since MS PR will both talk it down while declaring it "The Best Experience On Xbox."

Gazondaily2908d ago

"Expect we've already seen it, haven't we? "

We have but that's not enough for you lot though? You want to see it working on home consoles.

Yeah so let it get compared to what was shown. The cloud tech either works or it doesn't. You'll see come November. That's the point. Thought it was a pretty simple point.

Godmars2902908d ago

"The cloud tech either works or it doesn't."

By fan account and examples from in Forza, another title, cloud tech works as far as ghosting offline players in their friend's games. The issue is whether or not it can offer more significant benefits, an argument which is lost every day Crackdown 3 remains the only title in MS's which was suppose to show it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2908d ago
Godmars2902908d ago

Which, unlike the initial one, this latest preview didn't show.

generic-user-name2908d ago

Really bad move on their part not to show off the destruction at E3. I don't want to crap on the game, but that's all it really has going for it, but if it's as impressive as it was when they revealed it, that is enough.

Srelhow2908d ago

Did anything get mentioned about Crackdown using cloud power or is that dead?

opinionated2908d ago

They were only showing off the campaign which has no cloud because it needs to play offline. The multiplayer is still under wraps. I was confused too because the video hid the destruction behind explosions and quick edits. It was dialed down for offline play. I hope the multiplayer still exists.

NeoGamer2322908d ago

I remember getting the original Crackdown simply because it gave me access to the Halo 3 beta. It ended up being one of my favourite games in the 360 generation.

I enjoyed Crackdown 2 but it just didn't stay in line with the vision I saw in Crackdown 1.

I hope Crackdown 3 recaptures the Crackdown vision and is just as fun!

Show all comments (19)
690°

Tencent to buy Crackdown and Sackboy developer Sumo in $1.3bn deal

Tencent is set to buy Sumo Group in a deal worth $1.27bn (£919m), the companies have announced.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
Darkborn1412d ago

Tencent is really buying up everything. I'm surprised everyone is selling to them like this.

Rebel_Scum1412d ago

They want/need capital I guess.

darthv721412d ago

No way they are worth that much. They are a support studio. I guess tencent decided to throw them an insane price that Sumo would be crazy to turn down.

Its like the godfather. "Im going to make you an offer you cant refuse"

UltraNova1412d ago

Always the case.

Who owns the rights to Crackdown and Sackboy IPs though?

boing11412d ago

I've heard some time ago, that they created a special unit that has a mission to search for acquirable devs all around the globe.

-Foxtrot1412d ago

Going off their business practices they seem like a cancer in this industry

1412d ago
blacktiger1412d ago

chinese currency, no limit in printing, but they are selling in USD

PrinceAli1412d ago

Maybe because they're a publisher of games with a history of success loool..?

barom1412d ago

Even Microsoft can’t compete with that kind of money.

Zeref1412d ago (Edited 1412d ago )

Uhm yes they can.. What do you mean?

Zeref1412d ago

Money talks, Besides, those developers don't need to worry about income anymore.

enkiduxiv1412d ago

I doubt anyone that matters to the actual production of the games is getting a raise. The only thing that has changed is that now they can't buy any Winnie the Poo products for their kids.

senorfartcushion1412d ago

Well they’re allowed. America and China are leading the world in toxic capitalism.

n1kki61412d ago

As publicly traded companies it's either they sell and potentially get more, or tencent initiates a hostile takeover and buys at least 51% of the shares. These companies might not even be amicable to the buy out but opt to take it because hostile takeovers are terrible.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 1412d ago
frostypants1412d ago (Edited 1412d ago )

Yep. A company that built itself by ripping off IP of small, innovative developers and out-marketing them. Tencent is everything wrong not just with gaming but corporate ethics in general, and the assymetric regulatory playing field we for some reason permit from the Chinese government. Egregiously corrupt companies like Tencent should be banned from the US market.

senorfartcushion1412d ago

The US market would take Tencent to dinner and have it naked on the bed by midnight if it could. America and China are as bad as each other

Lightning771412d ago

They can take Sumo those devs really aren't that great. Sack boys big adventure scored good however but Crackdown 3 wasn't great. They're 50/50 Sony will find a suitable replacement for Sack boy. MS desperately needs a suitable replacement for crackdown, if it's not already too late in terms of fanfare at this point.

Sumo to me isn't that big of a deal there are better devs out there.

senorfartcushion1412d ago

Crackdown 3 was cancelled and remade a few times. Hardly their fault.

darthv721412d ago

This is the same Sumo who made Outrun 2, 2006 Coast to Coast, Sonic Racing Transformed as well as Forza Horizon 2 on the 360. I think they are better than you give them credit for.

Wulfer1412d ago

You might want to walk this statement back. Why else do you think this game goes for over $200 now?

https://www.ebay.com/p/5144...

1412d ago Replies(1)
ScootaKuH1412d ago

I'm surprised Sumo are valued so high

solideagle1412d ago

yeah, thats what I thought. $1.3 billion is very high, Insomniac sounds like a bargain deal for Sony!

chadwarden1412d ago

And they likely bought Housmarque and Bluepoint for even less than Insomniac.

phoenixwing1412d ago

at the two above me,
it's easy to sell for less when you know you're in good hands business and culture wise. I mean sure you could scratch out some extra money elsewhere but are all the people you know going to be taken care of when you get bought out? Sony takes care of them. Basically you can tell who's a scheming money scumbag by what ceo's/execs choose to be bought by. In the end money talks but there's extras to consider sometimes.

roadkillers1412d ago

I am as well. They do not own any IPs from my understanding...

DOMination-1412d ago

Me too! After looking them up, it seems like they were the parent of other game studios: Lab42, Red Kite, Sumo India, The Chinese Room and PixelAnt Games and also have some cryptocurrency technology.

They may also still hold the IP for back when they were Gremlin Interactive.. back in the Amiga days they were really a dev of some repute.

ScootaKuH1412d ago

Gremlin. Now there's a name that takes me back. Ocean as well.

Teflon021412d ago

They're not, it's likely them just throwing money around to make sure they have no opposition. Sumo is a valuable developer as they've assisted in alot of great games. They did LBP3, Sackboy, Sonic Transformed, I believe Assisted in both ModNation Racers and LBPK, Team Sonic racing, just to name the few off the top of my head that I own.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1412d ago
IRetrouk1412d ago

I honestly thought ms or Sony would have nabbed them, seeing as they have worked for both on their respective ips, colour me surprised.

Bennibop1412d ago

It's a lot of money for a group with no ips, what would they have worked on to keep so many studios and staff employed. For now at least they continue working on ips for the likes of Sony and Microsoft.

IRetrouk1412d ago

Sony and ms have more than enough ips to keep em busy, the price would have been an issue though, that I agree with, just surprised is all🤷‍♂️

frostypants1412d ago (Edited 1412d ago )

Tencent doesn't exactly pride themselves on original IP anyway. They just steal someone else's. They only need developer drones.

Sephiroushin1412d ago

They have enough to make them busy but there is no point in buying the studio that high, they could just make the developers some offers and thats it... heck every single developer could just quit the studio and with what is tensen left? no point in buying a studio with no IP you dont own the developers

IRetrouk1412d ago

I already agreed that the price was high, still don't take away that they could have been used, and be useful to either ms or sony

Show all comments (86)
80°

Xbox Cloud Gaming PC Preview/Hands on Impressions (BETA) - CG

Microsoft recently released their Xbox Cloud Gaming PC Beta which allows users the opportunity to stream Xbox games to their Windows 10 PCs or laptops. This follows on from being able to use the cloud gaming on mobile devices which works very well but is limited to the size of your screen. Having the option to play Xbox games with a larger display has its obvious benefits.

Read Full Story >>
cramgaming.com
1497d ago
280°

Crackdown 3 8K 60 FPS - Possible at Low-Medium Settings with an RTX 3090

CG writes: Nvidia’s claims that the RTX 3090 can render games in 8K at 60 FPS, ring true for us in this video. We put the game Crackdown 3 through its paces with some interesting results.

Read Full Story >>
cramgaming.com
bunt-custardly1689d ago

If you've ever super-sampled anything you would know why it can make things look better.

bouzebbal1689d ago

Let's talk about powahhhh of da clawwdd for a second 🤣did they give up with this thing?

bunt-custardly1689d ago

Oh right, I didn't get the joke sorry, it just clicked. Hmm, is Crackdown 3 really that bad/universally hated especially as it's on gamepass?

SullysCigar1689d ago

My attempt at humour could have been clearer, in hindsight..!

Yeah, sadly Crackdown 3 had been hyped so hard and so long by Microsoft, that when it launched as a mediocre game, it got panned. It was mainly the broken promises about the power of the cloud I think that did it. This was the 'cloud power' poster child for years and it all amounted to nothing, which is a real shame, because if they'd realised their initial vision it could have been special.

bunt-custardly1689d ago

I do remember the original vision where entire buildings could be demolished but wasn't that feature relegated to the multiplayer mode? For me, Crackdown 3 comes across quite generic. I suppose if it had the full destruction in the story mode that would have been bad-ass. If Red Faction Guerrilla can do it why not CD?

FanboySpotter1689d ago

Crackdown 3 was made for crackdown fans. Hated by non crackdown fans. Enjoyed by crackdown fans.

MadLad1689d ago

I played it on PC for a little while via gamepass. It's not nearly as terrible as people would try to make it out to be, but it's the definition of a "meh" game.
There's fun to be had if you're bored.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1689d ago
andy851689d ago

It's good it's possible but who would pick this over 4K60 on ultra? It would look far better

IanTH1689d ago

100%. This is obviously just showing what can be done with the current highest end hardware, rather than what should be. And if you're splashing out for an RTX 3090 over a 3080 for gaming (small performance delta if not using that huge buffer for productivity), then I guess you'll also consider splashing out for an 8k screen. And, I mean, you'll want to be able to do *something* with it lol.

outsider16241689d ago

Let's be honest here, even with extra high settings at 8k 120fps... it'll still look like crap. Sorry.

Show all comments (19)