Far Cry 3 might be one of the most hyped games of the years and to be honest it might be one of the best titles of the year aswell. This game will offer you a lot more than a normal first person shooter and will keep you occupied for days, if not for weeks if you go and explore the other modes the game has to offer.
Following a series of repetitive games, a formulaic approach, and a disappointing last entry, the Far Cry series has been run into the ground.
The trouble with most criticisms of this franchise is that they insist Far Cry 3 was the best game, but the things they claim to hate about the franchise are all the elements that 3 introduced.
Ubisoft gets a lot of hate for their content filling of maps. Personally I enjoy the mechanic when i play an open world game I like revealing hte entire map and doing all the side mission stuff before i go into main missions. Far Cry and the RPG AC maps where a joy to play.
Far Cry 2 was soo unique ... it was ahead of its time and is often misunderstood (thank you Clint Hocking, can't wait for his next game Assassins Creed Hexe)
(yes, FC2 was a departure from from FC1, so in strictest sense, Crysis 1 & 3 are the truer successors)
I actually enjoyed Far Cry 5 and New Dawn. Far Cry 6 was a joke. It was a step backwards in every way. That was probably the worst Far Cry I have ever played.
Far Cry 3, an open-world masterpiece that redefined the series. Gameplay and storyline makes it a timeless classic that still inspires today.
It's gotta be Far Cry 2 for me, the feeling of that game I'm still yet to find again, just everything about it, I'd kill for a remaster, I'd even be happy with just a bump in resolution and frame rate, occasionally go back to it, think I'm gunna have to do just that now 😂
There have been plenty of great villains in video games over the years. Now it's time for the VGU crew to name a few of their favorites.
why must console gamers always downplay the VAST improvements the pc versions of games ALWAYS have
from article;
"Personally I tried the console version, which looks a little less than the PC version but still looks amazing. "
a little less, thats horribly innacurate, would you consider the wii version of modern warfare 3 to be "a little less" than the 360 version, well the difference between AAA multiplats on ps3/360 versus pc is WAY bigger
on console, the games have jaggies, run at 20-30 frames, screen tear, sub-hd, 600p resolutions, sometimes lower, 540p alan wake, sometimes, rarer these days, if you are lucky, 720p
pc, 1080p, 1200p, 1440p, 1600p, up to more than 4x the image quality in just pixels, then add in 16x AA, dx11, ssao, depth of field, soft shadows, ect....ect....ect....
the pc is 2 full generations beyond anything on console
"a little less than the pc version"
no.....2 generations less......
a world of lessness!
lol
Is all that really necessary? Of course a PC will always be more powerful than a console, that's just fact and there's nothing wrong with that
I'm a PS3 owner and I'd take the convenience of not having to upgrade anything to have an enjoyable gaming experience any day over the enhancements of a next-gen PC rig
This whole console-PC flame war I see in every forum is just ridiculous. Just let us enjoy our systems. We don't need that elitist BS
This gets my vote for game of the year. You have to play it.