Approvals 11/3 ▼
MariaHelFutura (2) - 4244d ago Cancel
pungello88 (2) - 4244d ago Cancel
antbolton89 (2) - 4244d ago Cancel
KrisButtar (1) - 4244d ago Cancel
adarker (2) - 4244d ago Cancel
monochromer (1) - 4244d ago Cancel
Pixelgate (1) - 4244d ago Cancel
360°

PS4 and Media Support: They Listened

Sony has announced that they will accommodate the demand, and will offer both CD and MP3 support for the PS4 in the near future, to quell any newfound animosity towards the company.

Though there is no date on this change, not only will the upcoming modification attempt to reverse any perceived intent to limit players to Music Unlimited, but it will show that Sony is willing to listen and accommodate to customers’ criticism and demands.

Read Full Story >>
pixelvolt.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4244d ago
JoGam4244d ago (Edited 4244d ago )

I remembered I was criticized for wanting these request added and people said nobody uses CDs or listens to MP3 anymore.

THANKS SONY FOR LISTENING! I knew I wasn't the only one. N4G can sometimes be cruel.

daftpunkfan4244d ago

Well, CDs are mostly over as a "thing". But suggesting that no one listens to MP3s anymore is just kind of silly. Other than streaming, that's the main way people listen to music.

Lwhit64244d ago

My car was made in that awkward stage where we still had cd's but we were just starting to get AUX ports. Basically, I don't have an AUX port so cd's are pretty important to me! Hahaha

UltimateMaster4244d ago

How are they going to add the CD if the current PS4 don't support it?

GTgamer4244d ago

I was with you i was even on twitter asking Sony to support it.

HardcoreDaBoss4244d ago

damn.. sony is awesome. I love how they listen to the fans and bring them what they want.

Boody-Bandit4244d ago (Edited 4244d ago )

With me it was the opposite. I said I never used a console for MP3s and I received a 4 to 1 disagree to agree ratio. Not that I cared. I was just being honest.

I'm glad for those that will now have what they asked for from Sony. They just keep on given the consumer what they want.

3 hours 22 minutes 11 seconds to go!

Angeljuice4244d ago

I will always prefer CD's, without the existence of a physical medium you don't have the same feeling of 'ownership'. Hard drives will all fail eventually, media services can go out of business and accounts get corrupted. Anyone who really cares about their music needs it to be kept in a physical form for safety.
Also not all music is available to download anyway, there are plenty of rare tracks, small defunct record labels etc that never became available on anything other than vinyl/compact disc.

kingPoS4244d ago

The unfortunately part is that many would be glad to see audio cd's gone. They don't realize that same argument can carry over to dvd, bluray and even games.

So yeah, I too prefer own a physical collection. Whether it's music games movies; you gotta love those five inch discs.

Gateway MT6706 2008

Rodney254244d ago

That's why Sony is in this position now. They learned the most important thing in any relationship; how to listen. :)

DaGR8JIBRALTAR4244d ago

Ahhhh yeahhhhh! Good looking Sony! Keep doing right by your customers and your fortune shall be ten-fold...the way it should be.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4244d ago
RedRedSuit4244d ago (Edited 4244d ago )

The article has no source for this "news" and is most likely BS.

Just like the last such article on N4G (which almost everyone here bought wholesale for some reason).

thehitman4244d ago (Edited 4244d ago )

Huh? Yoshida confirmed that they bringing MP3s himself in an interview w/ ign they just had a bad oversight of it.

Edit: Source http://www.giantbomb.com/po... If you even bothered to look for the source you wouldve found it.

RedRedSuit4244d ago (Edited 4244d ago )

He has mentioned no date and hasn't confirmed anything. Even if he had vaguely mentioned bringing it back, this article contains no sources yet masquerades as if it's new information, which everyone here is buying.

EDIT: "If you even bothered to look for the source you wouldve found it." It is not the reader's responsibility to look for sources of an article. It is the writer's.

thehitman4244d ago (Edited 4244d ago )

The writer clearly wrote "Source" at the bottom of the article. Just saying lol.... I grabbed that link off the source he posted.

RedRedSuit4244d ago

Well, I have to say, you are right.

Though I sense shenanigans, as I did not see that there before. That said... you win this around and get a bubble.

Bathyj4244d ago

BAM.

It was a silly oversight, I can only assume it was a time thing. Remember before February everyone thought next gen would start in the middle or maybe at the end of 2014. 2013 seemed really unlikely.

Anyway, problem corrected.

RedRedSuit4244d ago

Can't believe you guys are buying this again.

It may still happen, but this article is unsourced nonsense.

Bathyj4244d ago

I cant believe you choose cynicism over optimism. If Shu said it, it will happen.

If you're just mad because theres no source.

https://www.google.com

_QQ_4244d ago

This seems to be a trend lately with MS and Sony. always good to listen to fans.

Felonycarclub84244d ago

Sony is doing everything possible to make everyone happy

Remy_S4244d ago

They'll be happy once they switch over.

Show all comments (51)
140°

Sony Faces Class Action in the Netherlands Over Allegedly Inflated PlayStation Store Prices

Mass Damage & Consumer Foundation in the Netherlands has filed a class action against Sony for inflating PlayStation Store prices.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4d ago
dveio4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

My personal opinion:

Manufacturers and publishers have indeed inflated the industry.

From $700 million development costs for games like Call of Duty, to digital (store) prices for games and DLCs, online multiplayer fees on consoles (why can you play Helldivers 2 online for free on PC but not consoles?) or still preventing sell/lend digitally purchased games.

Sometime in the future, this bubble will collapse.

They should know better, but they just can't help themselves and suck even the last penny out of our wallets.

BeHunted4d ago

Because Sony knows people will be forced to pay those prices for single player and multiplayer games, not everyone prefers PC gaming. Sony also has a monopoly on PlayStation digital games. In 2019, they stopped allowing retailers and game key sellers to sell PlayStation digital games, making them available only through the official PlayStation Store

anast4d ago

The Dutch gov. wants a piece of the pie.

Eonjay4d ago

They should be suing the individual publishers increasing the prices to $80 instead of suing the store. There are plenty of publishers still selling game for like $50 with much success (like E33). But this proves that the publishers are the ones setting the prices.... so again nothing changes because they aren't even going after the main offender. How is suing Sony going to make Microsoft not charge $80 for the next COD? Sony being the number one store in the market doesn't mean that publisher have to charge us an arm and a leg. Again the industry is laughing at us because consumers never get real representation. Just these fake platitudes that are meaningless.

BeHunted4d ago

"How is suing Sony going to make Microsoft not charge $80 for the next COD"

Because Microsoft doesn't have a monopoly, I can purchase Call of Duty at a huge discount from CDKeys or other gaming retailers. The only way to purchase digital PlayStation games is through the PlayStation Store.

djl34854d ago

Weird, I swore GoW, Stellar Blade, Horizon Zero Dawn, TLoU, etc. were on the steam store....uh.....

BeHunted4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

@djI3485

I'm talking about PlayStation games that you can only purchase on PlayStation. I can purchase Steam and Epic games from 3rd party retailers and key stores.

"Sony to stop selling full-game download codes at retailers"

https://www.videogamer.com/...

Killer2020UK4d ago

About time. There is zero fair reason why digitally distributed products that you cannot recoup any value when you want to dispose of them, should be priced higher than that of physical copies that entail all of the costs and the benefits of owning.

Show all comments (12)
170°

Sony Aims To Sell 15 Million PS5 Units This Year, but Is Shifting Focus to Monthly Active Users

Sony CEO Hiroki Totoki and CFO Lin Tao talked about the state of the PlayStation business and the strategy and targets going forward, including how they're responding to the tariffs.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community45d ago
Changed: content
Abriael45d ago
1Victor45d ago

I wonder how the USA tariffs war will affect that projection. 🤔

S2Killinit45d ago (Edited 45d ago )

I think they take that into consideration when they announce their projections. Currently, after the xbox price increase, the PRO is cheaper than the series x! That is ridiculous, and it can’t last.

darthv7245d ago

you keep saying that but the price of a PS5 Pro is S699.99 (US) and the price of a Series X is $599.99 (US)

S2Killinit45d ago (Edited 45d ago )

The series x with 2 TB storage space is more expensive than PS5 PRO which also has 2 TB storage space.

darthv7245d ago (Edited 45d ago )

Oh so you are pitting a regular Pro with a special edition X... got it. If you are going so far as trying to compare apples to apples... please add in the optical drive and stand to the Pro. Seeing as the X has both of those by default.

I will help you if you are unable to do so.
PS5 Pro 2tb: $699.99, Optical Drive: $79.99, Stand: $29.99 = $809.97
Xbox Series X Galaxy Black Special Edition 2TB: $729.99

45d ago
S2Killinit44d ago (Edited 44d ago )

The PS5 PRO has 2TB storage. The series X with 2TB storage and much weaker, is… more expensive! So yeah, Im pointing out that fact.

Also, the PRO does not require a stand.

Ps: regular series 2TB is $749 (where did u get 729?)

darthv7244d ago

Its right here on the official XB site: https://www.xbox.com/en-US/...

Okay, so no stand for the Pro, but you might still want the optical drive. So $779.98 vs $729.99. A properly outfitted Pro is still more $$ than a 2tb X.

S2Killinit44d ago (Edited 44d ago )

Do I need to mention that the series x is not nearly as powerful as the PS5 PRO?

And no, the PS5 PRO runs just fine without a drive, and people don’t have to buy the drive right away, assuming they want it.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 44d ago
drivxr45d ago

I wonder why they are shifting focus to MAU.

RaiderNation45d ago

Because that's where the real money is made, in microtransactions.

Profchaos45d ago (Edited 45d ago )

People are spending less time playing is a typical trigger for this.

The less time spent playing the less likely you are to spend more money on games and services including subs or even the next console.

Increased engagement equals more money.

45d ago
DarXyde45d ago

Same reason Microsoft does it: it looks better to investors and it's a solution when unit sales slow down.

Personally, I'm not a fan of this metric; and by using it, you're kind of signaling that you're moving into the "This is a PlayStation" era.

Z50144d ago

Because the PS4 also has users and not necessarily sales

Obscure_Observer43d ago

"I wonder why they are shifting focus to MAU."

Because they´d finally realized that MS wasn´t wrong after all.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 43d ago
45d ago
45d ago
310°

Sony Announces Large Profits Growth for PlayStation; Expects Further Wins in Current Fiscal Year

Sony announced its financial results for the fiscal year 2024, and things are certainly looking up, despite a decline in PS5 sales.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

✔ Fixed
Duplicate story
MaximusPrime_46d ago WhoDisagree(1)Agree(0)
+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community45d ago
Changed: content
Abriael45d ago
CrimsonWing6945d ago

Expect sh*t to slow down if prices aren’t kept in check.

Redgrave45d ago

Who downvotes the truth?

Even PSN itself is too damn high.jpg

S2Killinit45d ago

Gamepass is already at 20$ per month if im not mistaken.

toxic-inferno45d ago

@neutralgamer1992

Not all of us. I'm a big PlayStation fan, and have been since the PSOne. But I can't begin to defend what's happening currently.

At least Nintendo release a large number of games from their major franchises. Sony is just not banking on their established franchises, and yet are raising prices. Not great.

S2Killinit45d ago

Im pretty sure we are going to see a price increase for PRO. I mean think about it, its currently cheaper than xbox series x! That cannot last.

Eonjay45d ago

I'm absolutely sure we will not see a price increase. I don't think we should 'expect' to see price increase because it just adds validity to what Nintendo and Microsoft have done.

darthv7245d ago (Edited 45d ago )

Sorry to pop that bubble but the Pro is not cheaper than a series x... generally speaking (like you are). It is cheaper than one specific version, and doing so by not including the optical drive and stand like the X has by default.

So keep on trying to convince people you are right when everyone knows it's quite the opposite. A stock Pro is $699.99 and a stock X is $599.99. A special edition galactic black 2tb X is $729.99. And if you really want to compare apples to apples... adding the aforementioned optical drive and stand brings that Pro to $809.97 and then they would be on equal footing.

Twisting truths to fit a narrative... I expect better from you S2.

S2Killinit44d ago (Edited 44d ago )

The PS5 PRO has 2TB storage. And the series X with 2TB is more expensive. Which in my opinion is insane conseidering how much more powerful the PRO is. The PS5PRO does not need a stand, it can be used without a stand.

TheKingKratos45d ago

So the Pro is not offering any push in sales at all ?

CrashMania45d ago

It's still an expensive, niche product ultimately. And they exceeded their sales projections for units sold by half a million.

lawox45d ago

"18.5 million units have been shipped during the full fiscal year. This is actually ahead of the 18 million units target set by the company."

They beat their yearly estimate. It's not broken down by device, but it's clearly performing well enough. Since it's been released it's consistently been the second best selling SKU on Amazon only after the the Slim with disc.

45d ago
Bathyj45d ago

18 million a year is in the toilet?
I remember when 10 was considered good
Hell Microsoft would take that right now.
Probably pay $100b for it.

45d ago
BeHunted45d ago

If their profits fall next quarter, we'll probably see more price hikes. I can't imagine having to pay £20 a month for PlayStation Plus.

S2Killinit45d ago

I think gamepass is already paying that much.

45d ago
drivxr45d ago (Edited 45d ago )

Decline in hardware sales.
Behind on lifetime sales and decline in first party sales.
Third party content and PSN came through to save the day.
Things will improve starting with the next Ghost game.

Hopefully a steady flow of first party content by end of '25

rlow145d ago (Edited 45d ago )

I guess you get downvoted for stating facts from Sony’s own lips. What I’m curious about is what their top games of the year were and how much Xbox games contributed to the increase?

CrashMania45d ago

Well, generally 3rd party publisher games contribute the most anyway, so no different to capcom, EA and so on contributing to this figure.

lawox45d ago

That's because the report is actually really good.

They beat the console sales estimate that they set last year March, they have increased users both due to the record numbers of PS4 users and strong PS5 sales which is leading to great profits in sales and user spend.

This report is about the financial health of the PlayStation brand and as a platform PlayStation is stronger than ever. Heck they even have Microsoft putting their biggest franchises on the platform.

45d ago
S2Killinit44d ago (Edited 44d ago )

Well, the facts in the article are positive. Nothing wrong with his comment, but in my opinion it doesn't correctly indicate all the facts and nuances that give context to the reality of things. I downvoted for that only.

Make sense?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 44d ago
Lightning7745d ago

This is exactly what happened to Xbox year's ago. They had no first party and started seeing decline in 1st party sales, which effected their third party games which eventually effected their console sales. A slow decline across the board.

Calm down PS fans I'm not saying PS is becoming like old Xbox. I'm showing examples of the importance of first party output. Look how Xbox finally has compelling first party and things are on a up swing(despite years going on a downswing). I know thanks to PS releases which helps a ton, (which is why Xbox hardware only dropped 6% instead of 30+% like it usually does) The point still stands despite what Genz Trends may go, first party and compelling games sell hardware and software still. Sony's financial quarter is an example of this, of what lower First party output looks like.

No matter they'll be right back on track in due time any time especially with DS2 (not my type of game but I know many like it) and Yotei. They're not Xbox and let things get bad for so many years on end.

crazyCoconuts45d ago

"I'm showing examples of the importance of first party output. "
First party is mostly relevant for the sole purpose of creating EXCLUSIVES that are needed to stay competitive. With Xbox consoles collapsing and no more Xbox exclusives, first party is way less important. PlayStation as a platform now has free reign to profit without the high expense of needing exclusive first party titles.

red2tango45d ago

Sony has been very lazy with 1st party games compared to the PS4 era. And even the PS4 era was nothing compared to the PS3 era in terms of games.

S2Killinit44d ago (Edited 44d ago )

We have Ghost and Intergalactic coming. And then Marathon which is not exclusive to PlayStation. I think Covid and that chip shortage put a speedbump in game development because game manufacturers dont want even more risk that their game will arrive to too little hardware, but the games are starting to show up.

Lightning7745d ago

"With Xbox consoles collapsing and no more Xbox exclusives, first party is way less important."

Absolutely not. If that was the case then Nintendo would put Mario on Sega Genesis and Sonic on Super Nintendo. I know things are way different 30+ years later but not much has really changed in terms of exclusives and their impact on hardware. Especially early in the console life cycle.

Sony made all the money this quarter handover fist. Profits isn't a issue for them right now. I was just saying lower hardware sales and lower first party sales will hurt them or any console manufacturer of they don't have the compelling games in the long run. Just like it hurt Xbox. IF Sony keeps up not having lower first part output. Which we know they're not.

crazyCoconuts45d ago

Well no big exclusives in the last two years yet PS is doing great. What are people gonna do? Buy an Xbox?

S2Killinit44d ago

I agree with you. But they have had plenty of exclusives so far. Has it been ideal? Nope. I have a feeling we are seeing a resurgence with the effects of covid and that chip shortage now behind us.

Lightning7745d ago

No it's just like 360 where they had no games yet ppl still bought it because they sold ppl on the games early on that gen the fans were locked in and invested. They were riding the good will and was dubbed the shooter, racer box. The games dried up and they never recovered from it which hurt them in the long run. Same here with PS they still make the big bucks because they had games early on and the fans locked in and will continue to lock in for a little while longer despite lacking in first party.

S2Killinit44d ago (Edited 44d ago )

I agree. But the problem with xbox was that for some crazy reason MS thought game development wasnt all that important to a platform holder. They literally did not fund games with their own studios. When they lost marketshare they couldnt justify paying for exclusives with large install bases making it too expensive. That is not the scenario with PlayStation.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 44d ago
Show all comments (46)