510°

Minecraft Graphics Comparison Shows Consoles Still Have Some Improving To Do

The Xbox One and PS4 versions of Minecraft are upon us. Of course the first thing gamers do is compare graphics between different versions. The PS4 and Xbox One versions look exactly the same so there's no point in comparing those two. The real draw is comparing the console versions and the PC version. This comparison shows us what the console version could eventually look like if the texture mods become part of a future update.

Read Full Story >>
gamingjudgement.com
Randostar3884d ago

Comparing a game with texture mods on and off. This video is pointless, it just shows you PC can use text mods.

LackTrue4K3884d ago

bet my lunch that the one on "console" is just the same game without running the mod....i mean just look @ it, the terrain is the same!

MRMagoo1233883d ago (Edited 3883d ago )

could be likely, but if you put in a seed for a lvl I think it would be identical across versions so who knows.

Stupid article anyway, I can imagine if the console versions where using the same mod it would look the same and play the same.

XBLSkull3883d ago

When u mix that sky and water in the PC version it just makes the rest if the game look terrible. Keep it all looking poor or make everything good. Mixing it together is just half-assing it

Army_of_Darkness3883d ago

Minecraft looks like sh*t whether it's in 720p, 1080p or even 4k.. .It's like watching crap in hi-definition.

Spenok3883d ago

Good point. I don't think I would have noticed that. It took me all of 2 seconds to realize the "PC" version was running a mod. This article is, as everyone else clearly pointed out, using a Texture Mod.

Really? You're going to compare two "Different" versions of a game with one of them running a mod to make the game look better? Yeah Okay, Looks like I won't be clicking on any GameingJudgement articles again.

But back on the versions being the same, nice eye. Clearly they are both on the PC, he doesn't even say which console version is "compared."

3883d ago
christian hour3883d ago

What the hell has happened to my hobby?!

Where have all the smart and logical gamers gone?!

Why are there so many peoiple willing to sacrifice their morals and integrity to make bullcrap articles like this?!

*repeatedly slams forehead in to brick wall to numb the pain*

Maddens Raiders3883d ago

@army of darkness - agreed.

This game looks like complete shite no matter what. I have it on tablet for my 8 and 5 year old boys and they think it looks the same as well. I feel guilty at times for pushing it on them so early - got caught up in the minecraft hypemachine...

garrettbobbyferguson3883d ago

Of course the textures are the same. There aren't any actual textures used or an arstyle. Minecraft uses developer graphics. It may as well have been a placeholder, but they were too lazy to actually do anything else.

nX3883d ago

Stupid article but I have to say that the console versions shouldn't be priced at 20 bucks. Mojang is swimming in cash already even though their game hasn't evolved during the last few years.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 3883d ago
Reddzfoxx3883d ago

I partially agree but then again that is the ultimate difference for a game like minecraft. PC has modders and when you buy Minecraft your not just buying the game but everything the community has created.

Minecraft is simply best played on PC for the texture packs alone.

Its like buying a Mustang/Camaro (which ever you prefer) and getting the base package. Then you see someone driving around in the same style of car but they have a bigger engine and all the bells and whistles.

Then you try to convince yourself your not missing out on anything but in your heart you know your missing out on "everything".

Randostar3883d ago

They are nice don't get me wrong, but it doesn't have any drawbacks when i play without em. The ultimate experience for minecraft i think is playing with friends. I dont play a game like minecraft to be wooed by the prettiness, thats what Skyrim running 100+ mods is for lol.

joab7773883d ago

You compare them both w/ and w/out mods. Yes, mods do come w/ pc games, and damn I wish the the ps4 version looked that gokd, but u can't make a graphical comparison showing how horrible consoles r by using mods. Just show both.

And I'd kill for a minecraft type game w/ great graphics.

ScottyHoss3883d ago

Just a question, does PC have split screen support? Building a rig and grabbing a few 360 controllers for my living room, I have yet to buy minecraft but I've played it on console. If PC has split screen on top of mods then it's a done deal

kingPoS3883d ago

Except for the fact that those SS's & GT's generally consume a lot more gas than the base models. And when you live in Phoenix Arizona, having a power hungry PC gaming rig quickly become a real drain on the wallet.

Gateway MT6706 2008

3883d ago
loktec3883d ago

@joab777 Ever heard of landmark?

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3883d ago
Magicite3883d ago

PC looks like game of 90s, console looks like game of 80s /s

Dynasty20213883d ago ShowReplies(1)
Pogmathoin3883d ago

The unique thing about Minecraft is the simplistic way it looks. That has not changed on any version, mods do there own thing.... I like the game because of the 8 bit feel to it..... they are right to leave the look IMO...

assdan3883d ago

I'm really hoping this article is a joke.

IaussieGamer3883d ago

agree 100%. Yeah lets compare the vanilla on consoles to the moded version on PC. If them same mods where available on the consoles it would look very close to the pc version. Aferall Minecraft is not a graphical game

3-4-53883d ago

The point of minecraft is to relax and have fun doing whatever.

It's not a painting.

TheBurger293883d ago

Its actually shaders and not a texture pack. NO texture pack will look like this!

SoCalledMe3883d ago

? there are no texture mods in PC version only "Sonic Ethers Unbelievable Shaders"

maddskull3883d ago

you're right. since when did people start playing minecraft for the graphics i play minecraft in low setting and i still have fun. games aren't about graphics only. people need to understand this and minecraft is one game that doesn't need alot of graphical improvement because the game hasn't been about graphics and will never be. other games have graphics as a main point alongside game play and other features but that isn't the same with minecraft. the people that try to show that PC is way better than consoles you have to understand that we don't car i personally like playing on a controller and TV more than playing with a mouse and keyboard in front of a monitor.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 3883d ago
Reddzfoxx3883d ago

Pc doesn't have Grand theft auto 5. But I get the point you are making.

SuperBlur3883d ago

Will be out soon tho but that comparison was just silly funny stupid , disagreer are probably bitter owner of gtav on old gen (i am ,myself)

Lighten up people !! :]

Linwelin3883d ago

Not yet no, but it has a release date now :)

Nafon3883d ago

people didn't your joke, which I thought was actually pretty good lol.

This article is garbage. Such a horrible comparison.

Paprika3884d ago

Bit like comparing a person with and without make up on..... the consoles could run these mods..... they just don't have them... yet!

Move along, nothing to see here! I still have fin with MC on ps3. Graphics aren't everything.... its minecraft lol!

Nwah3883d ago

Chances are that these shaders could not run on consoles as Minecraft is a horribly optimized game that can only be better run by what else? A modification.

TheBurger293883d ago

I have an i7 4770k with plenty of fast ram and trust me, I get max 80 fps but usually in the 40s and 50s. So consoles can not run shaders.

DoctorJones3883d ago

'the consoles could run these mods'

No they couldn't.

Paprika3883d ago (Edited 3883d ago )

OK, but only due to lazy coding and the performance of these mods requiring excess power. In terms of ability of consoles, nothing in any minecraft mod is beyond consoles. Ie, the outcome visually of these mods are gorgeous, but consoles can easily output that level of visuals.

If we are talking skyrim mods, then we will agree!

Lord_Sloth3883d ago (Edited 3883d ago )

Seriously guys, it's a joke video.

Spotie3883d ago

Hard to tell, these days. Gotta check ID.

Omnisonne3883d ago

Honestly feels more like a bad attempt to amp up the PC-console debate

Bad attempt as in using modded Minecraft for comparison -_- lol

sinspirit3883d ago

Gaming Journalist Still Shows How Negligent and Uneducated They Are About Hardware and Software; Further Distances Themselves From Fair Review In Order To Get More Hits.

Show all comments (81)
40°

Minecraft splitscreen mod comes to Steam Deck and it might be possible in other games too

Playing Minecraft splitscreen on the Steam Deck is possible now, thanks to this script that automates everything for you.

170°

Microsoft Is Using Minecraft as a Trojan Horse to Promote Generative AI to Children

Generative AI is a controversial topic, and Microsoft seems to have found that Minecraft is the perfect Trojan Horse to get children on board.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
anast16d ago

Like I said, the younger generation won't care. They will even like AI games.

CrimsonWing6916d ago

AI is an amazing tool and you’re absolutely right, just like they’re caring less about physical media since they’re growing up in a digital world. Only us old-ass curmudgeon‘s cry about this stuff.

I personally, support AI 100%. As a creative outlet it’s literally a tool to help with creativity or shortcomings a user might have but dreams about doing things. Like those AI generated movie trailers on YouTube are awesome. Imagine being able to make games you’ve dreamt of and using AI to make it a reality.

Lot of great applications and I embrace it, regardless of having watched Terminator 2 a bajillion times, lol.

Abriael16d ago

The only ones who "support AI 100%" are those too lazy or too inept to do the job themselves.

The AI-generated videos on YouTube are absolute unsightly slop. They're all the same, like pretty much everything AI makes and will always make.

If you "dream about doing things"... do things. Put effort into learning instead of having a bot do it for you so that you aren't actually doing the things and are just taking credit (from something born of the theft of other people's work), trucking yourself into believing that you have created something when you have, indeed, created nothing.

Profchaos16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

AI is the anti creative outlet humans put heart and soul into their work and errors are a part of the art just as much as ideas are.

Offloading creative things to a gen AI is enforcing the fact that your idea wasn't strong enough to stand on its own.

Tacoboto16d ago

"... are those too lazy or too inept to do the job themselves"

Cool, yeah, you definitely know what you're talking about.

This isn't two years ago when it was new. I've been a software developer for 13 years and the code Gemini and GPT writes is actually usable, when you know how to query in the right context.

And why would I learn it? Oh yeah, because heads of companies and new opportunities in the future will 100% require knowledge of AI, and in 5 years, my near 20 years of experience would just be reduced to if I can meet the inevitable "5+ years AI tooling" requirements or not. Nothing I or anyone can do about that. Being lazy or inept is refusing to adapt to or flat out rejecting changes in the environment.

CrimsonWing, 100% right here.

anast16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

I don't support it more than I try to understand it.

Terminator 2 was worse than 1 and it let to the host of tasteless Marvel Movies and New Star Wars Movies we have today.

bunt-custardly16d ago

@abriel Carmack recently commented about this too. It's not being lazy it's progression.

Think about when the wheel was invented. How that made people "lazy" not having to carry stuff manually. AI is a tool and should be 100% human monitored/controlled. It's when you decide to let it do ALL the work, you become lazy.

Abriael16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

@bunt-custardly: Carmack is a tech chud and an executive. He couldn't care less about whether normal rank-and-file developers would lose their jobs to this slop as long as his company could save money on their salaries.

And yes, it's lazy slop.

"Because Carmack says so" is not a great argument.

Incidentally, what Carmack specifically defended is the Quake experiment, which is *literally* letting the AI do all the work, so there goes your argument.

Abriael16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

@Tacoboto:

If you let a bot do your job you're either lazy or inept. You pick. I can't care less of how much alleged "experience" you say you have.

If you use ChatGPT or Gemini you're literally stealing other people's work because that's where the code they give you comes from. AI creates nothing.

I've heard "Nothing I or anyone can do about that" about NFTs, crypto, and all that crap. Nothing is inevitable.

Tacoboto16d ago

Not using and crying fowl about AI in 2025 is like someone in 2005 saying that using Intellisense and code completion in Visual Studio is lazy and inept.

You know nothing, Abriael, and you speak out of ignorance rather than experience.

"you're literally stealing other people's work"

Ever hear of "open source"? Probably not, because with that statement you clearly know absolutely nothing.

Abriael16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

@Tacoboto:

You just demonstrated that you're just a troll and not a developer of any kind. A developer would know that the data used to train the AI chatbots you mentioned is not and has never been open source.

You're likely just an xbox fanboy trying to defend Microsoft just because it's Microsoft. Pathetic.

Tacoboto16d ago

LOL, so wrong again! I refuse to use MS Copilot in any meaningful regard still. Gemini provides the most detailed results (with context as well) and GPT I feel has started to lag behind it.

Copilot has routinely broken after a few queries for me and the UI Microsoft built is embarrassingly underfeatured. Again, you speak with ignorance over something that you do not understand.

Abriael16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

@Tacoboto: sure mate, keep pretending. Like any actual developer would slip on the open source discourse. Totally not a Microsoft fanboy with Master Chief in the icon. 👀

It's so open-source that AI companies are being sued into oblivion by the many they have stolen from. And when these lawsuits end with them being found guilty, this fad will hit the brakes big time.

Tacoboto16d ago

All I'll say is you should not speak against that which you have no knowledge of or experience in.

And I'll tell you that once you're an adult, with a big boy job, you're expected to get things done, and you should work smarter, not harder. If there is a tool out there that can make a 3 hour job a 3 minute job, you use that tool. That makes you competitive, that makes you more productive. It keeps you relevant in an evolving industry.

Abriael16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

We'll see where the "work smarter" goes when the lawsuits cripple this AI slop and everything needs to be retrained on non-stolen content, assuming it's even possible 😂

Profchaos15d ago

@Tacoboto nit sure how you're getting usable code from Gemini and gpt I spend more time fixing the code it outputs personally though Claude AI is far superior for generating it from my experience at least.

And honestly I'll go to Claude to write the bones of what I'm after nothing's perfect still a ton of rationalising that goes in after

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 15d ago
-Foxtrot16d ago

Well yeah because they’ll grow up with crap like this to make them like it

It’s like training people to defend generative AI or AI in general as they get older

Creative based AI is terrible and I feel bad for the real artists getting the shaft losing jobs to it

anast16d ago

Couldn't agree with you more.

jznrpg16d ago

They will care if parents talk to them about it in a way to show them why they should care. Unfortunately there may not be enough who do that.

anast16d ago

Noting wrong with being an optimist.

b00mFargl316d ago

I understand if this tool aids children in Minecraft development. However, I believe that substituting human workers with AI and reducing the creative input of developers, artists, and other professionals is detrimental. It also results in content that lacks a certain human touch.

Abriael16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

This has nothing to do with helping children develop in Minecraft. This just uses Minecraft to condition children into liking generative AI.

Their "curriculum" even paints intellectual property laws as something that can hinder innovation. It can't be more disgusting than this.

b00mFargl316d ago

The idea is that AI can be implemented to aid them in their creations, specifically for minecraft; That's all I was getting at.

Everything else I mentioned was in agreement that AI isn't good and can ruin everything. Sorry you missed the entire point of what I was getting at. Boop

Inverno16d ago

Its getting more and more dystopian lolz. Just wait til the robots are more commonplace, everyone will be replaced. Hey I'd be fine with it if it means everything in life will be free. Cause that's the goal right? The end of capitalism? Bettering society for the sake of bettering the world? By ending human labor? And allowing us all to live rent free and enjoy all the comforts that this amazing technology will bring? Right? Cause if we're all gonna end up jobless and homeless then wtf is the point?

goken16d ago

Gotta start em young is the plan here…
Maybe we should relook the whole capitalism thing 😅

Nacho_Z16d ago

People think the film industry is derivative and out of ideas these days, and they're right for the most part, imagine how it would be with creativity handed over to AI. Braindead, basically. Same for gaming.

In any creative endeavour like films, gaming, art, it needs nipping in the bud and used appropriately, not being embraced.

130°

"It's The Best Deal In The World": Mojang On Why Minecraft Will Never Go Free-To-Play

Not everything needs to go free-to-play!

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
Vits33d ago

I'm pretty sure that the vast majority of money Minecraft makes these days is from DLC, so going f2p would make a lot of sense. But given how cheap the game actually is ($30 for consoles/PC and $7 on mobile) I don't think it would make that much of diference.

VenomUK32d ago (Edited 32d ago )

If 50% of all kids buy just one copy of this game (made up number but not unrealistic as the game has become almost a rites of passage) then Microsoft is doing great by being paid for each copy.

StoneTitan32d ago

it would actually make no sense to go f2p.
If you can charge something for the basegame and people pay for it (obviously they are still doing it) then going f2p would be idiotic.

Vits31d ago

Puting a entry price on anything also reduces it potential player base and therefore its paying costumer for DLC. That mind you likely make the bulk of Minecraft revenue. That is basic business since at least a decade, so I would get in with the times.

badz14932d ago

Funny how they and their parent company have different views on subscription-based delivery.