Approvals 11/3 ▼
mafia_pc (1) - 3171d ago Cancel
kaiserfranz (2) - 3171d ago Cancel
Heli89 (1) - 3171d ago Cancel
OpieWinston (1) - 3171d ago Cancel
christocolus (2) - 3171d ago Cancel
ISHU (4) - 3171d ago Cancel
500°

EA Doesn’t Care About EA Access On PS4, Happy With Xbox One

EA Chief Operating Officer Peter Moore not concerned with PlayStation

Read Full Story >>
segmentnext.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (3)- Updates (3)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community3171d ago
Changed: title, url
TheGreatGamer3171d ago
Changed: title
TheGreatGamer3171d ago
TheGreatGamer3171d ago

Sony had their chance but they took the choice away from ps4 owners and now their customers have to live with it. #ForThePlayer

christocolus3171d ago (Edited 3171d ago )

There is no denying the value of EA Access and it's kind of weird how sony turned it down,it would have been best to allow their users decide for themselves.

Peter Moore's answers are just so funny.lol

https://pbs.twimg.com/media...

4Sh0w3171d ago (Edited 3171d ago )

Uhm from the interview I read yesterday he never said "I dont care", he basically said they were happy with Xbox One, and no comment about ps4, then finally when pressed he said ask sony.

vvvvvDragonknight I dont know why you are pulling fake statistics out of your butt and you dont speak for all ps4 owners....I think given the choice many would like optional services.

pivotplease3171d ago

Yeah I have no interest in the service, but I'm sure there are many out there who would love it. It's too bad because options are always nice. PS4 still has the superior free games service and although it's steeply priced there is PS Now which does hold alot of potential once it branches beyond PS3 games. So its not like the system is anything to mock when it comes to players getting a combination of value and innovation. I'd say #fortheplayers still holds true.

BiggerBoss3171d ago

While EA Access is a pretty good value for what it is, I would chop my hand off before subscribing to a service with EA. Even when I get an XB1 this November I'm not going to care about the service.

Some peoples disagree and love EA, but it's not for me.

DragonKnight3171d ago (Edited 3171d ago )

@4Sh0w: You're now going to point out where I say "I speak on behalf of all PS4 owners" while coming up with a way to eliminate when I said "approximately 1% of PS4 users even care about EA Access" because that latter pretty much invalidates the former.

blitz06233171d ago

It sounds more like he's bitter that Sony didn't allow them to include that service on the PS4. Those responses don't even make sense

Highlife3171d ago

This site is so damn confusing. I swear I just read an article with comments about how ea said they don't need single player. Everyone's reaction I won't buy an ea game or support them $60 games with no single player and tacked on dlc no value. Next article with comments Ea offers great value I support ea. Frankly I find ea confusing.

Ashlen3170d ago (Edited 3170d ago )

Well EA and Microsoft are definitely in bed with each other this gen, and it's not surprising given how many employees they have shared over the years (Don Mattrick).

I think it was a mistake on Sony's part to not allow options. And I think thier motivation was to push PSNow and had nothing to do with PSPlus.

My personal feeling is: I'd prefer if the industry stayed away from subscriptions, they almost always end up costing more in the long run and prices from subscriptions only go up as time goes on. Where as the costs of disks only goes down over time.

xfiles20993170d ago

Peter Moore is a prick he has always given me that vibe I have never liked him.

LordMaim3170d ago (Edited 3170d ago )

@christocolus:"There is no denying the value of EA Access"

Really? Cause I'm denying it.

For $30 you get 10% off digital EA games, which means you have to buy six EA games a year to get your money's worth. And it only applies to digital games so you can't even trade them in when you're done. They're discouraging physical sales over digital where they get a much greater margin.

You get early access, which is good. Its a week head start on games, which is a tangible benefit that EA Access provides. For alpha consumers, which EA loves, the thought of having something early drives sales. You can save your progress and pick up where you left off if you decide to purchase the full game. Basically this is another form of an exclusivity agreement, albeit an extremely short one, still a tangible benefit to subscribers. Otherwise the same as the Full Game Trials that Sony offers for free to anyone on PSN.

You also get access to the vault, which includes older EA titles. Great for subscribers, but it also bottoms out the used game market for EA's back catalog, screwing anyone who buys physical copies of the game who wanted to trade them in.

If you were planning to buy every game that EA makes, and you never buy used games, then EA Access is a really good deal. You're also EA's favorite kind of customer. For the rest of however, who buy used games, or are more selective in which games we purchase, not so much.

EA Access is basically a soft version of Microsoft's DRM strategy which EA was a partner in, and the only person it benefits is EA.

donthate3170d ago (Edited 3170d ago )

@LordMaim:

But I am sure you don't deny the value of PS+ and probably subscribe to it based on your comments!

They are essentially almost the same point for point. PS+ provides

* discount for digital games
* older game titles for free while subscription is active
* occassional demo/beta (worse than EA Access imo)
* allows online play (okay, you got me there, but is that really value?)

Personally, I love the idea of Netflix for games and we are getting a huge selection with Xbox 360 games coming with BC and that the vault gets bigger and bigger. I probably would have bought DA:I when it dropped to the right price, but now, free with EA Access! :D

------------------------

In terms of all the people downlplaying EA Access that were freedom fighters of DRM and options... you sound like a hypocrite and we know who you are!

LeCreuset3170d ago

"They are essentially almost the same point for point."

I'd rather pay my one PS+ subscription than see the model devolve into a bunch of competing services, each with their own subscription.

sonarus3170d ago

I dunno. I completely forgot this existed to be honest. Still don't care

0to1003170d ago (Edited 3170d ago )

yeah he's almost as annoying as Andrew House the CEO of SCEI who treats 3rd parties as first...

'home of call of duty' when it's a multiplat..

ff7 remake 'first on ps4' when it's a multiplat..

buy yeah no denying ea access is a great offer and should have been on ps4 as a choice.

ShottyatLaw3170d ago

Think what you want of the guy, but I will tip my hat to him on those questions Christocolus pulled.

Sony's "good value comments" were in poor form, and just on the professional standpoint, Moore has the right to be a little aggravated. As a "partner" company is launching a new service, you don't go out of your way to put it down. Make a general PR statement about not having anything in the works at this time, and leave it alone.

ShinMaster3170d ago

I keep forgetting what EA Access even is.

Don't they purposely delay new game releases for everyone else just to give it to subscribers first?

morganfell3170d ago (Edited 3170d ago )

EA Access value? I agree with LordMaim on this one. There are better ways for a gamer to spend $30 if they are looking for value:

http://www.bestbuy.com/site...

freshslicepizza3170d ago

hmm, so approximately 1% of ps4 owners care about ea access even though the latest npd results for july had the latest pga game #4 with the ps4 leading in sales for that game. ps4 owners don't care about games like dragon age too, right? i bet madden 16 will only represent 1% of ps4 sales for that month as well.

gotta love it when people speak out of emotion rather than logic. i wonder what the % of of ps4 owners who care about playstation now?

Keltech3170d ago

I can't argue with Sony giving us the option.

But I can argue about the value, and personally I don't see any value. Now if there wasn't a cap in the amount of time we can play the game within those 5 days... Then yes I would see the value

BeefCurtains3170d ago

I don't look at it as getting the game a week early. I look at it as everyone else gets the game late unless you pay a premium to play the game when it's actually available. Just another price gouge from EA.

Eonjay3170d ago

Oh, they care. They are a business and their product isn't on the most popular console. But, it really doesn't matter as long as they are getting what they need from the Xbox One platform.

Too bad so sad. I wouldn't mind it on PS4 if it was part of PS+. I just don't want to pay another subscription for games.

freshslicepizza3170d ago

@Keltech
"Now if there wasn't a cap in the amount of time we can play the game within those 5 days... Then yes I would see the value"

that makes a lot of sense. you want to be able to play new games for unlimited time during those 5 days for the price of ea access which is less than one new game? lol

@BeefCurtains
"I don't look at it as getting the game a week early. I look at it as everyone else gets the game late unless you pay a premium to play the game when it's actually available. Just another price gouge from EA."

this is what i have said before of one area that could be viewed as impacting others. it's not a price gouge though, it is a marketing ploy used as an incentive.

aquamala3170d ago

for those that don't see the value, don't subscribe, other PS4 owners like me want to subscribe but can't.

fiveby93170d ago (Edited 3170d ago )

I play one EA game at the moment. I feel no need to pay EA a subscription fee to pay a game. I could care less that EA access is not offered on PS4.

Docknoss3170d ago

As a gamer why wouldn't you want options. Everyone who is nay saying EA access without ever using it it just ignorant. A great variety of games for only $30 dollars yearly.You can't beat it really.

Genuine-User3170d ago

"EA Doesn’t Care About EA Access On PS4"

Pretty much how I feel about EA Access.

SonyAddict3170d ago

Captain xbox to the rescue again lol

WowSoChill3170d ago

Lots of insecurity and downplaying in these comments

EA Access is a great deal, and options never hurt, Sony publicly turned this deal down so if your mad or salty at anyone over this, it should be at Sony

Sony: EA Access Doesn't 'Represent Good Value To The PlayStation Gamer'

http://www.gameinformer.com...

Keltech3169d ago (Edited 3169d ago )

"that makes a lot of sense. you want to be able to play new games for unlimited time during those 5 days for the price of ea access which is less than one new game? lol"

Moldy,
I don't understand the placement of the question mark. Maybe you was trying to put a period instead. But in case it was placed there on purpose... I'm going to let you in on a little secret; you would still have to pay $54 dollars for the game, and ur stuck with the digital copy. To answer ur "?", I will gladly pay $6 for the physical copy lol

+ Show (25) more repliesLast reply 3169d ago
DragonKnight3171d ago

Lol, approximately 1% of PS4 owners even care about EA Access. It's EA, their games are worth nothing and we're not losing sleep over not having EA Access on PS4.

ArrowofAres3171d ago (Edited 3171d ago )

The following that mut and fut have alone makes your comment look ill informed

Paytaa3171d ago Show
sactownlawyer9163171d ago

Im with you even I have zero desire or need for ea access on ps4. Glad Sony blocked it.

DragonKnight3171d ago (Edited 3171d ago )

Dammit N4G, get your act together.

@Paytaa: Oh yeah, I'm so butthurt that I don't get to pay EA to give me discounts on their terrible games. Oh woe is me that I get to play games that are actually good and worth money. I'm so distraught and despondent over not getting to play Garden Warfare early, whatever will I do?

AstroCyborg3171d ago Show
DragonKnight3171d ago

"IF THEY DON'T CARE WHY WAS THERE SUCH A MASSIVE FIT TAKEN BY THEM WHEN BATTLEFRONT WAS REVEALED TO BE FIRST OF XBOX."

Firstly, to the left of your keyboard is the Caps Lock button. Press it to turn it off.

Secondly, because no one likes exclusivity deals in any form. Battlefront isn't the first game to release first on a particular console, then later on another console. Just look at Rise of the Tomb Raider. The idea is that if the game is finished, and there is no logical reason for delaying the game's launch on all platforms simultaneously, then it's just a scummy move regardless of subscriptions or not.

ZeroX98763171d ago

@DragonKnight

EA published games usually has great sales numbers on PS platform. As a fellow PS4 gamer, I can say that I love the NHL series, even if I don't buy it annually.
I had my fair share of good gaming sessions with many EA games and more is about to come.

Sony chose not to support it to generate more sales for their own service (Mass effect and Mirror edge are on the rental list, both published by EA). I'm not missing on EA access mainly because If I really like one of their games, I'll gladly buy it.

Ashlen3170d ago

I heard 99% of all statistics are made up. I'm 99% sure thats not true though... /rolls eyes

Paytaa3170d ago (Edited 3170d ago )

To you they may be terrible but there are definitely Playstation fans who would use the service and again they wouldn't be forced to buy it. If you want it then by all means get the sub but if you don't want it then...you don't get it. It's really that simple. Having EA Access just gives people another option. There's no harm in it.

donthate3170d ago

Dragon:

"Lol, approximately 1% of PS4 owners even care about EA Access. It's EA, their games are worth nothing and we're not losing sleep over not having EA Access on PS4."

So PS4 owners don't care, but people keep asking for it just like BC?

Somebody sounds very salty to me.

In the meanwhile, I will just enjoy BF4, Dragon Age, soon Xbxo 360 BC games and BattleFront early access.

If BattleFront is cr@p game, I would know to avoid it, but for you it might just be too late!

I like options, but I guess you do not!

DragonKnight3170d ago

@ZeroX9876: McDonald's serves 1 billion customers worldwide. Are you saying that McDonald's has the highest quality, great food?

@Paytaa: I love how this is the go to argument when anyone says anything remotely negative about EA Access. "It's an option" Yeah, and? It doesn't mean that because it's an option it isn't a terrible option. What's your point?

@donthate: Lol, no one is asking for EA Access on Ps4, stop lying.

Professor_K3170d ago

Oh, they care,

they cared so much theyr missinformed fanboys barked at MS and EA for not having the service instead of $any. LMAO ridiculous

JasonKCK3170d ago

Seems to me like you want EA access on the PS4, you can't get it, so you pretend like you didn't want it anyway.

freshslicepizza3170d ago (Edited 3170d ago )

their games are worth nothing yet they are still one of the highest selling publishers out there. makes perfect sense.

sony should allow its users to decide for themselves.

"McDonald's serves 1 billion customers worldwide. Are you saying that McDonald's has the highest quality, great food?"

what a great response. what's next, telling sony to stop activision from releasing call of duty? mcdonalds serves a demand for fast food at a reasonable price. just like how consoles serve the needs of millions who don't wish to have a high end pc. are you suggesting they only focus on high end pc's for game software?

warczar3170d ago (Edited 3170d ago )

@moldybread

"their games are worth nothing yet they are still one of the highest selling publishers out there. makes perfect sense."

It's not as if they sell a lot of games because they make the highest quality games and sell them at the lowest price; they are one of two companies who make AAA soccer games (most popular sport in world) and the only company who the nfl deems worthy of making there games (most popular sport in u.s.). These two factors combined with ripping people off every chance they get = successful corporation.

+ Show (13) more repliesLast reply 3170d ago
Lucreto3171d ago (Edited 3171d ago )

If that is how it actually went down. For all we know EA and Microsoft have some sort of deal in place. This is from when EA and Microsoft were getting all the timed exclusives and Titanfall exclusivity.

pivotplease
We don't know what deal is in place. Sony PR always up plays it's own services. Look at the Tomb Raider Xbox exclusive response. They knew full well it's coming to PS4 but said that.

pivotplease3171d ago

Or Sony doesn't want it competing with PS Now by having two subscription services. That and this might help bolster the PS+ prospects from EA. Instead of EA just putting the freebies on access and getting the subscription fee in its entirety. Business stuff.

Aenea3171d ago

@pivot

Why do people keep comparing apples and oranges? PS Now is so very unlike EA Access it's crazy.

blackout3170d ago

I wonder this. When Sony is trying to market the Battlefront game how does that work cause the game will be played first a whole 7 days before any Sony fan can play it. Doesn't sound like a smart deal on Sony's side. Sony is working off last gen format in witch Microsoft created and Microsoft has switched up as they seem to do every gen. Sony's Commander and Chief is just as dumb as there fans. The blind leading the blind over in that camp.
http://www.videogamer.com/n...

Keltech3170d ago

Of course they had a deal. Do you think it was a coincidence EA cancelled the "online pass" a few months before the xb1 was introduced. C'mon

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3170d ago
Yo Mama3171d ago (Edited 3171d ago )

Ummm, pretty sure it was Sony who decided against having it, not EA. But, I don't really care about it to begin with. I'm not paying another subscription fee for last year's sports games and a week early access to a few new games.

Riddler893171d ago

@yo mama And a discount on new games as well.. you forgot that one

SniperControl3171d ago

@Riddler89

Discounts on games that are already way overpriced by ea, in most cases the 10% discount still does not match the price of same game bought on Amazon for example.

RiseofScorpio3171d ago

Uhh Dragon Age inquision, Battlefield 4, PvZ GF and Need for Speed isn't worth it?

Yo Mama3171d ago (Edited 3171d ago )

Double post. Sorry

Christopher3171d ago

I think he's just brutally honest. Regardless of my interest in the service, Sony should have left that option up to the players.

DragonKnight3170d ago

I tend to believe there must have been some sort of cost Sony would have had to absorb for them to flat out deny an optional service like this, either that or some kind of deal was struck with MS that Sony didn't appreciate. Short of that, the only other reason for Sony to deny it literally is PSNow but that shouldn't mean anything because they could have just avoided putting EA games on the service so there it seems like there is more to the story than we really know.

moegooner883170d ago (Edited 3170d ago )

I honestly think he is just upset cause Sony turned the service down. 25 million users, he can deny it all he wants, but money is money.

someOnecalled3170d ago

I wonder what would happen if other pub came out with services like this. PS fanboys will still say sony is right in thinking for them.

PS fanboy: we don't buy that many of their games anyway.

Lol if most big publishers start doing this what games are you buying. Mass effect and star wars are coming out you don't want those either.

3-4-53170d ago

* It doesn't hurt Sony not having it, but it doesn't help either.

It's not a huge loss, but it is some loss.

Sony fans would love EA Access, or at least those who play a lot of EA games.

It's worth it alone just for PvZ:GW.

GameHero3170d ago

Here's the deal, Sony has PS Now and there is no room for another service like this...Can't believe this C.O.O. response. Pretty immature if you ask me.

XanderZane3170d ago

Sony chose PSNow over EA Access. They could have had both. Just silly that they turned this down when EA is handling all the servers and control.

_-EDMIX-_3170d ago

Not really, it conflicts with their own platform's service. Its no different then why years ago MS would not allow Epic to put out free maps or didn't have many free to play games or even MMOs off of XBL, which I still think is in effect.

Both services have things they allow, things they don't allow.

ie why MS won't allow subscription services like MMOs off of XB Live, which Sony allows as to why FFXIV isn't on XONE or 360.

At the end of the day, Sony still owns PSN, MS still owns XBL, they just can't allow anyone to do what ever that doesn't support certain things they are trying to convey, sell, function etc.

Mystogan3170d ago (Edited 3170d ago )

"Which I still think is in effect"

Noh there are quite a few F2p games on Xbox already and more coming.

Out now:
Killer Instinct
Smite
Magic Duels
Neverwinter
Project Spark
World of Tanks
WarFrame
Happy Wars
Forza Horizon 2:Fast and Furious.
PowerStar Golf
etc..

Happy Dungeons, Gigantic and Fable Legends are the ones I know of that are coming.

Microsoft is fully embracing the F2P model.

Also Elder Scrolls Online was P2P when it was announced for Xbox One and PS4 then it changed to B2P. I don't know if it launched as P2P on consoles. But that tells me that they weren't opposed to having a paid MMO.

The only reason why FFIV isn't on Xbox One is because of the shared servers. But now that Phil Spencer is head. I believe it will show up sooner or later. With shared servers.

_-EDMIX-_3170d ago

@Mystogan-"MS won't allow subscription services like MMOs off of XB Live"

"Noh there are quite a few F2p games on Xbox already and more coming"

Um....."subscription services like MMO's off of live"

http://www.cinemablend.com/...

and

http://kotaku.com/everyone-...

I mean...what sad is all you had to do is slowly read what I was saying. Never did I say anything about free to plays, what I stated was about Live and subscriptions with MMOs OFF of live ie you didn't need gold to play it.

"But that tells me that they weren't opposed to having a paid MMO"

No...they were merely opposed to having it not require gold as they still have it where it requires gold lol.

http://www.gamespot.com/art...

...the game still requires XBL Gold to play it, regardless of subscription going to free.

As for FFIV...I mean well it isn't on 360 or XONE its been ported to GBA, remade on DS, came out on Steam, but its not on PS4 yet so who knows.

I mean I jokingly assume you mean FFXIV lolz.

http://www.rpgsite.net/news...

You don't need PS Plus to play FFXIV either. MS polices make it that you must pay for gold, even if its free to play, even if it already has a subscription ie you would be spending some weeks or even months paying for Live, while paying for an MMO....yet you could be clearly spending those months merely JUST playing that MMO.

That could be one of the reasons as Bethesda had that issue with MS and still does if you consider Elder Scrolls still needs a gold subscription to actually play it (well that its subscription free, but you still need to actually buy the game so I understand, but even if it was free to play, as in free entry, they would still require it.

My point is really that both Sony and MS have different polices regarding certain things on their network, didn't PS3 not have some cross play with Portal 2 that 360 didn't due to MS polices? Didn't PS3 also have some games that allowed mods from PC but 360 versions didn't have them based on MS's policy?

Regardless it just further proves my point that they are both different and both have reasons for blocking certain features.

S2Killinit3170d ago

@TheGreatGamer
Sony had their chance? what are you talking about? We have PSNow on PS4. Do you even have to make sense anymore? EA access has NOTHING on PSNOW. They are not in the same league. I think its EA who is not very happy that Sony has its own service and that EA's service is missing out. You don't see Sony commenting on EA much, and the other way around? yeah...

N1GHTW0LFX3170d ago

As a PS4 AND PS3/XBOX 360 owner, I don't care at all for EA Access. I've played most of the older games in their library and if there are any games I haven't played by now that I would want to play, I would either buy them used for MUCH less than $30 or I would rent them from PSNow which is a better value. As for gaining early access to new games/betas, I really don't care. EA games have lost a LOT of appeal over the last few years to many gamers and this smack talking isn't helping their reputation any because it's this kind of arrogance that turns people away. Instead of trying to capitalize on last gen and resell us games most of us have already played, how about focusing on new games and fixing your company to regain some of our trust. Then maybe we'll talk.

Mystogan3170d ago

Anyone who dismisses EA Access is a blind Sony fanboy.

with EA Access you pay $30 dollar a year for a ton of THIS GEN games, discounts and Early Access(remember the thing you Sony fanboys get salty about?) with more being added and will include 360 backwards compatible games.

With PSNow you pay 20$ a month. Although they have many more games which justifies the price. They are ALL last gen games. And you have to stream it over a 5MBps connection.

hasein3170d ago

EA access and EA origins needed to be remove.
Early access for games is good but when EA release the retail version it ends up still have tons of bugs.Its kinda gimmick.
Games on EA origins is overpriced.Just put it on Steam OK.

PS now streaming games is good but $20 per month is not a good deal.
Sony should cut the subscription fee to $6/mo and bundle it with PS+ for total of $90 a year then Psvita,Vita TV and tv with PS now needs reduced price as well to 50 dollars / year.

DarXyde3170d ago

"Had their chance"?

You're acting like Sony can't approach EA ever again. EA, like Activision, love money. Why would they deny them that opportunity indefinitely? They wouldn't. Sony can totally change their minds and EA would be all over it.

Companies can change their minds quickly if it means keeping customers. Ask Microsoft.

IGiveHugs2NakedWomen3170d ago

Sony and PS4 owners don't give two s**** about EA Access. What is anyone really getting from it? early access to the same annual franchise and annual franchises from last year? Really?

christian hour3170d ago (Edited 3170d ago )

EA doesn't care about the gaming community in general, if it did it wouldn't have destroyed the landscape by introducing horrible console DLC trends like selling 128kb keycodes to unlock content on the disc right out of the gate last gen and set a standard for other soul sucking aaa behemoths to follow suit on. I miss when expansion packs where, ya know, expansive, and worth the price. (and also not something that was taking out of the core experience mid development by a suit from on high, YES this does happen, A LOT!)

There are a million other reasons I could point out why they don't care but i'd be here all month, but if you want an even more recent example of how out of touch they are with the gaming community, peter moores recent and total misunderstanding of their own statistics says it all "people dont play single player cos our customers dont really play our single players in our multiplayer shooters" (not an actual quote, but basicaly waht he said) right, and that had nothing to with the fact that they were just terrible single player experiences, it must be because people don't play single player in shooter games?

Riiiight, kinda rich coming from a man who was so invested in microsoft and a little game called halo (known for having a very good singleplayer AND multiplayer) that he got a halo 2 tattoo PLUS release date on his arm.

Ea are a business first, a games company second, they don't care about us at all, just our wallets.

And before anyone says "every company is in it for profit", take your blanket statements and burn them, it's possible to be passionate about something first AND also gain a profit. Loads of people do it, and they're the happiest people on earth, they get to do what they love, they get to make people happy and while they may not ALL be making billions they're making enough to live and enjoy life.

There are too many people out there who only see one goal in life, to be rich and succesfull, and they're ruining it for the rest of us.

Aceman183170d ago

I had DAI and traded it in because i got bored of it, and i plan to buy NFS, SWBF, and Mirrors Edge Cat for PS4. It doesnt matter whether i get to play it a week early or not ill still get to play them.

And when i buy the X1 next year i dont plan on signing up for this service because i dont care about the sports games or pvz. So even if this service was on PS4 i wouldnt sign up for it.

JMyers3169d ago

@TheGreatGamer... #Dealwithit

+ Show (14) more repliesLast reply 3169d ago
lelo2play3171d ago

If EA starts offering X360 games with EA Access then there's no point bringing EA Access to PS4, since it's not BC.

user99502793171d ago

well it would definitely add a layer of complexity, and people might question pricing parity. And by might, I mean that the internet would explode with unecessary fanboy fury.

Oh well. EA Access iz just zis thing, you know?

Blaze9293170d ago

wow, if they start doing that then wow!

Chaosdreams3171d ago

I don't care about EA.

There, now we all feel better.

DragonKnight3171d ago

People will disagree with you because you obviously are lying and actually do care about EA, you're just butt hurt that PS4 doesn't have the awesome EA Access where you get to pay extra to have early access to such high quality games like... and....

So there.

Chaosdreams3171d ago

I see what you did there.

*thumbs up*

kstuffs3170d ago

You are misrepresenting the benefits of the service, and the service is optional. If you don't find good values in it, then you should make that decision.

1. Games are added to the vault can be played as long as your subscription is current.

2. Subscribers have early access to EA new releases.

3. Subscribers have 10% off the digital copies of the the new releases.

If these features don't benefit you, then it's obviously within your choice to not subscribe the $30/year or $5/month . But of course it's EA that's being greedy and Sony is protecting you from "not good values."

DragonKnight3170d ago

If you think EA aren't being greedy with their sub par games and inflated subscription costs you're naive. The offer sports games for free because in a year everyone has moved on to the next, not free, sports game. EA doesn't have good games. EA Access is worth nothing.

Professor_K3170d ago

"I dont care but i care enough to wine about early access and exclusivity deals"

maniacmayhem3170d ago

"If you think EA aren't being greedy with their sub par games and inflated subscription costs you're naive."

The third or forth comment from you where I have read that everyone ELSE is naïve.

"EA doesn't have good games. EA Access is worth nothing."

That's your opinion and your welcome to it, but there are a lot of people who don't share your thoughts. And I lot of them happen to be PS4 owners.

Mystogan3170d ago (Edited 3170d ago )

I get your sarcasm. But $30 a year is a steal. Especially if you just got an Xbox One.

BF4, Plants VS Zombies, Titanfall, Dragon Age are not high quality games?

I like NBA, Madden and Fifa but i'm tired of buying them every year so now I get EA Access and just get them when they're in the vault.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3170d ago
christian hour3170d ago (Edited 3170d ago )

Its funny I see the same people who spent all of last gen bitching about EA and Origin and their regurgitated yearl releases etc etc praising EA access and attacking anyone who dare points out they don't like or care about EA because of their track record and beahviour.

Of course saying that, this just hatred for EA should not apply to developers who are not an inhouse studio at ea but are only being published by ea (Hey there Unravel, come here to me ;) )

FoxyGotGame3171d ago (Edited 3171d ago )

EA approached Sony and they didn't see the value in it. Exactly how many damned monthly subscriptions do people want?

I'll bet Star Wars: Battlefront won't get Early EA Access, and the lack of EA Access isn't diminishing PS4 Sales /

lastking953171d ago (Edited 3171d ago )

Nice edit there lol, that is a good guestion, with battlefront being multiplayer only will it get early access? hmm probably

Pay $5, save $6 on a new game +10% off on dlc and get access to 13 other games. That's what you call a steal.

What's there to disagree with? Oh yeah or you can pay $30 for a whole year and save even more and play the vault of games year round. I know it eat you up inside Sony declined ea but you being in denial about isn't gonna help. Go to Sony and tell them to allow access to come to ps4. What's next they're gonna disallow games they think aren't worth it? Well they're allowing destiny ttk so maybe they won't be that extreme lol.

FoxyGotGame3171d ago (Edited 3171d ago )

Great! That's fantastic!! ...so what are you complaining about?

Enjoy EA Access ...You sold it to yourself spectacularly.

Well Done!

/s

@AstroCyborg

Thanks for letting me know.

Aenea3171d ago

It all depends on how many EA games you actually buy each year.

This year I bought BF: Hardline, will get Battlefront and perhaps the new NFS.

The games in the PSN store in the EU cost €70, with 10% discount they will cost €63, that's 8 to 13 euros more than I can buy them physically for so the discount thing is only handy for DLC of which I haven't bought any yet this year from EA.

If I already buy the games I want there won't be much in the vault for me to play either.

Then there's the week earlier access to new games for 6 hours, nice, but don't think I will pay monthly for that...

So the to me this is a waste of money and if Sony allows this on their network all the other publishers will be going to do the same damn thing and before we know it we are paying 100 a month for all GAME related services. No thanks!

AstroCyborg3171d ago

battlefront is first on xbox due to ea access

MasterCornholio3171d ago (Edited 3170d ago )

What I don't understand is why some people treat it as a timed exclusive when 5 days doesn't really justify it as one.

Anyways I doubt the majority of people will care about that.

The biggest pro of EA access is probably the vault in my opinion.

Keltech3170d ago

Battlefront Beta is first on Playstation due to the exclusive deal. In reality we will play it first. We'll let you know how it is :)

TheCommentator3171d ago

You'd lose that bet... it's been confirmed, lol.

FoxyGotGame3171d ago

Yeah OK, I just thanked AstroCyborg for letting me know I was "WRONG" ....Happy with that?

My main point stands ...I don't care about EA Access and lastking95 has been dying to troll his 1st PS4 fan of the day.

Congratulations lastking95 ..you're a total genius /s

TheCommentator3170d ago

Of course you don't care, it's not on PS4, lol! Next time don't bet though, look it up... you do know you can do that on the internet too? It's pretty easy to do, and it'll save you from both embarrassment (maybe) and the resulting anger you currently feel.

Oh, btw, lastking95 is right so he actually is the genius...

Barnaby-Jones3171d ago

Battlefront was confirmed to be early access for Xbox One.

lastking953170d ago

Lol whatever I was just trying to inform you the service literally pays for itself and many times over. Only someone in denial would think paying $5 and receiving $6 back plus a bunch of freebies and early access is a ripoff/no big deal, it's laughable that's all.

3 stages if gamer denial
1. Deny, don't believe it and make fun of it
2. Downplay, make seem small feat if anything
3. Reassure, pretend your console can do it too.

Looks like stage 2 applies here.

SquillieDeeWilliams3170d ago

They literally said this week that Battlefront will be on early access a week before release.

Chevalier3170d ago

I doubt early access will change people's mind on where to buy it. If your the majority of people own PS4's already and it's 100% multiplayer then I am pretty sure sales will still go towards PS4 where your friends are.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3170d ago
zsquaresoff3171d ago

Really? Because I thought it was Sony who told them no.

Oh, its Peter moore. The guy who can eat a bannana sideways.

aconnellan3170d ago

Sony did tell them no, but you're missing the context of the full interview because the title is blowing it out of proportion, and the article doesn't include the full questions Gamespot asked.

He never said he doesn't care about it coming to PS4 - the interviewer asked if he wants to see it on PS4 and Moore replied that it "doesn't matter" because people on Xbox One are enjoying it.

Key phrasing: "Do you still want to see EA Access on PlayStation 4?"

"Doesn't matter. It's on Xbox One, and those customers love it"

He also refrains from entertaining the follow-up questions because, as he said, it's already on Xbox One - Sony said they didn't want it, so why is this question being asked 3-4 times? It's an entirely irrelevant line of questioning.

"Well Sony talked about it, ask them [laughs]. There's not much left for me to say."

Show all comments (183)
430°

Microsoft Will Be Debating Right Now Whether Xbox Consoles Have a Future, Says Peter Moore

It feels like the video game console is at a crossroads. With Xbox Series X and S floundering in the ‘console war’, Sony suggesting PlayStation 5 is approaching the second half of its life after missing sales targets, and uncertainty around the release of the Nintendo Switch 2, there is growing concern that the traditional video game console business could be under threat.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community41d ago
TheEnigma31341d ago

It's obvious that MS is leaving the console biz. MS may have tons of money, but that doesn't mean they want to keep losing money on the gaming division to prove a point. Thanks Phil

crazyCoconuts41d ago

It's likely but not entirely obvious. The messaging is leaving a lot open to interpretation, and they haven't forked over their crown jewels to PS just yet.
It's POSSIBLE that the upcoming Xbox exclusives do so well they see an uptick in console sales and... change their mind??

Michiel198940d ago

I feel like it's way too late in the console cycle for that, by the time some of them are out we are 1 year further. I think a better bet is to maybe make them with next gen in mind and make them cross gen between this and the next as to give their next console a great launch if the games turn out well. I feel that's their best bet to stay in the console business.

GamerRN41d ago

You should pray they don't exit. If they do, you will see the collapse of the gaming industry.

Aloymetal41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

Here we go again with that false sense of relevancy for the xbox platform.
I told you yesterday that the gaming industry was fine before MS entered the space and it will continue to do even better when they're finally gone. MS is/are not the ones keeping this industry healthy, far from it and most won't even bat an eye if they're gone.
...And Having lots of money doesn't mean success it just means you can keep failing for a long time.

SeTTriP41d ago

Xbox was spearheading the collapse of gaming.

MrBaskerville41d ago

They will just leave room for another competitor. Maybe someone who is more succesful at competing.

UltimateOwnage41d ago

Nah. We might see some real competition again. Maybe from a company that actually loves gaming. Like Sega.

helicoptergirl41d ago

Ridiculous. Acting like MS are the linchpin holding everything down and if they let go, then gaming will be ruined and prices will soar astronomically and creativity will be stifled and thwarted at every turn. It's a fallacy. I'm not saying it's preferrable to have MS out of the console space, but I am saying that all this fearmongering over what will happen if MS were to bow out is overexaggerated and overblown.

andy8541d ago

Collapse? It was here before Xbox and it'll be here long after. What exactly do they do to benefit it? Barely any game output, theyve taken studios and made them worse and they've hurt it trying to make everyone move to streaming.

Bathyj41d ago

Haha.
I'm actually laughing in real life at that

Why exactly?
What are Microsoft contributing to the industry that will be missed?

They're just taking a slot that should belong to someone better.

My vote is for Valve and a Steambox.

GamerRN41d ago

Since you guys clearly don't understand how this all works, I won't explain it to you. You guys will simply see it if it happens, then you'll quietly sit there acting like you saw it coming.

But you can research what Pachter and the other analysts have stated...
🤷

DarkZane40d ago

If anything, Xbox leaving the industry is actually what will save it and make it thrive. They don't contribute anything good to the industry and if anything, any bad practices today, they're the ones responsible.

Take a time machine, go back in the past and erase Xbox from existence, you'd come back to a present where the industry is much better. Remove Sony and/or Nintendo though, there is likely not going to be anything left.

InUrFoxHole40d ago

@Aloy
With competition sony has failed to deliver a diverse generation. Has shifted focus to Gaas, has put the support of their vr platform into the hands of PC, has jacked up the price of their service, is moving you into day and date on PC... Be careful what you close your eyes to. If you wish for MS to be gone, sony is heading in the same direction with less funding

IRetrouk40d ago

Didn't when sega switched it up🤷🏻‍♂️

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 40d ago
Lightning7741d ago

Have fun waiting till 2040 somethin.

Charlieboy33341d ago

Have fun waiting till 2040 for Xbox to make a great game

itsmebryan41d ago

@theenigma
The same can be said if not worst about Sony. Who lose $2 billion of value, lose 26% of there operating income, missed sales goal by 4 million, and has no 1st party games coming out till next year? Console sales are not helping Sony. They are a much smaller company and how long can they afford to lose so much money?

Bathyj41d ago

They are not losing money. They make profit. They bring in more then they spend. It's a business thing. Get a grown up to explain it to you.

You know a dropping stock price is not like that actually had to give 2 billion to someone. That didn't sell their shares. And failed to meet sales expectations? Still sold over 20 million in a year. You must be dizzy from all that spin.

S2Killinit41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

Just making up stuff to feel better? I dont blame you.

S2Killinit41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

Whats crazy is that when some xbox fans were cheering the acquisition of a large part of the multiplatform gaming, they didn’t realize they were cheering on what was to pave the way for xbox to leave console space.

Oh the irony. Karma?

StormSnooper40d ago

True ^
Yup, they celebrated taking games away from others even though they weren’t getting anything they wouldn’t have got anyway. Now it turns out it was all a plan to end Xbox as a console. Heh 🤦

Profchaos40d ago

Exactly right everyone thinks Microsoft is willing to bankroll an underperforming division simply because they can afford it however that's not how these companies operate they might bankroll something for a year or two while not gets established however now is the time they bare expecting a return on the investment and it's clear Xbox is underperforming.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 40d ago
rlow141d ago

Good article and this is not a duplicate. The link that @Maximus Prime shared is just a small portion of the full interview. This post is the full interview.

Times are changing quick, the same ol way the industry been is changing. Where people play is changing.

ChasterMies41d ago

“What I think Phil is doing is setting up some smoke signals that we're thinking very differently”

I’m surprised how slowly Microsoft is moving toward Xbox as a software platform. They usually don’t care so much about upsetting their customers with unpopular changes like they do with every other version of Windows.

badz14941d ago

yeah like they just very recently removed support for Android apps on W11 without much of a warning. simply because they claimed that not many are using them. Sony got a huge flak when removing OtherOS support form the PS3, I think the same should be happening to MS to for removing the apk support. such a dick move!

FinalFantasyFanatic41d ago

That is surprising, I know big companies can't move fast, but they're moving at a glacial pace, everything they've done with Xbox for the past decade has been moving at such a slow pace. I suppose they have money to burn with how big the company is.

derek41d ago

This "console market hasn't grown narrative " is overblown. The market has grown just not as fast as say smartphones. But so what? There is still money to be made in the business and just because Microsoft has failed doesn't mean the entire industry is facing sudden collapse. Gaming will be fine, every industry has to go through periods of restructuring. AAA games are made becuase its what attracts gamers the most and is where they spend the most money. (Demand/supply) Microsoft abandoning hardware should have happened years ago, they clearly lost interest at a base level in producing games and/or paying 3rd parties to back during the tail end of the 360 generation. Tired of hearing about the future of gaming, just make great games and/or invest in one's made by other to attract people to your platform.

hiroyukisanada41d ago

@derek Right! It's so obvious that all Xbox has needed to do is create great first party games like every successful console has done since the original Nintendo. It's not rocket science lol I have lost so much respect for Microsoft over the last 10 years and their rabid fanboys that do not represent their base as a whole. Literally just MAKE Great games and people will invest in your platform. It's not rocket science or excuses. It really is that simple lol
This victim mentality that Phil has instilled this generation has really turned me off the brand for good. Really enjoyed OG Xbox and, while I couldn't wholeheartedly support 360 due to that atrocious failure rate, they had some killer games and services. Ever since Gears of War judgement dropped in 2011 and they shifted completely to Kinect, it's been so bad.

Ninver41d ago

It all started going down hill after Don Matrick stated "stick with the xbox 360 if your don't have any internet.

That man singlehandedly destroyed the xbox brand then jumped ship as it was sinking 😂

DarXyde41d ago

Ninver,

Don had the look of a sleazy businessman, but I don't understand why that moment gets a bad rep.

They were super honest in that moment, and I have to say, it sucks that this is the direction the company would take, but it was such a mask off moment that really highlights their plan.

Nowadays, you have Phil, who isn't direct but is very much still going in the same direction.

What it comes down to, at least from my observation, is Don and Phil were/are just the messengers. Don took a dive following the backlash, so they repackaged the messaging approach with a new person to make it seem like the company is taking a new approach. Nothing has really changed.

So I don't think Mattrick did anything that he wasn't asked to do by his own higher-ups.

He's like a landmark really. Just a reference to a point in time when things got bad. In reality, it was Microsoft's vision for Gen 8 going forward that destroyed them, not Mattrick.

That's my read of things, anyway.

badz14941d ago

Don was honest, Phil is sleazy! don't blame just Don for that downfall, Phil was part of the team back then too. the one announcing the price for the xbone on stage was Phil, remember?

LucasRuinedChildhood41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

Reminds me of when the Wii U's poor sales led to speculation that consoles are dead. It's so repetitive and annoying.

Some people act like we're all about to switch over to cloud gaming when the internet infrastructure and data caps alone would take decades to accommodate such a change.

Google Stadia was shut down and died a horrific death just 1 year ago. lol

darthv7241d ago

If you are looking to something like the PS2 as the measuring stick... keep in mind that there was a percentage of units sold that were replacements for bad lasers and then you had others buy replacements because of model revisions. I'd venture a guess and say the real market saturation point is somewhere between 125-140m. And yes that includes handhelds because even those have users who invested in different variants over the coarse of their lifetime.

You can't truly use units sold as a measure of individual owners. you are right though, the market has certainly grown from something like the 8/16bit era to today, but nowhere near as quickly or as large as the smartphone/tablet market. You figure there are entire swaths of people who dont play consoles/handhelds but they do play on their phones.

crazyCoconuts41d ago

Agreed. I think if you look at the number of concurrent players playing the popular games of the time, it's always breaking records, not decreasing. Sure there are ppl that play on their phones, but a crap ton of kids and adults are sitting down at their computers or consoles to play. Are they all playing the same kinds of games i used to play? not really. But that doesn't mean consoles/computers are going away - they're gonna play games.

343_Guilty_Spark41d ago

It’s grown based on what. What PS console has ever hit 200 million? Even with Xbox doing poorly it’s the same customers who were already going to buy a PS console

derek41d ago

@353, Console sales are not the end goal but the gateway they're not the only measure of growth. You sell consoles to sell games and subscriptions to your platform and that has grown substantially since the ps1/ps2 generations. Revenue and profits have grown meaning the business has grown. Sony's concern is with their margins which have shrunk recently (some from the cost of producing a ps5 not decreasing like in past cycles, some from paying off the bungie purchase, some from growing development costs). So they cut jobs and will look to were they can save on development. Not saying that decision will be proven correct but this is a normal but unfortunate part of the business cycle and its happening across tech. You're talking about the addressable market, but as Layden said if you want to attract new people to console gaming then different games will have to be made then your traditional gta, cod, GoW etc that will interest them.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 40d ago
CrimsonWing6941d ago

They don’t. TVs have Gamepass and everything’s on PC.

Show all comments (76)
220°

EA Hopes to Use Generative AI to Drive Monetization and Make Development 30% More Efficient

Today Electronic Arts CEO Andrew Wilson provided a look into his ideas for the use of generative AI in the company's development processes.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community43d ago
Changed: title
Abriael43d ago
thorstein43d ago

I wonder what the next buzz word they'll slap in front of AI to make it sound exciting next? "Generative" as if it's creating its own content. Lol.

Cacabunga42d ago

EA is already dying a painful death..

peppeaccardo42d ago

i have a better idea .. why the whole exec team doesn't get replaced by chat bots ?

just_looken43d ago

Though i agree the ai thing is already in other forms of media there have been ai translations/scripts/voice over and even full ai commercials aired on tv. Ubisoft has created a ai game creator story/vo/music except the building of the game

The new unreal engine has auto terrain creation tools

In the world of greed in which it is winning without any major blow back ai is our future.

everyone want's biden dead on the mic or a criminal instead of a woman and now we are getting ai everything because no one will stop watching/playing ai created media.

GamerRN42d ago

Maybe they should just focus on making good games?

Just a thought...

Kiryu199242d ago

Exactly EA are just pure evil. When they are beating Bank of America to be voted the worst company to work for that’s saying a lot

Good thing I don’t buy their games day one and wait for deep deep sale years after launch (the select few games I am actually interested in)

Gaming is making so much money yet the greed of these companies is never ending

CEO’s and people on board making millions yet cutting jobs to those who are actually making the products

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 42d ago
Knightofelemia43d ago (Edited 43d ago )

EA is still a shady shitty company even with or without the help of Skynet. All they will use AI for is new ways to milk loot boxes and come up with the same sports title with a different year on the label. They are one company I truly do hate with a passion. They single handedly ruined some great franchise with their death touch. ME, Dead Space, Alice Returns, Dante's Inferno.

Stuart575643d ago

EA layoffs followed by 'Generative AI to Drive Monetization'

I knew it. Wonder what AI salary looks like? Nothing.

ChasterMies42d ago

I having a feeling that most of the layoffs in the industry are based on the idea that AI will do the same job for less.

DarXyde42d ago

Very likely, yes.

Made worse by the fact that the execs aren't changing their compensations.

My deepest fear at this point is that we are now in the capitalism endgame.

At this point, we really should just burn AI to the ground. Executives cannot be trusted to do the right thing.
How are those people expected to support families if everything gets automated?

Barlos43d ago (Edited 43d ago )

And take away creativity, and people's jobs as we've been seeing. Got it.

No thanks. I want my games created by people, not AI.

CobraKai43d ago

Exactly. If or when games start becoming more AI than people, im done with gaming. AI and companies like EA can suck donkey d***k.

just_looken43d ago

Though i agree remember this is no ps3/360 era were we got up to 3 games in one generation from on developer like gears/halo/bioware/sony/ms

The people today are pro esg/sweet baby for the most part AAA gaming is imploding right now.

We should be stepping back re evaluate everything as a whole this year xmen 97 written/directed by a woman that is nuts and its also being made by a group reshaping bodies to be less sexual like wtf. A dam famous cartoon from the 90's is being rebuilt with millions spent to be worse in everyway.

Gaming/movies/tv shows made today are worse than what we had 7years ago ai won't change this but that ai is also being made by these groups so either way we are screwed.
https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Eonjay42d ago

Don't be of afraid of women. Sexy characters in games and movies still exist. Got my Stellar Blade on preorder!!! Everything all the time doesn't need to be sexual...that's stupid, childish and dull.

Chocoburger43d ago (Edited 43d ago )

EA doesn't want to lose their title of worst gaming company ever, always trying their best to remain the champs!
What's sad is that they have so much potential to be a decent publisher.

SSX Tricky / SSX 3
Def Jam Vendetta / Fight for New York
NBA Street
NFL Steet
Mirror's Edge
Bad Company
Burnout 3 / 4 / 5

Remember when EA used to be awesome? It's all over with now. Unpolished, if not out-right broken games these days. Endless monetization and gambling in their sports games, and let's not forget wasting hours of your life trying to unlock characters or equipment using "surprise boxes!"

Show all comments (37)
80°

EA And Sony Layoffs, Entertainment News And More Skewedcast

Gareth, Justin, and JoeyZ look at Layoff news for EA and Sony and reasons behind the downturn in the industry and more.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (3)- Updates (3)

Updates

Changed: embed code
Christopher46d ago
Changed: embed code
Christopher46d ago
Changed from Pending to Approved
Community49d ago