150°

Why some find Resident Evil 5 to be racist. (Should they though?)

With all of the recent negative hoopla surrounding Resident Evil 5 due to the location and ethnicity of the Zombies this time around, Nintendo might just be happy that RE:5 will not be released on the Wii. This time around, the infestation and killing occurs in Africa, and many people, mostly those of African descent aren't pleased with what they've seen so far.

Read Full Story >>
wiirincontrol.com
-EvoAnubis-6281d ago

Because they're idiots. That was easy.

The Wood6281d ago

if it was set in Greenland or Iceland and had zero blacks, browns etc. If its set in a predominantly black part of the world then its logical for most of the 'infected' to be black. Whether your a 360, wii or ps3 owner Im sure we ALL agree on this one.

Rocko6281d ago (Edited 6281d ago )

I think this picture sums it up pretty good.

MisfitSmurf6281d ago

the real racist are the ones who are saying the game is racist to start with. They're so closed minded, any normal person would see that the game its just killing zombies, but the blinded A$$holes just have to look past the real reason the game is made and look at some part that doesnt even matter. Plain stupidity if you ask me

Science_NERD6281d ago

will those blacks claiming that it is racist consider it so if they paint every charcter white but gave them black features? Stupid uneducated fvcks

btw theyre forgetting what majority of race is making the game...Bastardo!

Amanosenpai6281d ago

An afro-chinese south-american dude with a british half sister killing nordish-koreans infected folks would be better... Dont you think?

BTW

<3 Black people <3 ---------> thats racist*

The Wood6281d ago

just because somebody says something is racist against blacks doesn't mean it was a black person who said it. That's a misconception that can cause unrest and misunderstanding, it can also be applied to all races

TruthbeTold6281d ago

The Japanese created and continue to develop Resident Evil...

Harry1906281d ago

What is your point exactly?

MURKERR6281d ago (Edited 6281d ago )

way to go really showing your intelligence(guess you can only play casual games not to much thinking needed right?),

the way you talk about 'blacks' go to open zone and let ur rascim flow freely next youl be sayin your not racist

the wood agree wid you dude bubbles up up up

JsonHenry6280d ago

Would it be less racist if they were in Africa and there were only white people around?!

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 6280d ago
Harry1906281d ago

there's always something to talk about.

coolmatrix6281d ago (Edited 6281d ago )

Capcom was notified more than one year ago about the tone and nature of this game.

Depicting black teen children is a first time for a video game where you shoot and kill. Showing slavery images in the form of clothing and hair ties is another. Mimicking the walk and manner of black weilding thugs just goes to show the lowest level Capcom has taken. The cherry momemt, Africa and the virus; someone forget today the AIDS epidemic and the exisiting view in some African nation.

The Japan Trade Organization, all government in African countries, the White House, Capcom's major investors and CAPCOM LEGAL DEPARTMENT as well as Walmart, Taget, etc. has been notified more than one year ago.

If this continues this could damage the reputation of Japan and Capcom.

The letter to the Justice Department of California is still fresh, tucked away and filed.

I wait to see how they defend this game in public. Corporate responsibility?

See you soon...Capcom!

devilhunterx6281d ago

Why people whine about this, but dont have problems with games where "white man shoot tanned skinned people"

Bebedora6281d ago

Why is beyond doubt. It's just selfrighteousness. Black and white. Right and wrong. Good and evil. So selfrighteous fvks. Go burn some place will you.

Show all comments (82)
140°

Resident Evil 5 - 15 Years of Being the Most Misunderstood Resident Evil

Resident Evil 5 launched 15 years ago today - and it continues to stand as a stepping stone from the good to the bad.

TheBrainZ473d ago

One of my favourites because of the co-op. Then Resi 6 arrived and the series nosedived further.

Knightofelemia473d ago

I enjoyed the game co-oping with a friend I know the game in solo the AI can be an idiot but RE5 is way better then RE6. I played RE6 with a friend if it wasn't cheap when I got I would have avoided RE6.

thesoftware730473d ago (Edited 473d ago )

5 was excellent, still play Mercs with my brother.
I would love a fully remastered RE:5, with some added, reworked content. The DLC for 5 was also excellent.

6 was awful.

CrimsonWing69473d ago

I never understood why the game was misunderstood. It was a fantastic game at launch and is still fun today to play. It’s as action packed as Resident Evil 4 was, yet that’s regarded a masterpiece 🤷‍♂️

chobit_A5HL3Y473d ago

it was "misunderstood" because they introduced co-op into the franchise at a time when people loved to have fake rage about co-op. like, you could play the game as a solo experience, but people chose to have their bandwagon rage because it was cool at the time lol

-Foxtrot473d ago (Edited 473d ago )

What the hell are you talking about? Fake Rage? Bandwagon? Come on.

You can play it solo but you are forced to carry around a shitty AI partner you have to micro manage. It wasn't as fun solo.

Co-op sucked all the horror, tension and suspense from the game because having a partner covering you was like a safety net. Enemy trying to sneak up on you? No sweat the AI will just automatically lock on, alert you while they shoot first telling you where they are basically.

It was the start of Capcoms fall with the Resident Evil series where it basically become an over the top generic action game which betrayed it's own survival horror roots. Least RE4 had a good blend of both but Capcom just went the wrong way with RE5, especially going off what they were going to do during the RE4.5 beta phase before co-op was added.

franwex473d ago

At least the game was a ton of fun tho. If the game was bad, the outrage would’ve been justified. They simply pivoted for a couple of games. At this point it’s bad because it’s called Resident evil 5? But if was called something else it would’ve been good? Please.

chobit_A5HL3Y471d ago

like i said: fake baby rage and bandwagon hate. res4 wasn't really that scary, either, and was already taking the series into more of an action-oriented direction at the time. 5 was a good game that people fake-hated because of co-op that you didn't even have to play lol hence the fake rage and bandwagon hate. i mean, it obviously did well enough for capcom to go ahead and make 6 the way they did, right? if 5 was so bad, they would have changed what 6 was during development. the difference is that 6 was actually just bad.

people "hate" 5 because res4 was so good, and 5 was just unfortunate enough to be its successor. like i said, 4 wasn't scary, either, and relied more on tension than horror, but it was already more of an action game. if you don't wanna like 5 because it's not scary or whatever- that's fine, but it wasn't meant to be strictly a horror game anymore at that point anyways. the gameplay was a lot faster-paced than 4, so saying that the ai helping you by potentially shooting someone that was sneaking up behind you is a moot point. there were more enemies that were more aggressive, along with newer threats.

5 isn't as good as 4, but it's not a bad game by any stretch.

RNTody447d ago (Edited 447d ago )

What? I always thought RE5 had fake controversy because it was set in South Africa and you shot a bunch of black zombies. I live in South Africa and thought the game was absolutely awesome, played the whole thing co-op with my brother.

@Foxtrot I think you're confusing the garbage Dead Space 3 with Resident Evil 5. Resident Evil 4 was already a hyper action game and had zero fear factor other than the grotesque appearance of some enemies.

Show all comments (16)
50°

The Best Co-Op Horror Games You've Missed in Halloween

Try to cope with your friend through terror with this list featuring the best horror Co-Op games you can play today.

Read Full Story >>
altarofgaming.com
270°

Complete Global Saturation! Is Resident Evil 5 Really the Best Choice for the Next Remake?

An exploration of whether RE5 is truly the most logical next step for a remake, or whether there are others in line who deserve their day in the sun.

Read Full Story >>
twinfinite.net
ocelot07632d ago

Remake of Resident evil outbreak as well as file 2. Same gameplay as the recent remakes. Choose what ever character you want to play as. With online co op.

DarXyde632d ago

I've been dying to see Outbreak come back for years.

Even RE Zero and Code Veronica would be excellent.

But for the love of God, not RE5 or RE6.

One they get around to the aforementioned games, why not remake the original Devil May Cry trilogy? That would be a much better use of time. At the very least, the first two games.

justsomeoffdude632d ago (Edited 632d ago )

code veronica should be the nest remake

neutralgamer1992632d ago

CV is good candidate for a remake but requires way more work for today’s standard. People look at CV through their tinted glasses. I think capcom wants to remake every game up till 6 and fix the plot holes so they can continue the series in one straight story path

Also not sure why only RE have to get remade when there are other capcom games that would be better suited for remakes like oninusha

DVAcme632d ago

That's PRECISELY the reason Code Veronica needs a remake. All the other RE games aged pretty well, considering the limitations of the time, but Code Veronica is the game that would be served the best bybremaking it because it feels so archaic these days.

neutralgamer1992632d ago

DVA

But it depends if capcom wants a big project or a quick remake. CV will require a lot more work than RE5

IMO they should remake other games before doing RE5

TheEnigma313632d ago

how many times do we have to say CV is the next best one?

CrimsonWing69632d ago

Nooooo! Why the hell can’t they do Code Veronica? I just don’t understand.

1Victor632d ago

RE5 is the closest to the bottom of the pot(a little smoky flavor but passable in a emergency) before we get to the burned crust that is 6 that not even the pigs would eat

CrimsonWing69632d ago (Edited 632d ago )

Unpopular opinion here, but I enjoyed 5 and 6. I just think, in terms of Remakes, the classics are the one that should get the treatment above the modern takes of the franchise.

Don’t get wrong, RE4 definitely was an outstanding Remake, but RE5… I just get less excited about a Remake for that over something like Code Veronica.

RaidenBlack632d ago

Nope.
Rather remake other past Capcom & non-mainline RE games ... IF they have to continue churning out Remakes.
I'd rather want a new 3rd person RE spin-off
Dino Crisis and Onimusha Reboot
New IPs after Pragmata ships

jeromeface631d ago

show this man the door... he overserved himself.

Show all comments (38)