40°
8.0

Review: The Crew: Wild Run – Adrenaline Avenue | Examiner

Examiner:
"The Crew was an alright racer, with issues that stemmed from having a lot of cool rides, but never gaining that feeling of a large player-owned stable that games like Forza, Gran Turismo, and Need for Speed attain. Wild Run brings new race modes, modifications, physics, weather, and overall a whole new mix of octane. The game still suffers from the same issues, but this time the mix in gameplay provided by drifting through rainy streets, doing backflips in monster trucks, and splitting lanes like an outlaw truly do change things up enough to feel like a sizable addition. The Crew Wild Run furthers the value found in the base game, which is to say provides some, and proves a solid expansion."

Read Full Story >>
examiner.com
RuleNumber53439d ago

Good to hear, sounds like they made some very nice improvements!

240°

Ubisoft holds firm in The Crew lawsuit: You don’t own your video games

Plaintiffs bring up a new claim, too, in amended complaint.

Christopher14d ago

***Replying to Ubisoft’s argument that the statute of limitations is up, the plaintiffs responded with their own photos of The Crew’s packaging, which states that the activation code for the game doesn’t expire until 2099; that’s an example of how Ubisoft “implied that [The Crew] would remain playable during this time and long thereafter,” per the amended complaint.***

I really hope this resonates with the judge on the two-sided talk Ubisoft has going on here. You can't have your cake and eat it as well, IMHO.

ABizzel113d ago

A few of more mishaps and Ubisoft won’t be around anymore anyway.

Assassin’s Creed and FarCry are keeping them alive right now, and it’s a shame. Tom Clancy games are at a minimum now, The Division had its run, Watch Dogs has come and gone, For Honor was something new-ish, their lacking in New IP, and their older franchises just aren’t getting the right love.

OWCY8713d ago

rainbow six siege is doing alright

neutralgamer199214d ago

I hope the judge favors the consumers because it really sucks what thees companies are doing. I am sure these companies will simply change their user agreements to add these new "we don't own the games clauses"

victorMaje14d ago

Ubisoft keeps trying so hard to not want my money. I will oblige.

isarai14d ago

Good thing i haven't bought a Ubisoft game since ac origins, and even that was a mistake 😆

Levii_9214d ago

I haven’t bought a Ubisoft game since 2014 and i don’t plan to change that.

Jingsing13d ago

I haven't bought a Ubisoft game since Watch Dogs 3.

vTuro2414d ago

Funny, now Ubisoft doesn't own them anymore either.

Show all comments (20)
90°

Ubisoft Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over The Crew Shutdown

Ubisoft faces a class action lawsuit over The Crew shutdown, raising key questions about digital game ownership.

170°

The Crew is Being Removed from Your Ubisoft Connect Account Right Now

The Outerhaven writes: With the closure of The Crew's online servers, Ubisoft has started removing access to the game from anyone who owns it on Ubisoft Connect.

Read Full Story >>
theouterhaven.net
mastershredder378d ago

Now? You are almost a week late.

shadowhaxor378d ago (Edited 378d ago )

Wait. I don't get it. I reported on something that I recently noticed. I did mention in my article that I wouldn't have noticed if I hadn't gone to play The Division 2. That said, if this was nearly a week ago, I wouldn't know, as NO ONE REPORTED ON IT! Not IGN. Not Gamespot. Not Kotaku. No one.

You got people here complaining that there are any real gaming journalists and game journalism sucks, but when someone is acting, doing something to make something known to the public about what a company is doing. What do you do? You poke fun at it. What is it that people want? Do you want to complain for the sake of it? Or do you actually want people to do something to make those who aren't in the know aware of the shady stuff that's happening and to sound the alarm?

ravens52377d ago

It's the "oh well" setting in on digital users. They don't care they don't own their stuff for some odd reason. 🤷🏽.

FullmetalRoyale377d ago

Good for you! People sometimes just feel the need to show how little they actually have to say. Very respectful dressing down, btw, which is another thing we need more of.

fan_of_gaming377d ago

I appreciate your article,
- "If this isn’t considered both a “WTF” moment and setting a dangerous precedent, I don’t know what else it would be"
- "it could also signal other publishers that removing games from our accounts would be okay"
- "Maybe those firmly against this digital future have a point after all"
- "This. Is. Fucked. Up."

As someone against an only-digital/streaming future for entertainment content (movies/TV shows/games/books), it feels like talking into a void about the points above on this website, or on Twitter, or with my friends, etc. People don't get it. I'm strongly contemplating whether this will be my last generation of PlayStation & Xbox consoles (I'm confident enough that Nintendo's next system will still support physical media and that their 1st-party games won't have online-required installation or usage restrictions).

Chocoburger377d ago

He is one of the long running trolls of this site, he never says anything positive. Every single one of his posts are either incorrect or flat out stupid. Pay him no mind.

OtterX376d ago

Thank you @shadowhaxor, we appreciate you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 376d ago
KyRo377d ago

Yet people will sit here and still say that digital is better 🙃

TheSenorCheese377d ago

Welcome to the era where you no longer own your games.

377d ago Replies(1)
vTuro24377d ago

I see they're trying their best to surpass Activision Blizzard for being the most hated gaming company. Keep at it, Ubisoft, I believe!

Show all comments (14)