Adam Cook: "Colm and Dan have to argue from the opposite stand-point, but the key thing here is that it's irrelevant if they believe it, deep-down, just that they convince the adjudicator (in this case that's me) if they believe it or not."
from paulsemel.com: In this exclusive Q&A, the author of the new technothriller based on "Tom Clancy's: The Division" discusses how it ties to the games while also bringing its own story to a close.
If you're looking to try out an exciting, team-based shoot 'em up, The Division is currently on sale on Steam!
TIM WHITE WRITES: "Multiplayer or single player? Developers, you can do both, just not willy-nilly."
I hate when I see single player games and see people begging for multi-player. Jeez guys it don't need to be on every game. Latest one I seen was atomic heart.
Multiplayer or even co-op
If it was always a single player game then that's how it is
It's a trend that never really went away. For me multiplayer in a primarily SP focused game was an excuse for DLC. Then there's the mentality gamers had that adding multiplayer makes a game worth the price, otherwise it should be half price for half a game. A way of thinking devs reassured when they started adding multiplayer to their sequels. We see the same with multiplayer focused games getting SP in their sequels.
Tbh multilayer now is a way to add live service and mtx elements, very rarely does it come of well.
What single players game used to be in a lot of cases now require 3 other people for keeping to really enjoy it and I hate having to rely on others to get the maximum from a game.
Sp should be sp, if devs want to add a separate multi mode then that's fine with me, the legends addition to ghost of tshushima was fricking sick but totally separate to the main game. Sick of co op too.
I remember when certain single player games had them as included optional modes that was played on the couch. Had brilliant times with Syphon Filter and Golden Eye. Me and my bro used to used to fight over who would play as Gabe even though it was technically just a skin. Good times.
No. Because I'll be too busy playing it & making my own opinion of it than be bothered reading anyone elses opinion. Lol.
Right now it doesn't matter however if The Division turns into another Destiny, it'll very much matter and do a lot of damage to Ubisoft's reputation and credibility.
Yes it does. If a game company doesn't have enough faith in their product to have it reviewed why should I have faith in it being good. Mind you, I don't take a single number as gospel when deciding if I should purchase or not but I do read for consistent pros and cons after many comparisons.
Not enough reviewers on servers plus play time to review game correctly, it would be like reviewers playing a beta wkd again kinda.
We all had chance to play the game during open beta to know if the games for you or not, simples. Its basically destiny with modern earth story with only time will tell, better end game content to keep you busy.
Keep your expectations in check, for me personally i will be all over this until winter season pass content drops, after that i will move onto horizon zero dawn as i never play any game for more than a yr before i move on to other games.
I will get my Gold Edition moneys worth, enjoyment playing with my 3 psn buddies of 8 yrs and more over the course of the yr.
For me no, just like I wont care about reviews or scores for No Mans Sky (although I have played Division) as both are games I will buy/play regardless.