190°

Far Cry 3 PS3 Install Size Revealed: 6.2GB

While the Blu-ray drive allows for huge gaming experiences that use up the whole 50GB that the discs can hold, an unfortunate side effect is that a lot of games have to have data installed on the PS3 because the data is read slower. Far Cry 3 is one such games, and PSLS can reveal that the game will take up a whopping 6.2GB.

Read Full Story >>
playstationlifestyle.net
ftwrthtx4534d ago

That's a big chunk of game.

dbjj120884534d ago

There are some incredible textures in the game (it seems) so that must make up a bulk of the data.

dazzrazz4534d ago

There are no incredible textures on consoles, everything is low details compared to pc. The only reason they force people to dump most of the game on hdd is extremely slow 2x speed blu ray mounted in ps3 units.

Foolsjoker4534d ago

Not a fan of this becoming the norm for games now.

Dasteru4534d ago (Edited 4534d ago )

@dazzrazz:

2x Blu ray = 9MB/s
Every 1x increase is a constant 4.5MB/s

Every 1x increase on DVD is 1MB/s max but alternates to nearly half at times.

The reason it needs to install data is because it is uncompressed to make use of the extra storage space on the disk.

More data to read = longer read time = installs to compensate.

rainkore4534d ago

That isn't too terrible. It's no World of Warcraft.

FanboyPunisher4534d ago

36GB I think its around these days..lol.

But thats a PC platform not PC. Desktops have tons of space and usually multi drives these days.

I'm getting Farcry 3 for PC def, wouldn't want to do injustice by playing it on console and seeing it in its lesser form.

Anon19744533d ago

It's always been a head scratcher for me why installs on PS3 are an evil thing, but no one bats an eye at mammoth PC installs, which we've been doing for decades. I don't know about the slims but it was one screw to remove my PS3 harddrive chassis and upgrade my drive. It's not like storages space should be a concern.

showtimefolks4534d ago (Edited 4534d ago )

dazzrazz

look man i wish PC gamers had their own sites because all any of you do is come on every article and talk about how superior the PC game is which it is. go enjoy it and leave the console gamers to our low textures and bad exclusives

i am sure you can enjoy halo 4,gears3,last of us,uncharted,god of war,zelda,mari etc,,,on PC oh wait

Farcry 3 looks stunning and i can't wait to get my hands on it. next tuesday mess effect trilogy and far cry 3

JoGam

lol sorry. and i wish you luck in that stay alive part lol

JoGam4534d ago (Edited 4534d ago )

Dude I can't wait till Farcry 33 comes out. Damn you seen footage too? Hopefully im still alive to see it launch. :-)

dirthurts4534d ago

Don't worry. Another year and the new consoles will be looming and things will be a little bit more balanced between pc and consoles again. For a few years.
Some console games do have fantastic textures. It's possible with the right engine.
Don't be dissing the consoles, especially when it's a platform neutral article.

MysticStrummer4534d ago

They do have their own sites, but how can they pretend to be superior if they go to those sites? Most people there have decent gaming PCs, and more than a few will have better tech than the garden variety N4G PC troll has.

chcolatesnw4534d ago

Well after spending 2k on mine i like the bragging rights come with it. And so do others. What if you had a Lamborghini and every neighbour in a 5 block radius had a pos wagon. I would drive up and down and in circles before and after work and every sunday so all them hill billies can see the shiny thing. Its human nature, and i welcome the negatives im going to get from the simple minded fanboys, in fact i embrace them, they make me laugh :DDDDDD

Autodidactdystopia4534d ago (Edited 4534d ago )

I wish console gamers had their own sites to go to all they do is come around here and bitch and discriminate against pc gamers. if you dont wanna hear it go enjoy your low rez stuff you love so much.

this website is for comments... good or bad its gonna happen. LOL

IDGAF about people i just like to argue

but i dont argue when im wrong, that would be....well... wrong.

Ju4534d ago

@chcolatesnw I'd think it's called immature, tbh.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4534d ago
dbjj120884534d ago

That's so much space. I don't mind deleting the install data of games I'm not playing anymore, but I didn't think my 160gb PS3 would fill up this fast.

Conzul4534d ago

http://www.newegg.com/Produ...

It's what I used. I recommend it so HIGHLY that I used capslock just there. That's how HIGHLY.

It'll hold all your PS+ games, your physical media installs, and a large photo/music/video collection to boot. I have a "Cinema" folder with HD movies that's reached 51GB. These drives also reduce loading screen durations, but won't really increase actual in-game fidelity/performance.

And when the PS4 comes out and has a sub-par HDD inside, just swap it with this one from your PS3.

BigStef714534d ago

Is that the highest you can upgrade your hardrive to? I was looking to get a new one for my ps3 but I wanted one that has a TB of storage capacity. What do you think?

Conzul4534d ago (Edited 4534d ago )

@BigStef71

Well they have one higher tiered model that's 8GBSSD/750GBHDD. That's actually the one I have. It costs ~$130 on newegg right about now.

In a PS3 system, about 690GB of that is recognized. Just go with that one. Totally worth it vs. a slower but larger drive.

insertcoin4534d ago

Sometimes I think the digital revolution is just a conspiracy by the hard drive manufacturers to force me to buy their products and waste my time downloading and deleting and downloading and deleting again.

ftwrthtx4534d ago

They want all of us to invest into their largest, most expensive HDs aruond.

ab5olut10n4534d ago

or in a $99 500GB drive. that too is a thing.

ftwrthtx4534d ago

I have a 500GB HD. It is down to 40GB free. I hate having to redownload games, so I need a bigger drive.

animegamingnerd4534d ago

why did sony ever feel the need for the installs on the PS3 i will never know why

bubblebeam4534d ago

Decreases load times, as Blu-ray reads slower than DVD.

I would love it if they gave the option to install every game. It really isn't a hassle. I just read the manual or get something to eat while it is installing, AND I put up with less issues in the game.

It's a win-win situation.

Siren304534d ago

I've never had a problem with installs either, I usually do my workouts while waiting so I don't feel guilty sitting several hours while playing the game.

animegamingnerd4534d ago

i see why but the problem i had with PS3 installs was that i have a old 40 gig PS3

bubblebeam4534d ago

@animegamingnerd

I understand. I'd hate to be the guy to suggest getting a bigger HD, as the 3rd party ones are very cheap.

I never had that problem myself, as I have an original 'Phat' PS3 (love saying that), and intalls weren't a big issue back then. I ended up buying a slim a few years later, and that's when installs became more popular.

The big boy only gets taken out when I need to play some old PS1 and PS2 games. It is in mint condition.

Oh_Yeah4534d ago (Edited 4534d ago )

Because for most games the ps3 needs them in order to keep performance up to par. The bluray drive spins at speeds of only 2x which is slow..so it needs help with streaming the data ya know? That's where the installs to the hard drive come in. Depends on the type of game and how it was coded also.. Such as God of War 3 which is around 40 gbs and it needs no install.

mushroomwig4534d ago

It's not Sony, it's the developers. Look at the Uncharted series, not a single install required.

Ben_Grimm4534d ago

Far Cry 3 is very different in terms of gameplay and design from the Uncharted series.

onandonandon4534d ago

Uncharted takes a few mins to start though

Norrison4534d ago

Uncharted is linear, far cry is open world, get some common sense.

Minato-Namikaze4534d ago

Infamous doesn't have installs does it?

floetry1014534d ago (Edited 4534d ago )

Infamous doesn't have to be reproduced on 3 different platforms with stricter publishing deadlines either.

Look at it logically. Far Cry 3 is a multi-platform title and unquestionably a much, much larger and more detailed world than either Infamous 1 or 2. Uncharted is made by a development team that know the console inside-out and better than anyone in the business because they produce games EXCLUSIVELY for it.

If people are annoyed by game installations (something that has been happening with games for almost 3 decades), then I weep for the future.

Ju4534d ago (Edited 4534d ago )

I'd guess there is a way to dynamically cache the data. But the fact is, both games load assets from HDD because it is quite faster. And yes, UC is easier to implement because it is linear. Try going backward in the game and you see some hick ups.

Using the HDD to cache data is a great idea. Pre-loading in an open world game makes the whole experience while playing a bit smoother. But true, Infamous2 is "open" and does not install, but probably does just what I mentioned. It dynamically caches textures when loading the first time. Would probably work with FC also, but gives you some "pop ins" at first (???). Level design can also a factor. How assets are placed in the world can make a difference. FC is very "random" in that aspect. Can be another reason that dynamically loading won't work. I'm just speculating, but there are just various reasons why things are implemented how they are.

@above. Ubi took the time to optimize the PS3 quite a bit. So your argument is invalid there. (see link above).

MariaHelFutura4533d ago

Yes Infamous 2 has an install, it is 1.3 GB/1300 MB. But yes, most PS3 exclusive games don't have massive installs.

SoundGamer4533d ago

Borderlands 2 didn't require an install on PS3 either.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4533d ago
AKS4534d ago

Why do you think a HDD was included with every single PS3? To give you some extra space to download porn?

Having a standard HDD can reduce load times and make things run smoother. It can also reduce the work the Blu-ray drive has to do. Try listening to the Blu-ray drive when you're playing a really demanding game that has no install. It tends to be very busy. I had a BD-ROM drive go out on me before. I'd much rather put the stress on the hard drive than have to replace a Blu-ray drive again.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4533d ago
Show all comments (56)
240°

Far Cry Has Become A Shadow Of Its Former Self

Following a series of repetitive games, a formulaic approach, and a disappointing last entry, the Far Cry series has been run into the ground.

Read Full Story >>
tech4gamers.com
JEECE279d ago

The trouble with most criticisms of this franchise is that they insist Far Cry 3 was the best game, but the things they claim to hate about the franchise are all the elements that 3 introduced.

Deeeeznuuuts279d ago

Couldn't agree with you more! I've always thought that, my personal favourite is two, the whole atmosphere, mystery, adrenaline, my vehicle steaming up because I've crashed too many times trying to escape and then getting in a shootout, having to pull a bullet out my arm while fire rages and bullets fly, can't beat it

JEECE279d ago

Yep, 2 is my favorite by far as well, and one of my favorite singleplayer games of all time. It was probably one of the last games Ubisoft made before they started homogenizing their franchises to be open world collect-a-thons with unnecessary RPG mechanics tacked on. I enjoyed 3 for what it was, but it was clearly an attempt to make the franchise appeal to a mass audience (which, in fairness, was successful).

LucasRuinedChildhood279d ago

That's not the issue. If Far Cry 3 never existed and they just made another 5 or 6 games that were increasingly generic copies of Far Cry 2 instead, would that make FC2 the real problem?

No. It's the lack of creativity and effort that followed that's the real issue.

And there are things that are genuinely different about FC3. Simple example - the story was easily the best. Best main villain by far too but it also has strong themes and wasn't afraid to explore controversial topics. The sequels are much blander.

Comparing the fun and creativity of Blood Dragon to the DLC in the sequels ... also says a lot about how Ubisoft fell off.

-Foxtrot279d ago

Yeah like even Far Cry 4 was decent, not as great as FC3 but they still gave us an interesting story, setting and villain. Pagan Min's random calls to Ajay were pretty funny.

They just got lazier and lazier, pumping them out while making it a little more streamlined each time. I mean Jesus, they gave us a silent protagonist with FC5 which really hurt the main story and are obsessed with pleasing everyone by trying to do two characters, male and female rather than just settling on one to tell the best story they can.

neutralgamer1992279d ago

I started FC6 and yes the game works fine but I just wssnt Fun. Do many Ubi games are huge playgrounds but feel empty and doesn't give the feeling of a world which is lived in

JEECE278d ago

I have found that the more recent FC games work better as what I call "background games." Basically what I mean is it's nice to have an active save in one of them going for those times you have 45 minutes to play games and just want to have fun and don't want to get bogged down playing a game online or starting a new game and spending all your time into an annoying tutorial. Like I haven't touched FC4 in years but I know if I had 30 minutes to an hour to play I could hop in and easily be back in the swing of things and attack an outpost and have a good time.

I think a lot of people use big RPGs like Skyrim or Cyberpunk in a similar way.

isarai279d ago

Yes because FC3 executed those aspects better. Every game since FC3 has just been Frankensteined off the bones of FC3 with half the effort.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 278d ago
Michiel1989279d ago

you could say it's a far cry from what it was

wesnytsfs279d ago

Ubisoft gets a lot of hate for their content filling of maps. Personally I enjoy the mechanic when i play an open world game I like revealing hte entire map and doing all the side mission stuff before i go into main missions. Far Cry and the RPG AC maps where a joy to play.

RaidenBlack279d ago

Far Cry 2 was soo unique ... it was ahead of its time and is often misunderstood (thank you Clint Hocking, can't wait for his next game Assassins Creed Hexe)
(yes, FC2 was a departure from from FC1, so in strictest sense, Crysis 1 & 3 are the truer successors)

JEECE279d ago

Yep. Unfortunately there has been so little since then that has scratched the same itch. Really the closest thing has been BOTW, which uses a lot of similar systems (though ironically FC2 came out before Ubisoft put the Assassin's Creed towers in Far Cry, while BOTW had Ubi towers). Obviously it isn't a shooter though. I keep hoping that that some indie dev will put an FC2-esque game out on Steam, but so far I've been left wanting.

Sircolby45279d ago

I actually enjoyed Far Cry 5 and New Dawn. Far Cry 6 was a joke. It was a step backwards in every way. That was probably the worst Far Cry I have ever played.

Show all comments (26)
80°

Why Far Cry 3 Was The Best Of The Franchise?

Far Cry 3, an open-world masterpiece that redefined the series. Gameplay and storyline makes it a timeless classic that still inspires today.

Read Full Story >>
tech4gamers.com
Deeeeznuuuts312d ago

It's gotta be Far Cry 2 for me, the feeling of that game I'm still yet to find again, just everything about it, I'd kill for a remaster, I'd even be happy with just a bump in resolution and frame rate, occasionally go back to it, think I'm gunna have to do just that now 😂

porkChop312d ago

A remaster of Far Cry 2 would be amazing, especially with the mods that fixed the broken stealth system and the dumb checkpoint respawns. Include those fixes and it would be a huge upgrade over the original.

JEECE312d ago

Enemies respawn in Far Cry 2? Terrible! It's a broken system! Make me a one-man army who can inexplicably hold an entire region!

Enemies respawn in Dark Souls and Zelda? Brilliant! So much more hardcore! Glad the devs took risks!

porkChop312d ago

The problem isn't them respawning. It's that they respawned after just 5 minutes. Like you'd still be in the area looking for diamonds, loot, exploring, etc, and the enemies would just respawn with you there.

70°

Our Favorite Villains in Gaming - Roundtable

There have been plenty of great villains in video games over the years. Now it's time for the VGU crew to name a few of their favorites.