90°

The Strategic Advantages of Backwards Compatibility on Xbox One

Backwards Compatibility had been one of the most requested features that most fans thought would never work but to our surprise Microsoft has delivered. There was much speculation as to how this would play out but after a few weeks we can now delve into the ramifications of this announcement.

StrayaKNT3216d ago

Bc is the biggest game changer of this generation.

feelforlove3216d ago

keep believing in that buddy. let's hope that will help Xbox One to win at least in US when they're crushed everywhere else.

StrayaKNT3216d ago

Lol that's great for you dude but I couldn't care less if ps4 has sold 2 billion consoles and Microsoft sold 5 thousand, it still doesn't change the fact that there are over 7 brutal exclusives on the Xbox one and only one niche exclusive playable on the ps4 IMO enjoy these amazing sales though, hopefully one day you will play some amazing games that you didn't have to kickstart. Take care dude and stop stalking me lol you look really hurt by doing that.

mikeslemonade3216d ago

lol at aussie's logic

he says "for you dude" and then he says "he doesn't care if ps4 sold 2 bil and X1 sold 5 thousand"

So clearly you are thinking for yourself too.

Sales equal more games. There's a correlation to that.

And I don't see the BC increasing much of the sales.

feelforlove3216d ago

you don't care about sales but you like to point it out that Halo 5 has the most preorders?

SpaceRanger3216d ago

You're right. It's what's gonna send Xbox to the top just like the Wii U! I mean the Wii U has been doing exceptional because of the right out of the box feature to play all of last gen.'s Wii games. /s

It's a great and nifty feature man, believe me it's a big leap forward from the entertainment/TV focused Xbox of 2013. But it's in no way the "game changer of this generation" like you state. The PS3 had it and the Wii U has it.

justlikeme3216d ago

It's not a game changer, but it is a big F U to PSNow.

Intranquill3215d ago

What are you going on about? "7 brutal exclusives"? They're the same core franchises that have been the heart of Xbox and it's community since it's inception. And if you're talking about anything other than Gears, Halo, and Forza, then you're more of a cloud headed fan boy than I originally believed. Because no one, and I mean no one, is craving to play games like Ryse, Dead Rising 3, or any other "brutal exclusive" other than the 3 I mentioned.

You can pretend PS4 has no games/exclusives, that's ok. Luckily what you think and the games I play contradict one another, so my gaming library will speak for itself. But overall, how the hell does playing decade old games on new hardware give you the "biggest game changer of this generation"? I'm genuinely curious why you think that is.

If everyone wanted to play these old games, then they bought the wrong system in the first place, and if everyone already has these games, chances are they already own a 360. So I don't see a big advantage. Who would want to move from the solid and easy to use 360, to the overly cumbersome and awful OS that is the One?

Oh, nice list of titles there for 2016. Let's see what PS4 has in store that's announced.

Ratchet and Clank reboot
Horizon
Uncharted 4
The Last Guardian
Hellblade

Not counting anything I've surely missed/what's yet to be announced, and all the awesome looking indie games that, in my opinion, both One and PS4 are successful in.

You can be a fan boy dude, just don't be one that supports stuff with opinions and "facts" and this "because I said so" mentality.

spoonard3215d ago (Edited 3215d ago )

Backwards compatibility is not a game changer at this point. Had MS had it ready with the launch of the Xbone, then it would have made a bigger difference. But people aren't going to run out and buy a new console so they can play games from LAST generation on it. At this point, it's people who already own the console that are cheering about it because they kept their old 360's and were holding off on buying a Xbone.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3215d ago
feelforlove3216d ago

7 brutal exclusives? and not 1 scored 90+ on metacritic? and highest rated Xbox One "exclusive" is an indie game playable on pc?

lolosgolos3216d ago

They don't have to score 90 on meta to be excellent games of which they are

christocolus3216d ago

Nice Article. Great job Ticgn. I like what MS is currently doing with Fallout 4 and Rainbow 6, i hope they keep doing this with upcoming exclusives and third party titles.

Lenrulesdaworld3216d ago

Yeah, my guys have been doing a good job of really looking at the situation and direction MS is in. There still a few ways ways to go but they have been on the right track and consumers are taking notice. Happy Phil is in charge, him & the team have made a real positive difference with the xbox division.

XanderZane3216d ago

True, with the B/C the XB1 is starting to get more positive press and with all these exclusives coming out st the end of the year, it should help the XB1 sell more system. It seems it will have a decent lineup of games to kick off 2016 as well.

StrayaKNT3216d ago

Recore
Quantum break
Sea of thieves
Scalebound
Crackdown
Gears 4

That's all the AAA games we know of so far and they are all coming in 2016 with recore and quantum break to kick the year. 2016 could be the best year for xbox depending on what we see at gamescom.

thecowsaysmoo3216d ago

Don't forget Forza Horizon 3, we all know that game is coming.

Show all comments (23)
260°

Fallout 4 – Why Was it So Divisive?

The RPG has seen an explosion in popularity thanks to Amazon's TV show, but it was Bethesda's most controversial Fallout for a long time.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
thorstein21h ago

I loved it. And I platinum'd it. I guess it's like most "divisive" games. If you don't like it, so what? Let those that do, enjoy it.

Eonjay14h ago(Edited 14h ago)

The article is trying to create fud where there was none. It has an 87 meta (on PS4). There is nothing divisive about it. It was well received. Period. I don't remember any arguments except for some performance issues when it first came out. Thats it.

VenomUK11h ago

I really enjoyed Fallout 4.
I loved the halfway goal of what you are building towards. I had a good sense of what it was and then when you finally are almost there the music builds up - beautiful!

@Eonjay Forget the meta scores there are plenty of people who loved Fallout 3 but thought Fallout 4 was a bit of anticlimax and I do get it. Pete Hines the retired head of Bethesda's PR was even asked about it, and his answer was that it was because it simply didn't have the novelty of being brand new that Fallout 3 had.

Profchaos3h ago

No venture beyond that so many of the hardcore gatekeep the franchise hard as 4 was far more popular and simplified many of the rpg elements refined shooting to the point where vats was optional the game was far more accessible and sold the most out of every franchise entry to date.

It's my personal favourite I get why people love 3 or NV but I do hate seeing people crap on 4 and the people who like it.

ChasterMies17h ago

Fallout 4 wasn’t so much divisive as not very good. But there aren’t many first person RPGs so what else are fans of the genre supposed to play?

FPS_D3TH17h ago(Edited 17h ago)

I think it was the lack of morality gameplay and lack of path to completion options compared to what fallout 3 and New Vegas offered. I think the issue mostly arose because of the voiced protagonist and how many lines of dialogue that needed to be recorded. Didn’t leave for many options beyond “good” “sarcastic douche” and the odd question or two for nearly every interaction. Personally I thought the game was fantastic as an adventure and exploration game, I liked the park system and base building, but the rpg aspects were fairly gutted. It made shooting much more tolerable too but it still wasn’t anything fantastic. The faction choices were ok and I felt like they all provided a more grey moral choice dilemma compared to older games which felt more good/evil but it wasn’t presented as such as prominently as I would’ve liked. You had to do some more internal and critical thinking of your own to come to decide why you’d support one faction over another unless you were in it just for some in game benefit or another.

kneon7h ago

I didn't like any of the factions, so when it got to the point that I had to choose, I chose to stop playing

jznrpg6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

I finished the game but you are correct. I was thinking I don’t really know which one to pick as I don’t really care for any of them. I was near the Institute so I just went with that quest line. A lame way to choose who will win but I didn’t really prefer one over the others

EazyC33m ago

I don't think FNV was good/evil. You have evil with Caesar's Legion, then everything else is different shades of grey imo and quite relative to your own political views! 😅

Friendlygamer17h ago(Edited 17h ago)

1 Bad writing, the main quest is terrible. The sense of urgency of the story is at odds with the open world nature of the game

2 Boring, bland factions

3 too much personality for the main character. The game decides that you're married, that you love your son, your voice... a rpg like fallout should have a blank slate mc

4 dead open world. Fallout 3 and nv have a bunch of small cities and locations on their maps that give you interesting quests and dialogue. In Fallout 4 it feels like 80 per cent of the map is focused on combat and environmental storytelling, it feels more like a post apocalyptic action game rather than a dialogue heavy rpg

Fallout 4 is a very fun open world fps with really cool environmental storytelling but a very poor rpg

Show all comments (48)
210°

What Made Fallout 3 One Hell of a Game?

Bethesda's post-apocalyptic RPG remains an unabashed classic, more than a decade and a half on from its launch.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
ZeekQuattro2d ago

For me its the fact that I could put hundreds of hours into it and still find areas I missed in my earlier runs. It was also my first FO and despite what I had to put up with at times such as overall crashs and killing my orginal PS3 with the YLOD it's still my favorite entry to this day.

-Foxtrot2d ago

Tons of reasons

But my silly little one…hunting for unique weapons and armour

Something Fallout 4 just didn’t really have as much because they replaced most of it with randomly generated customised weapons. Even Elder Scrolla doesn't do it as well.

Yui_Suzumiya1d 5h ago (Edited 1d 5h ago )

I remember during my first playthrough of Fallout 4 back in 2015 I somehow got an automatic combat rifle that shot explosive rounds by defeating a legendary creature. Unfortunately that was the only playthrough I ever got that weapon. It's a shame because it was absolutely epic!

Vits1d 19h ago

Sense of exploration. That was why older Bethesda games were so good. They might have had glitches, broken mechanics, meh visuals, etc., but they were some of the best around when it came down to the sense of exploration. You could go wherever you wanted and you would find something cool; it might have been a faction, a weapon, an enemy and much more. And that is what they are lacking now. Skyrim still had a lot of that, but Fallout 4 dropped it by focusing on an interconnected world and more randomly generated rewards. Fallout 76 just kept that trend and added multiplayer, and Starfield went even further in killing it by creating a whole universe with parts completely isolated from each other.

EazyC1d 16h ago

I think the retrospective of Fallout: New Vegas' existence has somewhat diminished the view of Fallout 3 in the eyes of many, but it getting out of the vault in Fallout 3 was, for me, the most remarkable experience I've had in a videogame.

I was 12 when it came out, and I remember I just saw the score it got in Gamemaster magazine (remember those!? 😅), and I just went to the shop and bought it with my pocket money.

Not knowing anything about the game, I thought the whole thing was going to be about growing up in a vault, especially given that I'd spent about 2 hours in it....I literally could.not.believe it when you got out and it was just this wasteland on every direction. Amazing.

Tody_ZA1d 16h ago (Edited 1d 16h ago )

Probably because these Bethesda games were hand crafted so that exploration meant something. Unlike Starfield where this sense of exploration is replaced with the illusion of scope and procedurally generated worlds. A player can always appreciate when they wonder into an unforgettable new encounter by accident or stumble across a new questline that becomes their favourite. Just like a player can always tell when they're ploughing through filler on auto pilot, that they'll forget the moment some resource numbers go up and nothing worth remembering occurred.

I mean, in Fallout 3 you could nuke an entire town as a SIDE QUEST. In The Elder Scrolls Oblivion and Skyrim, the Dark Brotherhood questlines were my favourite in any RPGs and you could completely avoid them if you didn't care for them. In The Witcher 3 side quests take you on ridiculously dark and mysterious storylines that are some of the best I've played in RPG history. There's a reason why people still talk about KOTOR to this day. Difference between a developer creating something or just padding a game world with stuff.

Fist4achin1d 12h ago

There were some side quests that could yld have been developed into an entirely separate game. Some great writing there.

Show all comments (13)
360°

Fallout 4 For PS5 And Xbox Series X – Everything You Need to Know

For those looking to jump into the post-apocalyptic RPG for the first time, here's everything you need to know about it and its upcoming next-gen update.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
Barlos1d 22h ago

Got it installed on my PS5 ready for this. Not sure I'll play it very much though because I didn't like the settlements feature, it just never seemed to gel with me.

Looking forward to giving it a shot though

just_looken1d 21h ago

Use manual saves keep them backed up on ps4 it was a crasher

Just a fyi

Barlos1d 18h ago

Hopefully it won't be after the update. Mind you it'll probably introduce some new bugs 🤣

Yui_Suzumiya1d 5h ago

I was lucky and had minimal bugs at launch in 2015. I got the platinum trophy a month after launch.

Seth_hun1d 17h ago

You probably need to download the native ps5 version, its not just a patch

Abear211d 12h ago

This was my question, article states it’s a native version so will need to re-download when it releases.

Hoping it’s not a Bethesda buggy mess as the game has been out forever, but not holding my breath. Also unsure if saves will transfer, unlikely as again it’s a new version of the game

banger881d 9h ago

"Not sure I'll play it very much though because I didn't like the settlements feature, it just never seemed to gel with me."

Doing the settlement related crap isn't mandatory, feel free to ignore it.

anast1d 21h ago

Hopefully it's playable by now.

just_looken1d 21h ago

tod: Can you load the start menu?

q&a: yes

Todd: does it load in allow you to move?

Q&a: yes

Tod: Great its gone gold ship it that is the quality we here strive for.

TheEroica1d ago

Naughty dog would've charged us 70 bucks for this. Thank you Bethesda!

anast22h ago

@Eroica

It's free because they are going to let AI do most of the work.

15h ago
Barlos1d 17h ago

It was always playable for me on my PS4 Pro. I don't recall any issues aside from the usual 'Bethesda Bugs'. Nothing even close to game breaking.

just_looken1d 12h ago

Now yes but first year it was very bad and you had to watch the save file size

Barlos1d 12h ago (Edited 1d 12h ago )

@just_looken

No I mean even back then, I can't recall any significant issues. Funny thing with the save file size is there were serious problems with Skyrim on PS3 because of the save file, until it was patched. Seems that Bethesda just don't learn.

Abear211d 12h ago

Far Harbor was barely playable on Pro for me, it was a slide show in the fog. I’ve been waiting for this patch for what seems like forever!

1d 9h ago
brando0081d 17h ago

Tried to play it again on PS4 last week to finish Far Harbour, the game kept crashing on launch. Hopefully this new patch let's me start the game lol

Abear211d 12h ago (Edited 1d 12h ago )

If Far Harbor is butter smooth and this baby has a smooth release overall I’ll take back everything terrible I ever said about Bethesda. This is the best game they put out in the last ten years. Still betting on a Day one patch incoming though and probably more to come. They should allow pre load bc their servers are gonna get boinked.

Profchaos1d 2h ago

Yeah far harbour on the PS4 was playable for me but wow did that fog cause significant slowdown killed off any desire to explore and instead I would go point to point as fast as possible.

gold_drake1d 17h ago

theres not rly much to know, other than the update comes out next week haha

Abear211d 12h ago

Here’s the one Pro Tip you need—play as Evil, it’s impossible to keep track of who you are supposed to be for and against with all the Factions—I say F them all and play Evil so it’s no stress! Lol

kneon1d 11h ago

I never finished the game because I got to the point where the game really wanted me to pick a side, I didn't want to side with anyone so I just stopped playing. It's pretty rare for me not to finish a game, but it just got boring.

Show all comments (32)