170°

XBLA: 'Braid' to Cost 1200 MS Points, 'Castle Crashers' to Cost 1,800 Points?

Four Japanese websites are now saying that two titles in the upcoming "Summer Of Arcade", 'Castle Crashers' and 'Braid', will be costing a little more than the usual XBLA title.

Read Full Story >>
gamerbytes.com
InMyOpinion6170d ago

If so that sucks bigtime. Those are the two XBLA titles I'm looking forward to the most. Bet they will be good though.

callahan096170d ago

I'm definitely looking forward to Braid. I am not a big Behemoth fan, and I thought that Alien Homonid was over-rated, so I have really no interest in Castle Crashers. But Braid looks awesome. I can't imagine CC being worth that price, but Braid may be! I'm glad Braid is the cheaper one.

gaffyh6169d ago

So 1200 Points is ~$15 and 1800 points is ~$22.50, not really worth it IMO, cos if you look at Ratchet Quest for Booty, it is $15 and I think Wipeout HD might cost a similar amount (maybe a little more).

I haven't ever gone on XBL (cos my 360 is not connected to internet) but i expected all the games to be 800 points or less. Dunno if people who were thinking of buying this game on XBL see the price as a boundary?

Dark_Vendetta6169d ago

Damn after finishing Alien Hominid I was really looking forward to castle crasher, but if the prize tag is legit I won't buy it

callahan096169d ago

15 for Braid seems like a fair price to me. From what I've read about the game (on Jason Rohrer's blog, for example) it's a very deep game with a worthwhile tale to tell and packs in at least a few hours of gameplay. Exactly the same set of qualities applies to Ratchet & Clank Quest For Booty, also at a 15 dollar price point. Seems fair to me.

I'm guessing that Wipeout HD is going to be about 30, though. That's what is being charged for Koei's Fatal Inertia for the PSN, and Wipeout HD will probably be a more critically acclaimed game that they can get away with charging at least that amount for (perhaps even 40 dollars, like they did with GT5 Prologue).

But Castle Crashers looks a bit too shallow for my blood, at least at over 20 bucks. I somehow don't see it being worth that, but I'll reserve my judgment until I play the trial.

Nevers6169d ago

http://www.joystiq.com/2008...

WOOOOOOT!!!!

... tho they could still pull a fast one on us... lol/cry

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 6169d ago
Relcom6170d ago

1200 points is what 15$? thats not bad but i think it is dumb to charge more for this.

Braid does look pretty good though, 2D platformers FTW

dachiefsman6170d ago

for me it depends on gameplay and length. If these games take 2 hours, then no way. Hopefully they have some depth and longevity.

outlawlife6169d ago

castle crashers may be worth it...seems like a big ganme with many characters/weapons/unlockables and what not from what the site says

but i'll wait and see...i highly doubt they will go over 1200 for an arcade game since and xbox original is only 1200

Bnet3436169d ago

Penny Arcade was 1600. and 1800 points is over $20. Damn I thought Castle Crashers would be $10, damn it oh well I am not wasting that much

GiantEnemyCrab6169d ago

Agreed! 800 points is where I draw the line on any downloadable titles.

Show all comments (17)
80°

Castle Crashers' Painter Boss Paradise DLC is a Surprise, but a Welcome One

After well over a decade, Indie darling Castle Crashers is getting a brand new DLC, and it's going to bring about some pretty sizable changes.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
190°

The Most Famous Video Games Made By Only One Person

BLG writes: "Do you know any famous games made by one person? Well, we’re here to educate you on some of the best one-man projects out there."

Read Full Story >>
bosslevelgamer.com
franwex1119d ago (Edited 1119d ago )

Nice list.

I’ll add 9th Dawn III to that list. Great game made by one person.

Always Sometimes Monster is made by two people technically, but let’s do an honorable mention.

NecrumOddBoy1119d ago

I’d add HABROXIA 1 & 2 on here as well. Berry does pixel wonders with the Game Maker engine.

1119d ago Replies(1)
ABizzel11119d ago

Technically speaking Minecraft should have been on the list. But it's nice to see these single devs thrive.

Rebel_Scum1119d ago

Some of these arent exactly “made by one man”

Looking at you Braid and Fez.

AmUnRa1119d ago

Theyr is no game made by one man. Theyr is always a team of developers behind them.
However there is always someone who comes up with the idea of a game.
When i would give an example of one man with that idea for me its Hideo Kojima....

LabRat1118d ago (Edited 1118d ago )

No there are certainly games made by 1 person, start to finish. Maybe after it launches and becomes a big enough success the 1 person will reach out for help maintaining it or updating, but games have been made by 1 person.

Unless of course you are being insanely nit-picky and trying to claim "the engine they used was made by Unity" or "the assets they put in were made by someone else"

Show all comments (10)
410°

Xbox Live Gold Subscribers Can Claim These Three Additional Free Games

Microsoft is offering three additional free games for all Xbox Live Gold subscribers in addition to the regular lineup of games this month.

Read Full Story >>
novicegamerguides.com
darthv721146d ago

Joe Danger is hella fun. Nice bonus from GwG.

deleted1146d ago

I enjoyed Joe Danger back in the day, it's pretty fun. What's amazing is how Hello Games went from a few of these rather simple games to the ultra-ambitious No Man's Sky!

1146d ago Replies(1)
Orchard1146d ago

I would love a sequel to JD - although I do realize that Hello Games have kinda grown beyond that scope of game.

Godmars2901146d ago

And still the contradiction of getting something for "free" from a service you pay for continues.

CrimsonWing691146d ago

But isn’t the service for online multiplayer? So, technically it’s “free games” included with your online subscription? I mean, what was the point of Xbox Live? To get free games?

Godmars2901146d ago

Only, after they tried doubling the price of another online service, some similar nonsense, isn't Xbox online multiplayer suppose to be free?

darthv721146d ago

"isn't Xbox online multiplayer suppose to be free?" No, it was always been a paid premium on console. The free games was not related to the rumored price hike. They were giving them away long before that.

If there was a service for free online multiplayer on console, it was PSN. Until the PS4 came out.

Jericho13371146d ago

How would you have worded it then? I’d say ‘subscribers claiming free games’ is about as clear as it gets.

Godmars2901146d ago

"As part of", "In addition to", "As an extra bonus". Anything better than, "Get this with no strings attached or requirements" which is what "free" implies.

Jericho13371146d ago

That’s like saying ‘buy one get one free’ doesn’t apply because it’s not technically ‘free’. Stop trying to find a problem with something when there isn’t one.

gangsta_red1146d ago

** "Get this with no strings attached or requirements" which is what "free" implies.**

No, it actually doesn't, it's just like when you get a free refill of soda after you purchased your first cup.

I think we are well enough into these console gens to stop bringing up this tired argument

CrimsonWing691146d ago

You always had to pay for Xbox Live to
play online multiplayer… this was the case way back during the original Xbox when it was released.

I don’t understand what you’re hung up about when plenty of subscription services give free things as a perk or benefit to a user who subscribes to a service.

Hell, Nintendo Power gave me a “Free” Strategy Guide of my choosing for paying for their magazine subscription way back in the day.

You’re getting the games that you’d need to pay for regardless of the subscription for free, bottom-line. The service you’re paying for is the online multiplayer service Xbox Live. You aren’t paying for Xbox Live and paying for the game you were handed out for free, you’re still just paying for the online service and nothing more. Hence, why the game in itself is free for Xbox Live subscribers.

sinspirit1146d ago

It was originally just for online access. It had updated and began monthly game releases to compete with PS Plus. Monthly games have been a part of Live for many years. It is more recently that the releases are getting worse and worse.

Godmars2901146d ago

Its been a majoritively dismissed point as DLC, MTs and now subscriptions became things. Failed protest against policies meant ultimately to strip consumers of ownership rights over media in general.

Still, may as well keep pointing it out.

sinspirit1145d ago (Edited 1145d ago )

@Godmars290

I guess people are just missing the point. And, now we got people thinking Live is still just an online sub and games are a generous inclusion like it's not a feature of the paid service lol.

Live officially on Microsofts site lists, "Free games every month. Now that’s Gold.
Get 2 free games a month, including backward compatible Xbox 360 games".

But, many are starting to say that Live payment is still just for the online access. Which, if that's what they're believing then I'm worried about why they'd pay just for online access. Paying for it back in the day was already a ripoff since they didn't even host dedicated servers to ensure the best quality connection. You'd pay for it just to host it on the internet provider that you also pay for lol.

I do think it's great to offer extra games on top of the existing ones. However, Live has repeatedly offered very lacking games, has listed the same games more than once, and even listed the same game two months in a row one time. They need to have a solid consistent history of delivering quality monthly releases.

traumadisaster1145d ago

And still the contradiction of bringing up a decade old tired complaint knowing we’ve all moved in but you. We all agree it would better if the author was accurate but this argument is so old now, move on.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1145d ago
Father__Merrin1146d ago

https://www.xbox.com/ja-jp/...

I've just redeemed knights quest needs GP/gold membership etc

1146d ago