majiebeast4186d ago (Edited 4186d ago )

Not impressed its like Ouya with a screen and prob alot more expensive at that. Lol it crashed multiple times and the pc connectivity didnt work.

tachy0n4186d ago (Edited 4186d ago )

its basically a PSVita for the PC platform it even has remote play but with the PC and has steam and the android market(google play store).

i recommend people to see the press conference when they show this thing.

SPAM-FRITTER-1234186d ago (Edited 4186d ago )

"its basically a PSVita for the PC platform"

Really? The Vita gets watered down ports of full retail titles with content missing and a different name.

This device is a portable PC/Console with the same games we play at our TV's, The PSVita is more of a portable Mini-Game device.

Day 1 for me. i have been waiting for a true hand held device that plays full AAA titles and works with my steam account.

tachy0n4186d ago (Edited 4186d ago )


somebody didnt read the article nor watched the press conference.

if you did you would understand what i said.

shield cant play full PC games on the go, only through nvidia's remote play, just like the PSVita with the PS3.

still the PSVita is better, since it has the OLED screen, games look better(PSVita is still the portable graphics king) and you can actually play REAL games on the go, unlike shield which will only play those crappy games from the android market(google play store) on the go.

if it could actually handle PC games on the go it would be a serious threat for the PSVita, but since it doesnt i smell a huge flop, and the sad part of this is that it looks like nvidia will spend the rest of 2013 supporting shield and mobile devices which is a huge slap to the PC gaming community since we were expecting the announcement of the GTX700 series video cards :(


im deeply sorry for that typo, is not from me its from Cnet lol

BattleAxe4186d ago

Looks interesting to me, can't wait to see the final product.

EddieNX 4185d ago

It looks like an irrelivant PoS

Vita and 3DS for the win...

geth1gh4185d ago (Edited 4185d ago )


Well crappy android market games to date, yes. Games possibly in the future? no.

Last I heard in the spring, the Terga 4 processor was supposed to have better graphical potential than the 360. Not sure how the ps3 holds up in comparison but it has to be extremely close, if it isn't better.

Last I checked vita didn't have the graphical power of the ps3.

So, game selection might be better on the Vita. Games that are developed for shield are gonna be much more polished and just better looking though.

sikbeta4185d ago (Edited 4185d ago )

It's kind of a mockup of those Xbox-portable rumors from years ago... and honestly, did Nvidia not saw what's happening with dedicated gaming handheld or what?

Doesn't matter if it runs Android or anything, people will not give a S#*T and procede buying Ipads + Galaxy tabs like they're doing right now

Oh... and doesn't look portable at all... guess Vita will share space with a new partner in the bargain-bin a couple of months from now

Zhipp4185d ago (Edited 4185d ago )

The Android market may not have many proper videogames as of yet, but as products like the Ouya and these gaming tablets grow more popular, they may attract the interest of big-name companies. After that it'll only be a matter of time before companies like EA begin to target Android(at least Tegra) for their multiplatform PC/Console titles.

EDIT: All the website says is that Shield has a retinal display, but it's going to ship for $400-$500 like I suspect, it'll probably have an IPS display. I personally prefer OLED for its true blacks, but a lot of people prefer IPS because they're considerably brighter than OLED/AMOLED, and their colors are more accurate as well.

MmaFan-Qc4185d ago

@SPAM-FRITTER-123 "The Vita gets watered down ports of full retail titles with content missing and a different name."

like what?

deadpoole4185d ago

I might buy this device after all as for the following reasons.

1. Gamepad is like proper gamepad with L1R1 and L2R2.
2. Second it supports native output and playback of 4K resolution video over HDMI.
3. Games aren't gonna cost fortune like other handheld devices.
4. Longer battery life.
5. Finally the real talent (which are freelance people) will be able to release games without the need of greedy publishers, scrutinizing/micromanaging studios and art hating/color hating/bunch of corporate high level staff who wouldn't know even how to play a game but rules and interferes or restrict talented skilled geniuses from bringing some new ideas in the gaming industry.

1. Screen ... is it an OLED/LED/LCD???
2. Will there be charge for accessing Tegrazone.
3. Latency when streaming game from PC.
4. Will u be able to stream just video games or can also stream video files/audio files???


4185d ago
deadpoole4185d ago


OLED is the future, colors can be calibrated to heart's content ... whereas on IPS Panel True Blacks cannot be achieved because any variance of LCD based tech simply cannot generate it at all. It is because of its lacking ability and dependence on light source being used in the back or side of the panel.

So yeah ... OLED is the true Successor of CRT tele when it comes in true blacks, colors and visual fidelity.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 4185d ago
SilentNegotiator4186d ago

"It's pure Android"

Sounds pure pointless, like all of those gamepad attachments for Android devices. Hardly any games make use of dual sticks (and well) because catering to the standard control - touch - is more cost effective.

metroid324185d ago

Stick with my wiiu HD6770 eats that gpu alive,and i can play on Gamepad.

DeadlyFire4185d ago

Its basically PC Remote play device like WiiU tablet controller. If they can show NVIDIA GRID + Shield then it might work out alright.

Only impressive feat I see is Tegra 4 outpowering OTON, Ouya, and Gamestick in the Andriod console market.

SilentNegotiator4185d ago (Edited 4185d ago )

I happen to have a HD6670 and it makes a punchline out of the Wii U.

But there are already plenty of devices that can steam this stuff. It doesn't take anything really special to stream content. I would save money and get what will probably be a cheaper android device and do the same thing with a cheap attachment.

What good is a Tegra4 for the 99.9% of low-demanding android games or even .1% of slightly demanding ones?

I didn't disagree, btw. I can appreciate that based on my comment you might think I didn't realize that part, since I didn't bother mentioning it.

tubers4185d ago

You do know that a pure android device gets up to date software support from Google directly.. There's also negligible to none bloatware.

At the end of the day, it's a better media consumption device than the VITA due to the industry standards the VITA lacks (HDMI, USB, microSD).

The browser will be much better too with html 5 support (Yes, it's android).

It all depends on competitive pricing for this new device of Nvidia.

Kevin ButIer4185d ago

Nvidia should push this tech along with a cellphone maker... i don't see the point of having a handheld console for this kind of service.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4185d ago
likeaboss3024186d ago

Actually it ended up working just fine and they did a couple game demos including connecting to Steam. Props to NVIDIA for doing a demo of what is clearly still beta hardware and software. It looks very promising.

zeal0us4186d ago

Won't be long before we start see those silly "PSVita/3DS killer" article.

EddieNX 4185d ago

This thing is nothing more than a Gizmodo. It makes me angry when people actually get excited about this junk.

like those shmucks who want an Ouya. It's $99 . And it's not even worth $99 at that.

Just go ahead people and buy these useless bits of junk. You and the other 325K people who ever buy one.....

CommonSenseGamer4185d ago

Big difference is that the tegra 4 urinates all over what the Vita can do.

shutUpAndTakeMyMoney4185d ago (Edited 4185d ago )

"Not impressed"

Doesn;t matter It's getting good press and reactions everywhere else.

"Project Shield is a Tegra 4 based console with a Micro SD card slot, a full sized HDMI port, and a MicroUSB port at the back of the controller."
I basically have a console streaming from pc to hdtv..

This plus steam box coming? nice!
Full conference for people who want to see.

rainslacker4185d ago

Almost all new devices get good press and reaction when they are announced, particularly when they are from a company like NVidia, which is continuously researching and developing some of the most advanced chips out there.

If this had been a proprietary console, similar to PS3, 360, Vita, 3DS, etc, then I would have been keenly interested, as it meant another competitor in the market.

As it stands, it's just a handheld droid device, of which I already have several. Likely being a very open platform means it's going to be hacked to all hell, which means very little developer support outside the indie scene. Much the way it is now.

tubers4185d ago


hacked? And so? THD will still continue like it did. Android games will still contiue as it did.

(Android/iOS gaming is steadily growing)

It's sure won't be as bad as a VITA getting hacked.. specially with waning dev support compared to 3DS/iOS/Android.

While you can say "just another droid". It's all relative.

The price is more concerning with this device.

ABizzel14185d ago (Edited 4185d ago )

Correction it's Ouya, but better (Tegra 4), that's probably more expensive, but also capable of running PC games via NVIDIA streaming.

Well see how much it cost, but I doubt it's be under $199 seeing how it uses Tegra 4.

More important to me is the design choice. It looks a lot like a MS portable concept. Hmmm. Is this a sign?

Haha1234185d ago

stream console games not ports, and get to play android games with an actual controller. damn time to get rid of my vita

tubers4185d ago

Depends on what you want. If you enjoy a more tradition handheld experience from Sony, you may still appreciate the VITA.

I'm actually interested to play Dead Trigger 2 on it: