150°

You showed us your best Fallout 4 settlements

PCgamer:

"Last week we asked you to show us the Fallout 4 settlements you'd built, and you all delivered in wonderful, post-apocalyptic glory! We sorted through all of them (and there were quite a few) and pulled out some of our favorites to feature here. Some of you proudly declared no mods were used, others did use mods, but most didn't specify, so I decided to include them all. Either way, you can find them sorted by each creator's Disqus username."

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community3434d ago
MilkMan3434d ago

These are nice, but I could never work on settlements myself for any extended period of time. Just takes the life out the game for me.

nowitzki20043434d ago

Im the same way, I just try to keep people happy I dont build much at all except what I have to. I love that its there and how good it is especially with mods.

kneon3434d ago

My problem with the settlements is that the people there are bloody useless. I've lost track of how many times people have been kidnapped from Abernathy and tenpines.

DanteVFenris6663433d ago

They aren't useless, you can make money off them as well as make them generate a bunch of supplies. Start connecting them and growing them and soon you'll be beyond wealthy. While having all the supplies to sell for more money, upgrade stuff, or build more.

kneon3433d ago

I've been beyond wealthy since very early on in the game just from Sanctuary alone. I built a massive amount of water processing and now I'm sitting there with something like 40k caps and 8000 clean water in storage waiting to be sold if needed. But I don't really have anything to buy. I rarely buy anything, I just sell stuff.

I've built up the rest of the settlements but I can't be bothered collecting all the stuff, I've already got several hundreds of every kind of produce in storage just at my home base and more resources than I know what to do with.

DanteVFenris6663433d ago (Edited 3433d ago )

It actually improves the game by miles especially the end game. I've already explored most things after 70 hours. Now I'll be trying to upgrade every single settlement to max. Now that puts the gameplay to be far more hours. And I really enjoy doing so.

What it improves is the ability to role play as a leader. Only thing is like to add is the ability to make your settlments into a raider group. Maybe dlc? I'm hoping.

It also enhances the economy aspects of the game and the role of charisma. Which I would ussually ignore that stat.

Ristul3434d ago

Wow, my settlement pales in comparison, thats crazy.

user99502793434d ago (Edited 3434d ago )

damn.... must be on PC. On console I'm constantly scrounging for metal and trying to distribute things evenly between my settlements. Plus my limit is 19 settlers atm so skyscrapers arent exactly practical.

also there is a limit to how much you can build in a settlement, at least on Xbox.

nowitzki20043434d ago (Edited 3434d ago )

Yeah there is a limit in the game I am not sure what it is but its on all versions. On PC there is a mod that lets you build more.

90°

Fallout 4 on Switch 2 seems inevitable, but what about Starfield?

A Fallout 4 Nintendo Switch 2 port seems like an inevitability, but what about other Bethesda RPGs like Starfield.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community26d ago
neutralgamer199226d ago

I think all games will end up on switch from Xbox. MS has embraced going to other platforms now if games aren't doing well on Nintendo MS may be more selective in the future

On playstation they have been quite successful

anast26d ago

I'm not sure too many people want to play Starfield.

Profchaos26d ago

Phils all but confirmed they are going in hard with the switch 2

TheColbertinator26d ago

All are welcome to Switch 2. Microsoft Games Studios is interested in long term profits and market value not petty fanboy thoughts.

24d ago
Show all comments (7)
140°

Ex-Starfield dev dubs RPG’s design the “antithesis” of Fallout 4

Starfield and Fallout 4 developer Nate Purkeypile reflects on Bethesda's city design, calling it the "antithesis" of the studio's older games

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community128d ago
TheNamelessOne128d ago

Starfield is actually a RPG. Bethesda hasn't done that in a while.

GhostScholar128d ago

People acted like starfield was so less interesting than fallout and drastically different, but I call bs on that. Both are decent games, but they are both filled with the appearance of things to do and items to interact with but 99 percent are just there to be there with no significance. Fallout has better character work but they are both sort of illusions that they’re vast.

128d ago
Shiore2u127d ago

Studio has been going downhill since Skyrim. Every following game gets dumbed down more than the previous. I'll be shocked if Elder Scrolls VI even has dialogue options.

anast127d ago

Fallout 4 was bad, real bad. Starfield might even be a better RPG.

trez1082127d ago

Fallout 4 wasn’t a great fallout game per se but real bad? I don’t know maybe I’m a little biased because I replied it not long ago and had fun with it.

80°

10 Excellent Open World Games Where You Control It All

GB: "Gamers have quickly realized that a fun open-world game isn’t just about size and scope but rather how you interact with it."

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community169d ago
anast169d ago

It's a click fest. Skip it.