DLC is an everyday part of gaming, with season passes and character skins available for most titles and a plethora of missions, weapons and costumes along for the ride. Tickles asks if DLC really is a good thing?
Dlc isn't really good or bad.. It just is Some seem to think any dlc should or would have been in the game otherwise.. That just isn't the case.. Devs can make extra money by pumping out content.. Its much cheaper then trying to make another full game.. Don't buy it if you don't want it.. It really is as simple as that.. Pretend it doesn't exist so you don't feel cheated Lol You need to view it as extra content rather then removed content.. If they couldn't sell it extra, they likely wouldn't have made it at all
The problem is that many companies do in fact take content out of the game and sell it as day 1 DLC. All finished content should be included on the disc come release day. Then once the game is out if the developer wants to start expanding the game with new content, fair enough, I definitely encourage that. DLC isn't all bad, but many of them are. Edit: @Fireseed "but DLC finished a week or so after release" Day 1 DLC is finished before the game comes out and could be included on the disc. Same with pre-order DLC.
The problem is people often THINK they know what was and wasnt done come day of release. On disc DLC is of course BS but DLC finished a week or so after release usually hasnt passed QA yet to be included in the game.
Yes it's sad but true as people have proved that there is a market for DLC and it makes money so it's here to stay. For me if I feel I'm being nickle and dimed so to speak then I wait for the complete edition which ruins all the excitement for a game. Pure greed is everywhere in the corporate world all we can do is vote with our wallets.
Pork chop.. I get that and agree completely.. But we don't know what their plans for it are.. If dlc wasn't an option.. Would they have even made that content? That was my point. We can only speculate that it was part of the core game plan.. The sole reason they created could be to sell as dlc.. I don't see how it makes much difference if they plan for it before release
Gamers have gotten what we asked for... Gamers buy games used where the publishers and developers don't get any profit. So they have fought back by creating DLC and microtransactions. I don't like DLC and microtransactions, but since gamers and Gamestop don't see any reason to give the publishers/developers any part of the used market, they are simply doing something that gets them the revenues they are losing out on.
DLC and microtransactions have nothing to do with used games market.
DLC has nothing to do with used games. DLC today is just smaller versions of what used to be called expansion packs.
I 100% agree I am not against used games but DLC was created so they can support the game to keep people from trading in and MT were created mostly for free to play games but when the above did not work they put them in paid games to so it is all a response from the used game market so gamers imo that buy mostly used games are to blame for all this crap I understand you want to save money but it affects the industry in a negative way
I don't buy used games. I also don;'t sell my games. However, I refuse to buy a game full-price when it has DLC-milking. I usually either wait for a çomplete' edition top come out, at a lower price, or I just lose interest completely. DLC has made me spend LESS on a game. Not more. For example, there are sooo many game I would have happily bought for full price on day 1, where they would have gotten 50-60 bucks from me. Games like Arkham Origins, Assassin's Creed 4 Black Flag, or Forza 4. However, because of all the DLC, I decided to wait for a 'GOTY' edition which has all the content. Or I just stopped caring completely, meaning they won't get any of my money. At all. Ever.
I agree as well. I buy all my games. Over 2,000 since the release of X360/PS3/Wii... And 99% were bought new instead of used. You have to understand that DLC and Microtransactions are not targeted at people like yourself. They are targeted to the larger majority of gamers that pirate or buy used. Cliffy B. formerly of Epic/Gears of War said something like "I have seen the number of gamertags compared to sales, the numbers aren't good"... That's the truth of the matter. MS and Sony have the data that proves that publishers/developers are missing out in probably about 75% of sales of their games. So they make DLC and microtransactions to ensure they get a take. Does it deter people like us from buying/buying day one. Yes... But do they make more money overall... Yes. This is really a bean counting exercise.
This has been an issue for a very long time. It honestly depends upon how it's executed, on a case by case basis.
This. I've had some really good experiences with DLC (like the Point Lookout DLC for Fallout 3 and pretty much the entire Rock Band series), but nowadays, the idea is being misused as a way to squeeze money out of big release. It depends on how it's executed, yes.
Proper DLC like TLOU Left Behind & RDR Undead Nightmare are good but disc locked DLC and stupid stuff like costumes and camos that you would expect from EA or Activision are bad.
Unless those costumes are the only form of revenue ala League of Legends and DOTA
I agree dlc should be 6 months to a year after the so called full game. They release half a game upto £60 and month later are askin for more.
or in Watch Dogs case, they're asking for more the same week.
I agree that dlc should be around 6 months after game launch but I also think that if a game has a season pass they should not be releasing extra content that is not included in that.
There is DLC that is worth the money and DLC that is just a cash grabbing scheme, offering next to nothing for far more than you should pay. And sadly people are more than willing to pay through the nose for something that should be available just through playing the game. Expansions is the DLC I like, a meaty add-on to a game, something to sink your teeth into, to enjoy a game in a different way or just to 'expand' and carry the game on. DLC like - the Dark Souls DLC, TLOU Left Behind, Far Cry 3 Blood Dragon - is worth buying. Buying a costume for your character? Nah, should be something included in the game for completing certain objectives, a prize for your commitment. Publishers are happy to take cash off people, and these people that pay it are the ones to blame. Until that changes we will just see more of it. You don't have to buy it though, so there is that. Just be like me - Don't buy it.
In the launch trailer for Dark Souls there were of the scenarios none in the final game. The same scenarios have appeared in the launch trailer of the dlc. So the dlc for dark souls do not seem at all fair .Then they could make one expansion instead of three episodes. We must not sanctify from software just because ds2 is a good game, even if their policy is bad. The same thing happened with the first one. Cdprojekt have a good politicy. Left behind is too expensive...
DLC is a waste of money. If it's not free I rarely buy them. I like to wait for GOTY editions for most games because DLC will be included and it cost less. I did that for the Batman games.
It depends on how you use them. This morning there was a nice article on the dlc politics of cdprojekt , then yes. Instead I disagree with the policies ea, ubi and also from software, their cut contents and divide them in episodes and sell them at ridiculous prices. Among other things, most are DayOne dlc. They do not understand that so we lose too, because as I expect many versions goty or full edition.
in a sense it just feels like they are taking content away because they want to charge games £70 instead of £50 for a game. however i dont really care too much. game prices have stayed the same since i was born. the big dlc that is sometimes sold as a seperate game is pretty cool idea though. like expansion packs from old pc games. they somehow feel worth the price, devs can push out something small very quickly whilst reusing most assets. however, i dont really like companies selling costumes and stuff. i mean its really cool ideas and i like to get them for free but companies do need to make money and they start selling loads and loads of costumes. look at lightning returns. well at the end of the day, its me being cheap. selling costumes is a great idea to rip money out of fans and fans are willing to do it. quite an equal exchange. also costumes dont make other players who do not purchase dlc feel like they are missing out on content. lots of people have different opinions. most just seem to hate the idea of purchasing digital content, they rather sell their game and then purchase the complete edition later. think a lot of older gamers feel like they need to future proof their games just in case servers go down in 20 years time.
Tasteful "Expansion" packs like the old days is more prefered. Like Brood Wars, or Guild Wars expansions. But DLC for an alternate Ryu colour in Street Fighter is a scam.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.