After we've already seen some comparison video's showing us Xbox 360 vs. Playstation 3 battles, this time also the Wii is involved. Of course it's not completely fair to judge Nintendo's new console on graphics, since it's focus on other features, but it's still nice to compare how the game really looks like in compare with the 'real' powerfull next-gen consoles.
or do all ps3 videos seem "washed" out compared to their 360 counterparts... I just get the feeling that the 360 is doing better contrasts (particularly the night scene... you can hardly tell that its night time on the ps3)
The Xbox 360 has a far superior GPU so its obvious who will have the beter graphics.
I cant believe how crappy the Wii version is! Anyway, the 360 is clearly better than the ps3 version. The very end of the video where you see the soldiers shooting...you can see how the lighting is better on the 360...especially when they're shooting there weapons! You cant even tell night from day in the ps3 version. Another game better on the 360!
Oh yes...good to be a 360 owner!
It makes me think that Wii was the system that Nintendo needed to come out with last generation instead of Gamecube. Yes, to the person above, the lighting on PS3 does seem to be a bit too bright on many games. The thing is, there are situations where being better lit can be useful. Let's take a combat simulation like we just saw as an example. You're pinned down behind a wall by a sniper up in a tree or on a rooftop somewhere, but you can't see him. You need to be able to look around in short bursts to try to find him before he kills you. If the graphics are very dark and shadowy, that sniper is going to blend better and be harder to locate than if everything is well lit. Too much lighting does have the effect, though, of making the colors look faded, which isn't good.
Is it okay for the Wii to have crappy graphics. They are only charging $50 less than what a core 360 cost.