1100°

Battlefield 5 Reports: Fans Won't Expect This One; DICE Did an Amazing Work Once Again

With the Battlefield 5 reveal set for this Friday, more hints have been dropped by industry professionals about it.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
Chris_Wray3006d ago

I'll remain skeptical. While I've always enjoyed BF, none of them have ever been as good as 'insiders' have said. None have ever hit the heights that BF2 managed to hit, more than likely a consequence of diverting much needed time into a single-player mode.

Not to mention that if Battlefront is anything to go by, my hopes are far from high.

kaiserfranz3006d ago

Well, Battlefront left out single player altogether. But I feel that it was a half-hearted effort, with them already busy with Mirror's Edge Catalyst and this new Battlefield

garrettbobbyferguson3006d ago (Edited 3006d ago )

Half hearted effort is putting nicely. They legitimately did not get a f**k about Battlefront. No single player campaign, no loadouts, nothing like the original games. They didn't even care enough to make it at minimum have the same features that any of the recent Battlefield games have. They sold it on name alone. Oh but I guess pretty graphics is good enough for most people. I used to say that Bioshock Infinite was the game that has let me down the most out of my 20+ years of gaming, but that has now gone to Battlefront.

Nathan_Hale533005d ago

It was a minimum effort game. Looked fucking gorgeous but that was it... Became dead within a year and sucked. If they want a MP ONLY game they need a lot more than fucking dance moves.

Alexious3005d ago

Agreed, they might have bitten more than they can chew. I wasn't thrilled by the Mirror's Edge Catalyst beta.

JodiePollard3005d ago

I'm making over $10k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life. Go to tech tab for work detail...This is what I do.. www.earnmore9.com

SolidStoner3005d ago

Battlefield need to go back where its started... 1942... everything else will be a waste, enough with that future/modern/infinite warfare.........

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3005d ago
Paytaa3006d ago

I'm still waiting for a Battlefield to be on par or better than Bad Company 2. That game was a milestone on my time with the 360. So much fun and even had an enjoyable satirical campaign that was a breath of fresh air compared to the overly serious FPS campaigns. Multiplayer was some of the best ever made imo.

Granted, I never played much of BF2 since I've never been a PC gamer predominately and the BF2: Modern Combat game for the 360 wasn't that good in my opinion.

Ickythump313006d ago (Edited 3006d ago )

BF2 is like the holy grail of battlefield. God i miss that game. Bad company 2 was also very good, but nothing compares to BF2 :)

vickers5003006d ago

Played both bad companies, bf3 and bf4, BF1943, and BF3 in ,my opinion is by far the best. Though I got it several months after launch, so I didn't have to put up with any of the connection issues launch titles usually suffer from.

Also got the BF3 season pass for free during the bf store glitch, and that had so much content it was like a brand new game. And I played BF3 on ps3 too. The controls, even with the input lag (which I ended up preferring, the 2nd patched version I believe) were smooth as butter, the maps were great, the weapons, hell, even the sounds are far better than BF4. I played BF4 on ps4, and shortly afterwards, switched to BF3 on ps3, and the audio is far better in BF3 for some reason.

With the season pass content, BF3 surpassed my previous favorite, Call of Duty 4, as my most beloved multiplayer shooter. BF3 for me is most definitely MY holy grail battlefield game.

BlackTar1873006d ago

No love in this chain for BF2142? BF2 and BF2142 are amazing. I really liked 1942 & 1943 and BF3 as well.

BF4 was a huge letdown

and i know im a minority but i liked BF hardline.

oof463006d ago

BC2 multiplayer was soooo much fun...even when getting spawn raped (which was it's main negative), but it was the single player that shined, in my opinion. I mean, what other military shooters would have the protagonists debating on such important topics as super powers and the movie Predator?

Edito3005d ago

I feel the same, Bad Company 2 was a hell of a game i had so much fun but i don't think they can reproduce what was good about that game, time has changed now everyone is focused on crappy multiplayer games that are dead on arrival...

b163o13005d ago

So what if BFBC2 came with BF5, even the MP with all of the DLC? Would that sweeten the pot even more?

I loved BC2, I actually loved the campaign, and it was one of my first experiences with online MP, blow my friggen mind! I have never spent more time in a BF game. Never.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3005d ago
seanpitt233006d ago

How big is dice I mean they have worked on battlefront, mirrors edge 2 and now battlefield 5 and they all released so close to one another. That's probably why battlefront had so little content I mean no developer can work on 3 massive games simultaneously and have lots of content.

UltraNova3005d ago

As big as EA wants them to be, apparently.

porkChop3005d ago

DICE didn't make Battlefront. Don't listen to the marketing, "from the makers of Battlefield." It was made by DICE Los Angeles. They were originally called EA Los Angeles and then Danger Close. They made the Medal of Honour games, including the horrible Warfighter. *Some* DICE employees moved to the studio, but it's not really a DICE studio. DICE Los Angeles is a studio that has had to change its name multiple times to get away from the crap games it made in the past.

starchild3006d ago

Good for you. I've enjoyed all the Battlefield games. They're my favorite military-type shooters.

I'm super excited to see what they've done with Battlefield 5.

hardcorehenry3006d ago

I think basing your expectation of the new Battlefield on Battlefront is a mistake. Battlefront is a casual experience through and through. Battlefield is an unstoppable machine. I am infinitely hyped. GOTY 2016.

PiperMCFierceson3006d ago (Edited 3006d ago )

Bf4 is easily one of this gens gems. Hands down their best work. Aside from a nusense "friend" infrastructure.

Khaotic3006d ago

Give dice some credit, while battlefront was one of the most shallow games and I had my fill in a three night rental, it was a technical masterpiece from a graphical and sound standpoint.

Kingthrash3603005d ago

Little bird told me it's about time travel.
Little bird = own brain
But the clues I've heard point to it. I heard ww1 then ww2 the future then ww2 again...why not have them all with time travel? Thet would surprise gamers at least

woyubu3005d ago

Sᴛᴀʀᴛ ᴡᴏʀᴋɪɴɢ ғʀᴏᴍ ʜᴏᴍᴇ! Gʀᴇᴀᴛ ᴊᴏʙ ғᴏʀ sᴛᴜᴅᴇɴᴛs, sᴛᴀʏ-ᴀᴛ-ʜᴏᴍᴇ ᴍᴏᴍs ᴏʀ ᴀɴʏᴏɴᴇ ɴᴇᴇᴅɪɴɢ ᴀɴ ᴇxᴛʀᴀ ɪɴᴄᴏᴍᴇ... Yᴏᴜ ᴏɴʟʏ ɴᴇᴇᴅ ᴀ ᴄᴏᴍᴘᴜᴛᴇʀ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀ ʀᴇʟɪᴀʙʟᴇ ɪɴᴛᴇʀɴᴇᴛ ᴄᴏɴɴᴇᴄᴛɪᴏɴ... Mᴀᴋᴇ $90 ʜᴏᴜʀʟʏ ᴀɴᴅ ᴜᴘ ᴛᴏ $12000 ᴀ ᴍᴏɴᴛʜ ʙʏ ғᴏʟʟᴏᴡɪɴɢ ʟɪɴᴋ ᴀᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ʙᴏᴛᴛᴏᴍ ᴀɴᴅ sɪɢɴɪɴɢ ᴜᴘ... Yᴏᴜ ᴄᴀɴ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ʏᴏᴜʀ ғɪʀsᴛ ᴄʜᴇᴄᴋ ʙʏ ᴛʜᴇ ᴇɴᴅ ᴏғ ᴛʜɪs ᴡᴇᴇᴋ...

COPY & PASE THIS LINK —————->> www.cashapp24.com

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 3005d ago
Deadpooled3006d ago

Make sure it works from launch this time :)

GUTZnPAPERCUTZ3006d ago

I know man... Was so excited when I bought an X1 and BF4 the same day, but pissed that I could not play it for a couple months since it was straight BROKE lol

dillhole3006d ago

BF4 became a great game in my opinion. But it had such a bad reputation by the time it was working. Hopefully they learnt.....

Deadpooled3004d ago

Still plenty of players online BF4 on PS4, no difficulty in finding games. But if it worked from launch there would probably be more players online now.

3005d ago
Phil323006d ago

Here's hoping it gets fans excited and makes them happy.

detroitmademe3006d ago

I think it'll be a good game and I think it'll be a great game when compared to it's peers. these days "average" is the new the"good". In my opinion the multiplayer shooter market is up for grabs. Just look at the landscape, people are actually excited for a cod remaster😒. if that's not a sign that the shooter genre is up for grabs then I don't know what is.

Alexious3006d ago

Overwatch may disrupt the FPS market much like World of Warcraft did with MMORPGs. Blizzard's magic may work once again

UltraNova3005d ago (Edited 3005d ago )

I can definitely see this happening. Knowing Blizzard they would never 'try and see' anything, if they are doing a new genre/type of game its because they plan to dominate it that particular landscape for years.

Don't forget WoW's appeal and subscribers are diminishing day by day for sometime now. Blizzard needs the next WoW and persistent online FPSs are today's thing.

On topic,

I would love to see Dice bring some of that Bad company quirkiness back to the franchise, in other words do their own fps again not try and get closer to CoD.

Majin-vegeta3006d ago

Well ita COD4 the pinnacle of the series.

Alexious3006d ago

Right, but that's with the nostalgia glasses on. Not sure if COD4 right now, as is, will be as appealing. We'll see

-Foxtrot3006d ago

Once again? So another shitty launch then?

nevin13006d ago (Edited 3006d ago )

Your Avatar matches your comment.

VerdicLinwe3006d ago

I swear to God Foxtrot I think sometimes you don't even care about making a point - you just like to see your own post count go up.

-Foxtrot3006d ago

I was making a point. Saying "once again" while Battlefield 4 took almost a year to become something which should have been at launch.

Jesus.

AgentSmithPS43006d ago

It's sad that so many lickspittles and apologists are trying to defend them after all the broken games they've released.

Hold_It3006d ago

It's sad that the same people complaining about Battlefield 4's launch are a lot of the same people that defend Bethesda's games.

Khaotic3006d ago

@ermac shots fired , I repeat shots fired...lol

Austin483005d ago

Im with foxtrot here why does anyone need to defend the fact that battlefield 4 launch was just plain awful it of course wasnt as crappy as battlefront now that was a joke lmao nothing but graphics and good sounds with that game thats all no SP or anything and remember its EA they will crush your dreams.

VerdicLinwe3005d ago (Edited 3005d ago )

Fox made his point after I called him on his op. Let's not be so dramatic. If your dreams are hung on these games you should step back and take a deep breath.

3005d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3005d ago
Show all comments (141)
110°

Battlefield V now broken on Steam Deck / Linux with EA anticheat live

That's all folks. EA anticheat has now been added into Battlefield V, so it's the end of being able to play it on Steam Deck and other Linux systems.

This joins the likes of Plants vs. Zombies Garden Warfare 2: Deluxe Edition, EA SPORTS FC 24, EA SPORTS FIFA 23, Battlefield 2042 and Madden NFL 24 that all have EA's own homegrown anti-cheat that make them simply unplayable on systems running Linux.

Now if you try to run it, you'll be greeted with an error. A shame to see a game that's multiple years old get broken like this and no doubt EA will continue to use their own EA anticheat in future online games. Battlefield 1 is still okay, and Apex Legends is also still running but perhaps it's only a matter of time before EA force it onto those too?

Read Full Story >>
gamingonlinux.com
just_looken112d ago

more comments here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/St...
https://steamcommunity.com/...

47 comments in hours bf5 won't launch anymore ea is saying meh not my prob bitch tosses a faq
https://answers.ea.com/t5/B...

Yes counter cheating that is good but when the ea app on pc is still totally broken and these cheaters are on 2042 same anti cheat this is just putting scotch tape on trumps file cabinet to prevent leaks its nothing more than a stop gap.

I mention ea app as for 4years it was in beta then tossed out with 3 year old issues and i still cant not get the products that i purchased on origin yeah i purchased digital but guess what there is no dvd games on pc anymore.

Philaroni112d ago

Likewise, I'm about to do some games with some friends here but if you wish to PM me I could share my Discord if you like to talk further. Oddly you bring up THQ that I did some work for in the past.

Also for Starfield I have just a Stock GTX 1080. Not even the 1080i version on an ultra wide and with some Ini, changes and other weird things I know I got it working at Series X frame rate. Sure not the the fancy graphics options. I know Bethesda games have always been more CPU then GPU limiting. A good application I don't see many using is Process lasso. It helps with may CPU heavy games on PC. (Battletech is the main one I use it for) Can find it here if you like. https://bitsum.com/

""Xbox has made custom engines like forza/unreal they used to support epic back in the day like slipstream like you said but they make so much cash they do not need to work as much as sony.

But the issue i find is the lack of passion behind games aswell as the mass amount of users that love the broken/microtransantion filled games we get every day. Back in the day when a game was crap or had something wrong it was a oh crap are we going to get shutdown or like thq just poof gone. But today its na who cares fix it later or write it off then oh wait never mind they like it such as the new cod.""

Going to combine me response here. You are right, MS and I do feel like what they do with not just Froza and also the tech they use in Flight Sim. Is not given enough credit. If I am correct the next Fable game is going to be using a mix of things from the Turn 10 Team, maybe Unreal? Hard to say at this point, But MS along with Sony both own a full License of the tech (Days Gone for Sony) I agree with you on the talent and passion part, games have become too much, at least AAA games the 'Milk, butter, eggs and toast" to support places now days. Innovations in gameplay and such has fell lower and lower. I still don't see mechanics and ways of playing games like I did so many years back, its a bummer.

For MS maybe the end as even though they might have a massive advantage in software and services (I use to work in Azure) They can kind of do some things at cost but seem to fail at it a lot. The cloud gaming push I don't think is going to have the effect so many hope for (Not sure why anyone wants that) I still want MS to have a chance but, if I sit here with my magic dice and roll it on MS games over the last forever, it could land on Crackdown 3 (Remember that?) The cloud powered game... and now they are trying to do it again with Kojima some what. As an engineer, its not happening now, tomorrow or anything in the next 24 years. I remember back on this interview with John,

https://www.reddit.com/r/nv...

We are not even at that point yet. So hope we get there and I hope MS is still a player but I do feel you are right in many ways, they are already trying to slowly retreat just by the rhetoric alone.

Ether way again PM me and we should talk more, would love to do so.

Philaroni112d ago

The rough part of all of this is that for those of us on PC mostly be it Windows or Linux based, the anti-cheat sucks up a lot of resources. It kind of reminds me of the conversation between, security and freedom. Too much of ether is both good if managed well or very bad. We just as gamers keep seeing this pop up over and over again. Wish I had some magic wand to stop cheaters... but I don't... hell we just seen what happened with Apex at a high level event.. getting that kind of access and such is not good... but at the same time. Can anyone, one person provide me an example where Anti Cheat has even like a hit rate above 50? I know I'm pulling numbers out of my ass, but it seems the cheaters beat the systems in place time and time again. Where there is a lock, and a smith to make it. We always will have a thief that breaks it.

just_looken112d ago (Edited 112d ago )

I can

Sense everyone seems to have brain rot and forgot the ps3 that is the solution.

The ps3 for its first half had systems that would only launch the game if it saw you had a ps3 controller along with a inhouse operating system and a real gpu/cpu it was way harder to run cheats off of along with the ability to make custom rooms.

Yes there were p2p lag switching then later on thanks to that dev kit leak cheat menus but for years games like killzone/mag had dedicated servers that were hard to crack a operating system/cpu those in public had 0 knowledge how to make stuff on them.

Right now if they put all mp files on the server so we just stream the game that would be a huge step or make the multiplayer run in a sanboxed mode separate on the system.

Philaroni112d ago

I'm glad you brought that up that Killzone had Dedicated servers. I remember the Yellow Dog Linux days of PS3, as well. EA use to do more Dedicated Servers for games but as time went on they would 'rent them out' and slowly the official servers would die down.

P2P Lag always had that magical thing (Gears 2 (Aak the shot gun) and Halo 2,3) fans know as host advantage. That alone allowed for lags switches, booting of others from games. ECT. (Though I admit, was the most fun I had when our team could beat cheaters. Man was that a good time)

I fully agree with you, the fact so much is working how it is has in a hard way compromised network/client security issue. I'll pick on COD for example where some assets are local and other are on server, between games and between even evolutions/iterations of the engines used.

just_looken112d ago

@phil

Thank you for the reply i am glad others on here remember

Now back to the series x having games with the same frame rate as a 2005 xbox 360 but the masses thinking that is fine and next gen.

Starfield on series x native 780ishp fallout 3 xbox 360 720p both 30fps gaming has "grown so much"

Sadly we are not in large numbers and see mp/sp tech wise/cheater wise has gotten worse not better.

Philaroni112d ago

I hate to say it about Starfield I'd have too look at reports from way back when. I swear to god they said it was going to launch with Creation Kit 2 (I worked with 1 alot in Skyrim mods in the block based aka cell based structure) Back then it was great, but for the life of me I don't know how a Studio like Obsidian can make a game same as Bethesda but with less bugs and bull shit. (Fallout Veg and Outer Worlds) Not that it was with out bugs but when a 3rd party does better with your own tech... I find an issue... with it all.

Frame rate stuff I only understand from two points, design and marketing. On the Design part yes back in the day 30FPS was I swear almost more common then now days. It was not a design compromise to keep it at 30 as the hardware and the way the game was being 'displayed' (Key thing there) was as impactful. Now days I feel the Marketing side wants a 4K trailer running likely rendered on a Xbox or PS system with little text saying (Oh wit was on a PC that no one is able to afford... of course teasing there a bit.)

I do understand that Starfield is a 'simulated world' where like every item you drop is there, for like forever... cool, that is not too new now days and design wise, is kind of a dumb thing.... who cares how many carrots you can collect... is it cool sure, makes for good PR in some ways. Lack of tangible game play is the issue. I can't take credit for this but a buddy of mine worked in advertising and I shit you not at Fast food. They would make wax and even 3D print now and then post render foods you would get, just for you as the client at a Burger King to not be given as you where sold on. (((( He did not work for them FYI.. but others)))

Issue with gaming as you are saying is too much is on the 'presentation.' It does not sell like it use too, that type of advertising. Most of it is word of mouth, who my friends tell me is a good game or not, what my friends are playing. Then comes the reviews.

Its dumb that our next gen systems feel like we gone all but up a step that we already went down two to three on. Take Uncharted 4 for example 30FPS SP and 60 MP. That I can deal with, and that was a PS4 game.

I do at times dis Xbox a lot, but come on, they still have yet to make there own damn game engine. Slipstream failed heavily, where Sony and most of their own studios have tech they made for the games they are trying to build. I am unsure how Xbox is again now saying the 'next' system will be the best ever. Sure it will be duh? Tech changes and grows, but I never seen a system use it so poorly. (I blame alot on the bloated Xbox OS FYI)

just_looken112d ago

@phil

You can have both presentation and framerate pc's have been doing both for decades now 4k ray tracing bla bla yeah that is different but starfield is no maxed out minecraft with its seed tech with ray tracing minecraft uses seeds also with huge buildings but for years pc's can do 60fps on that.

I mentioned 30fps because back in the day we had hd consoles alot of users had sd tv's just getting into hd tv's so i get the graphics difference but we are talking about 20years of hardware difference.

A real hardware console 6700 3700x 16gb of ram can run starfield at 60fps not maxed out but its possible this was pre performance patches:
https://youtu.be/hNM488QIKO...

Remember the apu/igpu tablet crap the consoles are using are based off of the 6700

The xbox operating system has always been windows based from windows 2000/xp xbox-xbox 360 the tail end of the 360 using vista/7 then to the series x using windows 10 that is why backwards compatibility works great its all direct x based with the same bc as a window's pc. What we see today is just the change from needing games to survive to making games as a product m$ makes more money in a week than what sony can make in months.

Xbox has made custom engines like forza/unreal they used to support epic back in the day like slipstream like you said but they make so much cash they do not need to work as much as sony.

But the issue i find is the lack of passion behind games aswell as the mass amount of users that love the broken/microtransantion filled games we get every day. Back in the day when a game was crap or had something wrong it was a oh crap are we going to get shutdown or like thq just poof gone. But today its na who cares fix it later or write it off then oh wait never mind they like it such as the new cod.

The new cod is making bank yes users hated it but the sales show the masses that do not post love it sadly

Heck did you see that wow has limited time store items now with hundreds online defending it because they think the store its what's need to keep the game online despite the $15 a month payment and m4 ownership.

I find in the end of this generation Microsoft will go the way of sega they might also just buy sony as everything sony except music/games is not making money they are a cheap buy for microsoft right now so we would just have 2 companies fighting in the gaming ring with papa os watching from the sidelines.

Great chatting 2 you may i recommend looking at rpgm games? they are out there even though i have a i9 4090 custom rig right now along with a ps5 i have been playing 4yr old games or rpgm stuff this year. Its funny i remember being a 2360/ps3 owner stacks of adventures now i am like well time to see what is in the past.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 112d ago
80°

EA anticheat and Battlefield

Battlefield V, getting easy anticheat

We're pleased to share that EA Anticheat will be extended to #BattlefieldV this Wednesday, April 3rd at 08:00 UTC.

You will need to restart your game to benefit from the changes of this Client Update.

Learn more via our updated EA Anticheat Blog:

just_looken121d ago

Other sources from battlefield official accounts.

https://twitter.com/Battlef...

https://www.reddit.com/r/Ba...

So steamdeck might have issues and those out there that are anti kernal drm will get a surprise. Depending on your setup you also might get new issues as i know rgb software likes to fight with easy anti cheat.

140°

Amazon Digital Game Sale For Xbox Series X/S & Xbox One

Daily Video Game writes: "There is a new digital game sale Amazon is offering for both Xbox Series X/S and Xbox One that heavily discounts several popular titles like GRID Legends, Mass Effect Legendary, Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order, and more for Xbox owners right now!"

Read Full Story >>
dailyvideogame.com