310°

Activision Confirms StarCraft II for 2009

The interesting fact with this presentation is that while we recently got confirmation that StarCraft II won't be joining us for the Christmas of 2008, but we WILL be seeing StarCraft II sometime during 2009.

"Next year's offerings from Activision Blizzard should include highly anticipated PC strategy title StarCraft II, the sequel to one of the world's most enduringly popular games."

Read Full Story >>
starcraftwire.net
Leord5715d ago

Well, as the article say, this is no big surprise, and Blizzard COULD probably postpone the release to 2010 just to mess with Activision, but I think this sounds pretty solid, especially considering the source.

theCHUNK5715d ago

More or less what I expected. If the beta is out by Christmas, we might see the full title by the summer.

Leord5715d ago

Yeah, that would be my guess as well. Perhaps less time between beta start and release though, so a beta after Christmas... Hopefully earlier release as well...

Evilswissmiss5715d ago (Edited 5715d ago )

Can't wait to see SC2. Looks good.

Synteny5715d ago

By the looks of it, I would expect SC2 to be released around Q3 with a demo released a few months before.

I would only expect a 2010 release if they hit a big snag somewhere in development, but that seems somewhat unlikely since the problems with unit identity and micro/macro balance are already here and should be sorted out soon (hopefully).

Leord5715d ago

Well, I still think Q3 is pessimistic. Ofc, it all depends on the Zerg and Protoss Single Player game. I think Battle.net 2.0 has a separate dev team. I think I heard them talking like that, Jay Wilson that is. Perhaps he reffered to StarCraft 2 team, who knows, but I bet a beta is quicker than you say.

TheCHUNK seems quite on spot. Beta at or after Christmas, and release in the summer/spring.

It's hard to know as Blizz obviously did a lot of polishing before showing off the different builds around the globe...

kalos5714d ago

I doubt we'll see a demo before launch. The Warcraft 3 demo came over six months after the game's launch, making it mildly pointless. It'd be nice if Blizzard actually did this, but they'll probably not if their track record is anything to go by.

Leord5715d ago

And woho! I just got my 7th bubble from someone kind! Thanks you a lot =D

SlyGuy5715d ago

Oh well. Already many other games to play in '08.

Sigh...See u in 2009 then.

Show all comments (16)
90°

It Seems Pretty Clear Why StarCraft 3 is Not a Thing Yet

Even though fans have been clamoring for a StarCraft 3 for years now, it seems like Blizzard really has no reason to spend time making one.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
StormSnooper160d ago

They sort of ran the story as far as it could go.

Also, it seems like blizzard is more busy with mediocrity at this point in time.

Jingsing160d ago

The problem with Blizzard is they have franchises that don't need sequels. People are happy playing the games that they previously made. What they need is new games, none of this business of trying to transport the old audience into a new version of an old game which only ends up nickle and dime'ing users.

170°

$15 horse for WoW made more money than StarCraft 2: Wings of Liberty

Jason Hall, currently an indie developer and former Blizzard employee, has been sharing some really interesting stories from his long career in the industry for a while now. Some of them are truly insightful, while others may seem depressing.

Read Full Story >>
gameworldobserver.com
Sciurus_vulgaris163d ago

I’m a little shocked that StarCraft 2: Wings of Liberty sold only around 6 million copies. The original StarCraft did over 11 million. Maybe Blizzard was too leisurely in releasing StarCraft 2? Starcraft 2 came out 12 years after it’s predecessor.

Plague-Doctor27162d ago (Edited 162d ago )

Im surprised too. Starcraft was still a huge name in 2010. It was kinda the only new RTS around and other genres like MOBAs hadn't really kicked off yet. I do remember at the time sentiment around the game was
pretty angry the game was being split into 3 but I doubt that would have impacted sales to that degree

Sciurus_vulgaris162d ago

For a long time I believed StarCraft II sold on par or better than its predecessor. There was so much hype for the game. Plus it had a pretty strong E-Sports scene for a few years.

Myself and half a dozen friends all bought StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty and played it religiously for a full year. While I bought the expansions, most of my friends did not. RPGs seem to be a generally low selling genre.

Nerdmaster162d ago

I'm not shocked at all. This was an early example of Blizzard being greedy. Instead of releasing a complete experience, splitting Starcraft 2 in 3 parts so it could make us purchase it 3 times if we wanted to know the whole story and play story mode with the other races.

Sciurus_vulgaris162d ago

I originally had that stance. However, Wings of Liberty, was just as long, if not longer than StarCraft 1. The expansions were of decent length too and added a good amount of additional content.

il-JumperMT162d ago

and people wonder why we are having mtx in everything. i blame the people who actual buy them.

Nerdmaster162d ago

It's interesting he used Brazil as an example of the importance of regional pricing. Nowadays many companies on Steam are setting their prices in Brazil as high as, if not more than, their price in USA. I simply refused to buy a few games when I noticed that's the case.

Extermin8or3_162d ago

This right here is the fucking problem.

161d ago
70°

Star Discord is a StarCraft lookalike optimised for mobile by a one-man team, out now

Illogical Games has just announced the official release of Star Discord, the one-man indie dev's charming StarCraft lookalike on mobile.

Read Full Story >>
pocketgamer.com
XiNatsuDragnel831d ago

I wish for a console version too