Approvals 6/3 ▼
Lethaltare (2) - 2975d ago Cancel
DrKarateChop (2) - 2974d ago Cancel
Maltaze (2) - 2975d ago Cancel
90°

The Division: Here's Why It's Perfectly Fine to Have No Early Reviews

TCC: This time, we’re giving Ubisoft the green light for its inability to have early review copies

Read Full Story >>
thecountrycaller.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

✔ Fixed
Bad Editing
When copying text from the source article make sure you read over the text and edit it if necessary. A good example is when a site writes "We" or "I" , as this should then be replaced with the site's or person's name, or you can quote the source.
DarkOcelet2975d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
✔ Fixed
Add/remove tag
Add game tag
DarkOcelet2975d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community2974d ago
Changed: content
HopsonLewis2975d ago
DragonDDark2975d ago (Edited 2975d ago )

No, it's not fine. People want to know if the game is good or not..

ArchangelMike2975d ago

But the servers don't go live until the day the game launches. So how to you want them to review the game without any servers? Would it be a review that reflects the gaming experience? No. So would it be a valid review? No.

What's wrong with waiting a week after the game is released, and then reading the reviews when people have had proper hands on time with the retail version. Heck whats wrogn with waiting a month, when all the day one patches and early bug fixes have been implemented?

C-H-E-F2974d ago

Uhh there was an open beta... if they didn't try that out to get a feel for it then why should we cater to their laziness? lOl the Beta is a good enough "review" in my book. Definitely day 1 purchase "Physical Gold Edition" in my book.

Adexus2974d ago

There was a closed alpha, closed beta and an open beta, if people don't know whether or not they'll enjoy the game by now then I don't know what to say.

Silver_ShadoWolf2974d ago

Exactly. People had multiple chances to try the game before release. But what I am really concerned about is why do people need others to judge if the game is good or not? Can you not make a decision for yourself? Do they not realize that game reviews are completely one-sided and cater to like-minds instead of the majority?

I suggest people play video games for themselves. With the option to rent games, you should not need some lazy, no-life guy who is to pathetic to get up and get a real job to give you advice on anything. ANYTHING. Their career path shows how unreliable they are. SMH

Bebedora2974d ago

I like this a lot more. Maybe I will start believe in those reviews again.

How many times hasn't a demo/beta been out to try out a game, and the retail version is way off the mark? I have lost count.

People obviously have a short term memory.

pumpactionpimp2974d ago

The reason people want reviews is because of the taste destiny left in everyone's mouth. Sure everyone who was interested tried the beta, and know what the game is all about. But how much game is there? What else is there to do? What kind of high level/endgame content is there? Etc? I know I personally am looking for answers to those questions.

C-H-E-F2974d ago

@pump
Destiny was horrible in the Alpha bad in the Beta and ehh in the retail...

Why destiny always brought up when it comes to The Division? Like no there is no STANDARD with that game... that game isn't a standard... and as for the beta to a game... betas/demos whatever you would like to call them are not that different than the retail versions... reviewers, review the game and it's an OPINION... nothing more... if you need someones opinion to help you buy something you may/may not like after playing it first hand then maybe you shouldn't get it. Because you are already on edge. Is all i'm saying. if you need to be talked into it, then obviously you didn't like what you experienced so far from the beta.

pumpactionpimp2974d ago (Edited 2974d ago )

Telling me how much content, and what is in a game, isn't opinion c-h-e-f. I don't buy a car, house, tv, or anything else before it's out, without knowing it's specs, and comparing it to the next closest thing. So why do it for a video game? The comparison to destiny was not a gameplay, or mechanics comparison. It was a comparison to how they chose to present their game. Hype it up, then release, and not allow reviews to sucker everyone in to buying day 1. I want to know if the division has a story. If it has enough gameplay (pve) to keep me interested for a while. I would also like to know if they just expect us to grind relentlessly (like destiny) as an end game mechanic, or if they have interesting stuff to do when you've completed the story.

These are not unreasonable things to ask. Especially when almost every game let's you know ahead of time what is in the game. A reviewers opinion isn't what I'm looking for out of the review, it never is. Since ubisoft won't tell us anything, the only option for me is to see what reviewers find.

I want to like this game, and I did enjoy the beta. But a new iP with little info on what there is to do, leaves me concerned. Especially when it comes from companies like ubi, ea, and activision.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2974d ago
Killz4Twinkies2974d ago

Agree that it is not fine. I understand the logic with having no one in the servers and it makes sense, but Ubisoft has burned this bridge in the past with reviews they embargo til after launch...

...

Assassins Creed: Unity anyone??

LazyMinion2974d ago

They had plenty of chances to make there own opinion by playing the beta. And if not whats stopping them from waiting a few days.

Pongwater2974d ago

If they wanted to know if the game was good then they played the open beta. Waiting for reviews means they want to know if someone else thinks the game is good, which imo is very silly.

Any review done without full servers wouldn't be a real review.

kmeck5182974d ago (Edited 2974d ago )

Those people can wait until the game gets reviews and then buy it if they want.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2974d ago
masterfox2974d ago

those morons at Ubisoft aren't confident that their game will do good, thats why there are no early reviews and I don't blame them, most of the people that played the beta including me already said the game is boring as hell!!

Pongwater2974d ago (Edited 2974d ago )

"most of the people that played the beta including me already said the game is boring as hell"

That's not what I'm seeing at all. Most people seem to have loved the game, judging only from online comments of course.

I know I loved it. After the beta I upgraded to a Gold edition. First time that's ever happened.

No game is for everyone.

zerocarnage2974d ago

What planet are you on. So over 6.4 million players said it was boring? Wrong most of those players will be buying the division. Why because they understood it was just a beta. It looked and felt absoloute wonderful. We got to see some of the features unlocked.

Now Ubisoft have detailed there plans for dlc and changes in clouding trading.

Ubisoft have worked closely with the community with the division and that's what counts, they're prepared to listen and take note, other publishers and developer s should do the same.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2974d ago
--Onilink--2974d ago (Edited 2974d ago )

Option 1:if you were planning on waiting for reviews, so shouldnt bother with Day 1 reviews either way, so just give it a week or so after launch and see proper reviews. In that case, it shouldnt affect you that they didnt give review copies.

Option 2:If you already preordered the game, then you dont care about reviews and made your decision already, so the lack of review copies is also irrelevant.

Chances are that if you fall into a middle point between those 2 statements, you would be the type of person that makes decisions based on very early reviews (usually from review events) and then is complaining that the game is not working like that on Day 1, or that the reviewer clearly didnt play the whole game... so i suggest moving over to Option 1 camp, the game wont dissapear because you started playing a few days after launch

Scatpants2974d ago

It's perfectly fine because I'm not planning to buy it.

Scatpants2974d ago

Meh, the beta was just OK. I could see myself getting sick of it relatively quickly.

Poroz2974d ago

I am not buying it either. Just not interested is all.

kingmushroom2974d ago

This game is gonna be great and i don't need some else's opinion

Show all comments (29)
160°

Microsoft’s Surface and Xbox hardware revenues take a big hit in Q3

Microsoft just posted the third quarter of its 2024 fiscal financial results. The software maker made $61.9 billion in revenue and a net income of $21.9 billion during Q3. Revenue is up 17 percent, and net income has increased by 20 percent.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community2h ago
darthv7214h ago

Xbox content + services up 62% while hardware down 31%... seems about right with the way they tout you don't need the hardware to play. People can play on their phones or smart tv or other means. I don't hardly play on my consoles directly since getting devices like the logitech g-cloud and ps portal. Which is to also say I have been playing more digital than physical because of these devices.

solideagle1h ago

you should apply in MS PR team buddy, I think you will do a great job in my humble opinion :)

Cacabunga31m ago

I can tell people like you are an absolute minority..

If service is up means their fans and fanboys accepted this model and subscribed to it. The near future you will see a big decline because the service is saturated.

purple1013h ago

Xbox hardware revenue tanks to lowest point of Xbox Series generation

Profchaos2h ago

I'm not surprised surface is struggling they aren't relevant anymore

XBManiac2h ago

Too expensive hardware when others offer the same or more for less? Good work, Green Team.

SimpleDad1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

"Despite some early successes for Xbox games on rival platforms, Xbox hardware is down by a massive 31 percent this quarter."
"Without Activision Blizzard, Microsoft’s overall gaming revenue would have actually declined this quarter."
"Xbox content and services would have only been up a single percent without Activision Blizzard..."
"It looks like next quarter is going to be a similar story for gaming at Microsoft, too."

That is crazy... so A/B/K is carrying the whole Xbox gaming.
Oh and Microsoft will be fine. Windows, Office and Cloud are growing with each pc purchase.

purple1011h ago

Activision: "we gonna need a bigger rucksack/backpack please"

Microsoft: "why's that"

Activision: "to carry yo' weak ass'

Profchaos1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

Top brass have also wanted to start seeing returns on the 100 billion they have put into various Xbox related moves so seeing more multiplatform games is highly likely especially from abk

It's basically saying that PlayStation is the reason Xbox is afloat right now thinks to Ps5 versions of COD

Show all comments (10)
90°

An Update on This Year’s BlizzCon and Blizzard’s 2024 Live Events

Blizzard writes: "After careful consideration over the last year, we at Blizzard have made the decision not to hold BlizzCon in 2024. This decision was not made lightly as BlizzCon remains a very special event for all of us, and we know many of you look forward to it. While we’re approaching this year differently and as we have explored different event formats in the past, rest assured that we are just as excited as ever to bring BlizzCon back in future years."

Read Full Story >>
blizzcon.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community13h ago
PRIMORDUS11h ago

How about you not hold Blizzcon anymore period. You fucking POS company. I really hope Blizzard would just die.

150°

Sony Patents To Prevent You From In-Game Harassment By Reading Your Emotions

A new patent recently published by Sony wants to gather biometric data of gamers to track whether one is being harassed using AI tools.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community20h ago
Profchaos1d 3h ago (Edited 1d 3h ago )

I hope this is one of those patents that never comes to fruition.

I already dislike the fact you can pay a significant amount for a online service buy associated games and content on said service and get banned from that service over potentially a misunderstanding the bans are already handed out for flimsy reasons

I'd rather see money invested in a ban that simply removes the offensive players ability to communicate with unknown players allow them to continue party chats with friends but not with Joe blow on cod.

exputers23h ago

Agreed. Blizzard recently banned a college Overwatch 2 player who's dependent for saying "shit." Pretty harsh.

Profchaos8h ago(Edited 8h ago)

How rediculas really. You can't say a word that's allowed in most PG films and prime time TV but the game is based around killing the enemy team using guns, explosives etc.

It's just backwards.

just_looken10h ago

What your talking about is called block list

In 2006 a spaceship dropped of the playstation 3/xbox 360 i say that that generation was the last great gen with game functions/tech that has yet to comeback

Anyhow the playstation 3 if you block listed a id they could not talk to you in chatroom with either text or voice. But that was pre mind fucked 2018 when people were more human than sheep.

But hey gta 6 is coming out billion dollar budget without a single player custom character creator and without singeplayer coop off/online something saints row 1-3 had on the xbox 360.

z2g19h ago

Take my social security and bank account numbers too! Here’s a picture of my wife and our address.

phoenixwing19h ago

Cmon where's the pictures of your children. Don't hold out on them.

H919h ago

At this rate I feel Sony will eventually sell a room to play games in it where they can monitor your every breath

jambola15h ago

I genuinely get a bit worried sometimes when a friend says something that could be offensive In a party
Because I have no trouble believing some bans would happen when in a private party for saying something wrong

SegaSaturn66918h ago

I want them to censor erotic content by measuring my groin temperature so i dont get too distracted while playing black ops 2.

Popsicle18h ago

Terrible idea. Not only do I not consent to providing my biometric data, the potential for mishandling biometric data is almost a certainty. Positive stress and negative stress can produce similar changes in biometrics. Interpreting the precise emotion a person is feeling is not only invasive but could be easily misconstrued. I hope this never comes to fruition.

Show all comments (14)