It’s that time of year again. A new Call of Duty has been given an official reveal trailer and a lot of people are already claiming that it’s the same game even though they haven’t played it yet. All we have to go off of is one trailer, and by the looks of the trailer it seems like it’s heading in a new direction. A direction I’ve wanted to see for a long time. I love the idea of it being set in the year 2054 because it opens up the multiplayer to new ideas, new to Call of Duty anyway. If there’s a franchise that needs new ideas, or some old ones to return, it’s Call of Duty. The trailer shows off some pretty neat stuff, but the question remains – how much of this will carry over from single player to multiplayer?
Former director at Activision, Bret Robbins, revealed that Advanced Warfare 2 had a working prototype, but it was eventually shelved for COD WWII.
That is a shame. AW is my favourite CoD. I hope they do a sequel one day.
I still prefer CoD based on historical settings or in near future settings(like CoD: Ghost) ... even though I liked infinite Warfare's campaign ... it was top notch
Game Rant Writes "With rumors swirling about a sequel to Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare, Sledgehammer Games can bring back a few weapons for a modern encore."
GR: "If one series truly defined the seventh generation of consoles it was Call of Duty. Sadly, the series has struggled to reach the same heights on PlayStation 4 and Xbox One and only Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare feels like the previous era of innovation and top-notch storytelling."
I quite enjoyed it but I think black ops 3 was the high point.
Modern warfare could be if a few tweaks are made and the new maps are good.
The campaign was OK, but the guns sounded like cap guns and the multiplayer maps were not memorable at all.