690°

Rumor: Activision wanted to utilize the full Xbox One GPU power for Ghosts, Microsoft declined

According to Thuway, who has been pretty accurate with his prediction of Battlefield 4 resolution on Xbox One/PS4 along with Call of Duty: Ghosts resolution on Xbox One/PS4; Activision wanted to utilize extra 10% of GPU power that is allocated for Kinect use but Microsoft denied it saying "No it would result in the environment being too unstable."

Read Full Story >>
gearnuke.com
OC_MurphysLaw3980d ago

Interesting if true..... have to wonder what "unstable" would imply.

mattdillahunty3980d ago

yeah, they make it sound like they're handling uranium or something. lol.

kneon3980d ago

Nah, handling Uranium is pretty simple unless you've managed to get a large pile of highly enriched Uranium.

You want unstable try this stuff, it's a lot of fun :)

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Maddens Raiders3980d ago (Edited 3980d ago )

I think they are talking about possibly stressing the OS too much as it relates reliability of the hardware in light of having to upclock but still only getting native 900P. Take this with a grain of salt as w/ any number of /rumors/ going around about issues MS has had with it as it pertains to yields and "rushing" out the system. http://www.cinemablend.com/...

I've said it before and I'll say it again, but MS should've have just waited and polished up their system with a 2014 release. There would have been nothing wrong with that at all.

DARK WITNESS3980d ago

Well the fallout from the xbone going belly up after all the other crap that it has gone through would be the equivalent to an A bomb going off...

ProjectVulcan3980d ago (Edited 3980d ago )

This is another potential problem for Microsoft.

Xbox 360 from day one had a mere 32mb of OS memory overhead and a single CPU thread I believe of 6 available on the 3 cores, as well as a pretty tiny amount of the GPU performance for scaling. They had this nailed down from the start, it took years for Sony to reduce PS3's memory footprint which at launch was in excess of 100mb.

However, Microsoft appear to be battling the bloat on Xbox One. Kinect, coupled with not one but 3 operating systems seems to be chewing up plenty of resources. 10 percent GPU performance, a bunch of system memory and it seems 2 entire cores of the 8 core CPU.

PS4 also reserves a lot of memory and a couple of CPU cores it seems but not nearly as much GPU performance- of an already faster chip.

They will both work to get that down but you have to imagine it'll surely be easier for Sony to reduce their overheads much further than Microsoft ever can on Xbox one, just because of kinect and the rest of the things they are attempting with their OS.

Kayant3980d ago

@vulcanproject

Well said i really don't think they would be about to give devs all that 10% after optimization due to the fact that GPU allocation is mostly used for the OS(Snap & Quick resume).... Seeing how quickly it exists a game & continues running it in the background seems like it will require quite of a bit GPU processing.

Xsilver3980d ago (Edited 3980d ago )

Soooooooooo the Kinect is the bottleneck smfh MS= http://newnation.sg/wp-cont...
We all know in the coming years games are gonna become more demanding so i don't know if the xone will fair well unless the devs Master the Esram but the same guy(thuway) that leaked this rumor also said that Esram will always be a bottleneck so idk.

ProjectVulcan3980d ago (Edited 3980d ago )

If you are going to run a feature like snap on games and have that kind of multitasking its pretty much inevitable you need to leave graphics resources free at all times unless you want stuttery, slow responses from the UI.

It takes a bit just to run a UI over the top like 360 did and PS3 eventually enabled. Remember how difficult it was for Sony to get XMB to finally run on top? Remember how it started off kinda sluggish and got a bit better with updates over the years?

Well that ain't free. Even on faster consoles it'll suck up resources, but what Microsoft want with snap and running skype or apps simultaneously, picture in picture, that fast scaling, UI overlays etc etc.....it'll use a fair bit if Microsoft wants it to function correctly without potential memory/CPU/GPU overflow.

It'll all pull resources away from games, particularly GPU and CPU cycles. Its more of a blow if you begin with less hardware performance in the first place.

JoySticksFTW3980d ago (Edited 3980d ago )

Neogaf's Proelite said this a few week backs

The biggest issue with Xbox One isn't 720p, it's what happens if some games push the system.

He said the choice was 720p or questionable OS stability, so MS is choosing to limit some games at 720p - 900p.

Found the link
http://www.neogaf.com/forum...

P0werVR3980d ago

No matter how these rumors come about, Xbox One will be THE console. I predict 2qt of next year.

Post marked!

solidboss073980d ago (Edited 3980d ago )

If these consoles are Uranium, then XBone is enriched to what can be used for medical research.
Whereas PS4 is weapons grade baby, 90%+...Yeehaw.

vigilante_man3980d ago

No big deal. As a developer of a console you know what hardware you can develop for and you max the heck out of it.

Rather than trying to outdo PS4 - which seems unlikely for any game this next gen - Microsoft and said developers need to create the best XB1 experience possible.

We all win then.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 3979d ago
Blackdeath_6633980d ago

crashing/glitchy UI maybe? also would 10% still be allocated if you don't have it connected

MysticStrummer3980d ago (Edited 3980d ago )

Yeah the UI thing is what I would guess also. It makes sense, given the multimedia focus of the console. They'd rather be able to Snap than have the games look as good as they can, which is sad in my book if the rumor is true. Guess it depends on what a person wants from a console.

Mike134nl3980d ago

Maybe the kinect wouldn't be able to function as advertised if the 10% gpu dedicated to kinect would be used for other purposes. Using kinect (to activate any snap features etc.) would make the game and kinect functions unstable.

pyramidshead3980d ago

Ouch, kinect holding on to 10% of the GPU and the horror story of the XB1 OS must be a massive headache for devs.

Let's hope they sort it. That's 10% of an already weaker GPU though that must be the real clincher :/

Ron_Danger3980d ago (Edited 3980d ago )

My guess would be something NSA related (he typed sarcastically)

Too many theories and rumors going around with both consoles... It's getting more anoying as we approach the launches.

Edit: I love how I typed "he typed sarcastically" and I still get a disagree...

Why can't people have a sense of humor anymore online?

tagan8tr3980d ago

Your right R_Danger we all need to lighten up myself included, no matter what a sony fanboy says about xbox or vice versa sony/microsoft would welcome that person with open arms.

Codey473979d ago

This is N4G you are NOT allowed to have a sense of humour/humor nor are you allowed to be sarcastic.

If the Xbone was actually more powerful than it actually is N4G would probably be a happier place.

These console wars can be brutal, unfortunately.

GarrusVakarian3980d ago

This is a rumour and we should treat is as such...BUT if this IS true then that's F'd up. A dev asking for more power and you deny them? Wow.

black0o3980d ago

as some1 above said ''snapping apps is more important then getting the games look good''

torchic3980d ago

what else was Microsoft supposed to do? it's kind of the same thing as a developer asking Microsoft if they can use more RAM for their game, or asking to use one more core, like okay?

I don't even get why Activision asked? it's an allocation for a feature Microsoft deems necessary for the operation of the console.

I don't know much about how game developers use resources but as far as I know, when a part of architecture is cornered off, it's cornered off.

Clover9043980d ago

Doubt it means much. Xbox One and PS4 are new console that are still working out their kinks. So maybe not now, but developers may be permitted to use all of the One's power down the road.

BX813980d ago

My guess is frame rate maybe? I can see this being true because of the scope of ms's launch titles not hitting 1080p 60fps. Despite what many on this site would have us believe it's far from over, I agree ms titles will only get better. It's a process to launch new hardware. The more advanced we get the harder it will be. I think Sony just has the advantage of easier to dev for hardware.

nukeitall3980d ago

It means that the software is designed to expect 10% GPU allocation for Kinect. If you remove that, you don't know what systems will fail without proper code-review, rewrite and testing.

During launch, when you are trying to get features out, it is a bad idea to re-engineering things. MS already had to do this with going back to stone age physical discs.

They are probably also trying to get all their development tools for the finalized hardware out.

clonerz3980d ago

I will take my physical copy "fanboy"" mr butthurt" I like to own what I purchase

DARK WITNESS3980d ago

if having physical media was such a backwards thing, why MS even bother putting a disk drive in the console in the first place.

pyramidshead3980d ago

"During launch, when you are trying to get features out, it is a bad idea to re-engineering things. MS already had to do this with going back to stone age physical discs."

Their vision was flawed, accept it. Think about all those people who wouldn't have bought the console because they'd have to wait weeks to download 50GB games. 2020+ the original XB1 may have been more viable.

sigfredod3980d ago (Edited 3980d ago )

Thats what happen when your objective is to produce a all in 1 box, handle many things but not very good at anything

nukeitall3980d ago (Edited 3980d ago )

Are you saying PC isn't good at anything either?

Surely it is possible to design one box that is good at many things. It just takes more time, and I think the Xbox One seemingly makes excellent tradeoffs to achieve said goals.

GuruMeditation3980d ago

@nukeitall I think it's quite clear that is not what he was implying. PC has the horsepower and architectural oomph to be a jack-of-all-trades, whereas xbox one seems more of a one armed juggler at this juncture. Chuck too much at it and stuff's gonna get dropped...

Visiblemarc3980d ago

Maybe it's because Kinect is somehow integrated in such a way that it can't be "undone" so there is basically no such thing as using it's memory/gpu but rather you'd end up sharing it and competing for resources .

mistertwoturbo3980d ago

That and 10% isn't going to make up a 125% deficit in resolution, then again they might have at least got it to run at 900p.

bryam19823980d ago

americans.don't know.how.to.build shit.no more houses made.out.of gypsum (drywall) and wood or particle.board no.wonder a little bit of water destroys them,cars made out of fiber glass consoles that.break easily

Blaze9293980d ago

"There is no way I can prove what I'm about to say, except you will just have to believe me. Comes from a source who I trust without fail."

so we still treating Xbox One anonymous sources as fact huh? Same old hate, just a different rumor.

BallsEye3980d ago

Yep, another info from a super neogaf insider who is wrong 9/10 times but when this one time he is right they write articles about his unbelievable predictions...same as CBOAT. I dog have better true/false ratio by wagging his tail.

GrandTheftZamboni3980d ago

Don't be so harsh on yourself. You're not a dog. And don't wag CBOAT's tail to predict future.

AngelicIceDiamond3980d ago

ESRAM issues.

10% of X1 power used for Kinect.

Everything I wanted to say but like always, nobody wants to listen.

MS said they'll have a solution for this in the future. Hopefully its in the near future because X1 needs to be outputting 1080P.

cellfluid3980d ago

Red ring of death ring a bell... Lol

Ps4Console3979d ago

Not long now for the Ps4 launch , these articles are just too much all the time feed us with excitement like Ps4 games & interesting points behind the Ps4 that is what we want .

+ Show (13) more repliesLast reply 3979d ago
TIER1xWOLFPACKx3980d ago

That title is asking for greenpowerz or elitegamer saying it's the dual gpu they wanted to use without them reading the article. Bit of a worry though if it was to make it unstable something isnt right there

Volkama3980d ago

Likely true. Why wouldn't Activision ask about utilising some extra power if they're struggling to hit their 1080p target?

We already know MS are going to work to free up that 10% resource over time, which implies they can't free up that resource now without shutting off the system-level features that use it.

svoulis3980d ago

Maybe over time they mean when the OS is stable without Kinect? Although I find it hard to believe considering Microsoft already stated you don't even need the Kinect plugged in anymore to use the XO.

I dunno so many rumors and speculations going around making my head spin. It is just scary that almost all the rumors turn out to be true.

Microsoft, what are you doing. Microsoft Staph.

Manic20143980d ago

I think they meant the use of kinect with the system will become unstable. Hopefully they get the fix within the next couple of months so Dev's can use 100% of the GPU.

nukeitall3980d ago

@MMEHTA:

One of the issues will be that they when Kinect needs the resource it doesn't have it causing the system to stutter or something similar.

This sort of thing means code has to be re-written to accommodate for the performance envelope changing. Also, MS probably wants to make sure they can support all the features and innovations they want before releasing those resources.

It would suck if you run into a situation like the PS3 who couldn't support cross or party game chat because of bad planning and software engineering.

3980d ago Replies(1)
AsimLeonheart3980d ago

I think he is a well known Neogaf member who has been fairly accurate with his inside informations.

Show all comments (107)
350°

Microsoft Reportedly Spends $1 Billion Annually To Get Third-Party Games On Game Pass

Uncover the spending behind Xbox's Game Pass subscription. Discover how Microsoft invests a billion dollars annually in securing third-party games for the service.

Read Full Story >>
gamersocialclub.ca
Obscure_Observer4d ago

Good.

Now that you´re releasing games and making big money from every gaming platform, you should double that amount and give us even more day one third party games!

Jin_Sakai3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

You’re delusional beyond belief. Businesses wise it doesn’t make sense and sooner or later they’ll be raising prices again to cover that billion they’re blowing every year.

outsider16243d ago

Lucky for xbox that papa microsoft is rich.

purple1013d ago (Edited 3d ago )

As someone else said earlier today, they are past the growth stage, it’s been stagnent for last 3 years, they are now in the money making stage, prepare to be goosed for as many dollars as possible for the least amount of content. It may not be bad now, (actually it is) but it will be soon (even worse) this year you got hellblade and starfirld and a load of other games that could be bought in bargain bins for about $5-30 and for that you pay them monthly

To add I honestly don’t know how you put up with the barrage of Xbox negativity (which is deserved). I put it down to:

A) you are being paid
B) you may have a problem thinking clearly
C) prefer rooting for the underdog, that’s a legit thing too. English people do it by default

Profchaos3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Yeah Aussies also love an underdog as long as that underdog isn't Xbox as they were too of the game with the 360 then lost their minds

Chevalier3d ago

3 straight years of missing Gamepass targets. Some people are just blinded by their own idiocy. Will be interesting to see if COD does anything this fall

CosmicTurtle3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

He is a troll. Designed to stoke people up on here. We know this.

It’s quite funny.

Popsicle3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Yet people still allow the troll to derail an entire topic. I don’t understand how moderation allows it.

I literally just skip the comment. This may be the best comment obscure ever made. I don’t know because I didn’t read it. I have read to many thread derailing post from this person to ever devote any time to reading another.

I wish everyone would ignore the trolls so we can have a genuine discussion. Stop feeding it and it will go away. Even just hitting the disagree button feeds it. Thats what it wants. This is the last post I will ever post about obscure because I am feeding them now.

Legit question to Mods. After such a long history of being a troll, how has this poster not been banned?

Profchaos3d ago

Is he though or does he just blindly love Xbox in the same way Sega fans loved the Dreamcast even though it was clearly dead they thought it could be redeemed

Ok yeah he's saracstic and does troll but I enjoy seeing what he comes out with it would be boring here if we never had conflicting opinions

Sonic18813d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Are you insane? You want them to double the amount when the Xbox is already struggling and losing money 🤔

Hofstaderman3d ago

Correction....XBOX is already dead.

Obscure_Observer3d ago

"Are you insane? You want them to double the amount when the Xbox is already struggling and losing money"

As long we get the games I couldn´t care less about a trillion dollar company losing money. That´s their business to worry about. I only care about the games.

And "struggling and losing money"? Really?

"Microsoft reports Xbox’s revenue is up 61% in Q4 FY24 thanks to Activision"

https://venturebeat.com/gam...

61% more revenue and BO6 is not even out yet.

MS will make a sh!t ton of money with that game alone in all platforms. So 2 Billion yearly invested in their *core* business is nothing!

So yeah, I want them to double the investments on Gamepass. Period.

Sonic18813d ago (Edited 3d ago )

"So yeah, I want them to double the investments on Gamepass. Period."

That ain't going to happen. Just because you want it 😂

fr0sty3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

They'll do that, after creating 4 more higher-priced tiers and making the one that currently includes everything only contain games that have been on the market for 4 years.

"Gamepass Ultra to the MAX: Now only $299 per year!"

MrNinosan2d ago

Already $240/year, so we're there within a year, without new tiers.

jznrpg1d 19h ago (Edited 1d 19h ago )

It will be 29.99$ a month eventually 360 a year

Profchaos3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

They are trying to get a return on abk and Bethesda they won't double day one we're lucky we are still getting them now that day one has been removed from base tiers

They want to make money not give it away

OlderGamer173d ago

Sorry O_O, I tought you where loosing it, but i now come to the conclusion that you realy lost it.
The coping from you is not on a stellarr level....

Flakegriffin3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Homie got 77 dislike and his brain rot will still help him think that he’s right.

3d ago
+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 1d 19h ago
MrDead4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

I like how they twist cannibalising game sales into "invests".

No lifetime sales with MS, they'll F-up gaming the same as streaming services have done to the movie industry and it's workforce.

Fishy Fingers3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Out of interest do you think those 3rd parties signing the deal are unhappy with the severence and have a gun to their head?

Bro probably has a PS+ sub and has library full of Epic launcher free games.

TheNamelessOne3d ago

lol

Pretty much. There's a lot of hate on this site for Gamepass, but put games on the different tiers of the PS subscription, and whenever they get that free day one release, it's an entirely different tune. No talk about how this choice is killing devs.

DarXyde3d ago

Do we think they're unhappy?

Umm...YES...?

They literally need to be paid up front to put games on the service. It's become a way to gain a foothold on the platform.

Do you think Atlus would launch on Game Pass otherwise?

MrDead3d ago

"Out of interest do you think those 3rd parties signing the deal are unhappy with the severence and have a gun to their head?"

I think you mean severance... and I've noticed you don't know what it means either, MS aren't firing the third-parties they're purchasing from.

"Bro probably has a PS+ sub and has library full of Epic launcher free games."

I'm not a console gamer, but yes I do have Epic with a library full of free games... but guess what Epic rotating free games every week doesn't do. It doesn't destroy lifetime sales and cut workers out of residuals. Then you bring up PS+ a service that also doesn't destroy lifetime sales as their model allows for new releases to earn.

DivineHand1253d ago

There are pros and cons to everything. Streaming services like Netflix is no different than cable tv except it is on demand. Services like Netflix has made it so that more studios can get a share in the profit where they can reach more consumers worldwide compared to the old days where the masses will only watch a few new titles per month.

The only negative about streaming services is that it no longer makes any sense to sell DVDs and Blu-rays though it can be argued that those persons may have moved on to building digital libraries for the sake of convenience.

The reason Xbox is doing so poorly is because they are not doing enough to be competitive. Their output of AA and AAA exclusive titles are extremely low compared to the competition and they haven't had a game of the year nominee in years.

Releasing their games the same date on PC is also hurting their console and it would have been more strategic for them to delay those releases by a year similar to what Sony does to maximize profits.

Gamepass alone is not to blame for Xbox's current position because it can be argued that if the service didn't exist and they had the same gaming output as they have now, they would be in an even worst spot.

MrDead3d ago

"Streaming services like Netflix is no different than cable tv except it is on demand."

It's nothing like cable. My comment isn't a guess lifetime sale of films has shrunk to a point it's almost gone and so has the revenue it generated, that is money from competing TV networks, cable/satellite and physical media sales.

Lack of revenue transparency with streaming has meant workers job security and pay has massively diminished, earnings from residuals is almost gone for example the writer for Squid Games because of streaming gets no royalties despite series earning $900 million for Netflix, before streaming he would have royalties form lifetime sales.
Or another example Willow the series was pulled and is no longer watchable here's why: “Willow” was one of nearly 50 titles that Disney+ pulled from its streaming library in May. Other titles included the series “The Mysterious Benedict Society” and the feature film “The One and Only Ivan.” Disney CFO Christine McCarthy explained that Disney was expecting to take a write-down in the June quarter of $1.5 billion-$1.8 billion by removing content from its streaming platforms. By writing down the value of the content assets, Disney can remove that from its balance sheet and reduce its tax bill." Also when you pull a show you no longer need to pay residuals to the workers.

Have you also noticed the drop in quality on sfx or thought some older films look so much better then they do now? This is because the industry now relies on cheap labour for sfx outsourcing abroad, more green screen instead of location shooting and a lot less real extras bring life to a scene.

Streaming in gaming is going to be far worse as we've seen with MS consolidating a massive part of the industry to try and make the service sustainable, lifetime sales being cannibalised by gamespass and a work force that has no unions like SAG is already paying the price.

All streaming does is remove income transparency, cuts the workers from the money and sets flat rates and removes consumer ownership... but CEO's and shareholders will still be ok as they benefit from the industry consolidation.

Huey_My_D_Long3d ago

MrDead is absolutely on fire with the post.

Nothing else I have to add other than that.

DivineHand1253d ago

@MrDead like I said pros and cons. Some of those issues can alleviated with alleviated with regulatory intervention to give more transparency to the industry but unlikely anytime soon with all the lobbying going on.

The issue with the squid game's writer can be attributed to the terms and conditions he agreed to. It happens often in business as no one really knows how popular something will be until you catch that lightning in a bottle. I remember reading about how Nintendo hardly made anything off Pokemon Go dispite Niantic making Billions.

I don't blame streaming services for studios finding was to reduce the cost of making films. That stuff would have happened regardless because of the greed of these corporations. We see that same cost reduction happening in every industry from food to Aerospace.

shadowT3d ago ShowReplies(2)
CrimsonGuardVII3d ago

@badz148 its not, it just straight lied.

gold_drake3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

we know this, we have known this since last year.

this is not new or news.

Show all comments (73)
440°

Report: Microsoft Cutting 650 More Jobs From Gaming Division Per Phil Spencer's Letter to Employees

Phil Spencer has sent a letter out to employees informing them that 650 jobs would be cut from Microsoft's gaming division.

VenomUK12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

‘Good guy Phil’?

The truth likely is that the decision was not his to make and is possibly a direct consequence of cutting costs following the ABK deal.

XiNatsuDragnel12d ago

Lol good guy Phil lmfao crazy

DodoDojo12d ago

Would be nice if he'd mail one of those letters to himself.

RhinoGamer8812d ago

Cut costs -> no bonus, stock options, raises for Phil and his leadership team.

Lightning7712d ago

"Good guy Phil" is comical. You have to bleed green to see that. I'm only a matter of time until MS, that's right MS even in ages themselves from the industry.

Sad, people and even sadder and pathetic company.

fr0sty12d ago

If they keep this up, they won't even be able to go third party anymore after they stop making Xbox hardware.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 12d ago
bionicstar12d ago

game devs aren't being let go.

“As part of aligning our post-acquisition team structure and managing our business, we have made the decision to eliminate approximately 650 roles across Microsoft Gaming—mostly corporate and supporting functions—to organize our business for long term success.”

darthv7212d ago

getting rid of some suits... now this news isnt so bad. Too many suits makes all the wrong decisions, esp the top dogs.

Michiel198912d ago

@darth they arent suits, they are people that work in administration, customer support and that kinda stuff

ZacultronTheFirst11d ago

Probably people from much needed Marketing department.

Nacho_Z11d ago

It doesn't make it any better if they aren't devs being fired.

11d ago
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
Petebloodyonion12d ago

The original story is from IGN as they are the ones who got the memo.
https://www.ign.com/article...

Still sucks!

badboyz0912d ago

The day we hear that Xbox is no more is vastly approaching.

12d ago Replies(2)
Obscure_Observer12d ago

"The day we hear that Xbox is no more is vastly approaching."

Not sure Sony is doing any better with all that money lost on GaaS and all that worldwide backlash regarding the Pro.

1Victor12d ago

@obscured: “ Not sure Sony is doing any better with all that money lost on GaaS and all that worldwide backlash regarding the Pro.”
.
Welcome back we missed you said no one 🤣

.
I don’t remember Sony cutting over 1900 employees then Less than 7 months later get a leak for another 600 to be on the chopping board but hey let’s equate that to a few people not been happy about a mid gen system refresh price 🤦🏿.

12d ago
1Victor12d ago

@obscured: “
They also casually forget that Sony have been laying off thousands of people too”
Yeeesh I got a better help discount code for you

BehindTheRows12d ago

Uh, thr Pro "backlash" is hardly something that's going to tank their business. Unless you've been living under a rock, there's no question that Xbox is in the gutter.

Quit pivoting to Sony because you don't like the subject matter. Their game division isn't in the toilet.

DodoDojo11d ago

Well Sony isn't selling more copies of their games on a rival system yet so they must be doing alright.

11d ago
Mr_cheese11d ago

@obscure

Saves some straws for the rest of us will you

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
343_Guilty_Spark11d ago

Vastly approaching is a weird phrase… vastly is typically used to convey the degree of some size or length or time.

Vastly approaching makes no sense.

You mean rapidly approaching.

MrDead12d ago

A combined $80 billion spent on consolidating a massive part of the industry, thousands fired all to line the pockets of the already wealthy and turn the gaming industry into a rental service.

FU MS.

crazyCoconuts12d ago

MS is a publicly traded company. If you have a 401K you yourself might own MS stocks.
I'm definitely not a MS fan, but CEOs need to keep returns high to keep their jobs if nothing else. They don't get to transfer the salaries to their accounts.
I blame MS for failed strategies, poor execution, lack of vision, etc.
These layoffs are just the result of those things.

MrDead11d ago

That's the weakest excuse for a giant monopoly I've ever seen... also companies like MS are more likely to damage people's 401k through monopolistic practices.

Obscure_Observer12d ago

"FU MS."

I love how you act all enraged and bully when it´s MS firing people.

"It´s all about the workers" at least they´re Sony´s employees, right? If they´re Sony they can go f* themselves right? It´s all justified and the blame lies elsewhere on some widespread industry problem, right? Right?

We been seeing some of Sony recent bs moves and you know what´s coming, right?

I´m expecting you to disappear the same way you do every time Sony layoff hundreds of people or get a whole studio shut down.

You´ll do anything to avoid and hold them accountable. But that's OK. You´are not biased, right?

1Victor11d ago

@obscured: “ "It´s all about the workers" at least they´re Sony´s employees, right? If they´re Sony they can go f* themselves right? It´s all justified and the blame lies elsewhere on some widespread industry problem, right? Right?”

.
Well Sony didn’t overreached and spend over 80 BILLION$ to acquire mayor 3rd party game developers and one MAYOR publisher the owner of the BIGGEST FPS just hoping to keeping it exclusive to their system and now having to fire thousands of employees to valance their books one more quarter.
Now Microsoft is beginning and going to kiss Sony dark ring and publish their “first party games “ on PlayStation. Regardless of who it is it’s wrong to do an acquisition and then fire people.
I applaud Microsoft for at least giving them a severance package and assistance getting a new job 👍👍.

MrDead11d ago

Chill out kid... also why bring up Sony, have they just spent 80 billion to consolidate a massive part of the industry to the detriment of thousands of workers?

MS lines their pockets whilst firing thousands, such a shame you support this.

Chevalier11d ago

Gee someone here said Xbox would NEVER release 1st party games on Playstation or competing platforms again?! Never tired to see you eat crow again.

11d ago
OlderGamer1711d ago

But but Sony bad...thats the normal damagecontroll from O_O. Dude its time to sing another song, this one is sounding like a broken record......

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
LG_Fox_Brazil12d ago

Not sure about the rest of the world, but here in Brazil we have a say that goes like this:

'May the last one to leave please turn off the lights'

What the heck is MS even doing right now?

Show all comments (74)
210°

Something Feels Off About Indiana Jones and the Great Circle

Shaz from GL: “Amidst recent concerns surrounding Xbox, Phil and Co. need a win. Unfortunately, I'm not sure if Indiana Jones and the Great Circle will be it.”

Read Full Story >>
gameluster.com
TwoPicklesGood17d ago

Looks good to me and I’m glad it’s coming to ps5

VenomUK15d ago (Edited 15d ago )

When it comes to video game previews I’m of the opinion that journalists should maintain a position of CAUTIOUS OPTIMISM. Yes, note and share concerns about the game with readers but maintain a restrained optimistic stance until actually having reviewed it so that any negativity is based on the game’s quality and not the author’s prejudices.

Here the author writes “ I’m going to continue to keep my cynicisms intact, less so because of my trust in MachineGames and more so due to the dumpster fire that continues to be modern-day Xbox.” This example illustrates the need to follow this guidance.

DefenderOfDoom216d ago

Not worried about facial animations , but I do hope the gameplay is fun . Most definitely I will purchase this on PS5, if the gameplay is fun .

BaughJaughs16d ago

nice hit piece. I notice the writer didn't mention any of the journalists / creators who had good things to say. From what i hear, it has riddick: escape from butcher bay in its DNA. To me that sounds like something to be Optimistic about rather than pessimistic.

ChasterMies16d ago

It’s odd to have a first person perspective for an adventure game with stealth and brawling. But’s not without precedent. Wolfenstein: New Order and Wolfenstein: New Colossus had a lot of adventure game elements. They were in the league of the greatest games ever, but they were both fun games. Indy looks fun too.

YourMommySpoils16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

Yes, Indy looks like Todd Howard. Something feels way too off.

Show all comments (25)