Ign playing cod ghost Playing Wargame mode with 1st ps4 gameplay footage to surface .
Glad they showing PS4 footage :-D
lol!!!!!!!!!!!! @ 1:20 on the video!!!! even the AI is camping!?! hjahahahhaha....
Didnt they say the A.I plays like a human?
This Game needs A LOT OF AA. http://cdn.memegenerator.ne...
Awesome video. This just took "next-gen" back to 2009.
I can't believe XBO cant run this at 1080p, i mean the graphics look so dated.
@majin-vegeta no they put all their work in the Fish AI :P amazing how the first time they show COD they show it on ps4 what about xbox version ?! BTW i noticed that all multiplat games was shown on ps4 and didn't see any xbox version of them only see one for BF4 and it was off screen i wonder why?! @u got owned it might be the developer fault not the console it self
u got owned - "I can't believe XBO cant run this at 1080p, i mean the graphics look so dated." oh you don't need to be so harsh, Battlefield will run at 1080p when ps5 comes out.
needless to say that it doesn't look next gen at all! but we have seen what CoD looks like on pc and a decent GPU from couple of years ago could still max it with no problem! this kinda make the rumor about it being only 720p on Xbone seems very unlikely. I mean...look at it! it looks like it's running on the iPad!
those are horrible graphics... Nice job Activision, that just looks like a PS3 version
Wow why does this look like current gen? I remember at the reveal they were showing off arm hair graphics and the game had to have looked better back then. Are we sure the video isn't mislabeled and supposed to say PS3? Am I going crazy, wtf happened? BF4 is about to take their crown ease, this makes Killzone look like it's running on the PS6. I'm really confused. Guess this is what happens when you continue to use an outdated game engine. They seem to be trying to claim that all their "next gen assets" were in the AI of the game. They keep mentioning it anyway, maybe graphics were largely ignore because of that or only a focus in the single player. I'm not a big cod fan but I'm still disappointed.
Is this really PS4 footage? 1080p or not, this looks pretty much the same as its always been.
What's even more funny is before he gets killed, the bot he shot was laying dead in mid air.isn't this game about to release? They must be kidding at acti
I can't believe this is the reason so many kids buy the Xbox AND to rub there faces in it, it's better on the PS4. This NextGen battle isn't even that, it's a massacre lol.
This pretty much confirms the fact that Activision is in it for the money only, not for quality. This is exactly the same aa before.
This looks so horrible. It's practically a shooter on iOS.
if you give money to activision for this turd of a franchise YOU ARE THE PROBLEM WITH GAMING!!!!!!!
Why is anyone surprised the graphics are dated? This is a really old engine and Activision is simply too cheap to start a new. This is what happens when you become complacent with a top selling franchise that the media gives a pass on with high marks which each and every sequel release. They are simply riding this into the ground with as minimal upgrades as possible. I love COD for what it is, a fast twitch run and gun game that's easy to pick up and play. After seeing this video I doubt I will even rent it. I held out a little hope it would be decent but this is worse than even I thought it was going to be.
what do you guys expect from a shitty ass game?
lol @people going on about why isn't it 1080p on xbone. I know PS4 can run games theoretically at 1080p and most games will run native 1080p but I doubt this will as its still the same old engine despite what the developers say they have just added a HD texture pack on top which demands a LOT of raw power. Why you think its so massive in size (50gb)? The PS4 has the advantage of GDDR5 here but lets be honest it will probably be upscaled to 1080p on both consoles.
They already showed it before. http://n4g.com/news/1377494... Dupe submission
I new that video looked familiar. Stopped watching when he climbed on the truck up the roof and pointed to the teammate going into the building. Very old video.
None of these games were built for nextgen. They are all ports. EVERY GAME is a port, so why are people buying nextgen consoles to play ports of current gen?
To me this is the most disappointing next gen game on both systems
i remember playing black ops and double checking to make sure my ps3 was in hd. Ghosts looks pretty bad. Every other game ive seen looks better
From the footage i saw the dog looked better than anything else.
Thats's cos It's not a nextgen game, they just ported the PC version so higher resolution but still old engine/lighting/animation/AI and low detail textures.
Yep and when I pick up my ps4 next month I want to feel like I'm playing on a next gen console and that's why I'll be playing killzone shawdow fall.
it looks ugly as shit and even though Xbone not capable of running it on 1080p what mess! lol way to go M$ and Activision!
yeahthis game looks current gen but it does not matter until it focuses on multiplayer and its multiplayer is 10x better then kz shadow fall multiplayer,at last what matter is gameplay and story not graphics ,i'am not compalning next gen but kz because kz feels very bad and still cod is fast paced multiplayer which is fun to play. And saying that xbox one does not will be able to play it on 1080p is very false because game still looks very outdated and man who said that shit only pedicted it and people hyped it and is not prooved as we know xbox one is not that weak but little weaker than ps4 .and all 3rd party game on next gen will look smilar as said by EA,ubisoft and activision.so that rumor is false and again graphics does not matter,and also 3rd party games will look silmilar on bases of graphics in next gen.
@jacklsback Doesn't multiplayer actually lower textures and some other items to get the engine to run at a fluid 60 fps when compared to singe player?
^traditionally that is the case...multiplayer gaming has to layer all the netcode on the cpu...taxing the cpu more so than a single player environment 'usually' does (that is a game by game basis though, some single player games are hell on a cpu as well)...the higher cpu usage will then dig in to draw calling, which is the information compiled on the cpu to be sent to the gpu for rendering... so, in short, higher cpu usage via netcode results in less room for draw calls...which means details need to be reduced for the renderer...and the game doesn't look quite as good... Not being an ass...but the archaic netcode of Ghosts is so old...i truly can't believe that it would tax even an iPhone's cpu...so, with this game, there really is no reason for the visuals to be turned down to the degree this video is showing...to me, that looks literally no different than a whole pile of current gen shooters...bf3 on ps3 looks better than that...despite running at a lower frame rate, but still...that is almost embarrassing...
Funny thing is, when he's in the menu, it shows A, B, and Y buttons. I don't think this is PS4 lol
Your whole wall of texts need proper punctuation. It's filled with tons of grammatical errors. You lost credibility when you started that mess of a comment, but I digress. You have no room to speak, you haven't played Shadow fall nor Ghost for that matter so comparing and saying which game plays better is a huge fanboi fallacy and fairy tale. Claiming gameplay and story over graphics going into this generation is down right embarrassing for COD fanboys and IW, with the specs of both these Next gen consoles you should have it all, so seeing this game look this dated even on next gen is just disheartening and it's the reason why I left the franchise after COD4. You're biased and totally trolling and defending a game running on an old engine showing it's age. Battlefield 4 and KZ mops the floor with this game and it shows
Most people playing this game don't care about the graphics really. I agree though it does look like crap for a next gen game. Seems like BO2 with new maps. We'll see soon enough.
This looks pretty awesome aside from some of the minor glitches shown. It's evident IW put a lot of energy into making sure that the game is fluid while keeping the niche CoD feel. The only thing that's sad is that Activision continues to play it safe with these compressed textures, but then again that may be the result of the manner in which the X1 processes it's textures. It would be pretty cool if Sony and MS could make graphical upgrades to these games for their respective consoles.
Looks like crap.
It looks more like a last generation game to be really honest .
The video quality is just terrible. I know the game doesn't look this bad.
Who cares. Same Call of Duty crap every year.
Well look at the bright side, guys; the fish can get out of your fucking way! :D
I heard Guerrilla is teaching Graphics Classes at the Y....someone tell Activision... 8)
Ive Pre-ordered Ghosts because i like COD. Now give me my disagrees please because of my choice of purchase. Thank you.
This is XBO footage. Watch when he's in the menus, and when it shows the helicoper. Pretty sure PS doesn't have LB and RB lol
Square comes up in game so can't be XB footage.
Another reason why people are sheep and dumb enough to buy a next gen console right now. This shit looks exactly like current gen. All the good games are coming out Spring 2014, so why buy a NXTGEN at this time so it can sit on the shelf for 4 months? Ohh yeah that's right....SHEEP
It doesn't look much different from previous COD games, is this honestly the PS4 version? a supposed next gen game Done it now haven't I, I've sealed my fate here, I share an HONEST opinion and i'll be labeled as a "troll/hater" Shall I go as far and say BF3 on the PS3 looks just as good if not better http://www.youtube.com/watc...
...and this game asks minimum 6gb of ram on pc, pathetic, isnt it?
don't worry...they're saving the better gfx for next next-gen.
@Venox2008 Nvidia says they teamed up with Activision to make the game look really good. Sure, it won't be as significant to consoles, but at least it will look better and remove those jaggies that AliTheSnake1 mentioned above. But I agree with you on the RAM. 6GB needed is not true. The recommended for BF4 is 8GB, but it only uses almost 4 lol.
Yeah you need 6GB of RAM, 250MB to run this game, and 5.75GB of imagination.
Well windows 7 alone use 3.2Gb on my PC. So the game uses 3Gb makes sense.
i agree its not that good lookin bf4 looks better i just cannot play long matches,thats why i choose cod
That's fair enough buddy, I can understand your reason +1 for surprising me
yep bubble for that, reaper... nothing wrong with playing CoD because of what it does best...quick fast paced matches that are easy to jump in and out of...simple as that... BF doesn't come close to CoD on that level...and its great to hear from people that admit that the depth/complexity of some other franchises is simply not their style...
yeah im the same way some people just suck at battlefield, well suck at having an attention span to stay interested in a game of battlefield, that being said I have still pre ordered bf4 for PC, thought my new 4000 dollar gaming pc deserved me to atleast try to evolve as a gamer. AS for using the fact you cant play long battlefield games as reasonable and logical excuse for buying garbage ass noob fest COD, I am appalled. Killzone shadowfall has short games aswell so theres absolutely no reason for buying cod besides A. You're a noob and you dont like how infiltrators trick you into thinking their you're friends, then shooting you in the face, and actually make the game impossible to pwn at if you're an average gamer. B.you're terrible with money and making logical consumerist decisions thus decided to buy xbox one. so which one is it because even though hellvacancy gave you're reason a pass im not going to. theres no real excuse for buying cod just mainstream gamers trying to set gaming back 5 years and teach developers that pushing your game engines limits year after year is not needed to be successful. A true gamer that supports the well being of the game industries future would never buy another cod game ever again. to many wannabe gamers are too afraid to just come out and say their noobs and that's why they buy cod over killzone. Id rather get my ass kicked at killzone, bf4 and learn to adapt as a gamer then play it safe and pretend to myself I'm hardcore because I can pwn at COD
No dude I'm with you on this. The game-play looks bland with no AA and low res textures. I honestly thought it was last gen footage.
call of jaggies so all next gen the screen will be covered with terrible aliasing as well? lame get it right devs, 4x msaa or gtfo!
HELL NO!!! 4x'S'SAA or GtFO! It's 8th Gen.
its still consoles so 4x to 8x msaa would be fine hQ antialiasing takes a hit on my gtx 780 hydrocopper sometimes so i doubt next gen consoles can handle better anti aliasing without dropping down to 30 fps. tbh if you really want decent anti aliasing you're going to have to spend more then 400 to 500 bucks.
Call of Duty Dog in 1080p and 60FPS, only on PS4
It's not really a bragging point to be honest. The game isnt a graphical showcase by any means. The fact that the PS4 can run something as beautiful as Shadow Fall at 1080p/60FPS, however, is VERY impressive.
wait, is this really true? The xbox one isn't running this at 1080 native? honestly...i don't even know what to say to that...based on the video i just watched...if someone said both consoles could fling this out at native 1080/120hz...i'd totally believe it... I'm not kidding...the graphical simplicity of that video is what we'd expect in something at 4k...right?
cod engine is either outdated and absolute coding mess opr the xbox one is as crappy as im lead to believe if it cant handle 1080p at 60 fps
This is multiplayer, i think activision downgraded multiplayer to focuse on single player with the graphics.
It should still look noticeably better than ps3/360 gen...
KZSF destroys this graphically its not even funny wow!!!! lol This looks no better then current gen imo
Who cares there 2 totally different game
They're two different games but they're both next-gen FPS games with expansive multiplayer components, and one just so happens to barely look better than a current-gen game while the other blows it away in every possible way. . . . I'm talking about Shadow Fall being better than Ghosts.
i dont play games for graphics no one should its all about game play and even tho cod is amost the same every year it still really and can get you addicted killzone on the other hand get boring by the end