170°

Gran Turismo vs. Forza Motorsport : Ultimate Comparison

"Both have cars, both have racing, so what's the difference?"

For people unaware about these racing series, you should know they are probably the best racing simulations in account for realism. Gran Turismo is the PlayStation exclusive series and Forza Motorsport is the Xbox loyalist. They are not NFS-ish titles giving a laid-back and blissful driving. Gran Turismo is a completely settled franchise now whereas Forza Motorsport is a brand new series having only two titles till date.

qwert6189d ago

HAHAHA...can't compare my beatiful crap game Forza F@gsport whith a magnific game GT5...PS3 fans stop this already...Forza is the worst racing experience I had in my entire life, and that because of my beloved pile of crap xbox360!...We the xbots are winning this...WE WANT CRAP!

Blademask6189d ago (Edited 6189d ago )

Buy Forza.

If you want a good sim experience with a top of the Line wheel like the G25 Or the Dfpro, or the Porsche wheel... amazing physics, as well as 1080p beautiful car visuals.

Buy GT5p.

NegativeCreepWA6189d ago

You got that backwards. I'm sorry, but any game you can go around a corner at a 160mph and bounce off a wall with no consequences is an arcade game, not a sim. Playing GT5 online is like playing bumper cars. In Forza people actually try to race. Because if you hit someone hard you'll be out of the race. It GT people will slam you off the road on a corner because they know nothing will happen. Ive always been a huge GT fan. But every since the first Forza I've realized GT is an arcade game the pretends to be a sim. Game-play is what makes a sim, not graphics. And as far as customization goes Forza has GT beat by a long-shot. Which is one of most important things in a sim. A like both games a lot, but when it comes down to which one is more of a sim Forza wins. GT does have the most amazing graphics I have ever seen though.

season0076189d ago (Edited 6189d ago )

if i want arcade experience, i would go for initial D
if i want sim, i would go for GT 5...

edit: to the one that replied just a few seconds faster than me...

I don't know if it is a trend in n4g, or if it is a flaw of the bubble system, but it is funny here because every single time people bash a title or a console, they tend to say they are the fans or they used to be the fans...o well, perhaps it protects your bubbles and sounds more like a fair guy?

Meh, if you want to bash something, just go for it and be a man...don't be like i used to be a fan but blah blah blah....

NegativeCreepWA6189d ago (Edited 6189d ago )

lol. I could care less about these stupid bubbles. Take them if you want. I guess its to hard for you and some of the other people on this site to comprehend that not everyone picks one console or one of two competing games. I must have been dreaming all those years I spent hundreds of hours playing the GT series. I was in no way trying to bash GT. Just stating the reasons I think Forza is more of a sim. And from the comments here I can clearly see most of these people have never played Forza.

Bolts6189d ago

There is absolutely nothing realistic about Fronza damage model. It is almost GTA 4 like, you can ram a car head on into a wall at 90 mph then drive off with a crunched bumper and a cracked windshield. At least in GTA 4 you get thrown out of the car and get your head busted up.

Kenshin_BATT0USAI6189d ago

I completely agree with you season007

Initial D has been one of the few proven arcade fanchises, I don't know a single person who hasn't liked it. Plus if you are into the series it makes it that much funner to play it.

2Negativecool6189d ago

This is just a blatant attempt for hits. They are comparing them when they haven't even played them.

One need only read the section discussing "damage" effects in the graphics 'comparison.' It says GT5: Prologue has "similarly detailed damage effects." !!!

There is NO damage in GT5: Prologue.

This comparison is FAIL! Just an worthless attempt to get hits, and it worked!

NegativeCreepWA6189d ago

That comment proves you've never played it like most of the people here. Damage is not only cosmetic. If you did what you explained in Forza you would barely be able to drive afterwards.

Moto136189d ago

GT5 won me over big time. I don't care about running off a wall or whatever. The realism is what I care about and GT5 is awesome and way better in terms of physics. Playing Forza2 after GT5 feels like driving a boat. I made a thread one time on gamespot forums on this subject and provided pictures of both. here is a link to that thread

http://www.gamespot.com/pag...

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 6189d ago
Zeevious6189d ago (Edited 6189d ago )

Forza has more arcade gameplay.
GT5:Prologue is more of a driving simulation.

Which is more fun depends on what you like to play or just your mood. They both are great.

Since Forza is just up to version 2 it will be great to see how Forza 3 compares to the full GT 5. Either way, they are both the best of the best in driving games.

Want even more realism now? Get a steering wheel for GT5...it makes a big difference.

KYU21306189d ago

i like the game but i have had so many problems with my 360 consolse that i got rid of it and the game. would have loved for it to be a multi-platform game.

Zeevious6189d ago (Edited 6189d ago )

Especially how far they have developed Forza, just looking at versions 1 & 2. Clearly they focused on coming as close to the GT experience as they could, and succeeded in just about everything.

I think just from the perspective of competitors, Forza will stay on the 360 & GT on the PS3.

Either way, each platform has a great driving experience.

PimpHandHappy6189d ago

Grid with Forza

its more the same type of racer

Show all comments (75)
100°

Gran Turismo 4 Cheat Codes Discovered 19 Years Later

Almost 20 years after its release, a set of cheat codes for the PS2 game Gran Turismo 4 has been discovered.

Read Full Story >>
gamespot.com
CobraKai785d ago

That’s cool! Knowing me I woulda still done the tests, but awesome they had cheats

Deathdeliverer785d ago

The article SHOULD say, “BLAST FROM THE PAST! Old school gamers in awe as GT4 cheat codes are discovered after 2 decades. These “cheats” offered free treats for gamers added time savers, additional ways to play, and more. Some magazines had sections or complete issues dedicated to them. Sound strange? Gamers today know them by another name, DLC or Downloadable content…

PhillyDillyDee784d ago

Sounds like a different article. You should write it. Can you do blogs on this site?

vTuro24784d ago

GT4 was my first ps2 game. I loved it, but the disc stopped working before I could complete it and I never got it replaced feelsbadman.

70°

The Best Selling PlayStation 2 Games of All Time

Ever wondered what the best selling PlayStation 2 games of all time are? Well, wonder no more! Here's the full top 10, and what they meant to the PlayStation brand at the time.

Tetsujin1000d ago

Surprised MGS 3 wasn't on the list but 2 is.

90°

PlayStation 3: chasing the 1080p dream, part three - Gran Turismo 5 and the indie explosion

From Digital Foundry: "Welcome to the third part in the biggest DF Retro episode we've ever produced - a year-by-year look at how 1080p gaming fared on the PlayStation 3. Launched in 2007 touting its then-exclusive HDMI digital interface, Sony layered full HD gaming on top of its Cell processor and RSX 'Reality Synthesizer' as key selling points for its third generation console. Of course, we all know how that turned out - both Sony and Microsoft machines routinely ran the most advanced titles at sub-720p resolutions, often with questionable performance, so what happened to the 1080p dream?

In the first two parts of John Linneman's investigation, we've covered off the first four years of the Triple's lifecycle and moving into 2010, the overall fortunes of the PlayStation 3 continued to improve. The platform holder released - what was then - the most advanced motion controller in the console space, backed up by experiments with stereoscopic 3D, which turned out to be a short-lived but still formidable pairing. Combined with a strong E3 showing, PS3 was looking good.

However, it's fair to say that it was a fallow year for 1080p gaming on the system, with only Scott Pilgrim Saves The World's razor-sharp pixel art upscaling, Castle Crashers and Soldner X2's 3D/FMV stylings accommodating full HD output - alongside a wonderful Monkey Island remaster."

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
ApocalypseShadow1030d ago (Edited 1030d ago )

Just remember ladies and gentlemen, Sony never said all games would be 1080p. Only that the system would support games up to 1080p in a survey before the system was released.
https://spong.com/article/9...
And as we saw, some games did support it, some games tried their best to support it and some games didn't or never reached it.

Is a higher resolution great to have if you can do it? Sure. Is it necessary for a fun game? No

But what I find interesting is Eurogamer. Are they really talking about HD and PS3 in their article or are they really pushing their 4.50 Euros 4K video download subscription? Seems one is being used to sell the other. Just look at the bottom of the article.

Michiel19891030d ago

thats what every company tries to do, push for people to buy their products. Are you really gonna blame them for that?

ApocalypseShadow1030d ago

Not all articles are about selling. They're about informing or entertaining.

Maybe I'm supposed to watch the video instead of reading. But I shouldn't have to click. But the article lazily tells us some games did hit 1080p and some didn't. I didn't learn anything new as I own the console. Then, they push a Patreon subscription.

Are you saying every opinion, preview, review and rant article requires a push to buy something now? Tell me which sites are prone to do so so that I can avoid them in the future.

Michiel19891030d ago

not everyone played during the ps3 era. I started during snes era but loved seeing articles/videos about how gaming evolved before that.

i dont think this article is trying to push you to get that patreon sub, it doesnt for me at least. I dont think theres anything wrong putting an ad at the bottom of the article. all the regular DF videos are free already.

SonyStyled1030d ago

Wipeout HD on PS3, a remake of the PS1 game was 1080p 60fps. And that released in 2007-08

Christopher1030d ago

This really feels like a filler article. I don't feel like I learned anything notable or substantial from this. I feel they could have reduced the unnecessary intro and over-explanation of things and put the whole series in one article for a more substantial and possibly informative piece rather than piece-mealing it out as they have.

dumahim1030d ago

It's more about the video. DF Retro videos are for Patreon members first, and I think the whole thing was one big video. For the youtube channel, it gets chopped up and released weekly.

ApocalypseShadow1030d ago

Chris is actually right on this one. Something known already was just kind of washed over in the article. Unless you're supposed to get more in the video. If more is in the video, then more could have been said in the article.

Only thing I learned new was that they are selling a subscription. My point though is that you gain more viewers by having better articles and content.

1027d ago