GameXtract writes "The CryEngine 2 was like a gift from god, except the gift had a few holes. The engine brought photo realistic games like Crysis into our world, but like many angry PC gamers the hardware demand was horrid, and the game would crash beyond belief. CryEngine 1 also delivered stunning animations for its time. The islands generated by the CryEngines were simply the best of their generation. Now with both engines released, and games to showcase their powers, comparisons is a good way to show just how far we have gone from the 1st CryEngine to the 2nd in a matter of years. After the jump we have comparisons screenshots of similar moments in FarCry, and Crysis. This is not a competition for which game is more epic than the other, but to simply see the amazing progress between the engines. Get all the comparisons after the jump!"
Get the full comparison after the jump.
Holger Frydrych has just released a cool VR Mod for the 2007 version of Crytek's first-person shooter, Crysis.
Playing it right now looks amazing! :D
so much fun, i hope they make a vr mod for crysis 2 / 3 too!
This is amazing. This is the direction VR should go in to boost adoption. Since I have beaten every Crysis except 1, this is now a good excuse to correct that problem.
According to Crytek CEO Cervat Yerli, "I want[ed] to make sure Crysis does not age, that [it] is future proofed, meaning that if I played it three years from now, it should look better than today." Yerli and the team designed Crysis' highest graphical settings for the PC hardware of 2010 and beyond.
While Crytek has officially announced Crysis 4 is in development, nothing new has surfaced. For now, gamers' only way to scratch that itch is to play the Crysis Remastered Trilogy available on PC and consoles.
OG 2007 Crysis (not the remastered weirdo), is & will forever be a legend amongst the PC community.
I mean the lighting and physics still hold up extremely well. I still revisit it from time to time.
I remember when I tried to play Crysis with my Intel Pentium Dual core E2200 @2.2GHz , 4GB ram and GeForce 9400gt. I was a kid back then and that was the best I could do. I would get about 15 to 20 fps. When I over clocked the CPU to 2.8GHz I would get about 40fps. The experience wasn't good at all and it was the only PC game I could not run back then unless and put the settings on low. At that point the game went from cutting edge graphics to PS2 graphics. To this day I haven't completed the OG Crysis. I was able to complete Crysis 2 and 3 after building a new PC when I got my first job.
"The shader work that came out of this was mind-blowing at times."
Well worth the extra work ! I enjoyed all 3 Crisis games and would also love a new one .
Still wish game development was overall this passionate and minutious about their projects. Obviously, there are still some great studios as exceptions.
I haven't beaten the first Crysis but I did play Crysis 2 and Crysis 3. I know some PC players were annoyed by the last 2 games being developed with consoles in mind but I believe it was an improvement. I had a great time with Crysis 3 to the point where I believe it was too short.
i think killzone 2 is going to p9und this game into the korean sand,
HMM...
I THINK CRYSIS LOOKS BETTER.
im kinda worried about the graphics in the console versions.. hopefully its close to pc graphics.