980°

What does Microsoft have to say about Sony's Xbox One "shifting message" dig?

In an interview with Eurogamer Microsoft Studios boss Phil Spencer accused “certain people” of trying to turn these policy changes into “a bad thing”, insisting the company's ability to react to feedback was “a strength”

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
HammadTheBeast4316d ago

I'm sure it also had something to do with a few people's job on the line, but whatever.

jackanderson19854316d ago

ha most likely but that sounds pretty crappy from a PR point of view

golding894316d ago (Edited 4316d ago )

"Other people will do and say what they're going to say. Fine. We're running our program. That's a strength of who we are."

Well said. No matter what happens xbox one will sell like hotcakes when it is out. but I have no doubt ps4 will sell more hence in more countries though.

4316d ago
xHeavYx4316d ago Show
LostDjinn4316d ago

If you read the interview he says it's because of community feedback. Does this douche seriously think nobody remembers all the smack-talk from MS to gamers? All the "you can't just flick a switch", "Buy a 360", "it can't be turned off" crap the spewed? Preorder numbers is what frightened them. Gamers spoke with their wallets and gamers know this is the only reason MS did anything.

This is why MS can't gain any traction with the gaming community. They treat gamers as retards and MS zealots just reinforce the view that MS aren't to be trusted. Every stupid thing they do has (many recently joined members and ancient (2006-7) accounts) message spamming following it about how it "doesn't matter" or some other such feeble damage control.

Till MS give gamers the respect they deserve I can't see it getting much better for them.

abzdine4316d ago

they've nothing to say it's the simple truth.

ABizzel14316d ago

"We built a platform for gamers."

No you tried to finish your goal of building a multimedia device for everyone, but gamers (your bread and butter that got the Xbox brand where it is) backlashed and now you're trying to get the gamers back on your side.

That being said the changes M$ made are commendable (most, because they took some things that shouldn't have been affected at all). But on the flip-side everything Sony said is true, you blundered you're reveal and everything but games regarding the XB1. Sony has stuck with their message of being for developers and for gamers, while M$ has backtracked on unfair policies, restrictions for gamers, developers, and forced Kinect on core gamers (the least likely to care) bring the XB1 a $500 price point compared to a $400 PS4.

Again the XB1 has had a turned around, but it should have never happened to begin with.

Gazondaily4316d ago (Edited 4316d ago )

YES, you can criticise Microsoft for their u turns. Clearly they were out of touch with their customer's needs. So were Sony back when the PS3 launched. But the fact that people criticise Microsoft for listening, and that is what they did, regardless of whether or not poor pre order numbers were a motivating factor, is just silly and childish.

You hated DRM. Fine. You were vocal in how much you despised it.
Microsoft hold their hands up and say, fine, no DRM. You then complain about their u turn?

You complained about the indie policies. Microsoft then worked hard to rectify their publishing policies, made the X1 a dev kit and gave out free devkits. Still complaining?

You wanted a chat headset. You got it. You scoff at this move and say "oh another 180?".

You get a free game of Fifa. People here, in what I have to say is such a desperate and fanboyish manner, play this down. "Oh Microsoft are buying their fan base or its for pre orders only". I mean....this is an unprecedented move on their part. Read the comments by people who mocked this when it was a mere rumour. Should I link the article so you guys can read the comments which got loads of agrees? They said it was just wishful thinking and it wouldn't happen. But it DID happen but instead of having the humility to admit that you were wrong you carry on with your silly tirade.

At this point I just think there's nothing Microsoft could do to silence some of these haters, who, let it be known, have been haters of the Xbox brand for quite some time now.

If you're going to adopt such a conflict approach and be so critical, apply the same standards to Sony too. I hardly hear about the requirement to pay to play online now but prior to the announcement, all I read was how people would never pay to play online.

The difference between Sony's E3 snub and Gamescom is that, inthe former instance, it wasjustified as it was a new announcement tackling a very divisive issue that needed to be clarified and addressed.Yesterday, Sony were just being petty. By all means mention your unflinching focus as a strength. But dont do it in such a childish way. The fact that many users on here defend the statement says more about them than it does about Microsoft and their obvious shortcomings. Phil is absolutely correct here.

gaffyh4315d ago (Edited 4315d ago )

@Septic - I think it's more to do with the fact that these policies weren't there in the first place. We had to scream and shout, and finally not buy the system before they even listened. THAT is Microsoft's biggest problem, they waited too long, they should have reversed everything BEFORE E3, but they waited because they thought that they could gloss over it and that people would forget because they showed some games.

It breeds mistrust, you can't blame people from being wary of every move they make.

mistertwoturbo4315d ago

Sure Microsoft, the lopsided Pre-order numbers on Amazon and other retailers absolutely has nothing to do with it. *Rolls eyes*

Ritsujun4315d ago

Mindless sbillyblindb0ts have in denial since forever. =/

xRedline4315d ago

@gaffy

The console isn't even out yet. They fixed the policies before the launch. They didn't wait too long.

What makes me laugh is that you say we as if you're actually someone who would have bought the console. We both know you never planned on it. You may be a consumer, but you're so far into your hatred of a company and love for another that your wallet was never a factor.

MysticStrummer4315d ago

I guess their "program" is to react in panic when their stated plans don't go over well.

They can't deny that their message has shifted.

UltimateMaster4315d ago (Edited 4315d ago )

insisting the company's ability to react to feedback was “a strength”.
Yeah, a big strength for Sony.

DragonKnight4315d ago

I find it very interesting that, in terms of PR, the roles have been reversed from the previous paradigm to the current one. It used to be MS that ragged on Sony and Sony replied with a standard response, now it's the other way around. There are of course monumental differences, but it's still interesting.

trafalger4315d ago (Edited 4315d ago )

"It used to be MS that ragged on Sony and Sony replied with a standard response, now it's the other way around."

lol

“We want to pack everything in today and future-proof this as much as possible,” said Kazuo Hirai, the head of Sony’s U.S. game unit, in an interview. “It’s a box made of future technology as opposed to Xbox 1.5, which seems to be a combination of things available today,” added Hirai, president and CEO of Sony Computer Entertainment America."

is that a standard response? it was this arrogance that got sony into trouble early on with the ps3. that was from 2005. but i guess when some members view things that must make m$ look worse 24/7 what do you expect?

IceKoldKilla4315d ago

Can't find reply on the otehr guy so here:
@Septic You are right only to those who probably aren't even buying one or just hate. Anyways here are some thing you need to keep in mind. M$ is one of those companies that clearly are just about money. The reason why it might seems Xbox 360 was good to its gamers is because of the money coming in. Yes all companies are in it for the money but nothing like M$ and (Apple). I'm not stupid Sony fanboy so don't comeback with bullshit like that. Reason why Xbox One changed even putting complaints aside is also due to the fact of Sony. Sony as the competition made it clear what it had over the Xbox One and listened to complaints from the PS3 days and integrated more than what Xbox One did with their complaints. So far that pre-orders went through the roof and seems PS4 will take over #1 but maybe X1 will be not far behind, we'll see because poor # of launch countries and PS being # in EU and Asia. Yeah people continue to talk trash and sometimes for no real reason but some are true man. Like how they don't respect their consumers that are the ones to thank for becoming who they are now (Xbox team I mean and by that I mean how big the brand is). One half is thanks to the company with their moves and the other half is thanks to the consumers. If you do opposite of what people want from the start and insult them then you lose a lot of trust and have to gain it back. 180 on things that were suppose to be there from Day 1 shows they made mistakes which is ok but not ok when you realise it's only because Sony did want people wanted. If Sony wasn't here or did something bad and didn't have support from people worldwide like they did for PS4 then I'm sorry to say but M$ would have continued to ignore fans and consumers and maybe even continue to say thing like "Well don't like it? Buy our old console. Oh not in your country? Too bad!" Not that they said it like that or at all but it would have gone down that road so when they show their true colors, they have to gain trust back. Also need to stop being so greedy! Company is in top of the world yet they need to get every penny from their consumers still! WTF? Give shit for free! Make stuff less expensive overall (not about console price). You know? Still might get a X1 in a couple years if it goes well and..if I have money :)

dantesparda4315d ago

"Microsoft Studios boss Phil Spencer accused “certain people” of trying to turn these policy changes into “a bad thing”, insisting the company's ability to react to feedback was “a strength”

My head is dizzy from all that spinning

JokesOnYou4315d ago

Great response. Let the X1 exclusive games do the talking....and apparently X1 games are what everybody is talking about.

tordavis4315d ago

@septic BRAVO MAN! BRAAAVO!!!

rainslacker4315d ago (Edited 4315d ago )

@golding

Don't forget this gem

"The two-way conversation that we have with gamers is critical"

So critical they shut down their facebook and youtube comments.

Sometimes....actions speak louder than words.

@Jokes

I agree. The games should do the talking. MS Execs apparently aren't very good at talking. Even when they do it's condescending. Even when they do, it goes against what they actually do. For the people that love to throw around the term "hypocrisy" on a daily basis, I'm surprised you don't do so for the execs of your beloved console.

Gaming1014315d ago

Phil Spencer, Boss at Microsoft Studios is on record as saying 'the concept of a digital ecosystem “remains a core philosophy” for the console as it evolves over time.'

That's code for "Our DRM policies will slowly but surely return in hopes that customers won't take notice/won't want to trade up for a different console when they've already invested tons of money in games and accessories for their X-bone"

You will never escape those policies, Microsoft even said the infrastructure of their DRM policies were hard wired, they can easily adjust and go back to some version of those policies anytime they want to. That's capitalism for you, so don't be fooled!

insomnium24315d ago (Edited 4315d ago )

@septic

"You hated DRM. Fine. You were vocal in how much you despised it.
Microsoft hold their hands up and say, fine, no DRM. You then complain about their u turn? "

No. We complained and they still said FU.

"You complained about the indie policies. Microsoft then worked hard to rectify their publishing policies, made the X1 a dev kit and gave out free devkits. Still complaining?

You wanted a chat headset. You got it. You scoff at this move and say "oh another 180?"."

Everything they've done has been in the name of profits and trying to take Sony's thunder away. Not out of good and fair policies or kindness of their heart.

"I hardly hear about the requirement to pay to play online now but prior to the announcement, all I read was how people would never pay to play online."

With Sony it's a choise wether to pay since you ONLY pay for the multiplayer. Everything else is free. Had MS done something similar like EVER I don't think XBLG would've gotten so much hate. Everyone on gold pay only for multiplayer mostly but there are many gamers out there who would quit paying for it if the situation was the same as it is with Sony's end with PS4 and PS+. Netflix is very popular on PS3 and there is a reason why.

It doesn't hurt that Sony offers free games with PS+. I myself have subbed on PS+ for a while now solely cause of the perks it gives me. But hey that's just me.

" By all means mention your unflinching focus as a strength. But dont do it in such a childish way. The fact that many users on here defend the statement says more about them than it does about Microsoft and their obvious shortcomings. Phil is absolutely correct here."

Have you ever heard about Aaron Greenburg? He gets off the hook with x360 fans but House should get ripped a new one? Everything else was perfectly fine by me except the smirk he let out after the reaction of the crowd. He should've restrained himself in not smirking to it. That was the only negative imo. The message itself said with a completely professional face would've been ok.

gaffyh4315d ago (Edited 4315d ago )

@xRedline - I would have bought the system if the price was right. I'm not buying it at £429 because the only game I am looking forward to is TitanFall, which I can just play on my 360. Although Ryse does look good, its not going to make me buy the console for it.

What makes me laugh is that you think people who are a little negative on N4G won't buy Xbones. I will buy one, but at the right price and time now. I would NOT have bought one EVER if they had not reversed their policies.

This is the difference, many people here applauded when MS announced game industry-breaking DRM for the Xbone, whereas a few vocal users complained and improved the console FOR EVERYONE. Now people will actually buy the console at some point, some at launch, before it would have failed so badly, that nobody would support the system.

Animal Mutha 764315d ago

@ Septic

Bubble up for one of the most sensible and reasoned comments I've read on here in ages.

Completely agree with every point you make. MS can do no right in many peoples eyes here on N4Sony.

I'm happy for all the changes they have made and its made me now seriously consider Xbox One. They screwed up but they have made massive strides to try and put that right.

That's just not good enough for some people.

The_Con-Sept4315d ago

PlayStation and Sony have kept their message consistent. Patents may have come out showing some grim images for games but now that the release date of 11.15.2013 has been revealed I am excited! Nothing but rock solid confidence coming from everyone in the PS4 camp.

It is just sad that there is so much scrutiny happening to the competition over every aspect of their product. But in this crowd it is anyone's game. And this time Sony kept a secret a true secret until the reveal.

In other words corporate espionage was either mislead, or never executed. 11.15.2013.

Perjoss4315d ago

"xbox one will sell like hotcakes"

thanks, but I'd rather not burn my fingers.

kariyanine4315d ago

@insomnium2

"Everything they've done has been in the name of profits and trying to take Sony's thunder away. Not out of good and fair policies or kindness of their heart."

If you think anything Sony has done hasn't been in the name of maximizing profits and taking Microsoft's thunder away, I have a bridge I'd like to sell you. Neither company is doing anything out of the fairness of their hearts, Sony has just done a better job of getting consumers to understand their approach.

+ Show (24) more repliesLast reply 4315d ago
malokevi4316d ago

If Xbox had been a flop, EVERYONES jobs would be on the line.

I don't understand how people aren't getting this.

MS is a consumer electronics/software company. As if they aren't "allowed" to adjust their policies in order to better fit consumer expectations.

The only people who perceive this negatively are the people who want Microsoft to fail. Sony included. And not because Microsoft is "bad", but because they are so dedicated to Sony.

Sony can continue to try and leverage every morsel of Xbox One news in their favor... for all the good it will do them.

I smell fear.

nightfallfilms4316d ago

Well said!!! The hate that these Sony Kids have for MS is so funny. Sony the saint of all companies can do no wrong. Ms changes policy's for the better before the product is released and Trolls find a way to spin it into a negative. Yet Sony on the other hand have screwed its customers before, lets see hidden DRM on its music CD's that they denied and didn't fix until lawsuits started. But I guess Sony is a Saint of company. All companies make mistakes as long as they learn from it and make changes for the better its all good.

pyramidshead4316d ago

Maybe you farted?

Sony isn't in fear at all.. I would admit they're maybe riding hard on the thrill from E3(and possibly trying to recreate it) and spreading it a little too thin now by the comment but in no way are they in fear.

The PS4 it seems has great potential, and I know they might not amount to much in your eyes, but if over 1million people have already put down an interest to pre-order(I'm aware these are subject to change constantly)would you be in fear of your next product failing?
http://i.minus.com/ibryYmcJ...

malokevi4316d ago

I'm extremely excited to get a PS4 before holidays end, actually. Very, very excited...

But I am looking forward to Ms' console, as well, and I hate this attitude Sony has taken. Riding on the high-horse, spitting at the competition.

I have great respect for Microsoft after this whole debacle. Not so much for Sony. They will need to prove themselves to me.

Magicite4316d ago

Yes I also smell fear. Fear that comes from all the pathetic xbots who still are claiming that xbox is a true next gen.

malokevi4316d ago

Well that's just a silly little thing to say, lil buddy! Any person on this planet who has the resources to invest in any piece of gaming hardware, this generation or next, has nothing to fear... only good times to be had!

Your perspective is laudable.

nukeitall4316d ago

I think Sony's comment is exactly what is the problem with Sony.

They consistently stick with their plan, and don't react to feedback. Instead, they are proud of it.

However, if you look at their product line. It took them over a year to react to the slow sales of the PS Vita or the overcharging of their memory card.

Remember the PS3? They rode the entire generation with little changes.

The only time Sony got a hit is when they decided to give or lend if you may free games with PS+. Of course everybody loves free access to games.

So what you should take from all this is, MS attempted to make radical changes, didn't forsee the backlash and ended up reacting very nimbly. Whereas Sony is this slow thudding company that hasn't changed much and it's claim to fame is it stuck by it's guns.

Big companies need to stay nimble, and not be afraid of making radical changes. If you don't, others will and you will loose eventually!

BlueBlood174316d ago

I smell fear from Microsoft...

Hence the 180s on almost every policy to match PS4 (CBA with a list) because their preorders were 8:1.

Hence the copying of Sony's marketing slogans ("Made by gamers for gamers" and "The best place to play")

Hence the copying of the style Sony made the conversations with creators vids, only Microsoft put THEIR OWN EMPLOYEES in and got them to take a dig at Sony about their indie policy which made absolutely no sense whatsoever and made the two who said it look like a pair of imbeciles.

Hence the desperate attempt to do the usual and throw money at the problems until they go away with the last minute inclusion of a headset and trying to create the illusion of value by packing in a free FIFA 14 with every preordered console.

Xbox, go home.

MysticStrummer4315d ago

The company in fear is the one that changes their stated plans considerably over a span of a few months based on consumer reaction.

That's not what Sony has done.

MrBeatdown4315d ago (Edited 4315d ago )

@nukeitall

"They consistently stick with their plan, and don't react to feedback. Instead, they are proud of it."

It's amazing how consistently full of it you are.

Don't react to feedback? The PS4 was designed entirely with developer feedback in mind, based on criticism of the PS3 and what developers wanted to see in a next-gen console. Sony sought out feedback, and developers praised them for it.

Sony listened, and responded to every criticism they could with the PS3. They dropped the price dramatically. They beefed up first-party support in response to "PS3 haz no games". They improved the interface and online features in every way they could, and even addressed criticism like cross-game chat as being impossible.

You act like Microsoft is more receptive, but the reality is, as much as you want to pretend it's Sony sticking to their guns, to a fault, what Sony has done have made them the leader in this race, and left MS playing catch-up since day one.

Sony didn't have to be reactive in the face of extreme consumer backlash. They listened first. Built the PS4 second. They got it right the first time, by paying attention the first time.

MS built a turd that was met with widespread disappointment, and had game journalists cheering when Sony made the announcements everybody wanted to hear at E3.

Sony listened the first time, and debuted their console to widespread praise. MS did what they wanted, fell flat on their face, and are now changing policy to save the sinking ship that Captain Oblivious plowed right into an iceberg.

Pretend all you want that MS's response puts them above Sony, but being receptive enough to criticism and consumer wants and needs to nail it on day one is better than spending months reacting to a PR trainwreck no matter how you want to spin it.

4me24315d ago (Edited 4315d ago )

@malokevi

"While others have shifted their message and changed their story, we were consistent in maintaining [our] message"

After looking at XBOne at April, May and present can you honestly say that above statement is not correct?

malokevi4315d ago

@4me2

Absolutely not! I don't think anybody can deny that MS has been making a lot of changes, many of them reactionary. But the real question is... does it matter? Mistakes were made, and then rectified.

None of this has any impact on my ability to play and enjoy the games I love on the console that I choose, and therein lies the difference.

To some people, it matters on principal. To me, it's Christmas eve. Nothing can shake my anticipation, because its been building since I could hold a controller, and principals and opinions don't even factor in. That obviously doesn't go for everyone, but there it is.

DragonKnight4315d ago (Edited 4315d ago )

@malokevi: "Riding on the high-horse, spitting at the competition."

Do you want me to show you examples from this gen of Microsoft doing exactly that?

"I have great respect for Microsoft after this whole debacle. Not so much for Sony. They will need to prove themselves to me."

This is a laughable response. You have respect for a company that only changed policies because they saw a humongous hole in their money bag thanks to said policies? After the way Microsoft have treated gamers, and acted this entire generation, there is no way anyone can make the claim that Microsoft are on any moral highground and deserving of respect for anything other than finally making the common sense moves they should have been making from the very start.

@nukeitall: "I think Sony's comment is exactly what is the problem with Sony. They consistently stick with their plan, and don't react to feedback. Instead, they are proud of it."

Are you serious? The PS4 is the result of listening to the feedback of 8 years of PS3 life. Of having to deal with the trolls complaining about B.S. like PSN maintenance and download speeds. About having to deal with people who aren't developers, and people who are, saying that the PS3 was too difficult to develop for. The PS4 has everything a gamer could possibly want, and everything a developer needs, to be great. Exactly what feedback have Sony not listened to in development of the PS4?

"However, if you look at their product line. It took them over a year to react to the slow sales of the PS Vita or the overcharging of their memory card."

The thing that dismantles your argument here is that people were whining about the Vita's price from day two. On day one, that is the day of the price's reveal, everyone was cheering about the price and then, because Nintendo reduced the price of the 3DS, the hate began. People were comparing the Vita to the 3DS and complaining within those parameters. What feedback did Sony ignore that was legitimately about the Vita and was something they could directly control and NOT in relation to the 3DS?

"Remember the PS3? They rode the entire generation with little changes."

You've been blind for years if you actually think this. The quality of games, and the changes to their online offerings, changed dramatically from when the PS3 launched. You have to be trolling with this one.

"The only time Sony got a hit is when they decided to give or lend if you may free games with PS+. Of course everybody loves free access to games."

Refer to my above response.

"So what you should take from all this is, MS attempted to make radical changes, didn't forsee the backlash and ended up reacting very nimbly. Whereas Sony is this slow thudding company that hasn't changed much and it's claim to fame is it stuck by it's guns."

That's what an Xbox fanboy takes from it. Reality is different. Reality is that MS attempted to act in a purely corporate interest mindset and were beaten back by the consumers. They reacted out of necessity, not because of flexibility. Sony offered what everyone asked for and hasn't had to change anything because the only people with a problem with the PS4 are Xbox One fanboys who never liked it to begin with. This is backed up by reality as you see that Sony has been receiving nothing but praise since February and Microsoft.. well...

"Big companies need to stay nimble, and not be afraid of making radical changes. If you don't, others will and you will loose eventually!"

You mean like the Cell processor? Yeah.

**EDIT** @Mr. Beatdown: +Bubbles for Well Said.

trafalger4315d ago (Edited 4315d ago )

dragonknight,
"The PS4 is the result of listening to the feedback of 8 years of PS3 life. Of having to deal with the trolls complaining about B.S. like PSN maintenance and download speeds. About having to deal with people who aren't developers, and people who are, saying that the PS3 was too difficult to develop for. The PS4 has everything a gamer could possibly want, and everything a developer needs, to be great. Exactly what feedback have Sony not listened to in development of the PS4?"

why do you think sony finally listened? money. it is about money and marketshare. the ps2 was also very difficult for developers but sony didn't care, they dominated. then they took this arrogant attitude designing the ps3 and trying to get loyal gamers to shell out $600 for a game system and using that large userbase they acquired over the years to fight hddvd. again, it's about money.

its funny how you think m$ only cares about filling there own pockets yet you think sony only cares about you. as a ps3 gamer we got shafted early on with multiplat games because sony didnt give out great developer tools and made a system that benefited them. the ps4 would also follow the same philosophy if it wasn't from losing faith from 3rd party developers and losing a lot of their previous marketshare. again it is also about money.

when the ps2 was the lead platform why would sony care how difficult the system was to make games on? did sony care the ps3 was difficult and cost more money for game developers? no, not until gamers started to complain why a more expensive system got an inferior product (not talking about exclusives) and saw 3rd party publishers favor the x360. what a coincidence, the ps4 is the first console of theres where they talk to game developers of how to build a game system. it just so happened to be in a generation where competition was way more fierce. if the ps3 dominated the ps4 would not have a pc type of architecture.

why is sony being so indie friendly? its because they want exclusive deals. again its about money. the same tricks m$ pulls with dlc and times exclusive deals your so eager to blast them for.

http://www.forbes.com/sites...

sony is paying for exclusivity rights.

they are all in it for the money.

"Of having to deal with the trolls complaining about B.S. like PSN maintenance and download speeds"

so anyone who questions why downloads take longer on the ps3 compared to there x360 are trolls? anyone who asks why psn has so many maintenance downtimes compared to xbox live are trolls? any developer who struggles on the ps3 are trolls too? wow, you really do live in a glass house.

what i find most interesting of all is after all of these changes m$ has done, after all of the games being shown they thought m$ never cared about, that sony fanboys still have nothing good to say about it. if sony fanboys care so much about games being the main focus of what a game system should have why do we rarely if ever see any comments from sony fanboys actually talk about xbone games? this goal posts shifting all over the place is getting old.

you would think that now that we are getting down to crunch time, the systems are coming that all of this nonsense would cease. that the games being shown would be what the talks would be now. but no, fanboys still have wounds that apparently never heal.

rainslacker4315d ago (Edited 4315d ago )

No one is saying they aren't allowed to adjust their policies. People are just saying they shouldn't have had the polices in the first place.

In this article, Spencer goes on about how the course of discussion between the customer and themselves is paramount. However, if that were the case, MS would have known what the consumer expectations were. What we got though was MS making their own expectations, with the consumer having very little part in it.

People, and Spencer himself, are infering that MS is an agile company. One that is able to quickly respond to consumer demands. However, the month between their reveal and E3 saw not a single shred of evidence that they were even considering it. Even their post conference interviews insisted it would be impossible. Then it took another month or so for them to realize they were going to fail with them in place.

I don't blame MS for trying to do the whole PR positive image thing now. Saying they're for the gamer and have our best interest in mind is pretty much par for the course. However, past actions go against this mindset in a very glaring way. The fact that Xbox fans themselves don't even notice it and only blame Sony fans for all of MS misfortunes is just enabling MS to act this way. Companies need to be held accountable for their actions, and it takes more than a couple positive press releases or contradictory interviews, which are easily scrutinized, to wash away the negatives.

Outside_ofthe_Box4315d ago

Wow, extremely well said MrBeatdown and lmao @ nukeitall!

madpuppy4315d ago

@nightfallfilms, malokevi

All corporations are cold, uncaring entities that care only about the bottom line. Sony is no better than any other successful company but, their climb was and is still in an environment of healthy competition with other companies vying for a chunk of market share in all their divisions, they learned that to get the most profit (eg= sales) they needed to understand their customers and "cater" to their needs. Microsoft, on the other hand was nurtured and hand held to a position of prominence by the worlds first high-tech monopoly IBM. until they bit the hand that fed them and became a monopoly themselves. most of their history is rife with either buying out competitors or crushing them with back door deals. they never had to compete on a level playing field with anybody and they never had to cater to customers because they were the only game in town (in the software industry) when they stated branching out into different industries they discovered that it is much more difficult to compete without a monopoly handicap. catering to customers needs is an alien concept to them. For MS, all this flip-floping is just growing pains while they learn how to function in a competitive environment with a strong willed consumer base (gamers) that will not tolerate corporate shenanigans.
They will stumble and fall, like they are doing now, but eventually, in time, they will become a company that will cater to the consumer.

and besides, all this is moot, Sony, MS, Nintendo, steam box, oyua and whatever other companies enter the gaming market are a good thing, they need each other for all the benefits that healthy competition brings to the table, keeps everybody on their toes and gives the gamers (us) the best value and variety.

ForgivenZombie4315d ago

Competition is good for everyone, I hope both systems do well because it will be good for gamers all around. The gaming industry would really be crap if any one console/company had a monopoly. Then they could dictate to us any changes they wanted to make.

Consoldtobots4315d ago (Edited 4315d ago )

@mad puppy

I like your explanation of how the PC market IBM created is what allowed MS to grow well beyond it's ability to compete in the industry. I disagree in them eventually becoming a consumer friendly company. I don't think they will survive all their blunders in the long run. THINK ABOUT IT, the only mild success they have had with any product in the last 10 years is the 360 and that's only AFTER throwing piles of cash at the division to first keep it afloat during the RROD fiasco and ultimately to compete with Sony by making the development community drunk with the wine of their timed exclusivity strategy. Windows 8 is an utter failure. If I were an investor my money would be headed a 1000 miles in the opposite direction from MS.

Sarick4315d ago (Edited 4315d ago )

That's not 100% true. Some people don't like the policies and methods Microsoft have used. It's not always about loving one brand or another.

When I look at the Sony brand I'm not totally in love or complacent to everything they've done either.

Does this mean other people are investing as in the same values I follow? No, I didn't like several changes and policy practices Sony made either. I liked plus when it was optional now that it's being changed I'm not to found of that.

So whats the difference? After all, I'm still swayed to the PS4. The difference is despite all the negatives there are ONLY 3 big name gaming consoles to choose from.

Microsoft
I think of Microsoft as the rich bully who looks for ways to constantly take my money. The one who changes tactics then when caught. This guy likes to cause trouble and uses every advantage possible to take out his rivals.

Nintendo
I see Nintendo as the guardian. They have their little house that I live in. They provide me with entertainment on a level that offers some protection from the harsh online environment. It's truly a unique as it limits the online experience. I love them as a whole, they do seem most fair in professional policy of the three. Unfortunately, I would like a more robust experience then their limited environment offers.

Last gen Nintendo simply didn't have much to offer me. It felt their agenda lacked enthusiasm for their products. Overall a I respect Nintendo this company. They try to be more like a family entertainment company then anyone else. Sometimes a little to much.

Sony
I see Sony as a charmer that's a nerd. He likes to make money but his methods aren't giving me a bloody nose. In fact I kind of like the guys style most of the time. When he wants to make money he chooses to weigh the factors of cost to quality. He always seems to add something of value for increasing the cost. Sometimes his ego gets inflated but hes a geek and all geeks like fancy or overpriced toys. He does like money but seems less aggressive. I see him as a valuable because he seems to have what I want.

Overall all companies are in it to make money. What is really upsetting is if the greedy anti-consumer monopoly duopoly or whatever succeeds. When we're given no choice but to follow that standard it'll be a sad day. I myself don't want standardized greedy policies that disrupt my hobby in a negative way.

I'm looking for a balance in value and content. I don't want useless gimmicks. I want to choose a product that produces content I enjoy. I don't want to deal companies that lie to get ahead through deceptive aggressive business practices, Want to milk every penny I have because they can, or one that tells me, "This is how we're doing and it's the future it DEAL WITH IT!"

Hopefully after reading this you have more insight. It's not always because of blind brand love and hate. There are legitimate factors that cause people to react. Some people don't want a bad influence taking a dominating foothold in the gaming market.

Ye,s there are gamers with insecurities (fanboys) but think about it. They love gaming and because they care about its future they feel the need to defend it.

This is just my two cents of an opinion. Don't take it personally because these feelings aren't after any single individual.

+ Show (17) more repliesLast reply 4315d ago
RedHawkX4316d ago ShowReplies(5)
firelogic4316d ago

MS: Always online
Sony: Not always online
MS: nevermind, not always online

MS: strict DRM
Sony: no DRM at all
MS: nevermind, no DRM at all

MS: No headset in box
Sony: Headset in every box
MS: nevermind, headset in every box

MS: Kinect is mandatory
Sony: PSEye is optional
MS: nevermind, Kinect is optional

MS: Indies can't self-publish
Sony: Indies can self-publish
MS: nevermind, indies can self-publish

Yup, you're a really strong company. I'd respect you more if you actually stuck to the vision you had in place that took well over 5 years to plan and implement than to just turn around and scrap everything you worked for.

Kryptix4316d ago (Edited 4316d ago )

Well said, to say that Microsoft did the 180s for the fans is being delusional. First it was the low pre-order numbers and then because Sony had a clear vision with many aspects of their future. I didn't agree with what Microsoft was doing because of the confusion and barely any explanation to their choices, but they blindly let their plan get blurred and forgotten and ran with what Sony is doing instead. Rather go with the console that is always one step ahead, than the one that goes 2 steps backwards.

darthv724315d ago

Its like sony did some kind of jedi mind trick on MS.

MS: Let me see some identification

Sony: You dont need to see his identification

MS: We dont need to see his identification

lol

Freedomland4315d ago

@firelogic

Man, you shot in between the legs.
Who will not agree to this even X1 fanboys know it.

Unlimax4315d ago

This proves how cheap this company is when it comes to where the gamers money goes .. Thank you Sony for showing their true colors !

madpuppy4315d ago (Edited 4315d ago )

I think that when Steve Ballmer looked over the pre-order numbers, he visited the Xbox campus personally to give them a pep talk, let's just say that if Ballmer is upset 5 year plans mean nothing. I mean, look at him, imagine having to calm a raging Steve Ballmer?!?!

http://androidandme.com/wp-...

insomnium24315d ago

@firelogic

Great comment! Bubs up

@darth

AHHHAAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAAAA!!! Thank you for the laugh. Bubs up for funny.

pyramidshead4315d ago

It doesn't honestly get any clearer than that to be honest.

While the tone a little harsh the statement held merit.

Also can people stop reading this N4g post sick of seeing Spencer's gurn on the top row, it's unsettling :/

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4315d ago
2cents4315d ago

Stay classy Microsoft. Good to hear some decent comments instead of trying to sling the filth back over the wall at Sony.

Biggest4315d ago

If they had it to fling, they'd be flinging.

Speaking of flinging. . . Fighter Within gameplay.

ziggurcat4315d ago

it's amazing that people criticizing sony for gettign a few jabs in here, and there forget this:

http://files.xboxic.com/xbo...

so, yeah... "stay classy microsoft."

MRMagoo1234315d ago

classy microsoft lol if they had anything at all bad to point out about the ps4 it would be the hot topic in every gamer site in the world but alas MS has no ammo

@biggest

"Speaking of flinging. . . Fighter Within gameplay." that comment there made me laugh so much i wheezed like an old man loli bubbled you up for funny.

2cents4315d ago (Edited 4315d ago )

This is going to be a very interesting generation of console gaming indeed.

Sony have set the tone and the Sony minions are in full swing, lol at all of ya.

While your all stupidly and blindly follow the PS4, I will be in gamer heaven with both!

Haha. Sucks to be so narrow minded.

Ryse
Forza
Halo
Quantum break
Sunset OD
DR3
project spark
Kinect sports

Oh and a little game called Titanfall

Oh oh... And a certain free game called Fifa14

Plus the PS4 selection that you all know by heart.

Hmm who has the last laugh now.

But but but

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4315d ago
Godmars2904315d ago

More to so with pre-orders than "reacting to feedback".

I they had reacted to feedback changes would have been made before E3. Not after.

ZombieKiller4315d ago

I don't listen to MS when they talk about anything other than their games. Even then its tough to listen to people like Major Nelson...ugh. Major douche more like it....

Who cares? Honestly. Who cares about their opinion? I don't give them money for their opinion. I gave em money because I'm a gamer and like some games on that are on the 360. Could you guys imagine what the XBOne will be like with an expired Live subscription? When that thing expires you won't even be able to watch TV!

They're just finding more and more excuses to build their paywall higher. Can't watch TV? Renew! Can't play games? Renew! Can use Internet Explorer? RENEW! Renew renew renew....

Everyone acts like paying for online on ps4 is something we should be mad at...I call that damage control from butthurt fanboys. Why? Because the console isn't a paperweight without a subscription like the Xbox. You dont pay for PS+? Fine. You can still play certain games without it not to mention use all of the consoles features. Without Xbox live, you can't do anything with the 360 except SP games. YouTube doesn't even work ffs....AND YOUTUBE IS FUCKING FREE....seriously how retarded is that?! Yet Xbox fanboys are all over us about paying to play online...haha OK. Keep trolling us while we all play the free games that Sony has been giving us....oh and it isn't a measly 2 free old games every month riddled with ads for dlc. This month being a PRIMARY EXAMPLE. PS+ gave me hitman absolution. Xbox live: Dead Rising 2...really? I bought and beat that game years ago. The only reason they gave that game out is because they believe in DR3 pushing sales next gen due to its "exclusivity."

corvusmd4315d ago

You have proven over and over that you're just a troll, nothing more. You never have anything factual or intelligent to say, you always just want to talk trash based on nothing. Were you not hugged enough as a child or something? Do you need attention? Or are you really just so intimidated by people actually liking the XB1 that you feel you need to constantly try to brainwash people with false trash talk so that they do not disagree with your "perfect" opinion? If you really felt that MS/XB1 was as doomed as you say they are, you wouldn't feel the need to kick them while they were down...it'd be like kicking a mentally handicapped kid after he fell and broke his helmet....in all honestly you just come off as pathetic and threatened.

HammadTheBeast4315d ago

All that stood out from that wall was that you compared MS/XBO to a mentally handicapped kid....

What is wrong with you?

Xbox One day One.

ZombieKiller4315d ago

No because being handicapped isn't the persons fault. Xbox knocked themselves down dude. For years its been about money to them more than its been about games.
The only time Microsoft changes policies or gives out free games is when it feels threatened by Sony doing it "just because"

corvusmd4315d ago

ZombieKiller, is this your first generation being a gamer? And are you really that blind to think that Sony gives away games and systems for free? And that Sony does the bare minimum that it can to get gamers to like them...instead of making a good network, they will give away old games that no one liked or already beat years ago for free....pay attention to Sony, it's all about numbers...the bigger numbers they can throw into your face the better...when you look at the details, the DEAL really isn't that great.

Hicken4315d ago

Of all people, corvus saying someone is a troll with nothing factual or intelligent to say?

I've seen more BS in your comments than the last five presidential elections combined.

ZombieKiller4314d ago

Your comments fail miserably Corvus. How can you call me blind and say I have no factual evidence when in my last comment I STATED what each system gives me? As a matter of fact nimrod, I stated alot in my comment with my YEARS (since before the NES) of experience as backup to my opinion. Hence my bubbles vs yours. Guess thats "everyone elses fault" huh? Douche. Then you go on to call me a fanboy after saying I have both and pretty much "proving" it by stating those facts? Seriously dude, what the hell are you so butthurt about that you have to comment on something someone said over the internet like that? Did I hurt your precious lil xbox's feelings? Did it go running to hide behind a paywall? How is the value of the ps+ vs xbl NOT an obvious fact proving my point? Instead of presenting a REAL argument, you mindlessly insult me with half assed, wanna be jokes that have been recycled more times than the COD engine....How does not getting hugged enough as a kid warrant a valid opinion abut gaming? You KNOW what I said was true and so does everyone else in here. Hence the agrees.
I don't hate the Xbox because I'm a gamer, I hate microsoft for knowing I'm a gamer and taking advantage of me. YOU are the one here without any factual evidence here, YOU are the one that has nothing intelligent to say, and you are the one coming across as being the douche...or should I say "pathetic and threatened".

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4314d ago
showtimefolks4315d ago

i am a sony fan and laughed when andrew house took that jab, but if MS truly believed in their original vision than they should have stuck with it. Yes early on it would have been tough but you advertise and deliver a clear message

but like MS's old habits the moment they saw sony/ps4 dominating they gave up their vision and now xbox one is a less powerful version of PS4 but costs $100 more

ZombieKiller4315d ago

Corvus your reply to my message was so retarded I won't even reply with a real reply. I'll just let all the disagrees and depleting bubbles on your behalf, do the talking for me.

You are seriously retarded. PLEASE do NOT buy a ps4. We don't need idiots like you on the PSN.

By the way, I've probably been gaming since you we're a mistake in your mothers eyes. Don't act like you know me or anything about gaming after that comment.

4315d ago
Retroman4315d ago

gamers not blind damn sheeps anymore.

anyone buy x1 is a DAMN fool
enough said.

4315d ago
donman14315d ago

Plus the fact they were... still are getting killed with the majority of early adapters pre-ordering the PS4 over the XboxOne. So yes, they were forced to change directions to stop the bleeding or try to.

sak5004315d ago

LOL look at the SDF trying desperately to negate anything related to MS.

Back in 2006, Ken said, People will do 2 jobs to be able to afford Ps3..None of these blind followers said anything but general non sheep gaming public showed them with their wallets. Sony started offering free HDTVs with ps3, then not one but 2 price drops even before 360 had a price drop. Ports were removed, things were cut down from ps3 and yet the above sheep keeps following their cult leaders blindly.

MS preempts the complaints of people before launch and yet these idiots like ham-mad are criticizing MS's decisions.

GO MS throw some more crying sdf kiddies in fire.

HammadTheBeast4315d ago (Edited 4315d ago )

Shouldn't you be buying a 360 or petitioning for DRM back or something?

sak5004315d ago (Edited 4315d ago )

I already have 2 xbox360 and petitioning for bringing DRM back on XBOXone was being done by u guys the SDF loyalists as the new changes by MS made your uber super duper computer entertainment sytem/hybrid world peace negotitor, technological marvel superior being/cyborg PS4 look like gameboy.

Jazz41084315d ago (Edited 4315d ago )

Sony has the most to be afraid of as they have made so many mistakes latley the ps4 if it fails even with vita numbers would be the end of sony. Sony has to much riding on this gen and there fans are feeling it to. Im so sick of hearing the negative rudder about ms I canceled my ps4 preodder yestersay along with kz and put the money on my xboxone preoreder and more games and guess what I will not look back as I enjoy games not listening to hate especially coming from sony on the main stage. I hope the ps4 does well for the industry and my story here is how sony and its fans talked me out of a paid preorder.

ZombieKiller4314d ago

Dude you not getting a ps4 because of fanboy attitude not only makes you look like a fanboy, but is no loss to anyone but you. Seriously, is that supposed to punish us or something? That's like your kid doing something bad, and you beating the shit out of someone else in front of him saying "let this be a lesson to you"
SMFH. Do YOU. Don't let others influence you like that.

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 4314d ago
user74029314316d ago (Edited 4316d ago )

i dont call humiliation upon yourself strength received.

iamnsuperman4316d ago (Edited 4316d ago )

I am sorry but this irritated me

"We built a platform for gamers"

After a huge backlash for a policy that wasn't really for us and the fact that your first Xbox One showing had the multimedia functionality as its focus. It may be a platform for gamers now but it wasn't built like that from day one

LOGICWINS4316d ago (Edited 4316d ago )

Microsoft cares more about how the Xbox One sells during the next 6-7 years as opposed to how it does Day 1. The general public that will be buying an Xbox One in 2014 and beyond will have no idea these changes occurred. Whether it was built for gamers Day 1 or not, 98% of the people who buy this thing will believe the way it is Day 1 is the way its always been.

Perception is reality.

What WILL hurt MS however is that they aren't reaching as many territories as Sony...and the fact that PS Plus offers a much better value to gamers.

Xsilver4316d ago

tell that to the Xbox fanboys who ill say it was the future of gaming u know lets take away ur rights because that's what i want from the future less freedom.

GiantEnemyCrab4316d ago

The idea of being able to access your entire game library on any console was the vision. DRM is required but what MS proposed was a bad idea.

I think they need to follow more of what Steam is doing.

Xsilver4316d ago

an option would of just been better that forcing it.

Biggest4315d ago

Just out of curiosity, GiantEnemyCrab, whats is keeping people from accessing their entire download library from any console? I've been doing that for 6+ years on the PS3. How is that a vision and past/present reality at the same time?

JamieL4315d ago (Edited 4315d ago )

@ Biggest
What are you talking about?
You're saying you can come to my house and access and play all of you disk based games? Or even the ones on your hard drive simple from signing in as yourself? I have never seen this happen, I think that's a BS lie.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4315d ago
Anon19744316d ago (Edited 4316d ago )

I agree with iamnsuperman.

In the long run I think it's a good thing that Microsoft has been listening to feedback. That's great, as Logicwins pointed out. The long game needs to be considered.

But consider this. If you hire two contractors to do a job, which one is better? The one that does the job right the first time or the one that get's it wrong multiple times, but accepts feedback well, takes it to heart and shows improvement?

Which one are you going to trust with your investment in the long term? The point isn't that Microsoft is showing that they're flexible, the point is they're only being flexible out of necessity because they keep botching subsequent tries. It doesn't exactly instill confidence in those paying attention, and those paying attention are the early adopters. While the long game is important, the console that looks the strongest out of the gate can help shape consumer opinion going forward.

darthv724316d ago (Edited 4316d ago )

I will agree but, the phrase, 'you want something done right...do it yourself' could fit in there at some point.

As a contractor, you dont really know if its done right the first time without knowing what the customer really wants. They can change their view at any time.

So being able to listen to feedback and make changes per the feedback and still finish the job is good too.

Sitdown4316d ago

Your scenario needs to be adjusted the contractors never did the job, they were on the blueprint phase.... nothing has been built.

Biggest4315d ago

I'm pretty sure they're already building PS4s. The consumer may not have access, but it's already built.

Mr-Dude4315d ago

Indeed, if gamers, media (and also thanks to Sony) hadden't reacted like they did on their old policies (DRM, Always Online etc) then things wouldn't have changed like it did, and the XBONE would still be what MS first intention was...

That's what keeps bothering me, that they even tried to do these things.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4315d ago
corvusmd4315d ago

Take a step back maybe...I like the way that someone else put it about a week ago. When you go to a car dealer, they don't tell you that the car can go from point A to point B...that's a given...what they do tell you about is all the new bells and whistles...maybe how it gets better gas mileage, or more horsepower, or that it has GPS...etc. When MS revealed it's console, maybe they were taking a similar approach....it's not that they didn't show games or talk about it's ability to do so...in fact they did quite a bit, people are just blowing how much they talked about other stuff out of proportion...maybe watch it again. That'd be like judging PS4 for only showing a controller.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4315d ago
ZBlacktt4316d ago (Edited 4316d ago )

Nice super spin explanation by him, lol. Yeah, for the gamers. Until we looked at our pre order sales charts.

Can't be honest not even once... Use high end computers to show their games at E3. Plant people in the audience to clap...

oh, butt hurt disagreeing Xbox person.... it doesn't matter the console you like. But be honest with yourself first.

negative4316d ago (Edited 4316d ago )

you people really need to get over yourselves

Show all comments (195)
220°

Phil Spencer Teases 2026 As A "Really Special Year" For Xbox

2026 will mark the 25th anniversary of Xbox, and Phil Spencer has teased it as a "really special year" for the games division.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
TheEroica2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

You got downvotes by pathetic gamers for feeling hopeful about good games coming out next year. Imagine how small your brain must be to downvote someone excited for future gaming joy? It is pretty neat to see people's world view blow up in front of them as they realize Microsoft has put themselves in a driver's seat that Sony hasn't been able to touch all generation.... What's even more pathetic is the same people downvoting you are the same people wishlisting Microsoft games on their ps5s 😂

P_Bomb2d ago

“Imagine how small your brain must be to downvote someone excited for future gaming joy?”

My dude your post history shits on EVERYTHING. You never have a good thing to say about anything lol! 🤣

PanicMechanic2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

“Getting ready for those GaaS reveals! Sony is a shadow of themselves this gen.”

You literally said this a couple of days ago. Start applying the clown make up, you hypocritical jester

derek2d ago

Yep we'll see, they have alot releasing next year.

RaidenBlack2d ago

NGL, next year might be one of the best years in gaming ... starting off with RE9 and GTA VI ...
and then all the good games that's been cooking
Pragmata, Sands of Time, Saros, Gears E-Day, 007 First Light, Blood of Dawnwalker,
Mortal Shell II, Onimusha, Marvel1943: Rise of Hydra
current-gen only Infinity Ward's CoD, Duskbloods
+ My guess: Wolverine, Exodus, Mudang, Crimson Desert, Clockwork etc ...
~ seems like it might get too stacked

1Victor2d ago

@rokos:”Hopefully “
I downvoted you not for been hopeful but because I have seen the same “NEXT YEAR WILL BE SPECIAL “ comment for the last 10+ and hasn’t seen anything special from Microsoft.
I hope next year will be the one that everyone been waiting for since the last 3 years of the Xbox 360, it have to be after over $80 billions spent on acquisitions.

Lightning772d ago

So the new excuse is they don't count because it's from the ABK now huh. I guess all those 3rd party games count even less because they don't own them. According to your always crappy logic.

InUrFoxHole2d ago

Lol. You haven't seen anything special? Do you even game?

OtterX2d ago

Always with the "next year..."! 😂

neutralgamer19922d ago

I don't know they have delivered this year and even last year. And they have a lot more content in the pipeline right now than anyone else. We can't just keep hating on MS

Indiana Jones
South of midnight
Avowed
Flight simulator
Hell Blade 2
Minecraft update
Gears of war reloaded
Indian Jones:expansion
Gears E day
Clockwork revolution
Fable
Doom the dark ages
The outer worlds 2
Grounded 2
Call of duty

OtterX2d ago

How many of those titles were just buyouts of companies that were going about making their games anyways? *Throws cash - "Oh look what we made!"

dveio2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

This list, that's been posted again, and again, and again in every single topic like this, contains almost nothing, literally almost nothing from Microsoft's own creational thoughtprocess.

It's a bunch of former 3rd party IPs.

Now even slowly returning to Playstation in some cases like Indiana, Hellblade, probably Starfield soon too, after they were made exclusively to Xbox on purpose.

Due to Microsoft's lack for own IP material except Halo & Forza. Which, the lack of, was the sole reason for all of it to happen in the first place anyway. Please don't pretend it wasn't.

And just look at all the games that come from Obsidian alone.

You really think Obsidian wasn't already working on Avowed and South of Midnight even without Microsoft buying Zenimax?

Microsoft delivered nothing but cheques.

OtterX2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

@dveio THIS. Lol, this dude thinks Call of Duty wouldn't exist without Microsoft! smh 😂

neutralgamer19922d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Common narrative I see often — that Microsoft shouldn’t get credit for the games its studios release because they “just bought them.” But this viewpoint ignores key context and sets a double standard that other platform holders aren’t held to

No one is saying these games wouldn't exist at all without Microsoft. But let’s not pretend that having a trillion-dollar company backing a studio doesn’t make a massive difference. Obsidian never had AAA funding before the Xbox acquisition. Pillars of Eternity was crowdfunded, and their resources were always stretched thin. Now they’re working on Avowed, with proper support behind it.

Ninja Theory’s Hellblade: Senua’s Sacrifice was made by around 20 people, using borrowed equipment and doing mocap in a boardroom. It was a passion project held together by tape and willpower. Today, Hellblade II exists because they were given resources, time, and freedom — something many developers don’t get unless they’re owned by a company that believes in their vision.

ZeniMax (Bethesda’s parent company) was in real financial trouble before the Microsoft acquisition. Reports and insider accounts have pointed out how much they needed a cash infusion. And while some people want to write off Xbox’s ownership of Bethesda titles, they forget the alternative could have meant layoffs or even closures.

The same goes for Activision Blizzard. Would you really prefer the company to stay under Bobby Kotick, after all the documented workplace misconduct and toxic leadership issues? Say what you want about Microsoft, but their acquisition brought accountability and change to a company that desperately needed it.

At the same time, Xbox gets hated on for doing what every major company does. Sony bought Housemarque, Bluepoint, Insomniac — but no one says Spider-Man 2 “doesn’t count” because of that. Why does Xbox get treated differently for acquiring struggling or undervalued developers and giving them a chance to thrive?

And the idea that Xbox locks games away is outdated. They're pushing cross-platform releases, cloud gaming, Game Pass, and backward compatibility more than any other platform holder. They're not forcing all studios into live service. If anything, their upcoming lineup is less GAAS-heavy and more focused on narrative and creativity — Avowed, South of Midnight, Clockwork Revolution, Fable, Perfect Dark, Towerborne, and others show real variety.

Whether people like it or not, Xbox is now the biggest publisher in the industry and owns the most gaming IPs. But what matters more is how they treat their studios. Most of these teams were previously stuck making AA games with limited scope — now they’re getting the tools and support to aim higher.

So when people say “Microsoft didn’t make those games,” they’re missing the point. It’s not about who started the studio — it’s about who enabled them to do their best work. You don’t have to love Xbox to admit they’ve helped a lot of developers and are taking a player-first approach.

Instead of writing off everything they do, maybe try recognizing the good they’re doing for both devs and gamers. At the end of the day, we should want more studios to succeed — no matter who owns them

BeHunted2d ago

I'm surprised Clockwork Revolution (BioShock meets Dishonored) isn't getting more media attention. The game looks interesting and reminds me of the old RPG games.

anast2d ago

The only good game on that list is Flight sim. The rest are either average or will be average. It's not a good look for MS.

TheEroica2d ago

My god.... Look how many comments are upset about microsoft's successes... 😂 This may be my new favorite thread. Not one gamer saying thanks for all the goodness coming their way, just bitter anger and downvoting the very games they themselves will purchase throughout 2026.... Sony really worked you guys over this generation.... Condolences.

DivineHand1252d ago

@neutralgamer1992 You said what needed to be said.

I have heard for years from older gamers that fanboys are the biggest issue with any fanbase. They will defend or gloss over negative news as long as the correct logo is on the box and they bash the competing platform no matter how much good they are trying to bring.

Right now their advocacy for PlayStation is elevating that platform so high that Sony no longer believes they need to do anything to satisfy their loyal fanbase like they did in the PS4 days.

I just hope most of them will eventually start advocating for themselves and encourage others to do the same. No one should blindly support one platform because these companies do not care about anything other than profit.

neutralgamer19922d ago

Hunted

And first proper game done by the studio with proper AAA budget and saying it will be released when ready

Anast

I believe we went through this before that you are objectively wrong. Meta critic, user reviews, game sales. In Playstation top 10 best selling games were 5 from Microsoft studios

Otter

No this dude is saying so many other studios wouldn't be thriving without MS money and people would be getting abused physically and mentally with Bobby kotick and his side kicks

Also maybe look up how the original founder of Bethesda and zenimax was kicked out of his own company by his best friend lawyer. So that was always a shady place and had been struggling financially before MS paid a premium of almost 7 billion

Eroica

I use to be a die hard Playstation fan and now I only have a Pc. I see how these fans are so toxic. They just can't handle any positive news regarding Xbox. When the best selling games on playstation are Xbox titles. Look at Forza horizon being best seller and that's years old game by MS. I guess ms don't deserve credit for that success too since they are the only company in gaming making acquisitions

Forget the fact Sony paid 3.6 billion for bungie and MS 6.9 for zenimax. Which investment has turned out better

Destiny and marathon with a lot of controversy

While zenimax output is nothing short of amazing compared to what bungie has released

crazyCoconuts2d ago

Yeah it's tricky. "Xbox" has morphed to mean different things to different people.
Console, now Windows, GamePass, and the cross platform games. There's a mix of attitudes towards all those things individually, and maybe an overarching attitude towards MS. But can't argue that the game companies MS recently bought continue to flourish, and GamePass PC has been a great value over the last year.

InUrFoxHole2d ago

@OtterX
You're the dude mad at your exes new guy. She's with someone else... get over it.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 2d ago
Lightning772d ago (Edited 2d ago )

They've had good output so far. So waiting for those games shouldn't be a problem.

Who cares if they're buy outs of companies or whatever excuse you want to make. They're games that are being distributed to other console. Play the games and enjoy it instead of fanboying or complaining.

ocelot072d ago

They going to be a he best and biggest publisher on Xbox, Playstation and PC next year. They not really said anything about Switch 2 though spite claiming to be big supporters.

quenomamen2d ago

If you call making one last Xbox before going full Sega, as Great. Then yea.

TheEroica2d ago

Doesn't feel like you're paying attention to what's happening.

RhinoGamer882d ago

It will be, his net work will hit 50 million and he plans to buy a new mansion in Cape Cod. Thanks everyone! #failup

Show all comments (39)
330°

Phil Spencer 'Very Excited' About Xbox Handheld Plans For 2025

With ASUS seemingly teasing an Xbox handheld last week, there's been a lot of talk about the device in the days ever since, and Xbox boss Phil Spencer has also teased something to do with handhelds happening in 2025

Read Full Story >>
purexbox.com
neutralgamer199268d ago

I really hope this isn't a windows based device even though coming from MS that's highly unlikely. SteamDeck is much much easier to use and offers a much better user experience than any other handheld device because it's all based on steam app. The Xbox handheld should be based on that because a Windows device with a 7-8 inch screen makes it's difficult to navigate

darthv7268d ago

Coming from Asus... its going to be an Xbox branded ROG Ally.

neutralgamer199268d ago

That's fine but hopefully it will be a Xbox app based instead of windows

VenomUK68d ago (Edited 68d ago )

When the casual market learn that there’s going to be an Xbox branded Asus handheld they will cancel their Nintendo Switch 2 preorders and get the Asus. No it won’t have exclusive games like Super Mario or Zelda or Metroid or Pilot Wings or Mario Kart or Animal Crossing or Donkey Kong or Pokémon or Super Smash Bros - but who cares as it will have access to the entire library of the Steam Store running on Windows. It will also have access to Game Pass with all the modern day classics like Avowed, Hellblade II and Grounded and Pentiment.

I think we all have to acknowledge that after all the criticism of Switch 2 on ResetEra it’s evidence that it will fail to sell and the Asus will outsell it. Dreamcast pushed Sega out of hardware, we all have to accept that the perfect storm of Switch 2 pricing, an Xbox-branded Asus and Phil Spencer and Aaron Greenberg’s persuasive promotion will likely kill off Switch 2 within a month. AND YOU CAN QUOTE ME ON THAT.

FinalFantasyFanatic68d ago (Edited 68d ago )

@VenomUK,
I don't think that even has a remote chance of happening, Nintendo has so much brand loyalty, even with the backlash on their not so great pricing, I still think it's going to sell, Xbox doesn't have as much brand loyalty. Plus, if it's just Xbox branded ROG Ally or something similar, why not just choose a ROG ally or Steam Deck? They can both do everything that an Xbox branded handheld can. If Xbox is going to compete in the world of windows based handhelds, it has so much competition, it's going to struggle.

You're way too optimistic about the Xbox handheld and the demise of the Switch 2, I'm going to predict the opposite and say the Switch 2 will demolish the Xbox handheld in terms of sales/popularity.

S2Killinit68d ago

@VenomUK
Not sure if sarcasm or satire.

VenomUK68d ago

@S2Killinit Satire. I’m not going to hate on people for being excited for a new console. But what is happening in the Xbox community is something wicked, content creators are hyping up the Asus to their audience about how great this thing is, and how it will be more powerful than the Switch 2 and the Steam Store outweighs any advantage the Switch 2 has with its library of games. I don’t believe they believe it but they are grifting. By all means look forward to it but don’t sell it as a Switch 2 PS5 killer.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 68d ago
PanicMechanic68d ago

Steam Os is amazing. By far the best. Can’t imagine MS having an OS that can top it (CERTAINLY not windows)

crazyCoconuts68d ago

Well they're gonna try. They've already stated they've been working on it.

FinalFantasyFanatic68d ago

Windows as is, isn't a great experience for a handheld, they really need to make a dedicated handheld OS, unfortunately they've always been hellbent on making a single product for both PC/touch screen use.

I really can't imagine them making something that stands up to Steam OS, it just works so well.

RaidenBlack68d ago (Edited 68d ago )

This is not their in-house made Xbox handheld for next-gen, which is slated for release in 2027 alongside with the next Xbox console, which might run a version of their usual Xbox-ified OS optimized for the handheld.
This is just a brand collab to produce an Xbox branded updated Asus RoG Ally (Project Kennan), which as usual ships with Windows. Think of it as the 5th main competitor in handheld PC market, after Deck, Legion Go, Ally and MSi Claw (I know others exist, but these are the popular ones).
https://wccftech.com/xbox-h...
And RoG Ally didn't get an update this year like the Legion Go, so this Xbox-Asus one might be that?
Anyways, even with 2025 chip upgrade, the Legion Go underperforms compared to 2023 Ally and 2024 Ally X.

crazyCoconuts68d ago

It can't be anything but Windows if it has the Xbox brand on it. Outside of the politics (which would be a showstopper), SteamOS/Linux can't run GamePass natively due to the crazy protections implemented by the Windows Store.

neutralgamer199268d ago

I am not asking the Xbox handheld to run steam, I just wanted a dedicated Xbox app on the handheld that handles everything from playing games, downloading games, gamepass and most importantly all updates are done from that app. Just a better overall user experience

Having to download multiple different things on a Windows based device becomes really a chore in a smaller screen.

crazyCoconuts68d ago

Having the windows handheld auto launch the existing Xbox Windows app will accomplish everything you mentioned, and I'm sure that's what this will be.
Fact is that MS will need to add a lot into that app to incorporate all the system level controls Steam incorporated into their handheld UI.

OmegaSoldati68d ago

Steam Deck for the win! Switch too.

Profchaos68d ago (Edited 68d ago )

It'll be windows all leaks indicate this is a windows based device with a Xbox skin it will integrate other storefronts because at its core it's windows.

@venom there's is no chance that parents will be buying their kids a rog ally setting up steam and other storefronts over a Nintendo switch 2 at Christmas.

That's a mass amount of hopium there.

Portable PC's in total have barely cracked six million sold the switch 2 will continue to dominate the casual crowd all known about it and news of a switch successor has already started spreading in mainstream media

neutralgamer199267d ago

I think switch 2 will do well but dominate I think we need to wait and see. The prices of the console and games is much more than switch so don't expect parents in this inflation time to spend $600 on 2 games and a console. Since it's Nintendo it should sell but I think we are underpaying the importance of the inflated market

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 67d ago
anast68d ago

Every inch of this things is going to be a subservice.

Aloymetal68d ago

And an even bigger flop in the making, it's like they're just throwing crap at the wall and see what sticks or rather find another ''clever'' way to keep squeezing more money from the already miniscule and gullible fanbase. Smfh.

Reaper22_68d ago

Squeezing money. Isn't that what sony is doing with tbe ps5pro. And what about all those remakes and locking some ps4 games to a subscription.

ABizzel167d ago

At first I thought this was a huge mistake on MS part. But after thinking about this more and more, while I still don’t think it’s going to do anything beyond 10 - 20 million in sales, I think that’s exactly what MS and ASUS are expecting and both are okay with.

I assume this is more of Asus saying to MS, look we have ten/twenty million of these handheld PCs already in production and we’ve only been able to sell a couple millions, partner with us and let’s brand them as Xbox handhelds ASUS will do all the heavy lifting so we don’t take a loss on all these, and all MS has to do is market the platform and put your logo, the new Xbox OS/app you’ve been working on, and together we’ll helps each other out and push more GamePass subscriptions.

That make complete logical sense as to why this came about, because otherwise….. So technically it would be a win:win for both companies, or a win for MS and a reduction of loss of ASUS, even if they only sell 10m - 20m units.

As for the handheld itself honestly, it should be solid and most likely based on the Rog Ally 7, but hopefully with the Rog Ally X case as that has a much better port and I/O layout. Plus if the Xbox OS is wayyyyyyy lighter than Windows then it should be a a good piece of tech getting more performance than the Ally 7 Windows version for around $499.

But that’s where the next problem comes into play…..Price. It’s Switch 2 all over again. The slight different is outside of the potential of DLSS, this should be a slightly more powerful handheld, especially if they create their own dock, but that dock will likely be sold separately meaning now we’re looking at $550 or more, for what will essentially be a docked Xbox Series S and a slightly more powerful SteamDeck / Switch 2 in handheld mode.

peppeaccardo68d ago

The Irrelevant-Held will be able to connect to the XFLOP Series X

anast68d ago

ha! It might last longer than the Stadia.

Profchaos68d ago

Basically what windows os turning into now every few weeks logging on I'm greeted with a hey how about some office 365 or your gamepass lapsed how about renewing and decline is in little blue writing while subscribe is a huge button

anast68d ago

This and I also get a pop up to subscribe to Xbox GamePass.

PanicMechanic68d ago

So smart of you caveman Phil sphincter. Did you get the memo on what Nintendo is releasing this year?

Kyizen68d ago

I dont trust Microsoft to build an OS for this looking at the Windows phone so I think this will be just Windows with a Steam like Big Picture mode locked in the UI to launch games.

Rockstar68d ago

This is good advice from Reaper here. I trust your advice and you've got my word...I wont buy it.

Thanks Reaper!

YourMommySpoils68d ago

Then don't complain about facts.

PanicMechanic68d ago (Edited 67d ago )

So in other words, it’s just another ROG Ally. I think MS has a winner🤣🤣

FinalFantasyFanatic68d ago

I remember when my sister bought a Windows phone, that thing was missing so many basic features, she didn't even own the phone for 3 months before getting frustrated and swapping it out.

Profchaos68d ago

I'll be honest I had a older relative that loved the windows phone cause it had a huge dial, contacts and camera button that was all it got used for.

Oh and it was bright green so easy to find

Moral of the story one person's trash is another's treasure

Reaper22_68d ago

Windows phones weren't the best but I also remember sonys phones didn't fare too well either. As a matter of fact they're newest ones aren't doing so great either. Not even in Japan. That says alot.

Profchaos67d ago

@reaper22 honestly Shane about the Sony phones to I brought the Xperia 3 when they announced remote play for it and it was one of the best ones I have had the battery lasted a few days the camera was some obscene 50mp but the physical design lagged behind Samsung and I think that was a huge reason it failed

Show all comments (60)
290°

Xbox Boss Phil Spencer Reassures Xbox Gamers Their Gaming Library Isn't Going Anywhere

Xbox's CEO Phil Spencer assures that, even though they are expanding to other platforms, Xbox gamer's libraries aren't going anywhere.

jznrpg117d ago

Phil, the words of a guy who only speaks the truth.

If I was an Xbox owner I wouldn’t feel comfortable with what he just said

crazyCoconuts117d ago

Reading his quote sounds like word salad. I'm not sure he said anything really.

darthv72117d ago

I'd rather him say more of our library will be made available now. It sucks to have so many 360 era games still stuck in limbo, especially Activision ones now that they are buddy buddy.

VenomUK117d ago (Edited 117d ago )

Sarah Bond had committed to backwards compatibility, so interpreting Phil Spencer’s quote, old Xbox games will always be playable with a PS3 on PSN like cloud solution, and on new hardware if a new Xbox console is ever released.

https://metro.co.uk/2024/04...

wesnytsfs116d ago Show
Scissorman117d ago (Edited 117d ago )

why does this even need to be reassured? it really goes to show you how nervous there fanbase is.

Eonjay117d ago

Right. I was thinking the same thing. This shouldn't be some sort of 'benefit' for Xbox gamers as MS goes to Sony and Nintendo... This should just be implied. No matter where the games go in the future should have any impact on the purchased games libraries of current Xbox consumers.

pwnmaster3000117d ago

Yup no matter how much they say they don’t care, the fanbase care lol

Profchaos117d ago (Edited 117d ago )

What's left of them one the last 12 months I've seen Xbox consoles flooding second hand marketplaces and going for half of their RRP

In addition this interview the whole panel was clearly not believing the viewpoint but not wanting to offend their guest

LabRat116d ago

When (or "if") Xbox goes out of hardware those who don't play on Cloud or prefer hardware...where will they play their library?

PhillyDonJawn116d ago

Not the question. If you already gave the hardware and games. Why would it disappear?

Chocoburger117d ago

Ah yes, Phillip, the pinnacle of honesty, and he never changes his mind. We can all take his word for it without hesitation. 🤥

Profchaos117d ago

He did but in the follow up sentence he talked about charging pricing because they are a business so who knows maybe the next gen box has a fee to use their emulator service I imagine wine ports to a PC architecture

Show all comments (39)