Approvals 13/3 ▼
Mikelarry (2) - 3237d ago Cancel
Pozzle (5) - 3237d ago Cancel
johndoe11211 (1) - 3237d ago Cancel
Eonjay (2) - 3237d ago Cancel
Nosred (2) - 3237d ago Cancel
ifinitygamer (1) - 3237d ago Cancel
150°

Will backwards compatibility win the console war for Microsoft

One of the more surprising announcements at Microsoft’s E3 press conference, was that backwards compatibility is coming to Xbox One. While Playstation 4 allows you to play PS3 games via Playstation Now, it’s a rental service not a backwards compatibility system. Microsoft offering the option for you to play your old Xbox 360 games on Xbox One does give them an edge when people are deciding which new console to buy, but will it be enough to catch up on the lead that Sony already has?

Read Full Story >>
xboxenthusiast.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community3237d ago
sammarshall1023237d ago (Edited 3237d ago )

Backwards compatibility is an amazing feature

I can play titles I missed out on last gen and buy them for dirt cheap

I'm waiting for Mass Effect 2, Red Dead Redemption, Lost Odyssey, Gears of War 2

johndoe112113237d ago

They didn't ask if it was a good feature, they asked if it will win the console war for microsoft and the answer to that question is a resounding NO.

Hellsvacancy3237d ago (Edited 3237d ago )

It is a really obvious answer, the PS3 didn't have BC last gen and it ended the gen on top

BiggerBoss3237d ago (Edited 3237d ago )

@hellsvacancy technically, the Ps3 did have BC at first. And the Wii (which had BC) ended the gen on top sales-wise.

However, BC will NOT cause the XB1 to magically overcome a 2-1 sales gap.

Neonridr3237d ago (Edited 3237d ago )

@Hellsvacancy - technically Nintendo ended up on top in terms of sales. And it did have BC...

and now I read BiggerBoss's comment.. lol (fail)

Hands Up For Games3237d ago

@Hellsvacancy

Haha hah

1. The PS3 DID have backwards compatibility in the console until Sony decided to take it out to cut down on production costs.

2. The PS3 did not end up on top, it trailed badly to the Wii - the 360 and PS3 were so close in terms of sales that most people call it pretty much level. If you have a link to somewhere with irrefutable facts about how many consoles were sold last gen, I'm all ears . . .

3. BC is not going to 'win' the 'console war' for MS but what it might do is persuade current 360 owners to make the jump and upgrade to the One and take there library with them.

Don't worry, I'm sure Sony will still 'win' this gen and you can continue your crusade, knowing you picked the 'right' side :)

3237d ago
Hellsvacancy3237d ago (Edited 3237d ago )

Hands Up For Games.... I didn't pick a side, I chose what I wanted, if I really thought there was a better console I would buy one

And you don't need to list things for me buddy, think I don't know this stuff myself?

MY (two) PS3s DIDN'T have BC, it was a feature Sony thought we could do without, and they were right

Neonridr, last gen the console war was between the PS3 and X360, just like it is this gen

XanderZane3237d ago (Edited 3237d ago )

It's a simple "No". It will help sell more game consoles, especially in the U.S., but I don't see the XB1 catching the PS4 worldwide unless Sony goes bankrupt. I think they will win the U.S. back eventually before this gen is over. So it's definitely will be a plus for the XB1.

@Hellsvacancy
The Wii ended the gen on top, not the PS3. The Wii did have B/C with the Gamecube. It even had B/C with the GC controllers. The war was against the Wii, 360 and PS3. You can't omit a game console, just because it beat your favorite. LOL!! Don't be such a fanboy.

Hands Up For Games3237d ago

@Hellsvacancy

You said:

"And you don't need to list things for me buddy, think I don't know this stuff myself?"

By adding a question mark to the end of your sentence, I think I was right to list things - do you know your stuff :)

As for BC and the PS3 taking it out, Sony didn't do that because they thought you didn't want it, they took it out to save money.

As for the "Console War" its only applicable to soldiers and to be honest, im a pacifist. Im here for the games :)

Gazondaily3237d ago

BC us a wicked feature but you will need A LOT more to dethrone Sony. I just don't see it happening ; well sales wise anyway.

Crimzon3237d ago

@Hellsvacancy

"MY (two) PS3s DIDN'T have BC, it was a feature Sony thought we could do without, and they were right"

If Sony were right about this, why did they spend $380 million buying Gaikai so that people could play PS3 games on PS4? Why did they also go to all the trouble of hiring studios to port PS3 games such as The Last of Us, Uncharted Trilogy, God of War 3, Beyond: Two Souls etc. to PS4, if nobody cares about it?

I mean backwards compatibility is just a way of playing last gen games on current gen hardware. You can say, "Oh, nobody cares about that" but Sony evidently cares from how much they're trying to profit off peoples desire to play PS3 games on PS4. In fact, I'm willing to bet that you have at least one remaster for your PS4 at the very least, along with many other people.

Seeing people on this website suddenly pretend that backwards compatibility doesn't matter just because Microsoft is offering a free solution doesn't make sense, because it's contradictory to both Sony's business decisions and the purchasing habits of the PS4 userbase.

Oh no, nobody cares about backwards compatibility at all. Now just let me fire up The Last of Us for PS4 now. Gee, can't wait for the Uncharted Trilogy later this year...

Spotie3237d ago

If Gaikai's acquisition- and its use through PS Now- was only about backwards compatibility, then why can you use the service through Samsung TVs? Does it even count as BC if you don't even need a console for the games? Hell, you don't even need a Sony device, meaning it can't possibly be BC in any fashion.

It'd be really nice if you guys stopped equating a streaming game to Sony's answer to BC when it's obviously not that.

AngelicIceDiamond3237d ago

This article is ridiculous. BC is great but it won't "win the console war." MS still has loads of work to do.

Crimzon3237d ago (Edited 3237d ago )

@Spotie

Playing old games on new hardware seems like the very definition of backwards compatibility to me.

Kingthrash3603237d ago

Short answer...no
Long answer no.
A few overlooked things come to mind when Xbox ones BC comes up is...the 360 doesn't have much in its backlog as far as blockbusters are concerned halo has the mcc so halo is out then gears has anniversary ...so it mostly leaves just 3rd party games which is cool, but it all depends on what games will be allowed. With ea and its service on Xbox will it allow BC free on its games? Capcom has said they are focusing on remakes so will they allow their games? Is assassins creed a game you want to go through again? How many games are going to be allowed by publishers? Will they be games you want to play? ....I'm just saying that true BC would be all the last ten games playable...like the wii ....which honestly I didn't use. Not many want a new console for old games....is this a great deal....yes it's free so obviously it's a great deal...but BC has never pushed a system to success. It's just a sad question to ask if BC will win a console war....it never has. The wii won because of wii bowling grabbing non gamers and bringing hardcore games like Mario and Zelda...it didn't win that war with its BC it won't with its attraction to casual gamers...

_-EDMIX-_3237d ago

@HellsV- Agreed. Though PS3 had BC from PS2 early on and PS1 BC the whole gen, I can't say that factored into them winning or sell a lot as it was for about less then a year that they even had PS2 full BC.

The reality is, at $600, it was clear it wasn't worth the feature.

Saving someone $80 on a used console won't some how win a gen, lol, that just makes no sense. What will win any gen is purely based off of what is offered during that gen, not what is offered from last gen.

Consider Wii sold almost 100 million....the Wii U HAS A Wii IN IT NATIVE!

Why isn't Wii U selling better then both? Consider its the only one that has native BC and the only one that has had BC since launch and from a system like the Wii that did near 100 million. I mean...that sorta answers just how important BC is to gamers.

Its a nice feature, but I don't see systems jumping off shelves for it.

Some features are nice to have, but the value of it isn't as much as folks would like to think.

Something valued is something someone feels is worth the money to buy, if I can get a PS3, 360 etc because I feel its worth the value to play those older games, then I'll buy it along with a PS4, XONE etc.

Why is it that we don't see that with PS4 and XONE? Its because its NOT worth the real value, ie its a NICE feature, its not a feature clearly folks want enough to go out and spend an extra $100, $200 etc just to have.

Again, Wii U very much says hello to that strange concept.

Death3237d ago

@Hells,

MY (one) PS3 DID have BC, it was a feature Sony thought we couldn't do without, and they were right

@Spotie,

We can argue the definition to backwards compatibility or we can acknowledge that Sony sees a definite value to their back catalog of games from the PS3. Gaikai/PSNow is the way Sony is giving access to these games for a fee.

Microsoft also sees value in their back catalog of games on the 360. They seem to understand that customers don't want to pay more than once for the games they own too. That is one of the reasons why they developed an emulator to play 360 games on the Xbox One. They will also offer these games for purchase since they still have value.

I guess as a fan it sucks to not be able to claim the Xbox is selling better than the PS4, but it also makes Microsoft try much harder to make customers happy. Sony doesn't have to try to make people happy since they are buying PS4's anyway. I have both so I make out either way, but if I had to choose I would probably give up bragging rights for more features and benefits.

donthate3237d ago

I think very few features will "win" a console war assuming you mean win is to sell more console than any of your competition.

However, it will help. I would argue it is one of the most important features to get gamers to switch to your console early in the generation, which we still are.

I kicked myself many times for not getting a PS3 phat with BC, but instead ended up with the non-BC PS3 phat with the metal gear solid 4 gunmetal grey. Wish I had both!

Professor_K3237d ago

He was trying to imply that No it doesnt mmatter because BC is an Amazing feature and this article is pointless

umair_s513237d ago

@johndoe It is in no way a resounding "no", adding features such as backwards compatibility do add up towards changing customer perception and bringing in sales

kreate3237d ago

Its gotta be a fully backwards compatibility. Even than its just a good feature.

360 lacks games in the late life cycle. While ps3 games are still coming out.

Ps4 needs BC more than the x1.

Spotie3236d ago

No one has ever referred to playing old games on a capable PC as backward compatibility. Those little things you can get from the dollar store with a dozen old arcade games you can plug right into your TV? NOT BC.

Yet a service that allows you to play older games on whatever supported hardware is BC because the games are old?

At some point, you guys have to stop reaching. You can twist reality only so far before it becomes just your own delusion.

+ Show (18) more repliesLast reply 3236d ago
Neonridr3237d ago

No it won't, but it's a great feature. Especially for those 360 users who haven't upgraded yet.

Nosred3237d ago

BC alone does not, but great games coming the same as this year and next and more great LIVE support will make the stay very close to the victory.

fermcr3237d ago

"Will backwards compatibility win the console war for Microsoft"

Great feature to have but NO, it will not win them the console war.
If it was presented and introduced at the beginning of this gen, It might have been a deciding factor... but now, it's too late.

FoxyGotGame3237d ago

Yeah exactly, it is a great feature, but it is silly to think BC could turn the tide. If X1 were to overtake PS4, it'll take a serious screw up by Sony, and hit after hit of excellent 1st party exclusive X1 games.

But, in spite of what I just typed, I don't believe in the whole 'Console War' thing. Just good games.

URtheWalrus3237d ago

And I totally agree with you. I am straight up an Xbox guy and I will admit that Xbox will not overtake Playstation worldwide.....with that being said, I am more than happy with Xbox keeping the #2 spot especially if it drives them to give customers more and more!

Eonjay3237d ago (Edited 3237d ago )

Nintendo stands in utter amazement.

But even if we completely ignore the Wii U's backwards compatibility, The answer is still no.

Sora_19943237d ago

Seriously Nintendo is probably sitting there ready all these articles like -_-...hello we would have been on top since 2012

Bigpappy3237d ago

The Wii-u BC is irrelevant to this conversation, only because the Wii was aimed at a totally different demographic. Most core games did not make it to the Wii last gen, so most people who had no interest in the Wii catalog then aren't going to suddenly garner interest. The Wii sold on the back of motion control with Wii-sports, Just Dance and Mario.

360 and PS3 is were the core games were release and were highly popular. 360 in particular was hugely popular in NA and UK which cause it to dominate PS3 in the west, both in hardware and software sales. So BC on PS4 and X1 are vastly different from BC on the Wii-u. Using that to gage the importance of BC on X1 is comparison and wholly irrelevant.

Having made that point, NO... BC alone will no make X1 catch PS4 sales lead. I would be shocked if that were to happen this gen. But why X1 needs to outsell PS4 to be relevant eludes me. They are both doing very well, and I think being behind has been great for those who own an X1 or is looking into getting one.

Godmars2903237d ago

Is it going to be more than a PR point that offers more than a trickle of seemingly random titles? Purposely have gaps in it because IP holders wont want an old game to be played?

SkippyPaccino3237d ago

I feel in some ways it hurts Microsoft. On the one hand it's a great feature (well when they have a good library) on the other it will most likely put a wedge between them and some developers. I don't like the way they are handling it "vote for the game you want us to emulate" now if the developer doesn't want them to emulate it, it makes them look like the azzholes for no reason except that they don't want Microsoft to emulate their game.

I feel they'll use it more as a pr stunt than an actual feature since in a year nobody will even care.

Godmars2903237d ago (Edited 3237d ago )

What makes it "Not All That" is that its more advertisement than honest feature. That it more "We did this thing, you need to celebrate us", rather than "We did this thing, you're welcome, now have fun with it".

It should have been something done day one instead of near two years after the system's release in the wake of DRM plans, which this very likely was a apart of only instead of being free with IP holder having the option to op in, gamers would be paying to play old games which they owned in order to entice IP owners to agree to it. With MS taking a nice cut.

And some people want to say this will save the console...

Death3237d ago

@Godmars,

You are focusing on a single possible negative aspects of b/c and holding it like it is real. You think third parties are going to decline b/c since it will cost them money if they want to make a remaster. It doesn't sound like a bad point if you ignore the fact third parties will also be able to sell these games on the Live Marketplace to people that don't have a physical copy. It's more a question of devs wanting to spend money on a remaster and hope sales justify development or if they want to allow Microsoft to sell an existing product for a small fee. We are already seeing some third parties bundle older games as sales incentives.

So far everything we have seen has been a positive response and in every article it seems you are doing the equivalent of saying the sky is falling. Until we see something even remotely negative from a third party, maybe we can just take b/c for what it is and enjoy this free feature.

Godmars2903236d ago

There's positive, then there's thinking that a piecemeal function that introduced only to be discontinued in the last generation isn't going to be discontinued again. Much less become a major system-seller feather.

At best, if MS follows through this time, it will get people who bought a 360 last gen and still have games, which they didn't sell to buy a PS4, to buy an XB0 when they bought a PS4 instead. Maybe get some to sell their PS4s to buy a XB0.

Show all comments (105)
290°

More Job Losses At Xbox, “There’s More To Come”: Paul Thurrott

Paul Thurrott in a recent episode commented on the on-going Microsoft fiasco hinting at more job losses and that "there's more to come".

Read Full Story >>
spieltimes.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1d 22h ago
Sonic18811d 21h ago (Edited 1d 21h ago )

There won't be no more acquiring game publishers from Microsoft in the future . Xbox has to pay Microsoft back. It might take two decades to do that.

sagapo1d 18h ago (Edited 1d 18h ago )

I don’t understand what you’re saying. Xbox IS microsoft so there’s no “paying back “.
And MS gross profit in 2023 was over 140 billion dollars so forget your 2 decades.

Unless you mean the money MS invested in Xbox (acquisitions included) and the time it will take for xbox as a brand to gain that money back on it’s own, then yeah, that could take a while.

romulus231d 11h ago

The better term to use might be return on investment, xbox is simply a division of Microsoft one that MS can easily do away with if profit margins are not met. So in that regard he's right, if xbox isn't showing the expected return on investment the higher ups are expecting than it's unlikely Microsoft will acquire any other studios any time soon, especially if they are spending billions buying developers just to shut them down in the end.

MrBaskerville1d 4h ago (Edited 1d 4h ago )

Xbox is a division that they discussed shutting down but doubled down on after Gamepass was pitched.

It needs to make money at some point. Big money.

KwietStorm_BLM1d 3h ago

So you do understand it or..?

rokos1d 2h ago

According to Statista the net income of Microsoft is about $72.4 billion dollars which is a bit lower than last year profit. That is almost as much as Activision's acquisition but I assume that would be a one off since it costs so much plus I see how their focus has been shifted to AI, thus any major future investments will probably be in that area.

Markusb331d 1h ago

i think you are really missing the point

VariantAEC15h ago

@romulus23
That is not why MS buys studios. They might continue to buy because it's about taking that sweet sweet IP out of the corporate husks of their acquisitions.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 15h ago
SonyStyled1d 17h ago

“There won't be no more acquiring game publishers from Microsoft in the future”

No bro, there do be is for Microsoft not acquiring for what is now if not what it be is 😂

1d 15h ago Replies(2)
ChasterMies1d 5h ago

Xbox isn’t a separate company from Microsoft. It’s all Microsoft.

Abear2123h ago(Edited 23h ago)

Let’s be real, this is the media spinning all the acquisitions and liquidations of said developers and spinning it to make M$ the villain.

This was bound to happen, a bigger slice of pie and cut costs, when the games come they stand to make more and that’s their agenda—it was the writing on the wall when the sales went through and legally all those who approved the sale and mergers knew this would happen.

Snowflakes need to realize business is ugly and you can cry all you want but this is how capitalism works. And it works.

That said, M$ needs to steer the narrative and grab hold of all this, make their plans known, hype the hell out of all those dead IP’s they plan to revive, and be honest about the timeline. This is likely to involve mobile and IP on other consoles, and most people realize that.

The problem is this company is incapable of being transparent and seems to often want to dissuade and confuse is customer base. The lack of E3 has hurt Microsoft and I don’t think they know how to properly or effectively market their brand anymore.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 15h ago
jwillj2k41d 21h ago

There really needs to be a class action lawsuit here. You buy these companies just to put people out of jobs. And it’s not like something happened to derail their plans this WAS the plan. Microsoft has no business in this space at all.

franwex1d 20h ago (Edited 1d 20h ago )

Microsoft has been doing this for years. They simply want the IPs. Look at Nokia. Look at Skype. This time it simply expanded to games. Gaming is not as important to Microsoft’s executives as it was to the founders too. Bill Gates was willing to sell the og Xbox at a loss. Steve Balmer approved the red ring of death fiasco. This CEO isn’t really a gamer.

-Foxtrot1d 19h ago

Maybe it's time though to put a stop to it and use a big giant like Microsoft as a huge example to the rest of these big companies.

There has to be a line drawn somewhere.

People like the FTC and the like went against Microsoft yet their Actvision deal was still allowed to go through yet look what's happened...it's not even Acitivisions studios aswell, it's Bethesdas.

VariantAEC15h ago

Years?

Try several decades, and in the gaming space 2.3 decades.

Jon615861d ago

You do realize this happens in ALL industries? Or are you just saying this because it is Microsoft? In any case I feel for those that are being let go but the trch industry is suffering right now.

jwillj2k420h ago(Edited 19h ago)

This absolutely does NOT happen all the time. Let me know the last time 1 company with a terrible product track record spent 100 billion onto acquire MULTIPLE successful companies in under a year only to shut them down and stop making their products regardless of how successful they were. Not merge them, completely shut them down.

And you can’t use Microsoft in your example.

Notellin20h ago(Edited 20h ago)

Class action lawsuit? The law is on their side and protects them at all costs. There are no rules to protect the people at the bottom.

jwillj2k420h ago

Not true when it comes to mass layoff do your research.

RNTody1d 20h ago

Ninja Theory, Perfect Dark, Crash Bandicoot, Spyro, Wolfenstein 3, Dishonored, Prey, Doom, Quake... something tells me that bad things are going to happen to these entities under Microsoft.

MrDead1d 9h ago

ID software, the makers of Doom and Wolfenstein that have been with us since 1991 could be gone and MS will keep the IPs.

I hope some of these studios can buy their freedom from MS otherwise this is going to be even more devastating for the industry and gamers.

Yui_Suzumiya1d 7h ago (Edited 1d 7h ago )

That's exactly what I'm worried about. I've been a fan of id since Wolfenstein 3D and I'm honestly afraid.

lodossrage1d 3h ago

Toys for Bob saw the writing on the wall and bought themselves out.

Wouldn't be the first time a company did that under MS either. Bungie and Twisted Pixel did the same. Considering what just happened, I can see some other devs trying to buy themselves out too.

anast1d 19h ago

Good thing the bosses of all those small studios made their money.

glenn19791d 19h ago

they cant do it right now they will get burned

XiNatsuDragnel1d 10h ago

Phil and his team need to be gone

lodossrage1d 3h ago (Edited 1d 3h ago )

Won't make a difference.

The whole structure needs to be overhauled. Anyone that replaces Phil will be no different than him, Mattrick, or anyone else.

Until the company changes how they go about business, nothing will change

glenn19791d ago

I just don't have any idea what they would do , they have done sooo much damage on their xbox brand, they have a show at July or June I think, but will it even matter even they show amazing games, idkn

lodossrage1d 3h ago

True,

But they may as well get it over with. Whether it happens now or later, the burning is going to hit the same.

Reality is the ONE move that can alleviate a lot of this is the one move they can't make. Remove day 1 from gamepass.

Show all comments (68)
90°

Microsoft Opening Xbox Mobile Game Store in July

The Xbox brand is expanding, as an Xbox mobile game store is opening this coming July where Microsoft will brings its "first-party portfolio."

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community2d ago
Jin_Sakai3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

“Bond adds that they will start on the web”

This will go nowhere.

Nice knowing you Xbox. This is what happens when the house never gets cleaned.

MrDead3d ago

The only this MS is expanding is the amount of feculence it sprays on everyone who just want to enjoy gaming and make games.

The best thing MS can do for the gaming industry is leave and never return.

XiNatsuDragnel3d ago

Good luck with this even it might not succeed.

Show all comments (7)
210°

Microsoft once tried to nab LittleBigPlanet from Sony after a few drinks

It turns out that many moons ago, Microsoft once had its eye on the Sony published LittleBigPlanet series.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community3d ago
XiNatsuDragnel4d ago

Microsoft had a good idea but fumbled it again.

Cacabunga2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Project Spark idea was decent but they quickly gave up ..
LBP was wonderful

ApocalypseShadow3d ago

Microsoft in a nutshell. Always tried to poach Sony employees, games, 3rd party games and devices like the depth camera that was turned into Kinect but was running on PS2 before Xbox 360. Wouldn't be surprised they wanted LBP. Just like they worked behind the scenes pushing the MLB to bring Sony's baseball game to Xbox instead of making their own.
https://www.playstationlife...

They didn't spend years trying to develop their own baseball game. They wanted Sony's game.

They're scum.

Zachmo1822d ago

Microsoft didn't force MLB on Xbox. MLB gave Sony 2 options either go multiplat or risk losing the license.

Rynxie2d ago

And why do you think MLB said that? I believe Ms approached MLB.

ApocalypseShadow2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Totally ridiculous comment.

The only exclusivity Sony had was to their own creation of The Show. Microsoft could have paid the MLB for the license just like Sony did and made their own baseball game.

Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox. They're worth 3 TRILLION dollars. You think that's not enough money to make their own baseball game? Don't be delusional.

Microsoft spun it like they always do and told the media that they had to trust Sony with their hardware. After they put Sony in that position of not having a choice. Either go multiplatform or stop making one of their successful games. That's a no win scenario.

And what did Microsoft do? They didn't try to sell the game to the Xbox community. They put it on game pass to hurt Sony. Pushing the idea of why buy games that are $70 when you can play them in their cheap service for $10. It was a dirty tactic.

You fell for the Kool aid drink Microsoft served you instead of spitting it out. Hope it tasted good because you were fooled by Phil and the gang.

2d ago
Hereandthere2d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Bond revealed that MLB The Show “always came up” in conversations between Microsoft and the Major League Baseball organization. “We always said, ‘We love this game. It would be a huge opportunity to bring it to Xbox.'” she recalled. However, when Microsoft’s efforts materialized, it put the company in an awkward situation where it had to send in pre-release consoles to a rival company.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2d ago
Notellin2d ago

"Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox."

Take a nap, conspiracies are rotting your brain.

2d ago
Hereandthere2d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

ApocalypseShadow1d 12h ago

Lying to yourself is unbecoming.

Article link tells you all you need to know in Sarah Bond's own words.

Hereandthere2d ago

They were too cheap/inept/lazy to develop their own mlb game, so they port begged for years and bribed the mlb to make the show multiplatform. Like i said many times, xbox brought nothing to the table their 24 years, ZERO.

ApocalypseShadow1d 12h ago

At least you and others get it. Note drank the Kool aid and asked for seconds thinking it was refreshing.

Most don't even know how it all played out but it's there in black and white for all to see. Microsoft brought it up for years until the MLB forced Sony's hand. It was a win win for Microsoft. Kill one reason to buy a PlayStation or kill the game by dropping it in a cheap service to kill Sony's sales numbers on PlayStation.

OtterX2d ago

"However, Healey said Media Molecule wouldn't have felt right doing that, adding it would have been "morally corrupt"."

Major kudos to Media Molecule for being an upright studio with principles.

Cockney1d 7h ago

They chose well, Sony gave them the backing to pursue their dreams with no restrictions even tho their games especially dreams have very niche appeal. Media molecule and Sony deserve respect for this in an age of risk averse publishing.

RNTody2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Great, more stories like this please. Show the last of the zombies holding the line what we've been saying for years: Microsoft is anti competition, anti industry and has no interest in making games at all.

But hey, at least there's an Xbox Games Showcase to look forward to, right?

Inverno2d ago

Well considering SONY just killed the series, LBP would've been dead by now either way. Though MM probably wouldn't exist by now either, so I'm glad they stayed with SONY, hopefully they don't get shut down any time soon or ever honestly.

Inverno2d ago

They shut down the servers, that's millions of user created levels gone. That and dead are pretty much the same, it's also been years since 3 and they cancelled HUB soooo.

2d ago
fsfsxii2d ago

They shutdown the servers because no one was playing, no one in the community cared about the user created levels so why keep them up? Wtf you guys would never succeed in running a business.

Inverno2d ago

Yea dood no one was playing so they shut off the servers. Cause people with enough common sense can't just Google why they were actually shut of, right?

Show all comments (29)