The Nintendo Switch reveal Confrence is out! Gamers now know the date, the
price, and the lack of release titles for the Switch. Reactions towards
this confrence has been mixed at the best. Some gamers see this as Nintendo
still not getting the point. Many see The Switch as the Wii U all over
again. Is this the Wii U 2.0 or can the Switch come around and be something
great? But, with games like Legend of Zelda Breath of the Wild, Mario
Odyssey, Splatoon 2, Mario Kart 8, how can this conference be bad?...How?
Nintendo and Pokemon Company have filed a lawsuit against Pocketpair Inc., the creators of Palworld, in Tokyo, Japan.
A patent lawsuit? What Pokémon-related patent could Palworld even be infringing that other similar games haven't? This makes no sense. Feels like Nintendo just trying to throw its weight around to bully competitors, just like they do with emulators even though they're legal.
They can't Innovate their own IP, but when others are breaking the ceiling, they run to the courts, gtfo Nintendo/Gamefreak.
Companies' gatekeeping mechanics behind the patent system to stifle innovation, consumers will always pick the better product, it's not the consumer's fault that Gamefreak has sat on their lazy assess for years.
The Palworld has been out since January of 2024 and now Nintendo finally decides to do something. I fail to see how Palworld is like Pokemon besides evolving monsters. There are other games out there as well where you can capture and level up monsters. Tales of Symphonia 2 does that capture monsters and have them fight with you and they evolve when levelling up. The two games might share some similarities but what game doesn't borrow from another game. I could understand if Palworld was just a straight on copy clone of Pokemon but it's not. Nintendo is starting to become a pain in the ass. Going full gung ho with rom sites that I can see, purposely taking down pictures from a strategy guide for Mario 64 the strategy guide never came to North America and Nintendo had the pictures taken down. Where does it every stop with Nintendo?
This feels like a scare tactic more than anything else. There's nothing here dozens of other games haven't already done, they're just mad this game showed people how much the pokemon series has been slackin and are desperately trying to make an example out of them.
How's about instead of spending all that money on court fees and lawyers you invest it into making pokémon better?
The 'Steam Deck 2.0' needs to make use of the AMD Ryzen Z2 chips if it wants a fighting chance against the competition.
I think when the next wave of these handhelds release I'll see what's available and finally grab one. The handheld aspect is nice, but I really just need something small to take with me when traveling. Been using my Series S, which has been good, but it would be nice having my PC library on the go.
I have the Rogue Ally and miss the Steam Deck, i love the extra power of the Ally but i am sooo tired of a million issues with windows and games, i miss the simplicity of SD, you launch a game and it works as long as it's supported, period, Valve really turned PC gaming in a console experience, so SD 2 is day one for me.
Deck doesn't need a "fighting chance". Specs have never won in the grant scheme of things. Value has, and the Deck has significant value and usability advantages over its so called "superior" competitors. Ask Nintendo how being in 1st place in sales in the next gen race with last gen handheld hardware works.
The steam deck has been my go to device since I got it.
I've tried an Ally and LeGo, both are decent handhelds, but I prefer the design of the deck with steam OS and window boot.
If they release a Deck 2 with a big enough upgrade. I'd definitely get one of those.
it would be rad if they used the same board layout and cooling allowing previous owners to upgrade.
Electronic Arts‘ popular free-to-play life-simulation video game franchise “The Sims” is breaking from tradition, with the gaming company confirming Tuesday that there are no plans for a “The Sims 5” game as the successor to the current edition, “The Sims 4.”
Instead, “The Sims 4,” now a 10-year-old title and the longest-running installment in the franchise’s 25-year history, will continue to receive updates and paid expansions, most notably a multiplayer mode and partnering with some “Sims” players who develop their own custom content for the game to sell it through the EA store as “Creator Kits.”
After seeing inzoi I’d delay with some experimental “expansions” like multiplayer too.
What did proved Nintendo gets it prior to this event?
The average non Nintendo gamer expectation going into the event.
-- Expected western multiplats to be announced at a Japanese Event
Your loss not Nintendo.
Anyone who thought Nintendo was going to have a bunch of western games announced don't know Nintendo, past system library of games or understand Japanese Developers.
If you don't like Nintendo or Japanese games. Stop talking about the Switch or Nintendo. Because you're never gonna get what you want nor will you even buy it even if Nintendo did get em.
Stop lying to yourself. Wake up and face reality. Nintendo isn't gonna westernize themselves for your sake. They don't care about you nor do the Japanese developers do.
Now i understand JRPG are too complex for some of you to handle. Too much reading and strategy for your taste.
You rather have hand holding games that put you at the nearest check point, with guns, gore, blood and realistic visuals with no sense of creativity.
If you don't like Nintendo of Japanese Games or Indie games for the matter. Stay your PS4(Even though it has Japanese games too but because it's Sony it okay) and Xbo---PC or Steam.
One feature I'd love to see with the Switch are handles with different analog positions. As I'm a PlayStation gamer I'd love to be able to buy a left Switch handle where the analog stick is below the D-Pad.
Nintendo struggle to sell their home machines, or at least keep the software sales running, and have done ever since GameCube. Even when the Wii sold loads to the casual market, the third party developers didn't stick around, and Nintendo didn't give the machine expected features that the other machines we getting and this is still happening to this day. The modern gamer in 2017, expects a robust online infrastructure. Third party support from ALL big name developers and to get their AAA games at launch, and they also expects the machine to be spec-wise at least similar to the competition, for this to happen. Nintendo refuse to move with the times, and also refuse to be transparent in and day and age, where gamers want to know the details of the system they are trying to be sold, especially when there is strife competition on the market.
The problem with the Switch unveil to me, was the information. They had an hour with all eyes on them to tell us what gamers wanted to know, and what they really did was cater that show to the same Nintendo fans (See: OtakuDJK1NG-Rory) , that will buy that machine regardless of how weak the showing is, because they love Nintendo and they appreciate the brand and have strong trust in the IPs. (Zelda, Mario, Splatoon etc) and while I Wont knock then games, (I like Zelda) I will say, this has proved countless times to not be sufficient in the current home console gaming market. The other problem, was the transparency of the event. There was so much they didn't tell us. Yet so much padding they didn't need. There was no reason to spend excessive time on '1-2 Switch' (a game that should be a pack-in and not a full priced title) and they spent a lot of time on 'Arms' which looks nice graphically, but at heart is just a Wii game... The same sort of shovelware that did not sell after the allure of the Wii on the casual market wore off... Plus its being sold as a fully fledged priced title.
The info people needed to hear, such as how are Nintendo going to bring their online service up to the expected level, that their competition has been doing for two gens now, was told to us in 30 seconds and skimmed over with no details. This communication is what hurts their brand and kills interest. During the conference, they showed 2 games that were confirmed to be at launch, they didn't give European price, they told us 'we have third party support' but just like the WiiU conference, just showed us a jpeg of developer logos but barley any substance. What this says to me is, 'We have a bunch of developers who aren't fully committed to Switch", they are going to port over 5 year old games, but if they don't sell, you can bet they are pulling support, the same way they did with WiiU, And this is EXACTLY what I see Skyrim as on Switch. (and in the case of clarity, there was NO details on Skyrim, is it vanilla 2011? Is it the remastered version?) We live in an age, like it or not, of the modern western AAA high budget blockbuster. And the large base of 'core' gamers, want that experience. You care argue all you want that 'Nintendo makes better games' and that "JRPGS more clever though" you are more than welcome to your opinion, but genuinely quite frankly I don't think the general home console market agrees with that statement any more, because if it was true. PlayStation 4 and Xbox One wouldn't have outsold the WiiU so brutally. Nintendo does not have a single block buster western AAA IP to compete in the largest market in gaming right now. And there lack of ability to see see this, and adapt to it, really hurts them on top of everything else.
We find out (Afterwards again) Europe doesn't get online play at launch. How mad is that?? Can you imagine Xbone One or PlayStation 4 not launching with online play? In 2017? It should be a standard feature at this point. So much for 'being committed to online'