60°

Bayonetta 2 Is Insane, And I Love It For That

IGN - Platinum's sequel is unapologetically over-the-top, and I wouldn't have it any other way.

Bayonetta 2 is insane -- that goes without saying. Anything Platinum touches, from Vanquish to Metal Gear Rising, is drenched with frantic madness, especially the follow-up to their 2010 incredibly deep action game-meets butt rock-meets extreme violence-meets European architecture.

Playing through Chapter 2 of the Wii U-exclusive for the first time just reaffirmed my claim that Bayonetta trumps any other action games in terms of sheer insanity. Within minutes of the demo, I had done about a dozen “firsts” for video games. For instance, a mysterious NPC pulled a Moses and turned a lake into a long, walkable tube of water. But of course, I didn’t just walk through it. I animorphed into a panther and ran through that bad boy on all fours. Yep, that was a first.

ritsuka6663588d ago (Edited 3588d ago )

http://abload.de/img/d768b3...

My god I need to see it again.....

http://static.gamespot.com/...

Yep people, Bayonetta 2 still fantastic.

TardcoreGamer3588d ago

Bayonetta 2 is a Wii U purchase waiting to happen in my eyes.
I'm nearly finished Platinum Games' Metal Gear Rising on PC. They really know how to make the absolute best action games.

CaptainN3588d ago

Well when you get it make sure to pick up Wonderful 101 with it. I am sure you will like thay as well since its action packed.

VINNIEPAZ3587d ago

Bayonetta and Monster Hunter are 2 of the main reasons I got a Wii U. Cannot wait for this game!

LAWSON723587d ago (Edited 3587d ago )

You sir with that gif made me want a Wii U even more. The awesome thing about Bayonetta is I have yet to pay any attention to either game and when I get them both on Wii U I will be in for a nice surprise.

wonderfulmonkeyman3588d ago (Edited 3588d ago )

It's bold, but I'm gonna say it anyways; from everything I've seen so far o it, and of the upgrades done to the port of bay 1...
This game, no, this celebratory collector's edition of the Bayonetta franchise, DESERVES to out-sell its initial miltiplat release.
It's staying true to form despite the change of system, and bringing improvements to all of the things that made fans of the franchise(such as myself) fall in love with it in the first place.
It would be criminally unfair if this didn't eventually outsell the original release; it's doing so many things right that I can only imagine Nintendo haters looking down on it at this point.
I'm hoping fans of the series will show more loyalty to the game than to its system and give it the high sales it deserves in the end.

Neonridr3588d ago

count me in day one for this game.

Never played the first game, so having it included is the ultimate fan service for those of us that missed it the first time around.

colonel1793588d ago

I liked the first one, but I was so bad at it, that when I reached the last chapter, I didn't have very few upgrades. I couldn't finish any mission with the highest rank, and therefore couldn't afford to upgrade anything.

Needless to say, I gave up. Yes, right at the end.

Bubbamilk3588d ago

So far that has been a lot more hype around this game than w101. Which is a good sign. Not to mention the addition of the first game with upgrades and the fact that since the first one was canned I'm sure platinum is bringing it like its their last bayo.

I know that doesn't always translate into sales but u are right they are set up perfectly for success. And I'm fortunate enough to have never played the first one. And I love these types of games. So if everyone who bought the first buys this one and so do I than there u go it will have officially outsold it.

And I have a feeling when the reviews roll in the haters will be forced to pawn their pitchforks for for a brand new Wii u. I've purchased consoles with way less options than the wii u currently has for way more money. So if it doesn't outsell the first than there is no hope for the future of games. Just blind fanboys.

Criminally unfair would be the best ways put it.

AWBrawler3588d ago (Edited 3588d ago )

hmmm i better watch my back. that phantom disagree is clearly going to do within his or her power to stop me from getting this game day 1.

The_Devil_Hunter3588d ago

Now this is an action game. I really didn't like some of the comments regarding this game. Calling it a poor mans God Of War. I love GoW but this is a hardcore action game this is the DMC I have been waiting for.

Blacklash933588d ago

People called it a poor man's God of War?

The cancelling and evade mechanics in God of War aren't as universally flexible or fluid as Bayonetta. Bayonetta herself is much faster and more nimble than Kratos has ever been, allowing for much more aggressive combat. The Dogde Offset innovation alone sets Bayonetta apart. The only thing holding Bayonetta's combat system back was the same-y weapons, which the sequel is clearly fixing.

Anyway, God of War stopped impressing me after 2. Ascension took everything God of War 3 did wrong and made it worse.

The_Devil_Hunter3588d ago

Agree everything you said. Except GoW 3 was among one of my favourite games of last gen. Ascension was bad.

LightDiego3588d ago (Edited 3588d ago )

One of the most anticipated games of this year, for me.
Bayonetta 2, Toad's Captain, Yoshi's Wooly World, Super Smash Bros, Sonic Boom, Hyrule Warriors.
Where are the gaming jounalists who said that Wii U has no games?

AWBrawler3588d ago

sonic boom is my most anticipated.. yea i know, odd.

OtakuDJK1NG-Rory3588d ago

Yoshi's Wooly Worl is early 2015 maybe March.

Show all comments (25)
110°

Why The Game Industry Needs In-Person Shows Despite The End Of E3

Skewed and Reviewed kick off 2024 with a look at the need for in-person game conventions with the End of E3 and compares the cost-cutting methods of Hollywood who still value in-person events.

gold_drake141d ago

so, this article didnt tell me why we NEED to have in-person shows like e3, other than the authors nostalgia and remembrance of covering one of these shows.

but it also doesnt mention everyone outside of america who have never had the chance to see it in person either haha
we had to watch the darn livestream, if they had it available, at 3am in the morning haha with lags amd crashes (not all the time)

while i think these shows are great and all, i dont really "need" to have them. people are busy, im busy. id rather watch a livestream than to book a flight, a hotel etc.

but theres still pax and all of that.

Garethvk141d ago (Edited 141d ago )

I did mention that you cannot have hands-on and meetings with key people and the excitement. Europe has Gamescom and had Paris Games Week and N.A
Needs an industry event again.

A Livestream does not even come close to what was lost. I much prefer seeing and playing the games in person and asking questions to developers and marketing people versus watching talking heads doing shtick on a scripted showcase with a carefully edited video.

gold_drake141d ago

"need" is a strong word for it, imo.

"good to have it" would be a better way to describe it.

and sure, gamescom is in se germanland, paris week in .. paris.

most people dont rly care for it anymore. they either tune in to a livestream or vod or read about it online.

but opinions are opinions. if u think we Need them, then there ya go.

Garethvk141d ago

I think the industry needs them. The rank and file public not as much but our coverage is greatly limited via livestreams compared to what it was to say nothing of streams. Hands on previews Re very limited as well as we used to play big games months before release.

ApocalypseShadow141d ago (Edited 141d ago )

I get what you're saying. In person is always preferable with a hands on. Because there are those like myself that like to try before buying. That likes physical mostly over digital.

But having said that, I think it's more *your personal need* than a need for the industry itself. You need to be the middleman giving your point of view, possibly your own personal bias or subjectivity or objectivity to the equation. *We* as gamers don't actually NEED it. We can come to the same conclusions, positive or negative about a game as you can.

Companies like Sony or Nintendo used to sit back and watch others give their take on things that were negative to the message or had an agenda. Especially during the PS3 era of website bias, swag bags, advertising hand shakes, biased video, free laptops, etc.

Companies like Sony took the reigns and decided to let their base see for themselves what the games look like, than through the eyes of some journalists, bloggers and vloggers looking to cash in on click bait and advertising.

Delivering their message directly to the consumer killed a lot of that nonsense. You see the developers, you see the game, and in many cases, you can speak to these developers on discord than worrying about some article's take on something.

It's not that I want you to become obsolete. But for some, I'm glad it killed their business practices. Also, we live in an era where these games could be streamed directly to the consumers after the presentation from Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft that gives that hands on of a game. They just have to implement that technology and make it high quality without latency. And *WE* as gamers can speak to each other on a preferred media platform and give our opinions on the gameplay we just experienced. Many journalists have not been fully honest on games before release because they fear losing their backstage pass and free gifts. We would know just by playing if a game is something we want. Remote play is possible now without lines, without expensive trips, etc.

To close, Sony has sold mostly 50 million PS5 consoles, over 110 million PS4 consoles and Nintendo has sold over 120 million consoles without a journalist take. They delivered their message and it's still reaching the consumers they are targeting without spending the millions of dollars on in person setup at a venue

I get what you're saying. I lived through the whole era when E3 was created and watched. But I don't need it and never been to one. And really don't need a journalist to tell me what to like or dislike.

EvertonFC141d ago

The ques for 1 game were 4 hours long for the most part, that's NOT fun.

S2Killinit140d ago

The problem with live shows was that it became all smoke and mirrors and a show of things not related to gaming. Therefore I would argue that it added a new layer of cost to the game developers and console holders that necessarily will need to made up for. Either we the consumer have to pay for that cost or the developer/manufacturer will have to bear the cost thereby taking away from profits leading to smaller studios dying out.

Remember xbox buying celebrities to make appearances? Thats a good example of unnecessary cost.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 140d ago
JackBNimble141d ago

You don't need to go to the movies either, you can sit on your ass and watch any number of streams but that doesn't make it any better then actually going out.

This generation has become so spoiled and lazy.

gold_drake141d ago

booking a flight and a hotel aint the same as going to the movies, but pop off i guess ha.

Garethvk141d ago

Streaming cannot replace the communal experience of event films.

EvertonFC141d ago (Edited 141d ago )

Actually it does, for one it's cheaper eating my own snacks at home than over priced pi** take cinema prices. 2 it's About £150 to take the family to the cinema or £15 for a new cinema release and watch at home on my awesome 4k TV.
3 We can pause the film when needed, sit in the warmth of our home and have no di*kheads talking through the movie.
That's called using your brain, not being lazy or spoiled dude.

TheColbertinator141d ago

I'd rather publishers send out closed betas to garner gamer concern and interest like how we had demos back in the day.

I don't miss E3 as much as I loved it at one point but that era is long gone.

Garethvk141d ago

There is a need but refinement was and is needed.

Zenzuu141d ago

Sad to see it go. It was a great event for gamers and developers all around the world getting together and celebrate gaming as a community.

The announcements of new games/hardware, hype, surprises and seeing live audience reactions, it's something only events like E3 are able to bring. It will be missed...

hombreacabado141d ago

if its going to be anything like the game awards where celebrities that dont even play games are there and its just full of fluff and commercial crap than no we dont need in person shows. we just end up watching the trailer montages the next day anyway.

Shiro173140d ago

To be honest E3 was one of my favorite times of the years when I was younger. I couldn't wait for all the big conferences and new announcements. It was hype even if nothing good was announced we had cringe moments to laugh at.

Show all comments (18)
60°

Talking Mortal Kombat 1 With Ed Boon And Thiago Gomes

During SDCC I spoke with Ed Boon and Thiago Gomes about Mortal Kombat 1 as part of a Roundtable.

60°

DC Heroes United and Borderlands Comes To SDCC

This sounds awesome. This afternoon, Genvid Entertainment announced two, all-new interactive streaming series at San Diego-Comic Con: DC Heroes United and Borderlands EchoVision Live.