980°

Assassin’s Creed: Unity Framerate Is “Atrocious”

Assassin’s Creed: Unity is out today in the US, but some people seem to have been getting their copies early with videos of the game appearing on YouTube yesterday. Unfortunately, some of those people who got their hands on the game early are reporting that there are significant technical problems with Assassin’s Creed: Unity, most notably the framerate

Read Full Story >>
nowgamer.com
3869d ago Replies(5)
Palitera3869d ago

Hiding the game is always an important "Watch Out!" sign.

bouzebbal3868d ago

but as long as people jump on some broken games day one, the devs will not feel pressure to solve the disaster for next time.
boycott is the only way to be heard and be treated correctly.
i dont buy AC games, i dont play COD and i dont play Battlefield. These 3 are for æe the most flawed games series, but also some of the most successful.. go figure out why!

2pacalypsenow3868d ago

Because they are fun to play and people enjoy them?

freshslicepizza3868d ago

i think the normal reaction would simply be to wait for them to fix the issues. i do agree though they should not be shipping games if they run sub-30 frames per second.

the reason those games you mention are successful is the same reason console owners buy blindly, its because they enjoyed what they put out before. the community did speak up about battlefield, which is why they delayed the next one and will no doubt want to focus on making sure it doesn't suffer the same launch as the last one.

boycotting has its drawbacks, namely a studio can go under or the franchise simply stops being made. buying the game and voicing complaints that are warranted is still your best bet but simply telling people to boycott all ubisoft or ea games because some of them had issues is not a reasonable response to me. at the very least don't buy them until you know they are running properly.

Army_of_Darkness3868d ago (Edited 3868d ago )

What happened to "parity" for better Gameplay and stability?? .....
Oh right, standard excuse.

Saigon3868d ago

Look I really like the AC series, specifically AC2 and the extension and this last one I wanted, but Ubi has gone too far with what they did a while ago. It was uncalled for and I am not talking about the fact that they made each system similar in FPS and scaling it is the arrogance that made the comment and what followed after it. No more for me especially since WD wasn't as great, good, but not compared to the hype. Seriously I couldn't shoot from my car, but the people I was chasing/chasing me was able to shoot...bs. Look I hope they get this fixed, but for now they have a lot of proving before I jump back on the bus.

Antifan3868d ago

@2pacalypsenow
He's asking WHY are the most successful franchises the most glitchy and technically flawed.
It's because developers can half-ass their games because they know people will buy it alway. It's easier to be lazy than to work hard.

IGiveHugs2NakedWomen3868d ago (Edited 3868d ago )

Ubisoft and EA are really churning out the turds. Watch Dogs was the last hoorah for spending money on Ubisoft games. The last Ubisoft game that I actually enjoyed playing was I Am Alive and that was almost 3 years ago. It's sad really. With all of the money that these developers make they could easily get a group together and make some truly original IP's, but the money from copy & paste annual franchises is just too easy I guess.

wsoutlaw873868d ago

Cod and ac are not at all the most flawed games, you just hear about them more and there are more people playing them. Their success is only why you see so many articles

NCAzrael3868d ago

I've never cared for CoD, but Battlefield and Assassin's Creed are two of my favorite franchises. They aren't perfect by any means, but they are fun to play, and that's what's important.

That said, there is no excuse for a game to be released while being buggy to the point of unplayable. Publishers need to stop stressing release dates and follow the "we'll release it when it's done" rule

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3868d ago
Mr Pumblechook3868d ago (Edited 3868d ago )

As I understand it the excuse Ubisoft gave for Parity was that it would deliver a better graphical experience. But if the game is running at 900p and sometimes 20fps on PS4 and not XBO then there is a real issue. It suggest that the platform that was sponsoring the game was the lead platform with lead testing, and that the PS4 is artificially neglected with poorer performance and second-class development.

I haven't played the game so I can't give my own experience but Ubisoft's anti-gamer comments mean that If i do play it, it will be a second-hand copy.

traumadisaster3868d ago

I'm surprised this happened, I would hope a patch would fix this and really should have already been released. I don't doom the consoles I own them all but this may be the first example of a multiplat that must be played on pc.

That didn't happen for years last gen, I'm surprised it happened a year into this gen.

Palitera3868d ago

Well, even yesterday I was talking to a friend about getting it or not and our opinions were the same: We were waiting on some great reason to buy it.

It happens that now we have pretty much the opposite.

wsoutlaw873868d ago

@traumadisaster I don't think this is a console power issue but more of a bug that needs a patch. A lot of pc gamers are experiencing the same issues, just not all.

XanderZane3868d ago

Seems neither system can handle this game. If this was 1080P on the PS4 it would have been even worse.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3868d ago
DonFreezer3868d ago

And the ps fanboys wanted the game to get to 1080p?For what to make it 5-10 fps average?

DevilOgreFish3868d ago

“Seriously I get the game is massive, but jesus the framerate in this game is atrocious,” said Reddit user Merkwerk talking about the PS4 version of Assassin’s Creed: Unity. “It’s not even close to a locked 30 fps, it feels like it’s running at 20 something most of the time and I’ve had it drop way below that a couple of times already.”

Even at parity it's not getting 30 fps, It would seem that only high end PCs can really run this.

showtimefolks3868d ago

What happened to that whole parity thing that UBI said

Also it's shameful none of the reviewers mentioned it smh

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3868d ago
Bansai3869d ago

People need to see what bullshit glitchfest this game is.

morganfell3868d ago

It's the French Revolution meets Watchdogs...

tordavis3868d ago

I don't like you morganfell, but that was hilarious! Take a bubble!

teknx3868d ago

And that children, is why you don't pre-order Ubisoft games.

I'm sure there are people who would still pre-order The Division. Completely baffling.

wsoutlaw873868d ago

It sucks because i want so much for the division to be the game it is saying that it is. But, with it being a ubi game i know it probably wont be.

Deividas3868d ago

Yup you are right. And it sucks because I want the Division to really succeed cause it can be amazing...but Ubisofts games are getting worse in terms of playability.

DOMination-3868d ago

I'm not interested in the division myself but it is a bit different. Its not being developed at ubi montreal or toronto but at massive entertainment which is in Sweden. Although i believe Ubi own them and obviously will have some control over it, its not usong the anvil engine or whatever its called nowadays

Deividas3868d ago (Edited 3868d ago )

Dude I can handle random glitches and shit but the framerate is beyond a disaster....I have MSI R9 280X (Overclocked too) in Crossfire......and I get about 28fps on average on medium-high settings.....WHAT THE LIVING HELL IS THAT???? The PC version is by far the worst. Was gonna pick it up for the PS4 too but now there is no chance at all.

I mean yea glitches suck but If i can get good frames, a little more enjoyable to handle the damn random texture pop ups and people disappearing on my like no tomorrow. But damn...

Orbilator3869d ago (Edited 3869d ago )

Is this after the 900mb day one patch?
I only ask as I'm playing off line the now and not really noticing anything like that?

q8kik3868d ago (Edited 3868d ago )

Yup i'm playing it on ps4 and the first time i experienced it was (don't worry this is at the start of the game) when you're supposed to do a jumping puzzle thing (in an empty place!) after bellec gives you a small artifact.

And the funny thing is when there's alot going on the screen the game holds a steady 30 fps, but sometimes in empty places the fps drops severely, to the point that it throws you off a bit.

FriedGoat3868d ago

Must be that incredible Ai......

killswitchmad3869d ago

Did anyone consider the fact that in all likelihood the game has a day one patch that hasn't been deployed yet? Ubisoft are well known for day one patches that increase performance quite substantialy.....

osprey193869d ago

Exactly, people seem to forget that especially in recent years, games have day one patches that improve things like patches and stability, anyone who gets the game early and play it before the patch should expect some problems, if its still bad after the patch then people do have the right to be annoyed, but until then people need to calm down.

Ares84HU3869d ago

That is just wrong man.

I'm sorry but whe I buy a game I expect it to work properly. I don't expect it to have problems.

Mikelarry3869d ago

just because some do it does not make this practice right. you have paid $60 of your hard earned cash up front only for you to wait for a day one patch to enjoy your game, if anything it shows that ubisoft yearly release for this game does not benefit it.

osprey193869d ago

@ares84hu, i referring to the people who got it before release, like people who have a friend who works at a game store or something, gotta remember as well this isn't widespread either, its a few complaints and thanks to the internet blown out of proportion. Many people i knw say they dnt have any frame rate issues at all.

morganfell3868d ago

News Flash:

DAY ONE PATCHES ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM, NOT THE SOLUTION.

KrisButtar3868d ago

So anyone playing games should expect a day 1 patch? The game is released today, its not released early. We should not have to be "connected" and wait for a patch to be able to play a game.

ThatOneGuyThere3868d ago

hard release dates and marketing costs are the reason for day 1 patches.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3868d ago
pelida3869d ago

I remember the days when you bought a game and it worked

Palitera3868d ago

Congrats for haiving a great long term memory, sir.

aLucidMind3868d ago

That time is still alive today. If you think games back for when the original Nintendo or the N64 didn't have any bug-infested messes then you seriously must have only played a handful of games at most. Having well over 100 games from the N64 alone, I can say things are better nowadays now that patches are available. The DLC thing bugs me now and then, though; I miss my unlockables lol.

XANDEO3868d ago

True but they are a lot harder to produce thease days then back in the ps2 era and before.

Caffo013868d ago

the patch has already been released..

Mornzie3868d ago

I understand what you're saying but, what about people that don't have access to the Internet?

Raider693868d ago

The patch is been deployed and the game runs like ass Still!The real problem is that Ubisoft is releasing games that are not finnished to the consumers,Ubisoft expects people to buy there games even if they are broke or in very bad technical condition,and this only happens because most of the people are willing to accept this crap and dont talk with there wallet!People need to start talking more with there wallet and dont support or buy with this kind of technical problems because buying them in this kind of state is telling developers and publishers that crap sells!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3868d ago
Show all comments (143)
80°

I Played Assassin’s Creed Unity Almost 10 Years Later. It’s (Kinda) Spectacular

Shaz from GL writes: "Assassin’s Creed Unity is looked at as one of the worst in Ubisoft’s iconic franchise. But playing it nearly 10 years later reveals it may just be the best"

Read Full Story >>
gameluster.com
Skuletor458d ago

Do the NPCs still randomly levitate every now and then? Even years later I noticed they hadn't patched that out

andy85458d ago (Edited 458d ago )

Honestly I loved the PS4 ACs. I'd love next gen ports of Black Flag, Unity and Syndicate

70°

Five small but brilliant maps in games

Small video game maps that are packed with things to do are better than huge but empty maps. Here are five small but brilliant maps in games.

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
leahcim912d ago

I am playing the Batman Vita game, it is amazing really.

160°

Why Assassin’s Creed Unity remains one of the best games in the series

GF365: "Since the first Assassin’s Creed game, there have been entries up until now. There are more than a few titles that are far from an ideal stealth game. Let’s discuss why 2014’s Assassin’s Creed Unity is one of the best games in the series."

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
isarai937d ago

Glitchy as hell and flat story, nah this aint it. AC2, brotherhood and 4 were amazing games in every respective

Furesis936d ago

Yeah i would say brotherhood and 4 were the best for me. I have not played the new ones and Unity was my last one. Seems like i made a good choice.

DarXyde936d ago

I gave up after Revelations. Just couldn't bring myself to care anymore and I got burned out of the gameplay.

Definitely agree on 2 and Brotherhood though. Great games.

YourMommySpoils936d ago

A Ubisoft AC game that's not glitchy? That will be the day.

Knightofelemia937d ago

After constant glitches Arno being boring nah I am good I skipped Unity. I will always like the Ezio trilogy, Black Flag, Rogue, Odyssey, Syndicate. I use to love the franchise but now it feels stale and boring. But my list of favorite entries into the franchise will vary from other players favorite entries.

RaidenBlack936d ago

Odyssey is a really well-made RPG game ... but it ain't a proper AC game, even though its part of the lore

ToddlerBrain936d ago

It’s funny because, at launch, it was universally panned for being unplayable. It’s a great game that holds up today. I’m glad they fixed it.

staticall936d ago

The only good things i remember from Unity are pretty graphics and really good descending mechanics (even though it sometimes didn't make much sense, when your character can drop down from like 10 meter height onto a flagpole perfectly).

Game is glitchy to this day, i was playing in it years after the release date (with all the DLCs) and it's still broken. You had to reload missions too often for my taste (characters do not spawn, you fall through the floor, getting stuck in falling/sitting/aiming animation, hidden blade stop working, assassination target running away at the start of the mission). Story was meh, searching for all the treasures wasn't enjoyable at all. Coop was pretty much useless, i've beaten every coop mission in solo. Helix rifts were awful as well.

Not saying i hate this game or anything, but it got too many problems.

Assassin's Creed (i know it's a controversial opinion) and Assassin's Creed 2 are still great to this day.

anast936d ago

Unity was okay. I prefer Syndicate and Origins.

Show all comments (17)