400°

Sony Files Patent For Glove Controller, Potentially For Use With PSVR

A patent filed by Sony for a glove controller was just published, and it heavily hints at uses with the upcoming PlayStation VR device.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
ccgr3402d ago

Ooh exciting! Still sticking with PC VR though

jukins3402d ago

If you got the rig no reason not to stick with it

dennigo3402d ago

price might be a good reason, then there's the fact it will work hassle free

nveenio3402d ago

I plan on starting with PlayStation VR as an entry-level thing. If I love it, I'll shell out for a pricier and more technically advanced competitor on PC. Otherwise, bless Sony, oh Gods of Gaming, for allowing me to get in on the [relatively] cheap.

Assuming, of course, that PSVR isn't $600.

SonyWarrior3402d ago (Edited 3402d ago )

i'm getting ps vr and will use it on the pc aswell. Even though it probably will not be officially supported for pc it sure will be unofficially just like the ps4/ps3 controllers the playstation camera ect...

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3402d ago
ShadowKnight3402d ago

Still sticking to both for exclusive games

BullyMangler3401d ago (Edited 3401d ago )

Sony glove controller patent?

Been glovin since the 80's

WeAreLegion3402d ago

Why not both? I'm doing both.

thorstein3402d ago (Edited 3402d ago )

Why not both? What do you think this is? Some sort of free society where everyone can make their own choice, including choosing both of a good thing?!!??

That isn't how it works in weirdo fanboy land!

Haven't you seen comments time and again that tell you that you can either have an X One or a PS4 or a PC and not two or all three!

Just who do you think you are?

/sarcasm

Omeganex99993402d ago

If you have the money and you're really THAT excited for VR, why not.

I'm gonna buy PSVR and build a new rig later this year (waiting for the new GPU to land and change everything), I might go for Oculus next year. Mostly for VR porn.

thorstein3402d ago

So. On an article about a peripheral for PSVR you thought to post a comment about the PC's VR?

awi59513401d ago

Didnt nintendo already do that here comes the power glove 2. Oh boy i think nintendo will sue.

NovaCorps3401d ago

stick with it then...oculus is already dead

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3401d ago
Aurenar3402d ago

it will end up as a Nintendo Power Glove?

madmonkey013402d ago

"now you're playing with power"

Clogmaster3402d ago

I wonder if they are going to implement this for "pron" purposes.

kenwonobi3401d ago

These were all my first thoughts.

ShinMaster3401d ago

At least it's much more likely to actually work.

Themba763402d ago

nintendo should have done this first we could have the powerglove 2

masterfox3402d ago

I totally agree on that but their anti-tech/anti-innovation mindset are screwing them up.

jcnba283402d ago

"anti-innovation mindset"

Lol Nintendo are the only one's who innovate their machines whether console or handheld and do not follow the status quo.

Wallstreet373402d ago (Edited 3402d ago )

jcnba28...

The only ones who innovate their machines lol really? Man this has been discussed in tons of articles Sony has innovated their consoles in many ways including the inclusion of Bluray first, 3D, etc in ps3 so please stop the nonsense...

WTH you think PSVR is? first of its kind on console and please dont mention that bs virtual boy which wasnt even virtual reality in any way, shape or form, it only used the virtual name.

Add to that all the innovative games Sony has been churning out as opposed to stagnant sequel after sequel and one or two new ips here and there and when it comes to innovation no one is doing it like Sony.

Its cool to have your bias but please dont restrict the definition of innovation and try to paint the only soccer player putting it in the goal as Nintendo as that is far far from the truth.

psplova3402d ago (Edited 3402d ago )

@themba.. The Vita says hello. The way some games take advantage of the tech it features offers more than anything any of the ds machines ever have. Or ever could. Uncharted Golden Abyss comes to mind among others.

MachuchalBrotha3163402d ago

Funny you say that when they were already trying VR and glove controllers in the late 80s early 90s.

Sunny_D3402d ago

I mean I can understand what he means about Nintendo innovating their consoles. GameCube had the unconventional controller pad, the wii used motion controls,and the wii U has a touch tablet as the controller.

Dubaman3402d ago

@Wallstreet37 Are you seriously saying that Sony using bluray for it's games are more innovative than the d-pad, analog stick, shoulder buttons, controller rumble, essentially creating the layout of how controllers will be designed for decades to come? That's just the hardware side of things and without mentioning how handheld gaming wouldn't even exist in the capacity it does now. How about the basics of game design across multiple genres which were crafted years ago and still influence game devs, fans and and anyone who chooses to call themselves a gamer. They're game changers. All 'home grown' too.

Bluray was developed by dozens of companies and was the next natural evolution of disc-based media after DVD. I wouldn't really call that a game changer. Also, the PS3 didn't introduce 3D; it was on the NES in Rad Racer and the Master System had a VR headset which worked with several games. Lets not forget the virtual boy either - as horrible as it was it was a risk they took and it didn't pay off. They still took the risk though.

I know this will get neg'd to Hell too because this is N4G, the Fox News for Sony Fanboys but no one can deny that Nintendo has brought more to gaming than anyone else, arguably Sega being behind them. I can't deny Sony are successful right now but it isn't because they were first to the party with innovative new ideas or because of the 'best hardware', afterall the PS2 was by far the slowest of its gen yet is still the highest selling console of all time.

If Bluray and 3D is all you've got then i don't see why there have been 'many articles' talking about them. I know where Sony has innovated in the gaming industry i just want to see the real fans and gamers split from the fanboys/posers, who spew nonsense because its the 'in thing' right now.

I mean, they released the PS1 with controller that had no analog stick - you ever tried aiming in Medal of Honor using the shoulder buttons?!

Muzikguy3402d ago (Edited 3402d ago )

@wallstreet

I agree completely. Another thread I said something along those lines and was completely bashed for it. Sony has done quite a lot for the industry IMO

@dubaman

I don't think anyone is saying Nintendo isn't innovative. It's just that you can't say Sony hasn't been. Of course some things were done beforehand and then evolved on. That's innovation also. So the joysticks yes, that was Nintendo. Sony decided we should have 2 of them and now that's stuck. So are you saying that since Nintendo came out with a joystick that anyone after that doesn't deserve credit? If that's the case then Nintendo shouldn't either because Atari had a joystick. Same with shoulder buttons. Yes SNES had them. Sony doubled the amount and once again that has stuck. They all have innovated one thing or another.

_-EDMIX-_3402d ago

I would say that concept hurt them in the long run more then help them.

What gets an install base into life time consumers is ultimately the software.

Nintendo with the Wii seemed to favor classic control schemes for their big IPs, which was counter productive imho for the entire concept of the Wii.

Many 3rd parties made some pretty cool games...

The issue with that.....they are 3rd party. Many, many folk got their long last experiences from those titles, thus moved on to Kinect, Move, iOS games etc.

So I would argue that Nintendo opened the door for those 3rd parties to introduce lots of casuals to their IPs. They feel in love with those IPs, not solely the Wii in general. Once those left, so did that install base.

I don't believe its up to a platform maker to seek to um..."innovate" in certain areas by force, merely make a platform that allows developers to be creative the way they see fit, ie why I prefer PSVR or even currently Kinect as separate things.

People will of course buy PSVR for VR titles, some of those titles will clearly be 3rd party games, titles that might be on PC, also on MS's own VR device next gen if they seek to make one.

What will keep long lasting and repeat consumers will be the IPs Sony makes themselves. If they are going to make PSVR, they must support PSVR (which they very much are doing).

I never liked that Nintendo was treating Wii as some after thought in regards to the main concept of the platform. Some of the best Wii games imho were done by 3rd parties, Zack and Wiki, Mad World, No More Heros, Red Steel etc.

ColonelHugh3402d ago

@dubaman

You ever tried aiming in Goldeneye with the 64 controller? Lol

Both Goldeneye and MoH are still great, regardless, and PlayStation had 3 kinds of controllers. No one should have been forced into using the original controller as it was obsolete for such games.

Kind of like how many people replaced their original Duke controllers when they were upgraded on the Xbox, although the reasons were a little different.

KiwiViper853402d ago

never had a problem with aiming in goldeneye... in fact i was quite the pro. had there been e-sports in those days, i would have been the best in the world at what i do.

ShinMaster3401d ago

@Dubaman

We're talking about the present. All of those things you mentioned were done 2 decades ago.
The Wii U is overflowing with so much innovation, it's falling behind the competition, their network and social connectivity is lacking, the innovative GamePad is hindering performance of their games.

Also, Nintendo was not the first to do thumb-sticks or rumble.
Quit repeating the myth.
Before the DualShock 1, Sony released a limited Dual Analog controller, which had built in rumble (not an add-on) at the same time as the RumblePak.
And thumb sticks go almost all the way back to Atari and later NeoGeo.

You could also argue that some of those things, like shoulder buttons, were a "natural evolution".
Nintendo now uses dual-analog sticks you can push down, built-in rumble motors and 4 shoulder inputs like PlayStation controllers.

"the PS2 was by far the slowest of its gen"
No it wasn't, it was the Dreamcast...

For the 3D on the NES and VR to be innovative and industry changing, it would actually have to make an impact and change the industry. But none of that stuck. They ended up being nothing more than gimmicks.
Today, with current technology, we can actually make stuff that works.

Philface3401d ago (Edited 3401d ago )

@wall: Oculus Rift was first of VR-Headsets.

@Muzikguy: Masterfox says that Nintendo isn't innovative, so Dubaman and jcnba set him straight. OF COURSE they are not the only ones, but they had quiet an impact with their inventions.

@ED: Not true every first party game could be played with Wii-remote and Nunchuck. Only Games where it was better to play with standard controller was Smash. Don't act as there weren't great first party games on the Wii the used the technology. There were many of them.

3401d ago
generic-user-name3401d ago

Can we please stop acting like the Wii U gamepad is innovative? Some guy just said "how about we use a tablet as a controller", that's literally it.

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 3401d ago
kotaku773402d ago (Edited 3402d ago )

Something like the gloves Tom Cruise is using on Minority Report

Goldby3402d ago

hes missing half his fingers "WHERE DID HIS FINGERS GO"

If i have to cut off 3 fingers to play with sonys virtual glove, i will say to that... sign me up!

masterfox3402d ago (Edited 3402d ago )

thats actually the only thing missing in this VR thing, PS has the move controller that is accurate as hell but still a proper representation of your hand still missing, not even PC has this mention not even in the long term, so PS by doing this is placing all the correct cards in the table to they able to create a proper VR experience, Sony is definitely shaping up the future for gaming like they show us in this trailer more than a decade ago.

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Alexious3402d ago

Actually there are already glove controllers for PC, such as this one: http://www.razerzone.com/ta...

Perjoss3402d ago

yes, there are quite a few VR glove projects going on:

https://manus-vr.com/

Alexious3402d ago

@Perjoss - That looks cool, thanks for the share!

WeAreLegion3402d ago

Manus is real. Talon was an April Fool's Day joke.

Errorist763402d ago

Actually the Rift controllers do have finger tracking!

Show all comments (101)
120°

The director of the original Silent Hill: “I look forward to seeing bold interpretations.”

Keiichiro Toyama—the creator and original director of the 1999 Silent Hill—shared his personal thoughts on the recently announced remake by Konami, reflecting on what the project means to him after more than two decades:
“I felt something similar when the game was adapted into a movie. It deeply moved me to see the names of the characters and locations I had created come to life visually, even though I wasn’t directly involved. That wouldn’t have been possible without the continued support of the fans and the dedication of the developers who’ve kept the series alive.
I’m really looking forward to seeing how the remake evolves this time. With the advanced technology we now have, I’m sure I’ll be surprised by how the game is reimagined. Since the original was built for the first PlayStation, there will naturally be challenges—like the camera and controls—but I’m eager to see bold and creative solutions to those elements.”

Read Full Story >>
www-alhub-me.translate.goog
senorfartcushion11h ago

Haha Not only is bold and creatively not what the industry wants, it’s not what most people want.

They want to get scammed and pay twice for a thing they already own.

Nightcrawler899h ago

Hope they use his vision in the game

Inverno9h ago

Was the SH2 remake even bold? Or was it more or less just a 1 to 1 over the shoulder remake?

Pedrof9h ago

I wouldn't hold my breath on "bold".

Show all comments (6)
260°

AMD CEO Shares Vision Behind Xbox Partnership and Next-Gen Chip Roadmap

AMD CEO Lisa Su talks about the Xbox AMD partnership, next-gen Ryzen + Radeon chips, and AI rendering tech coming to all Xbox devices.

Read Full Story >>
clouddosage.com
Obscure_Observer1d 7h ago

AMD is really building hype around their unique partnership with Microsoft to help and build an advanced and seamless Xbox ecosystem across all Xbox consoles and devices.

I wonder what she meant by "full roadmap of gaming optimized chips" though? Seems ambitious.

Next year´s Xbox Showcase already looks promising and exciting. Here´s hoping they deliver.

InUrFoxHole1d 1h ago

They had best show 3yrs in a row. Heading for another

VenomUK18h ago

Obscure_Observer said “I wonder what she meant by "full roadmap of gaming optimised chips" though? Seems ambitious.” To me, I interpret this to mean rather than having a couple of X/S products for launch and a handheld there is a longer term plan to release new products with higher specs at timed intervals. I’m speculating of course, but this could mean a spec bump every year or two, so that even if the PS6 or Steam Deck Home is released a year after ‘Xbox’ Microsoft can release an updated model that has a higher spec.

Agent758h ago

But Microsoft forgot the games.

KwietStorm_BLM14h ago

It's X3D chips for console. Everyone knows this. And it's been rumored in the PS6 forever.

Ganif12h ago

Correct.

"Sony's PlayStation 6 reportedly will feature an AMD semi-custom APU with a Zen 5 CPU and UDNA GPU, capable of 4K 120FPS and 8K 60FPS gaming. The console will include X3D cache and advanced AI upscaling technology."

https://www.tweaktown.com/n...

Obscure_Observer8h ago

"It's X3D chips for console. Everyone knows this. And it's been rumored in the PS6 forever."

I doubt that AMD´s CEO would waste her time making this huge and important partnership announcement over a tech that will be 7 years old by the those next gen consoles will be released.

Notellin8h ago

You should have just lead this comment with the fact that you have zero understanding of technology in the consoles and instead have a Toms Hardware online forum level of education.

Agent758h ago

But Microsoft forgot the games

Obscure_Observer8h ago

@VenomUK

"I’m speculating of course, but this could mean a spec bump every year or two, so that even if the PS6 or Steam Deck Home is released a year after ‘Xbox’ Microsoft can release an updated model that has a higher spec."

Very interesting theory. Still not sure how MS would actually make it work.

KwietStorm_BLM4h ago

"I doubt that AMD´s CEO would waste her time making this huge and important partnership announcement over a tech that will be 7 years old by the those next gen consoles will be released."

How old is the tech in consoles? It's not a huge announcement. It's marketing and you know it is.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4h ago
Fishy Fingers1d 7h ago (Edited 1d 7h ago )

Some odd, deliberate wording, no branding, not 'Xbox consoles, Xbox handhelds' specifically, feels and sounds like they're building towards hardware that anyone can be used or licensed to/by themselves and other manufacturers.

Multiplatform software and hardware 'Xbox/AMD APU'.

Obscure_Observer1d 6h ago

I guess you missed Sarah Bond´s next generation Xbox announcement this week, were she clearly states:

"I´m thrilled to share that we´ve established a strategic multi-year partnership with AMD to co-engineer silicon across a portfolio of devices, including, *our* next generation *Xbox consoles*."

But hey, I don´t think you´re entirely wrong, maybe MS will build their own Xbox consoles while licencing other manufactures to build and sell their own Xbox branded consoles. Who knows

BeHunted1d 2h ago (Edited 1d 2h ago )

I think you watched the wrong video. It's below the description, or you can watch it directly on YouTube.

https://youtu.be/kprpRvsOua...

PRIMORDUS1d 6h ago Show
HyperMoused1d 6h ago

Shares vision....we provide chips for money, this deal will sell many chips, we will make lots of money...good vision

Christopher1d 6h ago

The marketing behind this is so heavy that I worry about the actual outcome. Why are they just not showing us the product, why all this talking in market speak?

Lightning771d 1h ago

Probably because the next xbox isn't ready to release yet?

The marketing and rumors seem to be heavy out of no where. The rumor was a 27 release but it maybe it could be 26 new console launch instead.

Who knows.

Eonjay13h ago

There PR is alrways super heavy handed. No one is acutally buying an Xbox as is.
Also it is very early to be talking so much about a next gen console.

Obscure_Observer8h ago

There´s a lot of people interested on Xbox Next and its ability to run games from major stores like Steam.

We know that the PS6 is just around the corner as well, but so far, no news on what it might improve over the PS5 or PS5 Pro.

However, Sony already made public that their priority and actual focus is the PS6. So its not "very early" to talk about next gen when the very console manufactures are talking about it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 8h ago
Show all comments (38)
340°

Sony PS5 Era Profits Soar Past $13 Billion, Outpacing All Prior PlayStation Generations

Sony’s PS5 era has generated over $13 billion in profits, surpassing the combined earnings of PS1–PS4, with $136 billion in sales.

Read Full Story >>
inspire2rise.com
lukasmain1d 23h ago (Edited 1d 23h ago )

Their recent Playstation revenue is also more than Xbox and Switch combined, obviously in large part due to 3rd party sales.

Christopher1d 22h ago

I mean, if Sony is keeping third parties happy, kind of feels like a winning method.

GamingExplained1011d ago

I mean they have to, since they have 2 exclusives anyone cared about this generation, and those are now on PC. The rest is this creatively bankrupt string of remakes and remasters, taking advantage of the creativity of developers past efforts, and laying off teams creative side since all that work has been done already by previous teams.

By far the least creative generation ever.

lukasmain22h ago

@ Gaming-NEW-Troll account

"those are now on PC"

In that case. Xbox is Playstation's competition. MS have ZERO exclusives. ZERO. Nothing. Nada. Not a single exclusive.

Playstation has Astrobot. Demon's Souls, Astrobot Playroom, Gran Turismo 7, still not going to PC. They got Death Stranding 2 coming out in 3 days, NOT ON PC. Ghost of Yotei, not on PC.

That is 6 real exclusives MORE than Microsoft. Microsoft's Xbox is Playstation's competition. So lets compare.

I mean you brought it up.

Or does being "creatively bankrupt" not count when you have certain console exclusives going to PC years after they were released? In that case Returnal. Ratchet And Clank. Spiderman. Miles Morales. Silent Hill 2. And the list goes on

IRetrouk1d 18h ago

Kinda always been that way if you look at previous gens, exclusives are important but they aint the main revenue generator.

Reaper22_1d 17h ago (Edited 1d 17h ago )

.While that is impressive. Microsoft made 13 billion in one quarter. Making up facts doesn't make them true.

Mmmkay1d 17h ago

microsoft is not xbox. a bot should know that by now. you have been told this bs 1000 times on this site alone.

OlderGamer171d 15h ago

Yeah Microsoft but Xbox on the other hand.....

Aloymetal1d 14h ago

Your defense of Microsoft is only highlighting Lord Phil's and the lame MS mismanagement. Since you're talking about MS as a whole, imagine having trillions in the bank and still losing to ''tiny'' Sony PS and Ninty. It doesn't get any more lame than that.

Christopher1d 9h ago

If what Microsoft made as a whole was all that mattered, we would still have Windows Phones and Zunes. I would love to see Xbox' operating profits. Love to see it.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1d 9h ago
thorstein1d 15h ago

I prefer Playstation over Xbox when it comes to consoles but how does this news justify their layoffs?

Shane Kim1d 15h ago

But the execs brother. You got to think about them. How could they otherwise buy yet another mansion and yacht?

raWfodog1d 13h ago

People are generally paid for the work they are doing. Layoffs generally occur when there is no work for them to do (project cancelled, business slowing down, etc). I’ve been laid off from two jobs during my 40+ years of working so I know about these things. A company is not going to just keep paying people if there is no work for them to do, no matter how much profits they made.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 22h ago
MIDGETonSTILTS171d 18h ago

And this is why the game output for ps5 has been a tad slower…

1) they needed to be… games take longer to develop, and they’d burn out their teams trying to maintain the same pace as ps3.

2) they can afford to… games cost more than ever to push boundaries, so Sony had to figure out a way to match Xbox’s clever profit strategies in order to afford to continue to innovate and take risks.

lukasmain1d 13h ago

So much time was wasted on those Live Service shits. Glad they learned their lesson and have scaled that way back. Still haven't killed it, but I like it being in the background and not at the forefront

MIDGETonSTILTS171d 8h ago

Honestly, I love Helldivers 2 so much that I can forgive them for over investing in GaaS. At least they got one gem from the endeavor.

And I still dream of Factions releasing one day.

I don’t hate GaaS inherently, most are just implemented poorly.

Reaper22_1d 17h ago (Edited 1d 17h ago )

@ s2killinit

Thats xbox which includes other services. The playstion division also includes other services as well. Its mostly playtion but not all playstation. What's up with all the double standards around here.

Chevalier1d 16h ago

Yeah double standards like some idiots who got to talk about unrelated profits as a talking point. Wish those damn parrots could stay on topic with game related profits.

Next thing these idiots will talk about is something unrelated like Nintendo made more off the Mario movie than all of Xbox studios TV/movie endeavors combined you know?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/...

1d 16h ago
Deathdeliverer1d 16h ago

@Chevalier

Mind you that’s only AFTER buying all those other companies adding them to the revenue. It was a LOT lower. This is Activision, Bethesda, and others COMBINED to get that number.

“The sales of windows professional on the other hand trounces god of war sales” 😂

Reaper22_1d 14h ago (Edited 1d 14h ago )

All you did was prove that you dont know what revenue is. Tencent is no.1 in profits. Buts that's ok because unlike Tencent and Microsoft, Sony isn't in it for the money, right.🤔

pwnmaster30001d 13h ago

That’s what Xbox fanboys do. They’ve been doing this since Xbox one.

They will use all of MS, one of the biggest company in the world and play it like every dollar they earn comes from Xbox just to one up PlayStation.
Is actually pretty sad.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d 13h ago
Chevalier1d 16h ago

"Mind you that’s only AFTER buying all those other companies adding them to the revenue. It was a LOT lower. This is Activision, Bethesda, and others COMBINED to get that number."

Guys we're off topic here you know? Can someone bring us back on topic and tell us how much revenue Xbox studios does for movies and TV? Pretty sure we should also discuss how much Nintendo stands to make at Universal studios on Nintendo land and the rides should be a hot ticket this summer.

"Ouch! hahaha no wonder reaper wanna hide behind profits made by windows XD"

Yeah idiots with some sort of inferiority complex needs to get their win somewhere though. But wait shouldn't we get back on topic guys? Like seriously how much money do you think Fallout Season 2 will bring in?!

Reaper22_1d 11h ago

Nah, reaper's not hiding behind anything. I'm just pointing out some facts. At first the narrative was Microsoft isn't going to make the money back from the ABK deal to now their profits wouldn't be as high if they didn't get the deal. This very topic is part of the reason why the deal was secured. Sony's dishonesty and reluctance to tell the truth about how much money they're making and lying about how much this deal would hurt their business. That strategy failed. They're are making a lot of money. No doubt about it and its good for the industry but don't get butthurt when Microsoft post their profits and you guys see they are also making a lot of money as well.

CrashMania1d 11h ago

@reaper.

Microsoft don't reveal Xbox profits, sales numbers, or gamepass numbers, I wonder why that is?

You call Sony dishonest but at least they don't hide and obfuscate meaningful playstation numbers like MS do with Xbox.

IRetrouk1d 10h ago

Reaper stop lol, only one company hides that info and it ain't sony....

Chevalier1d 14h ago

"All you did was prove that you dont know what revenue is."

Nah all you did was confirm you're an idiot.

Reaper22_1d 12h ago (Edited 1d 12h ago )

You seem to be fluent in idiocy. Not everyone speaks it. So next time speak slowly and clearly so we all can understand. Getting emotional doesn't really make you smarter. Before you post a link with info make sure you know what it says.🫡

Chevalier1d 8h ago

"Nah, reaper's not hiding behind anything. I'm just pointing out some facts"

🤡 What facts? 🤣

Please share with everyone your idiocy

What does Xbox make in revenue and profit? What are their sales? How much money does Gamepass cost them? Oh right you got ZERO numbers to post.

"Before you post a link with info make sure you know what it says."

Says the idiot who can't even tell the difference between Microsoft and Xbox? Lmao. Seriously all you're showing everyone again is how much of an uninformed parroting idiot you are.

But go ahead and post your evidence! Oh right again ZERO from a ZERO. Absolutely 💯 hilarious to see you stumble like the idiot you are.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d 8h ago
Npugz71d 17h ago

Only because of games prices otherwise it’s the worst generation in PlayStation history especially for games

Reaper22_1d 16h ago

Thats true. The article did mention game and prices were a reason. Its also shows their greed is no different than Microsoft. Laying off all those people but yet bragging about profits and still tried to stop ABK deal. What the hell!

MatrixxGT1d 16h ago

Closing studios, layoffs, leadership changes, PS plus increases, multiple game cancellations and delays, total flops like concord. Slowest release of first party games of any generation and they just shut down PS stars I guess because it was costing to much.
Yet they announce record profits…..the greed here is insane, MS and Nintendo too. All of them milking gamers and we just keep lapping it up like a blood hound for a meal.
Them tariffs are really hitting them hard I see.

Deathdeliverer1d 15h ago

Well a part of running a business is a tight grip on that P&L sheet. In project management. It’s a known fact that the farther into a project you go, the more costly the corrections. Having something reach the definition of done, the end of the road, and it’s hated is a monumental loss of money. As games are usually made iteratively it’s like how was this not caught and course corrected several times before this point. Sony is definitely known as trusting and allows teams to make the games they want to make. They “trust the process”. The caveat to that big budget and freedom is if it bombs, especially if it’s your first game, you’re outta there. They have shareholders/stakeholders to keep happy. Where as normally a done game like Concord would give ROI as it was out in the wild. The cost of the project is recouped and turned into profit or delivered whatever value they wanted. If the game is now NOT coming out, how do they get that money back and stay profitable? By not paying wages for that team over a course of time that would have still been on payroll working on the next potential bomb, DLC for a dead game, and essentially costing more money.
It sadly isn’t greed, it’s business. They release these great profits because 1) it’s enticing for more stakeholders to invest, and 2) Despite failures they are still balancing the books and turning record setting profits.
How many live service games died at various stages of development? They are still this profitable? Imagine if the games came out and were hits to add onto the profits?

Christopher1d 9h ago (Edited 1d 9h ago )

So, you're saying that over $10B of this is from $10 to $20 software price increases? Zero to do with increased market reach? Massive MTX from third-party games?

Vithar1d 16h ago

where are the "Sony is in trouble" sayers? LOL

Chevalier1d 16h ago

They're talking about Microsoft quarterly profits like any true gamer would be doing.

Aloymetal1d 14h ago

Oh, that's coming, it's a mandatory thing just wait for next gen and you'll see infinite articles from the shills and the green fanbase saying ''tHiS GeN WiL Be dIfFerEnT''

stonecold31d 6h ago

over twitter xbox fanboy you tube are saying saying sony is broke cant afford warner bros.

Show all comments (72)