530°

StarCraft 2 System Requirements Dug Out

WorldofWar.net's technical guru, Kalos, seems to have acquired an interest in StarCraft 2 and has apparently been digging out all available information of StarCraft 2 in order to printing out StarCraft 2's probable System Requirements. It is a very thorough analysis of what we have learned at WWI, as well as old information from the Zerg Press Release in March this year, as well as every imaginable and unimaginable reliable source that's possible to find.

The two pages long article contains all the currently known information on the StarCraft 2 technical aspects from Blizzard.

Read Full Story >>
starcraftwire.net
Leord5868d ago

Well, it looks like I need to upgrade then. I have a 3 year old laptop... Still, I think the next one will be a laptop as well though. I really like being able to be "mobile"...

Funny, I didn't know Blizzard had bought that 3D engine in 2006...

SCFreelancer5868d ago

I am actually pretty happy with the results from this fact analysis. Both my Desktop and Laptop should be able to run it medium/medium-high settings.

There is a difference between running it smooth and running it smooth though. If you like to play competitive you want to prevent it from ever slowing down below a certain threshold to stay ahead of your opponent(s). For those who are more average players and/or love to play single player the actual performance is bound to another set of expectations: its nice to see the story play out in high detail :)

Leord5868d ago

Well, then you just have a better system than me =P I am not really looking forward to purchasing a new PC just to play my favourite gam,e but what to do?

kalos5868d ago

If anyone is interested in seeing a really good implimentation of the Havok Physics Engine, I'd recommend having a look at the World War 2 RTS game Company of Heroes by Relic Entertainment, very good game with good phyics. The fact that Blizzard have intergrated the same physics engine into Starcraft II is quite exciting to me, also encouraged me to take a look at Company of Heroes's minimums to see the kind of overhead I could expect from the demands of Starcraft.

Leord5868d ago

Really? That's interesting. The word "Havok" didn't actually mean much to me.

you think it might be the same in Diablo 3? I have heard people saying the physics looked a lot alike in the two games!

kalos5868d ago

I think that will probably be the case. Not much point liciencing something only to use it once after all :P And it would certainly be impressive on the scale that Diablo III was operating on during the WWI demonstrations. Nothing solid saying that it will be in there right now that I know of, but I wouldn't expect Blizzard to squander the technology while it is still hot and quite new.

Daver5868d ago

@1.2

Same here i'm buying a new PC only for starcraft 2 and diablo 3 :)

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5868d ago
Maticus5868d ago

I was expecting it to be a lot worse, I'm happy now.

Leord5868d ago

Indeed, with the graphics they have etc, it could have been much worse. I would assume that there will be a setting on "low, medium, high", as most games have, so people with powerhouse PCs can experience something more.

This is one thing StarCraft I couldn't do, as it was all in 2D.

kalos5868d ago

I don't expect Blizzard are going to throw us for a ring, but I'll keep my nose on what they are up to. I really don't expect they'll go beyond their famed mass market accessability, if they made the Pentium 4 series unable to run the game at minimum levels there will be many niggled customers. I wish I could have taken one of those PCs at the WWI to peices just to see exactly what they had set up there, alas.

Dark_Vendetta5868d ago

I'm happy too, my PC is a little better as the Recommended Specs. Now I just have to hope Diablo 3 is the same

Cogo5868d ago

Yeah, it could have been a lot worse. But that is blizzard for you. They do try to make sure most people can play their games, and even if whatever PCs they had at BlizzCon might be overpowered doesn't mean that the game will require such PCs.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5868d ago
hay5868d ago

Wow, actually I'll be able to play it with my old and grumpy PC, cool!

Adriana Lima5868d ago

lately, when i play dota or diablo ii, the fps just goes to hell

it drops to .3 fps

is it a virus, component failure, heat?

i did a few scans and nothing was found but cookies (yum.)

and I think it's good enough to handle sc2.
2.00 Ghz
3.2 ram
duo core.

kalos5868d ago

A XPS machine is supposed to be a high quality gaming machine, anything that struggled with Diablo II is either over ten years old or has a major fault with it. I would really phone them up and ask them to take a look at it, especially if your warranty is still good on it.

Adriana Lima5868d ago

and the fps drops when the bottom gets really hot.

i recently bought a cooling pad but it's at home and i'm at school til the week end.

i think my warranty expired.

kalos5868d ago

Try keeping your room ventilated well (I'm supposing it's summer there, that time of the year where everything gets hot for your part of the world?) and windows open/airconditioning on. Many PCs struggle with the heat, my old Athlon 64 rig used to be fine in December but come July...nightmare to work with until I installed a pair of chassis fans.

Cogo5868d ago

"Kalos", is that the same guy mentioned in the news item that resides at worldofwar.net?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5868d ago
Wuushu5868d ago

For some reason I'm having a hard time concentrating on System Requirements when i think about Adriama Lima.

Show all comments (33)
170°

$15 horse for WoW made more money than StarCraft 2: Wings of Liberty

Jason Hall, currently an indie developer and former Blizzard employee, has been sharing some really interesting stories from his long career in the industry for a while now. Some of them are truly insightful, while others may seem depressing.

Read Full Story >>
gameworldobserver.com
Sciurus_vulgaris255d ago

I’m a little shocked that StarCraft 2: Wings of Liberty sold only around 6 million copies. The original StarCraft did over 11 million. Maybe Blizzard was too leisurely in releasing StarCraft 2? Starcraft 2 came out 12 years after it’s predecessor.

Plague-Doctor27254d ago (Edited 254d ago )

Im surprised too. Starcraft was still a huge name in 2010. It was kinda the only new RTS around and other genres like MOBAs hadn't really kicked off yet. I do remember at the time sentiment around the game was
pretty angry the game was being split into 3 but I doubt that would have impacted sales to that degree

Sciurus_vulgaris254d ago

For a long time I believed StarCraft II sold on par or better than its predecessor. There was so much hype for the game. Plus it had a pretty strong E-Sports scene for a few years.

Myself and half a dozen friends all bought StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty and played it religiously for a full year. While I bought the expansions, most of my friends did not. RPGs seem to be a generally low selling genre.

Nerdmaster254d ago

I'm not shocked at all. This was an early example of Blizzard being greedy. Instead of releasing a complete experience, splitting Starcraft 2 in 3 parts so it could make us purchase it 3 times if we wanted to know the whole story and play story mode with the other races.

Sciurus_vulgaris253d ago

I originally had that stance. However, Wings of Liberty, was just as long, if not longer than StarCraft 1. The expansions were of decent length too and added a good amount of additional content.

il-JumperMT254d ago

and people wonder why we are having mtx in everything. i blame the people who actual buy them.

Nerdmaster254d ago

It's interesting he used Brazil as an example of the importance of regional pricing. Nowadays many companies on Steam are setting their prices in Brazil as high as, if not more than, their price in USA. I simply refused to buy a few games when I noticed that's the case.

Extermin8or3_254d ago

This right here is the fucking problem.

253d ago
160°

20 Best Sci-Fi Games of All Time

The best sci-fi games ever made range from diving into the depths of humanity to finding hope among the stars.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
rlow11235d ago

Don't really agree on Dead Space being number one. But usually come down to preference. Alot of good games on the list. I was hoping to see Aliens vs Predator by Sierra on the list, as it was a great game. Anyways for me the number one is still Halo but Mass Effect was really good up to the infamous ending of the third game.

Rebel_Scum1235d ago

I would put Flashback on my list. Its got such a great tone and background design. The cutscenes were pretty good too.

1235d ago
Master of Unlocking1234d ago (Edited 1234d ago )

DEAD SPACE 2 as number 1? Really? I've only ever played DEAD SPACE 1 (without finishing it) and, sure enough I liked it a lot, and have been yearning for getting to grips with an hd remastered trilogy for the PS4/XBox One/PS5/XBox Series X/S, but what about Deus Ex Human Revolution & Mankind Divided? Alienation (to quench our thirst for twitching fingers' top-down dual-stick shooters)? Or even Cyberpunk 2077 (once the game has been re-released and all the kinks have been ironed out)?

If not at the #1 spot, it seems to me these games deserved to be on the list somewhere.

But what really strikes me as unfair is, if you're going back to the PS3/XBox 360 era with DS2, how could you forget to mention Killzone 2 & 3? The Resistance games? When it comes to Sci-Fi FPS, it's inadequate not to pay your respects to those stellar franchises! Heck, even the Crysis trilogy should've been there IMHO.

140°

Starcraft Mass Recall is a Starcraft Remake in Starcraft 2, Version 8.0 available for download

A team of modders is working on a Starcraft Remake in Starcraft 2, and has released a brand new version of it.

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com