Approvals 12/3 ▼
eagle21 (2) - 3084d ago Cancel
ian86 (3) - 3083d ago Cancel
gangsta_red (1) - 3083d ago Cancel
20live (2) - 3083d ago Cancel
Wolfyseyes (2) - 3083d ago Cancel
GamingonPC (2) - 3083d ago Cancel
90°

GDC State of the Industry Survey Reveals Devs Optimism for Switch, Unsure of Mid-Cycle Refresh

Today, The Game Developers Conference (GDC) released the results of the fifth annual State of the Industry Survey, revealing trends in the games industry ahead of GDC 2017 this February.

Read Full Story >>
pressa2join.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community3083d ago
Changed: title
Resis7ance3084d ago
gangsta_red3083d ago

I think mid gen upgrades are a bad idea personally. Why not just go full on new console instead of a .5 type of console for an extra 400 bux.

Eonjay3083d ago

Because the gen is only half over and not everyone has bought into last gen yet either. The Pro (to which you are refering) is over 2x as powerful for less than 2x more than the PS4. Its a good deal if you haven't bought a console yet especially. Optimally, you want to take as big base over with you to next gen as you can. What Sony is doing is more like a iPhone 6 and 6 Plus model. Nothing more nothing less. The Plus is for those who want ithe better option this gen. Considering that the Scorpio is no where near next gen (see the PC guys not me), the real focus should be the games for those who just bought your current gen consoles.

The 10th Rider3083d ago (Edited 3083d ago )

With all the remasters and stuff we're getting, I'd be fine if we saw a new gen every three years, with games always releasing on two gens at once. That way those who want the latest and the greatest can buy a new console every three years, and those that don't can buy one every other gen (every 6 years) and still not miss out on any games.

UgoGalimbertti3083d ago

The only thing good I guess is the mandatory backwards compatibility for all games you have, digital library. Idk, it just sucks losing them all in a generation advance. Hope they treat the .5 to the whole generation the same way though

OtakuDJK1NG-Rory3083d ago

GDC isn't a good place to get statistics about the gaming industry,
They aren't surveying studios and developers around the world. Especially not from Japan.

Nu3083d ago

Personaly I could've survived with my 360 but I believed the next gen hype.
So to whoever is considering an upgrade take your time making a decision.

RedCloud883083d ago

The truth of the matter is we're getting these midgen refreshes for 3 reasons. 1, both conpanies delivered underpowered systems day one this gen, something that typically doesn't happen, and they delivered them later than anticipated. This forced developers into making their own target development kits for the new platforms and they overestimated the power forcing them to scale back after the systems were revealed. As a result, the systems were near maxed out in their first 18 months, where most systems arent at that point until years 3 and 4.
2, the entertainment industries extremely hard push of 4k. Think about the push to HD 15 years or so ago. We knew about the impending resolution increase for a decade before it ever reached a single consumer, and even then it was incredibly expensive, the content was barely existent, and blu ray was still a ways off. I bought my first HDTV, a 720p 32" vizio for $1,000 in the beginning of 2006. The push to 4k has been much faster. The UHD launch really took place in just under 3 years. And the tech has been pushed to mass market prices faster than any tv tech that came before it. I bought a 65" samsung 4k for $3,800 in 2015, and 2 days before this past christmas I bought a 55" samsung 4k hdr for $1,000. This rate of adoption forced Sony and microsoft to respond else risk losing market share to the dozens of streaming boxes with gaming functionality that are releasing everyday with 4k support.
3, and in my opinion most important, many gamers have transitioned to the cell phone and tablet market where statistics show people commonly upgrade/replace their devices every 2 to 3 years to stay on top of the curve. This showed gaming companies that most consumers are willing to spend console kind of money more frequently provided it doesnt mean they lose their existing content. Its very likely that whatever shape the ps5 and next gen xbox take(although realistically the scorpio is already the next gen xbox) they will follow this new pattern and be basically huge upgrades to current systems that run the same or slightly revised OS to ensure full compatibility.

EddieNX 3083d ago

I just traded my XB1 for an S yday and gotvca great trade deal. I'll swap my S for a Scorpio as well if that deal is good also. I can afford it and I think its worth it personally. I'll upgrade my switch in 2-3 years no problem

60°

Absolutely Beautiful Sega Genesis Games

The three most beautiful sights in this world are: 1) your spouse on your wedding day 2) the birth of your first child 3) a walkthrough for Ecco the Dolphin in some long forgotten scrawl.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4h ago
Babadook71h ago

Have to install a few of these on my Apple TV.

80°

Nintendo Switch 2 Console review - Worthy Successor with Issues

"Nintendo Switch 2 is a safe and solid follow-up in many respects but it has its issues, including the Virtual Game Card system and an aging UI."

- Stuart Cullen, TechStomper

Read Full Story >>
techstomper.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

✔ Fixed
Bad Editing
Remove name of site from title
MaximusPrime_23h agoWhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community10h ago
Changed: title
Chilliersplash7h ago

Not sure what games you're playing to average 5 to 6 hours battery. Mariokart World and Zelda gets 2 and a half hours max.

gold_drake4h ago

not sure if its a successor or an upgrade.

and theres no way u get 5 hours.

100°

Even the Meta Quest can be an Xbox — Leaked images show an Xbox-branded Quest 3S

Windows Central writes: "CEO of Microsoft Gaming, Phil Spencer, had previously been vocally opposed to the idea of a native Xbox headset, stating in 2019 that 'nobody's asking for VR' on Xbox. However, Microsoft's marketing strategy for the Xbox Series X|S generation has shifted with the rise of Xbox Cloud Gaming and the 'This is an Xbox' marketing."

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (3)- Updates (3)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1d 10h ago
Changed: content
shadowT2d ago
Changed: content
shadowT2d ago
mooreneco211d 8h ago (Edited 1d 8h ago )

Ah, a contributing factor to Meta dropping PSVR2 support for Beat sabre! Microsoft’s always stuck with the modus operandi of “if you want an original idea steal someone else’s” and try to destroy markets they cannot win in. They are doing to to console gaming and now trying VR!

OtterX1d 8h ago

It's like a rich kid who pays the smart kid to do his homework for him.

*Yea, such a shame about Beat Saber dropping Playstation support btw. :\

DivineHand12513h ago

Why would this deal with Xbox cause meta to end beat Saber support for the psvr2 when the game isn't even available on Xbox?

It is more likely that psvr2 is under performing and they feel it is time to end support. The psvr2 headset only sells whenever there is a sale to make it competitive with the meta headset.

OtterX1d 8h ago

The XBox way. Hardware, even game development companies.... let them do the hard work of building things, throw them some money, then slap an XBox logo on it!

Jin_Sakai1d 8h ago (Edited 1d 8h ago )

Good old fragmentation. Just what Xbox needed.

IRetrouk1d 8h ago

Looks nicer than the standard one

PapaBop1d 5h ago

This is probably nothing more than a branding attempt to show Xbox really is on all platforms. The Quest already has the Xbox Cloud app that supposedly works great. Would be cool if Microsoft actually entered the VR space in a larger capacity but if they was doing that, I imagine they'd have showcased it at their summer showcase.

Vits1d 2h ago (Edited 1d 2h ago )

Yeah, it's basically the same idea as the ROG Ally Xbox. Just a regular device that gives you access to the Xbox library and carries the brand, but nothing really special or groundbreaking beyond that. It’s not some custom Xbox hardware, just a repackage of existing tech with a logo and some software perks.

Now, when it comes to VR, Microsoft actually made a pretty serious attempt with something called Windows Mixed Reality. It wasn’t just a headset, they were aiming for an open ecosystem. They had APIs for developers, support baked into Windows, and even tools to convert regular desktop content into VR environments. On paper, it was a solid play. But it never caught on, third part support was half-baked and basically only Samsung headsets were worth anything. After about five years of trying to push it, they gave up and shelved the whole thing.

The bigger issue here is that VR just isn't ready for the mainstream. People love to hype it up, but at the end of the day, it’s a hard sell unless it’s cheap enough to feel like an impulse buy and even when you can do that, you need to support it with software. Making it a extremelly expensive segment for any company, just look at Meta, bleeding literal billions every years trying to get this stuff off the ground, and they are the market leaders.

OptimusDK8h ago

I don’t understand how people don’t understand that this is a huge consumer benefit. When I buy all these hardware component’s I can take my games with me. How many of us have not ended up buying the same game for handheld, vr and console not to mention pc. Stop the clear console war dogs and recognise this is good for consumers.