970°

Kotaku - Five Hours In, Mass Effect: Andromeda Is Overwhelming

Kotaku - I’m about five hours into Mass Effect: Andromeda, and so far, it seems like Bioware has created a behemoth of a sci-fi action RPG.

OB1Biker3012d ago (Edited 3012d ago )

You can say what you want about Kotaku, and I dont usually visit that site, but its refreshing to see a balanced, professional article and responsible, adult comments on the internet.

bnaked3012d ago

Ignoring all weaknesses is balanced and professional?

OB1Biker3012d ago (Edited 3012d ago )

She did mention a few flaws like hit or miss animation.
as in balanced I meant more a logical approach in trying to depict the games point by point rather than a sort of essay focusing on the writer emotional state of mind instead of the game per se

An interesting piece from Forbes here:
https://www.forbes.com/site...

LordoftheCritics3012d ago

People are making a mountain out of a mole hill really.

JackBNimble3012d ago

This is why I will wait and see what gamers say about the game before I even consider it.
I'll give it a couple of weeks before I make up my mind.

Aloren3012d ago

Out of curiosity, is ignoring all qualities more balanced and professional ?

3012d ago
_-EDMIX-_3012d ago (Edited 3012d ago )

They are simply focusing on what was done correctly.

If someone didn't know any better, they would think this game was just a CG movie.

The bad animations are just 1 part of the game, its still actually a game folks.

Not saying ignore the animations, but seriously, how many articles can they really write about that feature?

I get it sucks, but let the them focus on other aspects of the game.

Your basically asking them to BASH the game based on a feature and ignore all else.

Vantol3012d ago

@_-EDMIX-_ Because Mass Effect IS about story, animations and graphics. If it had broken or no gameplay - noone would bat an eye. But telling ppl that "bad story and animations is ok, because there is something else" is like telling "who cares if your car can't move, it has good audio system!". Smh

CorndogBurglar3012d ago

@ Vantol

"Because Mass Effect IS about story, animations and graphics. If it had broken or no gameplay - noone would bat an eye."

This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. You spend way more time dealing with gameplay than you must realize. If the shooting or game mechanics were broken, nonone would play it because it would be a horrible experience. If there was NO gameplay then you would just be watching a movie. And by that point it would be a very bad movie compared to other animated features out there.

freshslicepizza3012d ago

some people just want the world to burn. i will find out this weekend after trying it out if my preorder will stay or not.

morganfell3012d ago

Whether or not a game is good is not awarding a plus or minus one to each feature and then if it comes out 51 to 49 in the plus column the game is good. It doesn't work in that manner.

There are some features in games, even if they are few in number, that have the ability to overwhelm the other more numerous qualities in a title. It is like a great meal that is expertly prepared, appealing to the eye, the aroma excites the appetite...and then too much salt just ruins the experience. All the other factors, perfectly cooked, the visual preparation, all of it is for naught.

Or more simply, someone put two ounces of bird crap in a 10 ounce bowl of soup. Are you going to try and eat around it? Even if you did you would be focused on that crap as you try to finish the bowl.

This game is a case where well over 90% of the players game for an experience where they are immersed in the universe and care or hate the individuals and actions as if they are real entities. They develop a connection to the characters.

Just look at how people felt about Shepard.

These broken animations, the idiotic dialogue remind you often enough that these are mannequins. Not characters about whom you can care. All movies involving androids or robots where you learn to care about that character as a sentient creature do so because of out ability to connect with their humanity. Here is a case where we disconnect, sometimes in derision, because of their inhuman qualities.

bluefox7553012d ago

You really can't trust games journalists anymore. I'm more inclined to listen to certain youtubers than anyone from Kotaku or IGN.

-Foxtrot3011d ago

Exactly

They know EA will be furious if they make more people cancel their ore order

Unspoken3011d ago

Game looks fantastic! I've seen the game play and I've seen the graphics. Running on PC 4K HDR 60 fps the world looks beyond amazing. Any Mass Effect and Bioware fans should pick this up. Remember, this is a Sony biased site not wanting to take away from Horizon, which had it's own issues in facial animations, weak voice acting, poor directional audio, running at poor resolutions and laughable 30 fps.

morganfell3011d ago

"Game looks fantastic! I've seen the game play and I've seen the graphics. Running on PC 4K HDR 60 fps the world looks beyond amazing."

What a laughable remark. You speak as if only graphics matter. One thing MEA is not is a graphical powerhouse. Yes in this day and age we should have both graphical fidelity AND gameplay. Apparently you only care about one side. With that being said attacking Horizon Zero Dawn for its renders makes anything else you have to say null and void.

You seem to be missing the point that while no one is raving about how MEA looks, it also isn't the issue that is causing the uproar. A matter you believe (wrongly) that by ignoring will disappear.

The irony is it is YOU that is praying for some sort of counter, in this case to Horizon Zero Dawn. BREAKING NEWS!!!!! Mess Defect AnDrama isn't it.

Had you put a /s at the end of your post it would not have seemed out of place.

Ashlen3011d ago

I have played about 3 1/2 hours of the trial and while I did actually see one of the weird animation I have also played though scenes that have been the focus of comical videos and those animations looked fine. But I would say the animations are such a small part of the overall game. The story is interesting the gameplay has been pretty solid though I prefer a class system. It seems like a mistake to focus on the animations when there are so many more important features to the game.

IamTylerDurden13011d ago (Edited 3011d ago )

@Unspoken

Horizon ran at poor resolutions? What? It runs at cb 2160p on PS4 Pro and looks 4K. It runs at native 1080p on the regular PS4. For a console game Horizon is almost as good as it gets. regarding resolution.

It runs at 30fps, but it is not a Bethesda 30fps. Horizon runs at one of the smoothest locked 30's i've seen and when combined with the exceptional motion blur it is a truly fluid experience.

Facial animations were very good in spots and mediocre in others but overall it was very impressive to have every NPC fully voiced and lip synced in such a grand open world game. Zelda BotW and it's 97 Metacritic didn't do this, and MEA isn't an open world game. The more important the character, the better the facial animations and voice work was in Horizon. You picked the wrong game to take a shot at, Horizon is very technically impressive.

freshslicepizza3011d ago

morganfell,

you are making a mountain out of a molehill. play it for at least 4 hours and then tell us what you think. dont go by what other impressions say. the facial animations are in no way the most important part of the game.

_-EDMIX-_3011d ago

@Van-but unless you know something we don't you don't actually know the story and I believe the game is more than just its graphics and animation.

Mind you graphically this Mass Effect looks absolutely amazing the only thing it has trouble with its it's a animations

But BioWare has actually always done animations poorly in this game looks like it's worse than the previous in this department but that's never really stopped me from playing the previous Mass Effect for god sakes Graphics never stopped me from putting over 170 hours in Fallout 4 Graphics never stop me from playing Fallout 3 and New Vegas last generation actually despite those games graphically being even more inferior to their Triple-A counterparts then Fallout 4 was

The gist of it is I just don't care about such things enough to say I won't buy the game.

I'm not telling people that body animations is okay I'm simply saying I don't care enough about it to not pick up the game simply because I've played so many games that had strange animations or even or Graphics simply because I actually liked the game

Look up something like breath of the wild the game literally looks like a game ripped straight out of 2006, people have no problem playing that game that game is getting lots of perfect scores and clearly the fans of it enjoy what they're playing

Let me remind you again that you don't know the story to this game to say that it is bad

Mind you that is completely subjective I personally like the concept of humanity trying to find a new home.

I'm sorry it's not filled with your stupid Citadel political jargon bud, I like the simple concept over them trying to find a new home while also trying to stay diplomatic with the species that already exist.

That's completely up for me to decide whether or not I care for the story.

What I like about this article is that it's focusing on what the game does well. We already know the game has questionable animations that are pretty bad

Some users would actually like to hear about the rest of the components that make up this game because that might not be that important to users.

I'm playing Horizon zero Dawn right now and it's easily one of my favorite games this generation and I could tell you right now that the facial animations are not that great in the lip syncing is definitely off but that doesn't stop me from enjoying the rest of the components of the game yes the performances are not Uncharted or the last of us or anything like that.

But for god sakes who on Earth stated that was the minimum standard threshold for animations?

I played the last three Mass Effect and did not care about its bad animations then I won't care now.

I'm sorry but I'm at Mass Effect fan that actually only cares about the core concept I'm not emotionally tied to those three games.

+ Show (15) more repliesLast reply 3011d ago
Artemidorus3012d ago

Maybe it's balancing because you finally agree with something they did.

OB1Biker3012d ago

Haha maybe
I also meant balanced, professional as opposed to angry, emotional if you wish ;)

ShadowKnight3012d ago (Edited 3012d ago )

I know Mass Effect Adromeda has bad animation but Horizon Zero Dawn had distractingly bad lip sync where the characters didn’t always make believable expressions something was off about it and it's hilarious that people didn't notice that ...but most people overlooked that, because it had no bearing on the overall quality of the game. It feels like people want Mass Effect to fail. I still think Witcher 3 had the best animation and lip sync for a RPG this gen imo

Dark_Knightmare23012d ago

I agreed with everything you said till you said witcher 3 had the best animations. I love witcher 3 been a fan ever since I played the first on a potatoe pc that could barely run it and was constantly dropping frames but the animations in witcher 3 weren't very good they were almost robotic. Now the lip sync I agree with it was really well done but the animations not so much

UCForce3012d ago

Here the thing, I faced these issues for a long time, but it doesn't bother me that much.

CP_Company3012d ago

What nonsense are you writing here.i am about 60h into the game and apart few conversations,lip sync is working flawless.

Inzo3012d ago

Nothing wrong with the lipsync in HZD, the problem is the lips dont round out the words properly but it is a very very minor issue compared to the rest of the game and with a game as good as HZD, its easy to overlook.

_-EDMIX-_3012d ago (Edited 3012d ago )

I noticed it and its still one of my favorite games this year if not this whole gen.

I think many are over reaching the facial animation thing. it sucks big time, but I didn't care that the first 3 Mass Effect games had bad animations.

I took what I could from the game and moved on.

@CP_Comp- no bud. Don't lie. You'd have to be BLIND to not notice the lip sync issue with HZD.

I own it day 1 too buddy. I don't get the reason behind lying. I like it too, but don't lie about this feature. I don't see what your getting from it, it can be EASILY looked up.

Critic4l_Strik33011d ago

Agree but, MEA animations are worse than HZD...not only the facial ones, but even the walking ones...

HansSoloBerger113011d ago

Yep..it's trendy to hate on Andromeda at the moment.I'm sure people will do this with Red Dead 2 as well

MorpheusX3011d ago (Edited 3011d ago )

@ShadowKnight

" It feels like people want Mass Effect to fail. "

EA's Karma has been brought on of there own doing. It is what it is.

When you have a History of being a bully, a swindler, and choosing to actively involve yourself in taking a socially controversial political stance, a history in anti-consumer practices, its only natural that consumers are going to want to see you fail.

That's life.

GNCFLYER3011d ago

I noticed it. I'm not a reviewer though.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 3011d ago
MRMagoo1233012d ago

Kotaku were probably paid , I have seen people play this game streamed and it has way way way more cons than pros

starchild3012d ago

Funny. I've watched hours of gameplay too and I have not seen these huge cons you're alluding to. I think some people want this game to fail and are blowing relatively minor issues out of proportion (most of which are present in other similar games).

I'm not saying the game is perfect by any means. I just haven't seen anything to justify the extreme negativity from some people.

OB1Biker3012d ago

You know what, I don't even believe in reviews and I said it many time on N4G. They usually give away too many spoilers anyway. Those are only previews though. Don't take what they say too seriously. I just like when I can get some factual information I may personally like or dislike rather than a completely biased, emotional point of view
People should just wait for reviews if reviewers point of view are important to them. No need to be over dramatic over previews.

3012d ago
MRMagoo1233012d ago (Edited 3012d ago )

@star and co

😂 you guys are a riot , we now have about 15 articles talking about how sh!t the game is now , So I guess you guys aren't seeing what everyone else is seeing huh ? There are more articles coming too ......either you guys are legally blind or everyone else is wrong 😂🖒

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3012d ago
obidanshinobi3012d ago

The words "Kotaku" and "balanced, professional article" do not belong in the same sentence.
Unless the words "are seemingly unable to provide a" are sandwiched inbetween. :D

meka26113012d ago

Played the EA access trial of this game last night. It's hard to know how I feel. I will say that the animations are just god awful and really jarring, especially on the main character. It's like they didn't know how to program animations when you can customize. Eyes and mouth are the worst offenders. They fixed the characters smiling during certain scenes, but the voice acting doesn't match the situation. And my god is the dialogue cringe worthy; and yes the characters continually point out the obvious for you.

OB1Biker3011d ago

Fair enough. I v'e never been bothered with animation oddities tbh. Only few rare games manage to render believable animation, thats not really what Im looking for the most in games. I feel people pay attention to these flaws too much because they are pointed out by the media.

CP_Company3011d ago

_-EDMIX-_--i am writing like legit player.i had over 100 conversations and maybe most,in 5 of them was bad lip sync,in rest of them,there was 0 problem.so,yeah,in my experience,it is pretty flawless and i even did not finished game yet.what was more,and i saw,that actually some of facial animation were awkward and weird,like Nils,and some other,but it is small fraction of all animations.

Nivekki3011d ago

It looks awful. The devs and EA should be ashamed of themselves, I love the first ME trilogy, but what I've seen of this looks like a joke. The script and animation is so amateurish it's laughable. After what's been released this year so far this looks like an abomination.

AnubisG3011d ago

Dude, Kotaku loves this because it's a SJW crap. That is why they are loving this.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 3011d ago
3012d ago Replies(1)
Gwiz3012d ago

The focus on animations is really weird lol,,

l3w1s3012d ago

So why not make MEA text-based? So the kewls could show off their rp skillzzzzzz.

aaronaton3011d ago

strangest comment ive read today. Animation is the foundation of any game. You could have uncharted level 3D assets and engine, but if its poorly animated the immersion is instantly broken. On the other side of the coin, you can have a low budget game with great animation, that will truly bring it to life!

Animation is Key.

Emme3011d ago

No its not. Great animation is nice to have, but servicable animation is sufficient, and I doubt the average gamer really notices it.

Gwiz3011d ago (Edited 3011d ago )

Foundation?yeah to have ANY at all..
XD

Chumdiddy3011d ago (Edited 3011d ago )

I think it's valid given that half the game experience is delivered via dialogue tree conversation and cutscene. Animation is huge in that arena when trying to make it believable.

It's hard for me to not get a bit creeped out by the videos I've seen. Everyone looks like they're facially frozen except in the lips where they are over exaggerated.

It's nightmare fuel for me (ha).

OMGitzThatGuy3011d ago

When you are looking at animations 100% of the time in games something as wonky as what I am seeing in ME:A is enough to take anybody out of any immersion and can disconnect players from characters. They done goofed.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3011d ago
PhoenixUp3012d ago

It better be if it wants to live up to the series' expectations

bolimekurac3012d ago

other then the obvious stability issues that looked pretty dam good and the action seemed exciting and fun

Vantol3012d ago

What "action"? I puked on my monitor before I could see any "action".

Unoriginalplayer3012d ago

Might want to see a doctor....

Show all comments (92)
110°

For All Its Flaws, Mass Effect: Andromeda's Approach to Romance is Something ME4 Can Learn From

While Mass Effect: Andromeda was let in several key areas, one of its approaches to romances is something Mass Effect 4 should consider revisiting.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
VenomUK146d ago

I hope Mass Effect 4 ignores the inferior prequels and instead closely follows the far superior Mass Effect: Andromeda and Dragon Age Inquisition.

anast146d ago (Edited 146d ago )

Mass Effect 4 should just make Mass Effect 1 but better with current tech. Fans would be happy. As far as romance, they should take notes from the Witcher and Cyberpunk.

Ristul146d ago

Later Bioware games have to little build up. You can have a normal conversation and all of a sudden BAM! The character you talk to becomes super flirty.

TricksterArrow145d ago

Reminds me of Baldur’s Gate. I wanted to practice some magic and Gale made it super weird. Not even gonna mention Astarion.

gold_drake146d ago (Edited 146d ago )

iii dunno about that.

the only really great and funny dating partner, is that outlaw guy anyways haha he was funny as hell.

other than that, i found every character to be very annoying.

ZeekQuattro145d ago

Shout out to Keri the Asari reporter. Current relationship status be damned as she's game either way. Anything for a good story. 🤣

100°

Mass Effect Companion Tier Ranking

One of the best things about the Mas Effect series is the companions you meet along the way. So here is a tier list of all the companions from Mass Effect!

Read Full Story >>
lordsofgaming.net
IAMRealHooman187d ago

Bro missing companions: Legion, Grunt, Samara/Morinth, Javik, EDI

anast187d ago

Legion, Zaeed, and Jack are my favorites.

RiseNShine187d ago

To think that Bioware at some point was capable of doing games like this, you see those characters and remember them like good old friends, and now check ME Andromeda, Anthem, Veilguard etc and wonder what the hell happened.

anast187d ago

They lost too much talent.

IAMRealHooman187d ago

some in andromeda are decent, I agree with peebee and Vetra being good companions. Except Liam he's trash tier

anast187d ago

Liam lol I can't stand that dude.

IAMRealHooman186d ago

it's like bitch but your shirt back on, your not blue or spikey get away from me

310°

BioWare Thinks Mass Effect Andromeda Was Better Game Than Reception Suggested

BioWare thinks Mass Effect: Andromeda was a better game than what reception suggested; taught the studio not to shoehorn open-world without any meaningful content in it.

thorstein223d ago

I played it and it wasn't as bad as people said. Is it in the 8-10 range? No.

It's a 6-7, which means it's a solid game.

LordoftheCritics223d ago (Edited 223d ago )

Veilguard and Andromeda are of similar level to me.
6 to 6.5 ish

Though I think i enjoyed Andromeda's combat and sense of scale a little bit more.

XBManiac222d ago

Veilguard has better graphics.

neutralgamer1992222d ago

I agree with you It was a 6.5 type game. Gameplay was solid everything else was lacking. Playing at launch with all the issues was just absurd. EA could have let the developers keep patching and fix the game but they stopped just like they did with anthem. It’s crazy to think multi billion dollar publishers can’t afford to keeping patching their games get medium size developers can support the game for years

But when you have android wilson running the company what else can we expect.

OtterX222d ago

Except 6-7 doesn't translate as solid. 6 means a bit flimsy, but still good/enjoyable if you can look past the flaws. 7, a little less flimsy, and enjoyable. 8-10 would be "solid".

But I get your point. I skipped the game entirely, so I don't have an opinion on it.

H9222d ago

I played this game back when I wanted to give every game I bought a fair chance and finish it, it was the reason why I stopped doing so, god the game was bad

TheNamelessOne222d ago

I actually enjoyed Andromeda. It wasn't a 10/10, by any means, but I played it years after the fact, after a lot of patching, and I had a good time with it.

anast222d ago

Same, I enjoyed it too. I might even replay it soon.

TheNamelessOne222d ago

Might do the same, honestly. Went through the trilogy a couple months back.

raWfodog222d ago

I liked it as well, and also played it for the first time over a year after it was released. The original trilogy was a better story overall IMO but I still enjoyed Andromeda.

lellkay222d ago

The game is so unbelivably bad, it's laughable.

pwnmaster3000222d ago (Edited 222d ago )

It really wasn’t. Well for me nd I’m a big fan of the series.
Was it mass effect standard? No
But overall I thought it was a decent game.
6-7/10.

Armaggedon222d ago

You might want to try playing a truly bad game. Go boot up two worlds or gollum to get the perspective you need

MatrixxGT222d ago

Wow, two worlds…red ringed my 360.

Armaggedon222d ago

Lol. Its one of the only games that I have experienced buyers remorse with. The only one I can think of is riders Republic.

matt139222d ago

So delusional, the title was an embarrassment to the original trilogy. it’s the equivalent of 2042 to the battlefield franchise.

thorstein222d ago

2042 had a redemption arc and what exists now is a pretty good FPS.

Show all comments (39)