590°

Why the Future Doesn’t Look Good for the Xbox One

Alex St-Amour from 3GEM writes: 'Despite the bright colors of Microsoft’s advertising, the grass is definitely not green over on the Xbox One’s side of the fence. The last console to enter the 8th generation race roared out of the gate this past November with an impressive launch, but its momentum has since petered out; now it’s being left behind by its chief competitor, Sony’s PlayStation 4. So why have Microsoft’s fortunes reversed so dramatically, and what have does the future hold for the Xbox One?'

4129d ago Replies(15)
Axios24129d ago (Edited 4129d ago )

I always laugh at these articles

Sony provided figures for past console sales to show how the PS4 was outselling all previous gen PS consoles

This Sony did to show that PS4 is selling well

Fact of matter, Sony's figures show X1 also outselling EVERY previous gem PS console.

So unless

PS1
PS2
PS3

were failures, then the X1 is selling very well

The funniest part will be to see what the fanboys say about "recent sales" in March

PlayStation:
=4 months (one territory) – March 31st, 1995 – 0.85 million
-10 months – September 30th, 1995 – 1.77 million
-16 months – March 31st, 1996 – 4.26 million
-22 months – September 30th, 1996 – 8.07 million
-28 months – March 31st, 1997 – 13.50 million

Click here to find out more!
PS2:
1 month (one territory) – March 31st, 2000 – 1.41 million
7 months (one territory) – September 30th, 2000 – 3.52 million
13 months – March 31st, 2001 – 10.61 million
19 months – September 30th, 2001 – 19.58 million
22 months – December 30th, 2001 – 24.99 million

PS3:
1 month – December 31st, 2006 – 1.7 million
4 months – March 31st, 2007 – 3.5 million
7 months – June 30th, 2007 – 4.2 million
10 months – September 30th, 2007 – 5.5 million
13 months – December 31st, 2007 – 10.4 million

@ Lukas

http://www.gamingenthusiast...

SONY POSTED the numbers to show how well the pS4 is selling, it also shows how well the X1 is selling

Bignfhooter needs to do some research:

http://www.gameinformer.com...

360 outsold PS3 in 2008, 2010 (even), 2011

doolin_dalton4129d ago (Edited 4129d ago )

Yet again you have no FACTUAL rebuttal, so you simply attack Axios2.

His post is 100% accurate, and is a major reason to believe that the future of Xbox One looks good.

Eonjay4129d ago

LOL. These figures mean nothing because the Wii U also had a bigger launch than PS1,PS2 or PS3. These figure are meant to be as barometer for launch performance and nothing else. For example, the PS3 had a bigger 1 month launch than the PS2, and yet the PS2 outsold the PS3 by 70 million units.

Kingthrash3604129d ago (Edited 4129d ago )

smh...let it gooooo. please just....-.-
refer to meme above.

BitbyDeath4129d ago

Difference is Xbox sales dropped off a cliff in January and February isn't looking much better.

Who knows what'll happen in March though, will be interesting.

christocolus4129d ago

@Axios

Nice info. I never actually thought about it that way.

Ontopic: i believe ms will turn things around like sony did with the ps3. They already seem to be going in the right direction and the increasing ps4 numbers will only put more pressure on ms to keep doing all it takes to get more gamers on board and that should be good for fans. Im really looking forward to their E3 conference this year.they need to come out guns blazing and im sure they will.

BigFnHooters4129d ago

"i believe ms will turn things around like sony did with the ps3."

The PS3 has outsold the Xbox 360 every single year its been on the market including the very first.

So, yeah, LOL...

Majin-vegeta4129d ago

PS3=more expensive stronger hardware

Xbone=Weaker hardware more expensivve

See the difference???

http://stream1.gifsoup.com/...

doolin_dalton4129d ago

"i believe ms will turn things around like sony did with the ps3"

That's very likely. After all, it's a marathon, not a sprint as many here want to believe. I believe the future is good for the Xbox One, and I use historical FACTS to support my opinion.

"The PS3 has outsold the Xbox 360 every single year its been on the market including the very first."

Repeating a lie over and over will not magically make it come true.

scott1824129d ago

Just the fact that a $200 more expensive console outsold the 360 most months tells me they didn't need to turn anything around with the PS3, it even outsells the X1 now.

I don't like these doom and gloom articles though, they are ridiculous, the X1 will be fine.

Muerte24944129d ago (Edited 4129d ago )

Facts:
*Xbox has lost every generation to a Playstation since xbox's existence
*Xbox 360 started with a year of the market to itself
*PS3 was stronger than Xbox 360 but harder to program for
*Sony first party studios showed the power behind PS3
*Microsoft's 1st party portfolio is only a fraction of Sony 1st party
*RROD wasn't covered under warranty until June 2007 (Xbox 360 launched November 25,2005)
*Xbox 360 maintained the price advantage throughout the generation
*Microsoft generally buys exclusives eg(Titanfall,Dead Rising 3, Halo,Gears of War, Ryse) rather than produce them (made by 3rd party studios
*Playstion brand is stronger than the Xbox in video games
*Sony didn't 180 on Bluray even though, at the time, then knew the drives were expensive to produce.
*Microsoft chose not to make HD-DVD drives built into Xbox360 for games, ultimately costing them the format war

In conclusion, Microsoft is not Sony. Sony was able to do what the did because of their brand and their enormous first party studios. Microsoft has neither of those things over Sony or Nintendo for that matter. But nobody can deny the impact that Xbox Live has made on video games, and for that I WILL tip my hat to Microsoft.

Nathaniel_Drake4129d ago

I disagree PS3 always had the world wide appeal. Xbox doesn't and it needs that more than ever with America being taken away

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4129d ago
UncleGermrod4129d ago

Funny, you are stating facts, and people just don't like it. Cheers man

djplonker4129d ago (Edited 4129d ago )

I had 5 different xbox's three red ringed and the other two dont read discs unless you open and close the tray alot (I counted 200 times on gta v at launch) and my friends that had 360's have all replaced atleast one...

You can say that the xbone is selling just aswell as the ps 1 , 2 and 3 but the ps3 was more expensive even with out inflation and back in 1996-2005 gaming was less mainstream and sony had to compete with some of the best consoles of all time (inc ps ps2 of course!) like the n64 or dreamcast no one is going to look back on the xbox the same way unless it is compaired to the death of sega.... atleast thats the way it is heading!

450,000

V

58,000

And one is "sold out" the numbers dont lie this generation is already set in stone its just who will be second microsoft or nintendo!

ThePope4129d ago

Set in stone? Haha nothing is set in stone.

Illionaire4129d ago

You want to compare numbers. Look at the recent numbers.

The Xbox One is barely outselling the Wii U and PS Vita worldwide, which are both considered failures. With 20x the advertising budget.

The first consoles are bought by hardcores and fanboys. The Wii U had a great launch. Then had a major drop off, like the Xbox One.

jmc88884129d ago (Edited 4129d ago )

@axios

People think Sony and Microsoft...wow big console players. Well back then Sony was seen as the upstart that might not know what it's doing against the veterans at Sega and Nintendo. So some people waited to see what Nintendo was offering.

This is a big deal because if Joe Blow made cars, would you buy one? I don't know, how good of cars can Joe Blow make and will he be around to service them a few years from now? When a new company enters the market, even if they are named Sony, there is some hesitation early on by not knowing what to expect. You also see this with the OG Xbox. People trusted PS2 brand and knew what it was all about.

PS2 was supply constrained, but it shows you how many people wanted a Playstation 2 to see how fast it grew. 10 million in about the first year. People loved what Playstation offered.

PS3 is a very mixed bag. It debuted at a nosebleed price of $599, but on the flip side, was also a major deal. Why? It depends on who you were. If you were a gamer who had an HDTV and wanted to buy blu-rays it was by FAR the cheapest solution. So some people saw it as nosebleed and others saw it as a deal. The XB1 offers no such proposition. No one sees the XB1 as a great deal.

Blu-ray players went for $849-999 at the same time a PS3 was on shelves for $599. Me personally I had an HDTV and wanted a blu ray player AND a gaming console. Especially after already having a RRoD with my 360 I wanted some redundancy console wise.

So $599 was worth it to me. I was buying a cheap blu-ray player that also happened to be a gaming console with all of what Sony brings. The firmware could also be updated, so in this sense it was the best blu-ray player on the market, since unlike the more expensive blu-ray only players it was internet connected for firmware updates. So you knew the PS3 blu-ray feature would be updated, unlike the $999 super primo ones which wouldn't. Like with 3D support. Those early $1000 blu-ray players never supported them.

If you just wanted a gaming console, then yeah, it was nose bleed high. It just depended on what you were looking at the console for. Sony's arrogance about getting a 2nd job didn't help as well. But people were excited about the exclusive games, the blu-rays, free online, and the potential power of the cell (which was overhyped and hard to use, but unlike ANYTHING the XB1 has, it actually was untapped power, and it was tapped).

Now we'll skip ahead to the XB1. XB1 wasn't supply constrained. We've been seeing how many people want an XB1 because everyone has had a chance to buy one if they want.

Microsoft pissed everyone off 100x more then Sony. I don't care how much outrage Sony caused at the launch of the PS3, the XB1 disaster was a rolling sideshow for months. It's been coming from anyone related to MS that has opened their mouth. From January 2013 until the present it's been one fiasco after another. From rumors of DRM, always on, no trading discs to the performance of various games now. The outright lies of cloud power, that they weren't underpowered, to the denials of all the rumors until they revealed all the rumors to be true, etc, etc.

Microsoft simply can't get good press that isn't shilling for it. This is what you see. Xbox One another disaster. Or Xbox One is the best because of the Cloud, Kinect, etc. It's insane.

jmc88884129d ago

Microsoft doesn't realize how badly it damaged it's image. It's one thing to think so highly of your product you ask people to do something unreasonable to buy your great product. That's one thing.

It's another to give the middle finger to your customer base and claim it's all for their own benefit. Not just once, but about so many things, consistently, for over a year and still are.

It's not even close. People feel betrayed by MS. They feel used. They feel small and unimportant. They know they are being lied to, hearing PR spin, and still getting screwed.

Worse yet when you look at how they are marketing the console, it sure isn't to you. But some person who isn't satisfied with their cable/satellite service and need something else along with Kinect which people tried on the 360 and said...this sucks. Then on top of that, you were forced into this NSA spy device and they barely have any games for it. Everyone knows it's weaker and yet it's all more expensive. They may like XBox live service better, but people REALLY like free games with PS+.

Then when you look out over the horizon, what do you see? Exclusive 1st party games? Nope. You see an almost non-existent 1st party dev list, and some of that is tasked with games you know you'll never buy because they are Kinect based.

Microsoft has so alienated their fanbase, it's going to be near impossible to get them back this generation. There's no blu-ray fallback. There's no Cell to tap. There's no commitment to 1st party devs. Just a commitment to Kinect, which almost no one wants.

All the crazy things they blame on their customers and meanwhile show they haven't learned well enough how pissed off people are with their sycophant comments as if none of the crapstorm ever happened.

Now they can sway alot of people, including myself, if they just do the following. Massively drop the price to $299, which is the point where I start to consider it given it's horrible gaming tech. Then provide content no one else can with 1st party games, ALOT of them. When I can buy Halo 5, and have a choice of about a dozen other exclusives of similar quality, then I will most likely buy one. But I'm also a minority type gamer, the kind that likes to get all the consoles and keep a good PC. Of course I don't expect those exclusives to come out for a few years, so I don't expect to get an XB1 for a few years.

So now let's bring all the way back to those numbers. Your argument weaves through all these areas trying to showcase that the Xbox One can do the same and comeback just based on those launch numbers, with no real context, and it's true Xbox One can eventually become more liked, but unlike the examples you give me, there are major differences of how those numbers played out like they do, and none of them favor XB1 in the slightest.

jmc88884129d ago

People aren't buzzing about the XB1 like they were any of those other consoles. It's a pariah right now. Overpriced. Underpowered. It's a focal point for companies crapping on their fanbase. We're in a depression, and it's going to get worse economically. People are pissed off. They're pissed off in general, let alone at a company that thinks they're stupid. Just about every time Microsoft opens their mouth it makes the people hearing it feel stupid. We average folks know we're being lied to about EVERYTHING. Microsoft added themselves to that list with the way everything has and still is being handled. In a time of US versus THEM, Microsoft has chosen to be THEM. Not good.

These are all reasons people don't want to touch the console. Throw in some NSA revelations, and the fact that Xbox One will receive near universal poorer iterations of every game, and it's not likely it's going to behave like those other consoles showcased.

Most gamers tried the Kinect, and thought it sucked. Everyone knows you shouldn't force this on everyone and make it an option. But Microsoft won't budge, and so this stance reiterates everything Microsoft did wrong early on. Every time someone thinks, why don't they just take out Kinect and lower the price...it reinforces all the DRM, used game, always on stuff.

Far more better consoles have failed for much, much less. Price issues. Game issues. Perception issues. You can't get any worse then that. People see Microsoft's PR people and think a used car guy is trying to sell them a lemon.

At least the PS3 had extra power, free online, and a commitment to 1st party devs.

The XB1 doesn't have the extra power, doesn't have free online, and where are the 1st party devs? We're looking at late 2015 and late 2016 for their two announced heavy hitters of Halo 5 and Gears.

Meanwhile they've had over a year to gauge the reaction to their policies, because yes, once the rumors came out over a year ago now, they were clued in to how all these policies were going to play out from the public's standpoint, and should have ditched all the horrible policies, and start/acquired more devs.

Did they spend this past year creating and buying new devs? Not really. So they aren't even showing their audience that things will get better. How? Where are the devs to deliver outstanding games as a reason to buy the XB1 above all others? They don't exist. The only way the XB1 has better games is if they have games the others don't have. Because if it's on other platforms it's 3rd best behind PC and PS4.

jmc88884129d ago

Finally you have all the whispers of Xbox going away. From the #truthfact that some major investors want Microsoft to ditch it. To the #truthfact that Elop once mentioned that if he was CEO of Microsoft he would consider spinning it off. You see the sales charts, and yes it should have people wondering. Is this why they aren't acquiring more devs?

..and as a sideshow everyone has fresh in their minds a certain console that is also failing hard to sell itself to people, the Wii U. It's natural to project...can this happen to the Xbox One if I buy it? Yes it can. While probably not as bad as long as Microsoft owns the XBox brand, if the price of the XB1 stays high it won't be that much better.

Wii U owners know Nintendo will bring them their 1st party IP's and they are numerous, even if very, very slow out of the gate. What does Microsoft have besides Halo and Gears in the works? Could they even if they wanted to given the lack of devs under their stable? They are looking even SLOWER out of the gate then the Wii U...but at least they have the 3rd party multiplatform games...except they are all lesser performing versions. So it is kind of similar. If you won't buy 3rd party games on the XB1 because you will on a PS4 or PC, or you simply chose an PS4 because you knew this, what do you have on the XB1? Only first and second party games are eligible, and if you compare first party to first party between Nintendo and Microsoft, Nintendo's releases are far more numerous in their first 15 or so months then Microsoft's will be on the XB1.

I don't want Microsoft to fail. I hope they learn a good lesson and come back strong. But I don't see HOW they come back other then massively lowering the price and in a few years, IF they commit to creating/buying devs to pump out games a few years from NOW, I don't see them having a shot. If they indeed do this, I still don't see a great shot. I see them hanging around and perhaps worth buying, but overtake the PS4? No. They've pissed off too many people, the games most people play will never be best on XB1, and as long as Kinect/Price are not decidedly in their favor it will be a massive headwind.

But they can be competitive...in a behind 2:1 ratio way. Still there. Have it's exclusives. But ONLY if they commit to it being competitive. They are still hanging onto their utopia all-in-one vision, and this E3 we'll see concretely how this generation will go.

Are they acquiring devs behind the scenes quiet like? Do they announce a massive price cut and removing of Kinect? Do they commit as a company to the Xbox brand, from their new CEO that the Xbox One will be supported heavily with new IP and exclusive games through the end of the decade? Proven by early looks at about ten brand new AA or AAA IP's.

Because if E3 doesn't have most or all of these, then Microsoft's Xbox division is in even deeper trouble then it currently is in and instead of comparing the XB1 launch and thinking it will grow like past Sony launches, you'll soon be comparing the XB1 to the sales of failed consoles.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4129d ago
jmc88884129d ago

I don't care if Sony used the method, it's a faulty one.

Using a total number units sold when those launches were supply constrained as a comparison between launches is not a valid metric.

That said they sold the most and are still supply constrained, so in a sense, the PS4 numbers tend to be a little more valid because they sold more plus were supply constrained. But it is still a faulty comparison. Yeah these other past consoles might have sold more then they did if they had more supply, but only the PS4 and not the XB1 can also say that.

We know the PS4 is up there however because it not only is selling out, but it flipped the market share in Microsoft's top two territories. U.S. and U.K.

Also you have to look at what drove the console sales, and the narrative. I'm not sure how old you are, but I was in high school when Playstation came out. It was like a lightning bolt.

Back in the 90's the cost was very much akin to the $499 of XB1 even though it was at a much lower price point. If you factor in inflation, REAL INFLATION, not the fake government numbers adjusted with hedonics. Then with release after release people just kept lapping them up. But some people held out until they saw what the N64 was offering.

You see Nintendo used to be the hardcore gaming console, which Sega Genesis sort of wrestled away from Nintendo, but not really. More like an even split. But the headstart it had over the SNES played a big role in that. So while a lot liked Playstation, they didn't offer Mario and many people were loyal to Nintendo. But when the N64 debuted, as good as some games were, the Playstation compared favorably.

When the Playstation and N64 went head to head, Playstation had the cheap and easily manufactured disc based games rather then the hella expensive and harder to manufacture cartridge games. Playstation had the cheaper unit, more games, they cost less, and were in plentiful supply. Not to mention the whole mature gaming aspect. N64 had hilariously high priced games that were hard to find.

But still PS1 when it first was released was a new thing, people didn't know what to expect, and it was also a very crowded market. You also had 3D0 and Saturn to contend with along with a strong base that was only 3-4-5 years old of SNES and Genesis userbase.

Chevalier4128d ago

It's also fact that every Xbox console has lost to PS. Wii U had a big launch and where is it now? 46 million 360 were sold in NA and now PS4 with apparently NO games is destroying Xbox One. Is being outsold this early by PS3 good? Please try to spin that too. It is being outsold in every market which is FACT. No numbers you post explain the huge drop in demand. Even if they moved 200,000-300,000 they would be still be over 2 million behind.

Ra30304128d ago

"Yet again you have no FACTUAL rebuttal, so you simply attack Axios2.

His post is 100% accurate, and is a major reason to believe that the future of Xbox One looks good."

Well now.....I have a rebuttal.....IMO what fanboys on both sides are missing is first what some console did10 yrs ago means nothing today. The only thing that matters is and it's not what I think or what you think. The only thing that matters is what's going on inside the Microsoft boardroom. The X1 came out smoking hot the first 6 weeks but since then and we're talking the last 8 week the X1 has been performing less than poorly and that might be an over statement.
The only thing that boardroom cares about is this....."What have you done for ME lately"!
We all know that half or maybe even more than half of the shareholders want to sale at least the X1 hardware division. Why? There's no money in it. Needless to say the X1 gaming division has everything riding on Titanfall and March. They don't need to sell 3 million consoles and even the sales numbers with Sony but they need to sell a lot. And who knows maybe it's already to late and their going to sale the hardware off soon anyway and they want to move as many as possible before they dump it. That boardroom as a whole was never all in on the X1 from the start. All these crazy deals you see now with price cuts, game give always are to get the ball rolling but they are losing lots of money as a trade off to make those offers. Really you could say their throwing money at it hoping to fix the problem and "it" is a bottomless hole. No one knows what will happen but March will be fun to watch.

chrisarsenalsavart4128d ago (Edited 4128d ago )

2010? And 2011?
In N.A. Only but worldwide in your dreams only

gamer20134128d ago (Edited 4128d ago )

Don't worry yourself about it. This site is full of insecure, immature and irrational fanboys who are afraid of any positive facts that favor the X1. Time is on Microsoft's side, they have the money and the exclusives so we shall see. Just leave it at that.

Gamer19824128d ago

Only outsold the previous playstations launch day because consoles are more widely bought now and believe it or not there are more people on the earth! Since launch though the numbers have dropped to WiiU numbers in fact even the WiiU launch numbers were amazing (3 million sold in first 2 months) and now people are calling that a failure as after launch month the sales dropped HEAVILY. Thats whats happened with the Xbox One unlike the PS4 which is STILL selling out everywhere..

However its still selling well enough to make a decent profit the only issue is with PS4 running away 3rd partys are gonna choose ps4 for there exclusives as its a safer bet.. Thats when sales are gonna dwindle to a non selling well point.

3-4-54128d ago

-22 months – September 30th, 1996 – 8.07 million
-28 months – March 31st, 1997 – 13.50 million

in 6 months PS1 doubled it's consoles sold.

You really think XB1 is doing that EVER ?

CharlesSwann4128d ago

That is a lot of typing to hide from the truth.

+ Show (13) more repliesLast reply 4128d ago
OSIRUSSS4129d ago

MS investors should just close down the XBOX division! MS should just task efforts to the OS sector.

Saito4129d ago

The future for gaming looks good. Success prevails all!

bennissimo4129d ago

Second best launch of any console, ever.

Yup. Horrible.

The only folks who "win" this console generation are those who purchase both.

Anyone who goes on about how "MS sucks" this and "X1 will fail" that is delusional and will miss out on great games.

That's like saying the PS4 sucks because its launch games sucked and the only decent exclusives it has between now and 2015 are inFAMOUS and indies. Might be true, but it doesn't matter. Because you should own both.

Just like last gen.

Mexxan4129d ago

No this is spot on. Had Ps4 at launch, and picked up an X1 last week. Great games, big smiles....

IG-884129d ago

Second best?
if you're not first you're last!!! :P

I think it has to do with the PS4 doing so well that it is making the Xbox One looks like it is doing worse than it is doing.

I would say that Deep Down and The Order 1886 look like they could be really good IPs that are said to come out this year.

MysticStrummer4129d ago

"The only folks who "win" this console generation are those who purchase both."

Anyone who's happy with their purchase, whether it's one console or all of them, wins.

H0RSE4129d ago

I always found the co0nsole war so utterly pointless. Picking sides based on which platform you play video games on, and slinging insults at the competition? Are we 5?...

iceman064129d ago

I think that you are correct. The future for MS and the Xbox One looks good...just not great yet. The PS4 is killing it, but we all know how fickle a console generation can be. One small step could land either one of these consoles in a heap of trouble.
All in all, I'm just happy to have a choice of where I want to game...whether it be Xbox, PS, both, or Neither. It's good for the overall health of the industry.

jessupj4129d ago

Wouldn't matter if the xbone had the best launch in history, the fact is sales have dramatically decreased.

You think MS would be in panic mode and price cutting their console and giving away their best seller 3 months after launch if they were happy with sales?

You people keep harping on about launch, but it's the sales trend that is infinitely more important.

I know the doom and gloom articles get a bit annoying. Any level headed gamer knows the xbone isn't going anywhere, but I know MS are not happy with the current sales trend.

chrisarsenalsavart4128d ago

Better yet get a ps4 and a WIIU cause most Xbox exclusives usually ends on PlayStation or pc anyway.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4128d ago
Show all comments (182)
210°

Activision Forces Adverts into Call of Duty Black Ops 6 and Warzone Loadouts

With the launch of Call of Duty Season 4, Activision quietly put adverts inside loadouts for Black Ops 6 and Warzone, sparking a backlash in the process.

18d ago
18d ago
lukasmain18d ago

Putting Ads in a pay-to-play Premium title? Well done Microsoft. Well done /s This is really scummy.

jjb198118d ago

This game will never change because these sweatlords love buying up all the skins and bundles that become obsolete the following year. They're the ones perpetuating Activision's greed.

VenomUK17d ago

If Microsoft introduces adverts into its other games I hope it can do them without disrupting the immersion of the game world. So for example in the new Fable game it would look out of place if there was a billboard advertising Cadillacs.

A far better way to do it would be to have a wizard conjure a 'dream cloud' in front of your character and then in the cloud you can see the Cadillac car and see the text with price and availability and hear a booming sales voice promoting the car. That would work so well as it wouldn't be a billboard and completely, 100%, fit in with your character's adventuring in Albion. Doesn't that sound so much better?!

crazyCoconuts17d ago

@venom, or how about our of 100 farts in Albion, 1 of them has a Cadillac pop out

VenomUK17d ago

@crazyCoconuts That’s undeniably off-beat - but it could really work!

18d ago
Show all comments (19)
410°

Xbox's first-party handheld has been sidelined

Xbox's handheld ambitions continue unabated, but the focus is shifting towards improving Windows 11 for third-party handhelds — for now. The Xbox Series X 'Melrose' successor is safe, with development continuing at full pace.

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
20d ago
20d ago
20d ago
shadowT20d ago

Is there really a market for handhelds next to mobile?

Vits20d ago

If they run the same games as the main home console, then yeah, sure.
But if they need specially tailored games just for them? Probably not, unless there isn't a home console for comparison (see Switch).

RaidenBlack20d ago (Edited 19d ago )

I am kinda low-key happy this happened.
Dont want another Series S situation (games to be designed from 4 to 12TF scale and not 10 to 12TF).
Hope PS follows suit as well. Tablet SKU sharing with console for 10th gen, will just continue the cross gen -esque development/design phase/nature.
Want a proper 20+ only TF rasterized next-gen plz (+ frame-gen and the lot).
If anybody wants to continue the cross-gen, the Series S|X, PS5 will remain for that. And Switch 2, if you gotta go even lower in the TF range.

ABizzel120d ago

Yes and No. All of the PC handhelds combined have struggled to sell 7 million units, which would be a flop for any “console”. So the market is extremely niche because of price and target market (the informed hardcore gamer / casuals aren’t picking these up).

These handheld PCs are $500 or more, and offer at best Xbox Series S performance levels, so it’s best for MS specifically to just partner with ASUS, instead of investing millions if not billions.

Sony can make their own with custom AMD hardware due to their partnership, and stronger global brand for hardware. But even then it brings the question, of being a lower resolution PS5, and what does that mean for PS6 cross-gen (likely another generation where the first 3 - 4 years are just upgraded last-gen games).

Kosic20d ago

Imagine a Wii U style console, where the tablet doesn't rely on the console it's self, you download the game on the console under the TV and play in 4k glory, then you can remote play, get some unique game features if using both console and handheld in tandem. Then you can download the games in 720-1080p to play on the go, continue your progress, and continue on the TV when you get back.

Sony could get away with this due to exclusives, and that would be a reason for sales. Look at the portal.

I can picture seeing new hardware having some sort of GPU dock, where the handheld runs 1080p, and the dock has additional hardware to bring in 4k/60 specs.

I do think handheld gaming is going to be a strong future, imagine Nintendo release a new upgraded GPU dock for the Switch 3, every 2 years. More frames, sharper graphics on the same game for an extra £150 for a dock with a built in GPU chip. Console cycles doesn't have to be renewed, just the hardware can be improved by them reselling docks to us again and again with small/yearly upgrades like mobile phones.

GamerRN19d ago

Did you just imply that Sony can make a better stronger handheld than Microsoft? You do realize we are talking about Microsoft, the tech giant, right? If Microsoft can't make one that's cost effective, Sony definitely can't...

Brand and market share means nothing when you are a trillion dollar company

ABizzel119d ago

@GamerRN

It has nothing to do with what company can do it, or what company can spend.

For anyone taking a basic business class there is a term called ROI, and Xbox home consoles are selling at an all time low, meaning their ROI on a handheld is a risk that doesn’t make sense, even if they can afford it. Businesses are there to make money and it doesn’t make sene for MS to invest in a handheld that’s a companion device when their current home consoles they’ve spent 20 years working on are at an all time-low, when they can invest with little risk with what ASUS already has to offer.

This is why Sony can build a better device, because they have less risk involved, meaning they can invest more in their own product, and they already have an exclusive partnership with AMD on creating features and hardware. So in this specific case, YES Sony can built a better handheld, due to custom hardware, customer tools, low level APIs, compared to an off the shelf product running Windows or a Window Xbox kernel =.

TheEroica20d ago

I play steam deck primarily... Don't play consoles or mobile. The deck covers it all.

badz14919d ago

@shadowT

The Switch is a handheld, so will the Switch 2. what are you on about?

Cacabunga19d ago

To run native games offline? Anytime

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 19d ago
CrashMania20d ago

Funny to see the alt already damage controlling and having a meltdown with multiple accounts in the comments already.

Sad for MS if true, a dedicated handheld would go down a lot better than a rog ally 2 with an Xbox sticker on it I think.

crazyCoconuts20d ago

It couldn't have succeeded for a number of reasons. Now they've retreated to the Windows front and trying to keep that relevant for gaming. How long before Windows Central realizes there won't be a real console successor to Series X either?

Lightning7720d ago

Except there is. That project is reportedly full speed ahead.

Outside_ofthe_Box20d ago

@Lighting77

So was the handheld until today...

Lightning7720d ago

@outside obviously not since they sidelined it and they wanna see how the Asus does. Are you saying they're gonna cancel the next console?

crazyCoconuts20d ago

@lightning - I'm admittedly trying to box you in here - Do you think the next Xbox console will have Steam on it?

Outside_ofthe_Box20d ago (Edited 20d ago )

@Lightning

Here we go with having to spell everything out.

If I told you yesterday that Xbox was going to sideline the handheld console what would your response have been? Probably something along the lines of "I doubt that since Phil has been talking about it for some time now"

My point is just because they are "full speed" ahead now does not mean that will not change in future. As we have seen with the handheld. Do you understand what I'm trying to say now?

Lightning7720d ago (Edited 20d ago )

Box me in? No you said the same thing you've always been saying for years now. Those are the rumors to have Steam integration.

What about it

If you told me they were gonna cancel it tomorrow it would nothing more than fanboy talking points. I only wait for credible sources not what someone else says.

Also this is the handheld not a full blown new console. The Asus is yet to release and they're waiting to see how that thing does. Critical thinking is my strong suit you should try it some time if you can. But Ok cool well you hang your hat on that I guess. Main New console is gonna get cancelled even though the handheld is a different marketing device than the main the console itself.

__y2jb19d ago

I think there is a 75% chance there will not be another Xbox. There is zero reason to buy one now. No way it can possibly sell more than 10m units after Xbox went third party.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 19d ago
BLow20d ago

That's what they do. Goalposts shift like the wind.

I'm really confused on why they are making a "first party" device and also have a Rog Ally with their sticker on it. Make this make sense. How is their own device going to be any different?

Your console doesn't sell and they expect a handheld to?

RaidenBlack19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

The Rog Ally one is gen agnostic ... as you deciphered, it was to be the updated Rog Ally but just with Xbox branding. PC handheld with some Xbox features.
The handheld Xbox is/was supposed to be sharing the same gen/ecosystem with the next-gen (10th gen) Xbox. Think Series S but handheld ... it'll run the Xbox OS or whatever the next Xbox will run.
...
As for anybody wondering/confused why MS is doing another Xbox console ... coz mainly its the 10th gen of home consoles next, which started wayy back in 1972 for the 1st gen. And MS wanna be part in it, in the 10th anniversary gen of consoles. If they gotta bow out, they can't do that at 9th i.e just before 10th. They wanna stick around till the 10th or the X-th gen and check what the fuss happens.

Outside_ofthe_Box20d ago

Curious as to what excuses the spam was saying. Because prior to this news, the Xbox handheld was used as proof that Xbox is still committed to the hardware space. This handheld being scraped is not a good sign...

20d ago
Outside_ofthe_Box20d ago (Edited 20d ago )

@Spam
You can replace scrapped with pushed back if you like. It's not a good sign either way.

20d ago
1Victor20d ago

asq3= obscured: “ What’s your source on the handheld being scrapped? “
Read the article from Microsoft own website and one of your favorite quotations site when it’s something bad about Sony.
Oh BTW good luck with your next SPAM account.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 19d ago
Show all comments (77)
200°

FTC drops case against Microsoft’s Activision Blizzard deal

The FTC has officially dropped its case against Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision Blizzard.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
slate9127d ago

The sweet smell of tax dollars burning

Killa7827d ago

From the unemployment this deal caused, no doubt.

Obscure_Observer27d ago

"The sweet smell of tax dollars burning"

They never stood a chance. It was a lost cause from the start. And yet, still, they´d decided to go ahead and double down on their bs to bleed the taxpayer even more.

dveio27d ago

The IRS demands 29bn USD in not paid taxes from Microsoft.

If we're talking bleeding.

1Victor27d ago (Edited 27d ago )

@slate: “ The sweet smell of tax dollars burning “

The smell of political donations endorsements under the table.
There I fixed it it for you
We all knew Microsoft plan of “10 years of all systems publishing “ and some of its supporters happy that after all the games would be “exclusive to Xbox “ now that things have changed and Microsoft got humbled by the lost of money from CoD going down from OVER A BILLI🤑N to
MILLI😩NS the sales failing of games that would released on PlayStation and be forced by INVESTORS asking for their M🤑NEY to grow faster than the next 10 years it is obvious that it would be a waste of money to continue this litigation.
Edit:@obscured: “ They never stood a chance. It was a lost cause from the start “

Same as your grievance stages.
Have you passed the bargaining stage yet ? Or are you still on the anger stage 🤣

slate9127d ago

I knew my singe bipartisan sentence would bring out the crazies. Thanks for the wall

Astrokis26d ago

Not sure if I’m disturbed or entertained but either way I hope you are alright

OtterX27d ago

I think they're convinced now that MS won't (and can't) withhold releases from conpeting platforms. MS on the street corner now like, "Who wants a taste?!"

PhillyDonJawn27d ago

I wont be too sure of that. Gotta wait and see till after these deals expire

OtterX27d ago

That's how it always starts, "I'll just work this street corner for a short while until I get caught up on my bills..."

Tacoboto27d ago

Oh yeah, they're totally gonna make Xbox exclusives again, with the hardware they're totally committed to selling and making available lol

raWfodog27d ago

As far as I'm aware, the only 'deal' that was discussed was for Call of Duty. Xbox had no obligation to make any of their other games multiplatform. They did that of their own accord.

OtterX26d ago (Edited 26d ago )

**btw, I'm talking about street food vendors, just in case there's any confusion!

https://external-content.du...

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 26d ago
Lightning7727d ago (Edited 27d ago )

I've seen videos and talk a online speculating MS long game. Some think that MS multiplat move is use to appease the FTC so they can buy more and is somehow a move that could get Sony to open up their platform. In other words them going third party and letting their games go everywhere. MS possible scheme and ulterior motives, speculated by Jeff Grubb is that putting Xbox store on PS via regulation Which would hurt PS buissness very badly because that 30% cut would be even less or not a cut at all. MS buys more because they're "playing nice" by opening up its platform to Epic store and steam which would force Apple and Sony to open up their ecosystem to other stores like MS.

If that's the case that'll mean as I said before, PS fans buying Cod on PS via MS store would give 100% maybe even 90% of the money being pocketed by MS while Sony's store front wanes when it comes to third party because guess what? MS is buying more third party and preying off the extreme ignorance of the FTC. Manipulation of the FTC and MS overtaking the PS store and customers

My thing is this. I know it's a opinion and speculation but why does Sony have to open up its store or force them to go multiplat? If they still believe in selling their freakin console then let them do it. If they want to provide the best games and the best content for its fans then let them do it!? Why because the competition is trash at selling games and consoles for 14 years now Sony has to change? MS using the ignorance of the FTC to overtake gaming as we know it?

Again it's just talk and opinion but man this seems very, very possible imo.

dveio27d ago

Well, at the time, I actually did think the FTC and CMA did a poor job in court. But also the judge.

Having said that - it is what it is.

If 75bn mergers in any industry ain't a threshold to deny them, then I don't know what is.

As far as your thoughts about other 3rd parties getting taken over in the future go:

I think publisher buyouts are off the list now. I think it would be reeeeally difficult for MS to win another trial try taking over any other publisher.

But smaller studios ... maybe.

However, right now I can't see studios out there advocating for a buyout from Microsoft.

That isn't to say an announcement of such couldn't drop on Monday already. Because we today know that Microsoft had approached a plethora of other studios in 2018 to 2021, such as IOI, CD Project, etc.

We'll see. And we can't do anything about it. It's up to trade commissions and then probably courts to decide.

Lightning7727d ago (Edited 27d ago )

"I think publisher buyouts are off the list now. I think it would be reeeeally difficult for MS to win another trial try taking over any other publisher."

That's the thing MS is ticking all the boxes by not have anything be exclusive so the CMA/FTC see that they're doing "fair practice" in games and content distribution. Which technically greenlits more aquisions or it makes it easier for acquisitions because MS is a mega publisher now.

"However, right now I can't see studios out there advocating for a buyout from Microsoft."

Hopefully not but them going multiplat could entice Studios to join MS because nothing is not longer exclusive which means more money for them, studio and teams.

We can't do nothing about it but Sony can. They can block xbox games on their console (lose that 30% cut) but Sony won't do that because that's money that will be lost and Sony runs a buissness. That's the only way to hurt or slow down Xbox.

I'm probably over thinking it as I do these things but it's something we shouldn't just ignore and be weary of MS motives here. I'm keeping an eye on them.

Rancegamerx27d ago

The idea that Microsoft is manipulating the FTC and forcing Sony to open its platform is silly and has no evidence to back it up. Microsoft’s multiplatform approach is 100% due to past failures and its laughable position in the gaming industry. Their best attempt was a fluke and a lie, brought on by Sony’s missteps and a poorly made machine that broke down too often.

Sony would never allow themselves to be "forced" to do anything; they control their platform and storefront perfectly fine without the need or desire to add an unnecessary Microsoft storefront. Even if, by some flaw on Sony’s part, Microsoft were able to introduce its store on PlayStation, Sony would adapt rather than collapse. Digital storefront competition already exists (Steam, Epic Games Store, Xbox Store), and PlayStation’s business won’t suddenly "wane."

Also, regulators like the FTC don’t operate on ignorance—they actively assess market behavior to prevent monopolies. Microsoft isn’t secretly overtaking gaming with some ultimate scheme. The industry might be changing or shifting (for the worse, in my opinion), but Sony will continue evolving based on market trends, not because of alleged schemes.

Gaming isn’t about one company "playing nice" or another being "forced" to change—it’s about making money with games, something Microsoft has yet to achieve in 25+ years.

Lightning7727d ago

"The idea that Microsoft is manipulating the FTC and forcing Sony to open its platform is silly and has no evidence to back it up."

That's why I said it was all speculation that's what Jeff Grubb opinion. I made that clear several times. You know what's funny? When Jim was in court ppl got mad at the FTC for protecting Jim Ryan instead of the consumer. Maybe he was right to worry about his business. Now look Releasing Xbox games on PS keeps MS studio an a float. Now Xbox games are all over PS now. Maybe Jim was onto something.

MS is still competing with Sony just in a very different way. The FTC back down mainly means they can buy more and MS next steps can proceed. We'll have to see what happens in the future but I wouldn't be so sure on your stance.

InUrFoxHole27d ago

@Lightning77
MS putting games everywhere is the most consumer friendly thing I've seen a game company do.

dveio26d ago

@InUrFox

What does "putting everywhere" actually mean?

This book has so many pages.

• Xbox was dying in revenue
• Regulators put a 10 year deal on CoD
• Microsoft had to give away the streaming
• Spencer himself only offered 3 yrs initially

And most importantly

• Again, Xbox was dying in revenue

Xbox have the benefit of their actual financial situation giving regulators and courts the impression they release games everywhere, what they actually do.

But for reasons they can't be proven guilty of anything in court.

I'm not judging, it's just what it is.

IF the Series generation would have developed differently and was much more successful, I don't hesitate any second to believe in what Spencer had originally planned to do:

• Make everything Xbox exclusive
• We today know that Spencer had also approached Sega, From Software, CD Project, Nintendo, and even Valve was on their list of buyouts.

MS are playing a card here everyone knows why they are doing it.

Putting Doom "everywhere", which even was it already before it got bought, ain't a MS thing.

It would had hurt them in many ways if they'd put it exclusively to Xbox.

But, no matter what - it is what it is.

Xbox bought themselves back into the game. And I think many people just don't have very fond feelings towards this behaviour, wether on corporate nor private levels.

Let's see how they'll run with it.

In 2030, but most importantly after regulations will have expired we will learn better.

Reaper22_27d ago (Edited 27d ago )

Seemed like a lost cause anyway. Microsoft gambled and it paid off big time. That's what you call a big boss move. Sony played a huge part in the success of that acquisition.

wesnytsfs27d ago

Bout time. Pointless from the start.

Show all comments (26)