430°

Zelda delay is a Nintendo bait and Switch disaster we've seen before

A potential Zelda delay could be a disaster for the Nintendo Switch launch.

Read Full Story >>
nintendotoday.com
CocoaBrother3140d ago

"The forever PG-focused Nintendo didn’t provide much of a reason for hardcore gamers to care about the console."

A rated M game doesn't make a game hardcore... why do people think it does?

Plus, Nintendo hasn't announced the launch line up yet so saying they haven't learned to have a solid launch line up is a tad premature in my opinion

ChickeyCantor3140d ago

Stop, my e-peen can only get so erect.

gamer78043140d ago

Yes and no, m rating doesn't make it hardcore but a hardcore system needs a variety of game types and age ranges

wonderfulmonkeyman3140d ago

Dude, we've got 13 year olds playing, and in some cases streaming, games as M-rated and "mature" as Dead Space, and mature adults with jobs and families playing, and in some cases streaming, games as E-rated and "kiddy" as Yoshi's Wolly World.
At this point, I think we can safely say that age ranges on titles don't really mean jack anymore.
Every game is basically for every gamer at this point; it just depends on the tastes of said gamer.

gamer78043140d ago

@wonderfulmonkeyman

I know some kids do but I couldn't disagree more saying that all families are like that.

Concertoine3140d ago

@gamer7804

Good thing he didn't say they all were.

Segata3140d ago

Not to mention Nintendo has published many M rated games

3140d ago
Moonman3140d ago

Maturity is something that can't be defined by age these days. Did you see the political race at times? LOL

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3139d ago
Summons753140d ago

Well the Zelda delay is still a rumor as far as I know so until there is confirmation why go into a tizzy? Also even if it is delayed, WHO CARES? I'd much rather have a game that works than a broken game with a 42gb day 1 patch. Look at FFXV, the previews before the September delay were saying frame rate is bad. Fast forward to Judgement Disc and the game is running smooth as butter....but yeah it's Nintendo so let's have a fit and scream DOOOOOOM.

jaymacx3140d ago

Exactly right. if they launched Zelda lets say June or July that's fine. As long as we have something until then.

Phunkydiabetic13140d ago

Dude! You totally WILL have something! Splatoon is supposedly the pack in game! So....you know....you can play a game thats been out for two years already!

UnHoly_One3139d ago

Don't forget 5 year old Skyrim that is already on PC and 4 other consoles

That's a system seller.

Shiken3140d ago

Zelda was never given a release month. It has always been 2017. People just ASSUMED it was March. The game could release in Dec 2017 and it still would not be "delayed" because no date was ever given.

I want it to come in March as much as the next guy but it is annoying to see people talk about delays that do not exist. In reality the game has only been delayed twice.

3140d ago
Gh05t3140d ago

Well considering it was first stated to come out in 2015 I don't know how you can say it's always been a 2017 release. Then in an interview they said it would be 2016, then delayed to 2017.

They showed it off on WiiU at E3 like it was almost ready. They have stated it would release on both consoles at the same time. Yes it's an assumption that it would be a release title but it's not far fetched and still over a year later than originally projected.

Shiken3140d ago

@Gh05t

Seeing how I mentioned that it was delayed twice, it should be obvious that I was refering to 2015 and 2016 being those two delays as they are the only ones to exist.

When I say always 2017, I am refering to when 2017 was actually announced onward. My point was that no month was given so any month in 2017 is technically not a delay at this point. I suppose I could have worded that better.

conanlifts3140d ago (Edited 3140d ago )

I mentioned this to a nintendo fan recently. They disagreed and seem to think zelda was a launch title. To date there is not a single launch game confirmed for switch. Nothing will be confirmed until January.
For me i bought a wii u day 1 and nintendo delayed pretty much every anounced game. I want to see guaranteed release dates for a long list of games before i consider ordering this device.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3140d ago
SegaGamer3140d ago

It's hardly a massive problem. There are plenty of other games out there to play while you wait anyway.

3140d ago Replies(3)
DiscoMan3140d ago

How so? The game is also being released on Wii U. The game isn't a good enough reason to buy a Switch if you already have a Wii U. There needs to be an exclusive reason to buy the Switch, and that is clearly the Mario game.

IanTH3136d ago (Edited 3136d ago )

I know this comment is on the late side to the point of being potentially pointless, but the Wii U didn't sell a ton and most people are going to be looking to pick up a Switch over Wii U to play the new Zelda on. It may not be a huge differentiator for you and me (assuming by your statement you are also a Wii U owner), but there are plenty of people where this is a big deal and they won't buy into the console until Zelda launches. The longer the install base takes to show up, the more apparent risk there are to developers looking to support it.

3140d ago
Show all comments (60)
410°

Microsoft planning “major” Xbox layoffs next week

The cuts are expected to be announced next week.

Microsoft is also planning thousands of job cuts that will impact other parts of it businesses

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
2h agoReplies(1)
2h agoReplies(1)
Obscure_Observer2h ago

MFs has been beating their chests over great quarterly results and big profits to shareholders while firing people by the thousands just like Sony.

I wonder if at the top of those rumored layoffs they´ll also cancel upcoming or unannounced games while shutting down more studios as well.

2h ago
pwnmaster30002h ago

Always got to throw shade at Sony smh.
Yes we get it,
MS good Sony bad
MS bad Sony is also bad lmao

2h ago
Obscure_Observer1h ago

F* them both!

Just for the record, I don´t care about your victim complex crap either. Find someone else who cares.

blacktiger54m ago

He was talking about both. Why you getting offended when he's using both names

pwnmaster300028m ago(Edited 27m ago)

@Blacktiger

Im not offended , that’s just his formula lol
He can’t help help himself, he needs to bring Sony down when the topic involves MS.
Whether is good news for MS or bad, it some how leads to Sony doing bad lmao.
It’s actually hilarious.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 16m ago
Tacoboto1h ago

"just like Sony"

Gosh you're insufferable, not everything needs to be both-sides'd. Sony's had layoffs, but nothing like what Microsoft has been doing and is continuing to do.

CrimsonWing691h ago(Edited 1h ago)

I mean, no offense, but this is why you’re not some corporate business person running a major corporation. Big profits don’t mean jobs are safe. Do you understand why things like this happen:

Cutting jobs to maintain or increase profitability, especially in underperforming divisions like parts of Xbox like other gaming divisions.

Corporate restructuring and relocating resources for strategic stability in ever changing markets and consumer behaviors.

Investor expectations and optimizing operations to maintain investor confidence. Whatever boosts stock prices and improves future margins.

And there’s many other factors at play. It’s never as simple as business doing well, everyone’s safe. That’s just you not understanding at all how corporations work and have been working since the beginning. This isn’t something that’s specific to Xbox, you can bet your ass Sony and Nintendo do this and if it’s not clear by now, game development is not a stable job nor has it ever been for many. A lot of developers are contractors and guess what happens when a project is done?

Ganif17m ago

Nintendo said they have no plans for layoffs, and you can't seriously claim that the scale of Sony's layoffs most of which involved Bungie which is self managed as even close to the same scale as what Microsoft has done since they purchased Zenimax. And that significantly less layoffs would have happened if those publishers had stayed independent. Keep in mind that much of these layoffs have been due to redundancies specifically related to these buyouts.

-Foxtrot1h ago

It's like banging your head off a wall, he just can't help himself.

Microsoft can do no wrong, Sony sucks at everything and Nintendo is bigged up because it's less hassle than trying to defend Microsoft all the time

What's going to happen when Microsoft finally turn completely third party, then what?

anast53m ago

I enjoy Obscure. Obscure does good work.

crazyCoconuts45m ago

Did you know that the first n4g was designed to be a perfect human world? Where none suffered, where everyone would be happy. It was a disaster. No one would accept the program.

Tacoboto6m ago

I wouldn't be surprised at this point if anast and osbcure were both alts for the Admin.

We know how Obscure especially drums up additional comments and clicks with his spam-worthy remarks that somehow never get moderated

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 6m ago
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 6m ago
1h ago
Show all comments (49)
80°

Sony Faces Class Action in the Netherlands Over Allegedly Inflated PlayStation Store Prices

Mass Damage & Consumer Foundation in the Netherlands has filed a class action against Sony for inflating PlayStation Store prices.

dveio1h ago(Edited 57m ago)

My personal opinion:

Manufacturers and publishers have indeed inflated the industry.

From $700 million development costs for games like Call of Duty, to digital (store) prices for games and DLCs, online multiplayer fees on consoles (why can you play Helldivers 2 online for free on PC but not consoles?) or still preventing sell/lend digitally purchased games.

Sometime in the future, this bubble will collapse.

They should know better, but they just can't help themselves and suck even the last penny out of our wallets.

anast41m ago

The Dutch gov. wants a piece of the pie.

Eonjay18m ago

They should be suing the individual publishers increasing the prices to $80 instead of suing the store. There are plenty of publishers still selling game for like $50 with much success (like E33). But this proves that the publishers are the ones setting the prices.... so again nothing changes because they aren't even going after the main offender. How is suing Sony going to make Microsoft not charge $80 for the next COD? Sony being the number one store in the market doesn't mean that publisher have to charge us an arm and a leg. Again the industry is laughing at us because consumers never get real representation. Just these fake platitudes that are meaningless.

60°

Nintendo Switch 2 review. Is it enough of an upgrade?

Two weeks in, Nintendo Switch 2 feels faster, smoother, and sturdier. But is it enough of an upgrade?

Read Full Story >>
clouddosage.com
anast46m ago

It doesn't matter. Nintendo plays by different rules. They are still reskinning games from the 80s.