E3's Biggest Games Reviewed Now: Killzone 2, Gears 2 & More (GamesRadar)

GamesRadar writes:
"You know the problem with E3? You have to wait months before you find out if a game that looked great in July is going to kick ass or blow goats when it finally arrives in November. And it it sucks, you feel deflated. If only you could read, right here and right now, which games are really worth eagerly anticipating and which you should just start fitting for cement shoes right now. Wouldn't that make the world a better place?

Well congratulations Johnny, because now you can! After years of exposure to inhuman levels of liquor, cigarette smoke, and E3 cafeteria food, we've actually developed the ability to see into the future. Here, for the very first time, are the exclusive first reviews for all of the games you're most excited about this very E3."

[Omega4]

Killzone 2: "It's boring, from the all-gray graphics to the level design (hey, another warehouse!) to the set pieces, which involve such exciting things as blowing up a small bridge or opening a very large door with a hand crank"

Speaks volumes about the PS3s next MEGA flop, and how much did it cost to make again.....im sure it was the same amount it would cost to keep FF13 exclusive LOL!

[Gamefan12]

wow you are a fanboy.... this is a review based on few minutes of play on a demo in one level. ya nice

[Aquanox]

They might be a bit too harsh on Killzone 2. However, multiple reports from E3 indicate that while pretty, the gameplay itself is way too predictable (aka uninspired) and that they need to work hard on it.

Please Guerrilla, don't dissapoint Sony fans. You're basically the biggest bet for the next year.

[Jandre02]

LOL. The multiplayer alone makes this game absolutely insane. The gray graphics? Thats one level you idiots.

Even still, if its all gray, ITS A WARZONE! There are no forest or anything like that, but if "beautiful colors" is what you want in your shooting games, then maybe, just maybe, you are a tad bit gay.

Me personally, having multiplayer graphics that top every other console games single player graphics, smooth framerate, and physics/lighting thats unparalleled in any game, thats enough for me.

Killzone 2 is looking amazing. Hate on it all you want about the "colors", but I like the gritty gloomy art direction. Whats funny is you never hear anyone say anything about Gears having the same environment.

[TheColbertinator]

Little Big Planet Rules!

[San anto]

God daem i hate the unreal engine, it looks fcking pathetic i mean ffs since when was the world all sparkly glossy and shiney, jesus stop trying to mask textures with the pathetic attempt at lighting.

[Blademask]

And as far the Killzone2 review... Buuhahahuhwauaha.

They have been playing the same level for a while now. Read the IGN pre-view to confirm this. The level @ E3 is the same level, just with a peek of it futher down the line. I guess 5 minutes into the game you should be into a whole other level/map/world by then.

[Milky]

RIDICULOUS IDEA TO BASE A REVIEW OFF 5 MINUTES OF RANDOM GAMEPLAY.

[herbaldoctor7]

these guys suck get a new job (gamesradar)

[Wildarmsjecht]

LMAO..basing a review off a title you play for 5 minutes, in one particular level that has been used since the beginning is smart /sarcasm.

I don't remember people complaining about always seeing the middle east in MGS4 or playing it at various demo kiosks. And what did the scores there show, Hmmmm???

If going 5 minutes in one play session should equal a new level, the game should have 100 just to keep me satisfied. Silly Gamesradar...

[ChampIDC]

It does help to read the little disclaimer at the bottom. It was meant to give a little insight into the games and for fun. FUN being the key word here.

[crck]

Giving out review scores on preview builds is an irresponsible stunt. That brings into question gamesradar's already questionable reputation.

[TheExecutive]

give me a break lol. Gamesradar is retarded. Eric if by any chance you read these forums please do us a favor and start flipping burgers.

[pp]

Kill zone 2 may as well join all the other flops on ps3

[JVIDICAN]

this list is bs did you see the banjo score?

[Stryfeno1]

But did you see Gears 2 score?

[silverchode]

lbp?

[Jandre02]

And its still almost a year off.

Heres something thats funny, lol

The only non-bundled exclusive games on the 360 that have broken 2,000,000 copies are
Gears
Halo 3

Lol. Killzone 2 is guaranteed to sell at least 3 million WW within 6 months.

[Wolf873]

I mean even if he did review games based on few minutes of demo, could he seriously consider Killzone-2 worthy of 6? That looks way better Gears, I mean seriously he appreciates how everything looks grittier in Gears but complains about the samething in Killzone. WTH? Damn, those guys would wag their tails if M$ held up a bone for them.

[TheExecutive]

I think both games look fantastic but to even consider what we have seen from KZ2 a 6 is just plain retarded.

[VirusE]

Maybe it was based on game play rather than graphics? Going by your standards Crysis warhead was the best game of the show. Did any of you guys play KZ1? Have any of you read any of the previews that all seem to point out that is bland and unoriginal? KZ 1 was about a 6-7 why would part 2 be any different? Guerilla HASN”T MADE ONE GOOD GAME YET YOU BRAIN DEAD IDIOTs!?!?!?!? Why is it so hard to believe that KZ 2 will be more of the same trash those of us with brains have seen guerilla pump out for years? If you played Tiny toon adventures Dizzy’s Candy quest by guerilla raise your hand otherwise STFU with this killzone must be great cause it’s shiny BS. You would have to be blind to not see the disappointment that killzone 2 will be. Read the freaking previews for god sakes! Everyone who has played it seems to say the same things. Those who have not played it seem to think it is the 2nd coming of Christ.

[Wolf873]

First of all Virus, there is no need to be calling anyone "Brain Dead Idiots", we can talk without having to foul mouth anyone. And secondly, no ever said Crysis doesn't has the best graphics, it does, imo. Also, having a history of bad games doesn't mean that the next is a definite failure, maybe they'll come around this time, who knows? But as it stands, Killzone -2's demo from the looks of it deserves a 7 to 8 at the least. The fact that whoever is playing that game manages to get around and kill some soldiers means that the game is at least playable rather than condemning it for horrible gameplay. And my only argument was that the reviewer found similar aspect of the game positive in Gears but negative in KZ.

[Gun_Senshi]

Pro reviewers like Gamesradar can review a game from the name ONLY

[klashawnd]

6 for Killzone? They just insured that today will be their biggest day for web hits this month lol.

[ChampIDC]

Well, I'm doubting the game will get a 6, but so far, I'm feeling that it's going to get similar scores to the first game. All in all, that'll mean it's a solid game. It just won't be what everyone is hyping it up to be, just like almost every game except the rare few that actually live up to the hype, such as MGS4.

[Halochampian]

if it is getting the same scores as the first one.. that means around 6 or 7. Everyone is having the same complaints about the game.

and people.. stop actually taking all these reviews like actual reviews. They are just fun factors right now.

[pornflakes]

Killzone 2: "It's boring, from the all-gray graphics to the level design (hey, another warehouse!) to the set pieces, which involve such exciting things as blowing up a small bridge or opening a very large door with a hand crank"

lol owned.. i mean Movie Gear Solid 4 THE GOTY game cant reach 3 Million after 4 weeks (lol) and KZ2 should NOW be THE game of 2009? haha!

[bosels11]

Anyone who reads into these baseless stupid EARLY reviews is a moron. You cant review demos of games that some dont even come out til next year. And to all you dumb A$$ MS fans - FU!!!! report me for being rude, who cares?

[SIX]

Just goes to show how impressionable fanboys can be huh? Tell me this. Have you played Killzone 2? How sad is it when your opinion of games rests on other peoples impressions.

[juuken]

Porn, you need to get laid.
Seriously, go get laid.

This is utter bullsh*t. These games aren't even finished yet and they're handing out scores? Articles like this is what fuels the never ending war between 360 fans and PS3 fans. I didn't even find this very funny to say the least.

[hotshot127]

so now all of a sudden the fps genre has to do more? JUST when its a ps3 exclusive huh.....
i swear, they purposely put the score that low just to get hits and they put gears a 10 to try and show that its miles better.

only reason they gave little big planet a 10 is because its not competing with there favorite 360 games.

ign said killzone 2 is satisfying and they never felt bored and they they cant wait for it to come febuary. and as far as im concerned, ign is the only review site i can trust so this fanboy shi# has to stop. so everytime its a ps3 game, it has to be completely new and refreshing. then i guess gears 2 will fail since its basically the exact same as the first.......

[RAY017]

WTF, WTF, WTF, WTF!!! A F@$&* 6/10!!! this people are on crack!!! As a PS3 fan I admit that GOW2 looks good, but is not superior to KZ2.

[VirusE]

Again maybe they are going off of how fun the game is rather than how it looks?

[Halochampian]

I think that is what they are going by.

"Hey... if we make the best graphics.. that means everyone will think our game is fun.. when it may not be!!!"

[VirusE]

Halo it's sad that so much time is wasted on KZ2 when games that are actually going to be good like resistance 2 and LBP seem to go over looked. People say MS hypes up halo yet at least halo comes from a proven dev with millions of games sold and a loyal fanbase unlike KZ2. KZ 2 is 100% hype and zero % substance from what has been shown and said. KZ 1 was hyped just as much and “halo killer” was tossed around by Sony very recklessly and then it blew up in their face. KZ even getting a sequel surprised the hell out of me. It would be like MS making a sequel to shardowrun. The gfx are simply amazing and possibly the best on a console but i don’t buy games from companies with proven track records for sucking and If I wanted to buy a game for gfx alone it surely wouldn’t be a console game considering 2560x1600 has 4 times the pixels of 720p. I learned my lesson about buying into hype from junk companies from buying games made by acclaim as a kid. Guerilla is the acclaim of this gen; they have never made a good game yet people love to talk them up.

[pornflakes]

well, ps3tards also laught at halo3 although it was in beta, so??

[SIX]

I find your comment kind of ironic in a way because,"ps3tards" as you so eloquently put it, are still laughing at Halo3.

[juuken]

Hypocritical 360 muppets at it's finest!

[Boink]

you hate them for their KZ2 quick review and they totally suck, and are obviously wrong, so does that mean the 10 they gave to LBP is wrong too?

Gears and resistance look awesome though.

[vasilisk]

Dude everything is wrong.
This is plain retarded and they're doing it to get some hits. Pretty pathetic if you ask me...

[DJ]

Well as we all learned from MGS4, the first level is Always representative of the entire game. And how did Gears 2 get a 10? IGN reported that the game has serious framerate issues when there's too many enemies onscreen, and that the enemy AI seemed glitchy.

[VirusE]

Having played both KZ1 and GOW1 i dont see how this score is even slightly out of line. Gears on metacritic (I know metacritic is owned by MS BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH have a tissue) got a 94 and kz1 a 70. Crazy how history seems to repeat itself!

[thor]

What's more, the first level of KZ2 looks amazing, and from what I've read it plays amazing as well. So I don't see what their complaint is... it's all the same apparently... yeah all 5 minutes of it...

[zypher]

forget the first Killzone for a minute. please tell me you're not taking any of these reviews (be they good or bad), based on a few minutes of gameplay seriously are you? how would you expect people to react if you said a game sucked and you hardly even gave it a try?

[TheExecutive]

Hey VirusE get over it, just because games in the past by a developer werent completely and utterly awesome doesnt mean that every game they ever make will suck.

Oh yeah, and before you go calling people brain dead idiots maybe you should take a course in logic. Why you ask? Because your conclusions use some rediculously obvious fallacies (Non sequitur).

Lets pretend for a minute that what you say is average or other say is average is actually FACT, which it isnt, and lets take a look at this little argument here:

Here I will spell it out for you:

1. Every game made by GG is average

therefore,

All the games ever made by GG will be average

Do you see how retarded that sounds? go ahead, say it out loud to yourself.

[VirusE]

No i am not take the reviews seriously at all but the killzone fans are. This just further proves what i have said about KZ2 from day one. I am not a Sony hater; i just think killzone is trash.

TheExecutive, great logic LOL, way to pump yourself up over nothing. If it looks like sh!t and smells like sh!t why would you want to step in it? I don’t need to waste my money playing games from devs who are proven time and time again as junk. Fool me once shame on you…… If kojima announced a new game wouldn’t you want to check it out simply based on his resume? In the REALLY REAL world away from your mom’s house and the net a resume is VERY important and if your resume sucks most people will not give you chance regardless of how pretty you are on the exterior. If you continue to fail and get a name based around failure chances are you won’t even get an interview. Nice try though. Here you say this out loud: Next time i am at a new restaurant and i get food i do not like i will continue to come back and buy the same dish even though it continues to taste like crap and never feels worth the money. All of a sudden your "logic" and "facts" seem more like childish ignorance mixed with a desire to be EXTREMELY stubborn in the face of over whelming defeat rather than a form of intelligence.

[TheExecutive]

Lol overwhelming defeat? In the really real world this is a video game. In the really real world, when you say something is going to suck and try to explain it without taking into consideration new facts some people are going to point out what is wrong with your statement.

GG's have made two games in their existence, this game seems to improve on everything everyone had a problem with the last game. I didnt even really like the first game but you seem to ignore the changes and just say, "this game is going to suck because the last games did" without looking at the improvements and differences that are presented to you. Which not only makes you look stubborn but the way you attack people makes you look childish in the process

[RememberThe357]

I'm sorry man, I know everyone is on your case, but I gotta say your a little off. If you look at the game play videos you can see that this game looks really solid. Granted it's only a video, you can still get a good idea of what the game will offer. Have you seen the character animations they got? you shoot a guy in the knee and he acts like he got shot in the knee! Thats f*ckin cool. That alone makes me want to play the game.
I think the big point is that the author knocks on Killzone 2 for the same reason he like Gears of War 2. How does that make sense to you? Your point don't really make complete sense, they're like a half finished sentence, I think I know what you were saying but I'm not quite sure. However to be fare, your opinions are your own and although many people here would respect that you try to hide you bias behind logic, and we all know how well that works out.

[VirusE]

RememberThe357 I agree that it does in fact look awesome. I will not take that away from the game. That being said i thought Killzone one looked awesome, i went out bought it and low and behold it wasn’t awesome. I have been playing games for 26 some years of my life and i have seen MANY games with awesome graphics come out that are a let down. GFX are NEVER a substitute for good game play. Guerilla has fooled me more than once and i am not buying into the same old BS again. With SOOOOO many good games on the horizon why waste my time getting pumped over a game that is being called bland? I will be playing gears 2 and resistance 2 so killzone will have to be awesome to even warrant my time. If it comes out and gets great reviews i will rent it. If i like it i will buy it end of story, I can admit being wrong and have done so before. I thought Lair would be awesome because it had dragons and lots of killing, I thought the n64 would beat the ps1, I thought the dreamcast would do well and the list goes on. That being said Killzone 2 has to PROVE it is worth my dollar with more than shiny gfx based on the trash guerilla has put out in the past. Sorry i am going by real world experience not hype sony is shoving down my throat. I am not saying killzone can’t be good, I am saying I am not calling it a good game until it has proven itself simply based on the fact that the other killzone games have been mediocre at best. I don’t pay to see Uwe Boll movies for the same reason I don’t give Guerilla my money.

Why is it okay to have a positive biased towards a game made by a good studio but not negative biased towards a game made by a bad studio? MGS4 had 10s before it came out just based on our faith in Kojima why can’t it work the other way around? No one is willing to touch my comments about guerilla never making a good game because we all know it’s true.

PS gears got game of the year and is one of the highest rated next gen games from the makers of unreal and UT. KZ1 was a flop from a dev with a history of flops. The difference is very obvious. Gears is a much fresher idea than killzone. Neither is revolutionary but KZ has been done much more often than gears. How many games got a cover system post gears? Better question how many games got regen health and a dedicated nade button post halo....... And neither game brought anything new to the table uhh huh.

[TheExecutive]

hey virus i can understand your point that graphics are never a substitute for gameplay but why cant ya have both?

Check out this article that was just published by meus, it has to do with the online portion of the game:

http://www.n4g.com/events_e...

[VirusE]

I agree dude, it does look good i am not saying it doesnt. Again i honestly thought KZ 1 looked awesome too and it wasnt. I dont think the game will get anything under an 80 but i will bet a million bucks both Resistance 2 and Gear 2 will both be rated higher and will both sell more games. Any takers?

[MvmntInGrn]

KZ2 will not get a 6, Gears 2 shouldn't get a 10. BIAHH will get like a 4.

Also Far Cry 2 will not get an 8, if early impressions are to be believed.

[Microsoft_Spokesman]

If GeoW 2 gets a 10, then I am the queen of england!
What the hell! Oh look, 5 player online, OMFG!!! Look at these happy colours, more emo dark colour please.
Do they read any gaming magazines or anything like that or do they pull bullshit out of their @ss all the time?! EMG even said there are levels "that show the beauti of the planet". And WTF R2 gets an 8, R2 is better than Queers of War 2. F*ck this site and f*ck homo xbots.

[happyface]

Killzone recieves a 6 and is called boring. Sony and Gorilla better get their act together

Gears 2 recieves a 10, is it really that much better than Killzone?

very disappointing if you're a ps3 owner

[Panthers]

OMG your right. Extreamly disappointing. I am going to sell my PS3 now. This article changed my view on gaming.

I dont see anyone here taking this seriously.

[happyface]

dont sell your ps3 just yet

resistance 2 looks like it could be good, it got an 8

little big planet got a 10, but it looks very kiddie and I'm not into kiddie stuff

[RememberThe357]

You totally should! There are like no games coming out anymore. Ever. Yeah, I'm totally going to move into the mountains and cut my self off from society. This article changed my view on the world.

[Mr_Showtime1]

If anything I would say it's a bad time to be a an Xbox owner based on microsofts E3 conference, to me it looks like thier slightly pushing that "hardcore" audience like myself aside in favor of a more casual market, if you think about it they showed Fallout 3, RE5, and FF13, all games coming to the PS3 aswell, thier exclusives that thier trying push scene it? your in the movies? LIPS? or those silly avatars and maybe you good include more Portal but they didn't say anything about what it would be, but I dont want to play this stuff, I want more of the quality titles MS had last year.

whereas on PS3 theres titles like Socom, LBP, Resistance 2, Bioshock, Infamous and God of War on top of Fallout, RE5 and FF13 to fall back on even if KZ2 isn't great(which i'm confident it will be.)

Sometimes dude it good to form your own opinion on things rather than listening to what others are telling you.

[juuken]

...Reviews on demos/previews.

My, my, what has this gaming industry come to.

[blakstarz]

That review just reeks of suspect...come on now...a 6/10 for Killzone 2, but a perfect 10 for Gears? Obviously, some fanboy payola....just based on what was shown, KZ2 merits more than a 6...and I highly doubt Gear is a perfect ten, I have the 1st one, while good no doubt, not worthy of ten, especially with the skimpy multilayer.
And Resistance 2 an 8? After seeing that Leviathan level.....YEAH RIGHT DUDE!!

[assassin223]

well what did you expect this is gamesradar. but what i can't understand is how you can review a 6min game. and also what i can't understand is why even try reviewing a game that has 6 months left of development matter of why even review any of those games.

[Halochampian]

based on your comment.. I dont think so.

[assassin223]

yes i did read the article. in my comment i am just asking what's the point in making a fake review for 6 to 10 minute demos, wouldn't it have been better if they did a previews or give there impressions of the games instead

[Halochampian]

because they wanted people to know on a scale of how much they enjoyed it. What is so wrong with that?

[pp]

Killzone 2 got a decent score

[Microsoft_Spokesman]

peepee, you are a guy mother f*cker.

[fermcr]

Let the conspiracy stories begin ... :)

[achira]

lol. obviously they are fanboys. kz2 destroys geow2 in graphics. and i am sure in gameplay, too. gears 2 looks like ut3 on ps3, nothing new.

[Halochampian]

your comment made me laugh. The only thing you know about KZ2 is the graphics and you are already saying the game is better than Gears of War 2. They weren't giving the scores on graphics!!

They are giving scores on how fun the demo was and gameplay!

and if they are fanboys.. why did Banjo get a 5 and LBP get a 10?!?

[VirusE]

"and if they are fanboys.. why did Banjo get a 5 and LBP get a 10"

Dude seriously, don’t bring logic into this. If the only thing that will ever sit under your TV is ______, regardless of what changes happen in the industry and regardless of how many good games come out for other systems then chances are you are not to be reasoned with or objective. Overly proud singles system "gamers" (doesn’t that imply it's about games?) wont let logic mess up a perfectly terrible argument.

On a side note MS has got to be kicking themselves over the purchase of Rare LOL. At first i thought the big N was crazy to let them go but i am starting to see why they let them go.

[tudors]

I am not that impressed by what I have seen in KZ2 because of the colours scheme and the AI, but to give a actual review at this stage is daft, anyway it's the multiplayer that I am interested in, I am already sold on Resistance 2 because of the multiplayer, the graphics are good enough just not great so far, if the multiplayer is good in KZ2 then the PS3 will end up in my collection.

[Asurastrike]

"The reviews contained here are not official reviews, obviously. Those will have to wait until the games are actually finished. These are merely conceptual placeholders generated for your amusement."

[Halochampian]

at least some people read the whole article.

[TheExecutive]

ok, first off it says:

The reviews contained here are not official reviews, obviously. Those will have to wait until the games are actually finished. These are merely conceptual placeholders generated for your amusement. But we wouldn't be shocked if we were close on most of these.

without the last sentence it seems intelligent and just for fun. With the last sentence this article becomes retarded.

[grantps3]

that was stupid.

i mean killzone 2 only gets a 6? becuase its gray? boring....its because your not playing it...gears was boring to watch too but it got a 10.

resistance 2 deserves at least a 9 if not a ten. yeah the graphics arent the best but theyre still polishing them and improvng them....and saying that the maps are too big and its takes for ever to get across it "YOU TARD" when your in a squad you respawn near them...and making fun of the weapons becuase its a sci-fi machine gun? those are shots below the belt.

LBP got a nice deserving score-10

and dont EVER say how killzone and resistance are too scripted/linear because gears of war was sooooo scripted

[trancefreak]

My $$$ is on killzone 2 MS isnt getting a dime from me.

[Aqua]

100% sure that if Gears 2 and Killzone 2 had gotten switched scores that you PS3 fans would be all over it and trashing Gears 2... Also: You guys are making me lmao with all your names trying to make fun of Gears of War 2, like, Queers of War, Greys of Bore, ETC.. So jealous, so pathetic. hypocrites

disagree disagree disagree disagree disagree disagree disagree disagreedisagree disagree disagree disagree disagree disagree disagree disagree disagree disagree disagree disagree disagree disagree lololololololololololololololo lololololololol im done with hilarious site lololololololololololololololo lololololololol

[Crazyglues]

Some of their concerns are the same concerns I have about some of these games coming out, and I would not be surprised if they turn out to be really close to the actual final game reviews..

R2 I think will score better, so more like a 9...

Gears of War 2 is looking good and should be another intense experience, and story as part one was..so a 10 is not unexpected.

But Killzone 2 Wow.. if that turns out to be true that will be sad.

But people wonder why PS3 is not worried about keeping games PS3 only like GTA IV and Final Fantasy because it doesn't really matter anymore. These games are not selling systems, that and Sony believes that the fact that it's PS3 is also a blu-ray player is enough with their core games to give them the edge.

Will that happen who knows, we shall soon see.. But Microsoft seems to feel different, so I say let the games begin. Let's see if this is really PS3's year. (There are some really good games coming out, so it should be really interesting)

[Playstation Man]

This is a pretty pathetic excuse to get quick hits. I review Gears of War 2 a 5/10 cause it looks just like Gears one and IGN says it has framerate issues. 5/10, that's final. lol.

[SRuN4]

Proof no matter how good Killzone 2 is, people will give it low scores to drive traffic. Rather sad and pathetic if you ask me. If this was on another platform though, well.. things would be different and I'll leave it at that.

[mrnjl]

Well I found it amusing and a good mix of scores. Out of all the gameplay video that I've seen, GOW2 does look the most impressive all round. But while saying that I'm going to guess KZ2, Resistance2 and Fable2 will get higher scores than what was shown there. But hey you never know, they could be spot on and none of us really know until we play them.

[mfwahwah]

I would give all of these games a 1/10. They were way to short and seemed unfinished. Gears 2 gets a 10/10 for effort though. /sarcasm

I like GR since they're articles (not the ones that can be affected by bias / opinion too much) are hilarious and creative. This one sucked balls though.

[Cinos123]

While I am not going to say the reviewer is completely biased when it comes to Gears and Killzone, I will say this; notice how on Gears the guy went into the Multiplayer portion of Gears and not so much for killzone? Not like they weren't showing multiplayer for it.

While I agree the level they have shown so far is gray, but that's what the game is....a war. Last time I checked war wasn't about rainbows and unicorns.

[dachiefsman]

well they reviewed what they saw. I doubt most of these reviews won't transition to the final product, but the KZ 2 did surprise me.

At the end of the article:

* Probably not. The reviews contained here are not official reviews, obviously. Those will have to wait until the games are actually finished. These are merely conceptual placeholders generated for your amusement. But we wouldn't be shocked if we were close on most of these. *

[dro]

a review for games that are still work in progess...wtf.....wtf...wtf... !!!!!..are u sure u are not ment to be doing a preview instead of a review...wtf !!!!!!!!!

[San anto]

Im sorry they reviewed killzone based on one level eh...
Looks like the reviewer has bias MS rider writen all over them in MS spunk tbh.
Makes me laugh at gears review, oh look another overly shiny glossy texture has zoomed passed my overly sized character.

To hell with the unreal engine and its one size fits all mechanic, Fck u unreal.

[dro]

were did u get ur display pic from...i have been looking for it every were XD

[zxvfrr41]

As others have pointed out, your logic is flawed. KZ1 was GG's first game. That doesn't mean they didn't learn from their experiences and from the feedback on the game. On the flipside, EA's Madden has been around forever and had some great games in the past. Unfortunately the Madden games suck now. On top of that, the developers, producers, artists, writers, etc don't stay in the same positions. New people come in and others go out or move aroud within the company. While a company's resume of work is important, it's not the tell all.