Approvals 11/3 ▼
JasonPC360PS3Wii (1) - 6310d ago Cancel
INehalemEXI (2) - 6310d ago Cancel
predator (4) - 6310d ago Cancel
Vip3r (2) - 6310d ago Cancel
wohoo (1) - 6310d ago Cancel
Tecra_X (1) - 6310d ago Cancel
180°

Call of Duty 4 Re-reviewed

Gameguru.in writes-"Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare is one of the biggest hits of 2007. It aggregated a score of 94+ on both renowned and tainted sites, the reviewers might have discussed and dissected the article in great detail, but there were quite a few boundaries that they probably forgot to touch upon which makes the experience of playing Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, one of the most satisfying for quite a period of time."

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

✔ Fixed
Wrong story type
Should be
It's on PC as well...
Snoozer2826310d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Downtown boogey6310d ago

I never liked CoD 4...
I never felt immersed AT ALL!
Never got those shudders in my spine.
There wasn't any motion blurr that helps a great deal with immersing.
And Xbox 360 version has better graphics (better textures) than the PS3 version... And I have a PS3!

lawgone6310d ago

I agree with the immersion thing. I like COD4 and have played it a lot but the story is weak. Bioshock and even Resistand Fall of Man do a much better job.

nanometric6310d ago

then you both are simple minded... the story was made to make you think and wonder about the war.

!!!SPOILER!!!

I think that the game was made supposed to show that the war is not fun, tho it seems to be cool that you can bomb enemies with an AC-130 gunship, but then a commentary by the pilot-"Ha, I see little pieces flying everywhere", or something like that. Or when you blow s**t up with the grenade launcher from a chopper and save shot down pilot in the end of act 2, but then a nuke goes off and everyone dies. And at the end, you still think that it was all cool and rad, but then you see Griggs getting shot in the head and after that Price getting CPR.

!!!END SPOILER!!!

Imo, the game is made to make you think that was is not fun and games, and that it doesn't end with a "They lived happily ever after", but that it is brutal and unnecesery.

antoinetm6310d ago

@1.2 bubbles for u.

The nuke part is very well crafted.

its nice to finally see a mainstream fps showing the war from that point of view. (something the tom clancy's lack)

+bubbles @ infinity ward.

Close_Second6310d ago

...versions of COD4. Whilst playing the games you won't notice any differences at all. If you're anal retentive enough to want to get to the same spot and hit pause so you can examine things in detail then good luck to you. Me, when you're in the middle of an intense on-line firefight I couldn't give a rats ass about subtle differences in textures or lighting...I just enjoy the game!

The lack of in-game XMB on the PS3 version is its only weakness.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 6310d ago
niall776310d ago (Edited 6310d ago )

thats for ruining the online america :P

the amount of dumb curse words, camping, glitching has gone up but 100x when compared to just playing PAL players

thisguywithhair6310d ago

Kind of off topic here, but does anyone know when the dlc for COD on the PS3 will be available?

Close_Second6310d ago

1. The lobby system for COD4 is by far one of the worst lobby systems for any next-gen title. I want to be able to see what games I could join and what my connection would be like before I join. COD3 provided a more advanced lobby system. Halo 3 provides a prime example as to how a next-gen lobby system should work.

Worst aspect of the lobby system is how you can quit a game and keep ending back in the same game when trying to join a new one. My record is 9 returns to the same game! Shear f**king brilliance!

2. The spawn system. Its annoying how when playing on-line the guy you or your buddy just killed spawns in behind you and has a free shot.

As for the single player campaign. Moments of brilliance however, they are about as immerse as a rail gun shooter, e.g. Time Crises 3.

aggh im on fire6310d ago

I thought COD4 was a case of pretty graphics but not so mucg going on under the hood. The A.I was awful, the infinite spawning enemies ridiculous and on veteran it was a case of enemies having infinite grenades and a run to check points.
It still looked lovely though.

Show all comments (13)
140°

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III Coming to Game Pass July 24

Everything you need to know about Modern Warfare III coming to Xbox Game Pass and PC Game Pass.

Read Full Story >>
news.xbox.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community300d ago
darthv72301d ago (Edited 301d ago )

Will be interesting to see what sort of numbers GP users draw in come tomorrow. It is believed that this is one many have been waiting for.

301d ago
thesoftware730300d ago

Darth,

That is not accurate; this game is old, and most people who want it have already bought it. You might get a small number of subs, but we will mostly see a good influx of players(not new subs) from people with Game Pass who will try it, which is what happened with D4.

CoD: BO 6 will be the test for actual sub numbers.

darthv72300d ago

That's fair... seeing as many have been saying they want CoD in GP. My comment was more of , now that its here... what can it do. Im sure there will be other titles in the franchise that will either entice or turn off different users.

Bathyj300d ago

No one's buying a console and signing up for a monthly bill just to get this game to avoid buying it. That's ridiculous. Besides everyone bagged the crap out of this on release for the 4 hour campaign.

andy85300d ago

Sweet. Never got round to it on release. I'll give the campaign a go

chicken_in_the_corn300d ago

Severly underrated game. Big improvement over 2.

50°

Why MW 2019 is still the best looking Call of Duty to date

MW 2019 is five years old at this point and on previous gen hardware, but it is still the best looking Call of Duty game to date.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community398d ago
EazyC397d ago

MW was an excellent videogame. They messed up Spec Ops big time, but aside from this it was a huge step in the right direction initially. Most notably, at launch it seemed to come from a very cohesive creative vision that was felt across gameplay, to story to art style/visual direction. It was also very notably written by prominent ex-Naughty Dog guys that quit almost immediately before release.

That COMPLETELY dissolved through post-launch content and the full pivot to a "cross-mode" narrative that completely obliterated the cohesion in overall story direction. Warzone then "became" the new face of Call of Duty and the franchise completely removed itself from anything remotely creatively "good". It is a pure money machine, so I kinda get why they're doing it....but I personally completely lost interest.

I would love to see Infinity Ward move off CoD and get to make their own product with full control. They clearly have some massive talent in their ranks but it's perverted by Activision's corporate interests.

70°
3.0

Call of Duty Modern Warfare III (2023) Review - Jump Dash Roll

Call Of Duty is back with its yearly instalment, but is Modern Warfare 3 breaking new ground, or just a lazy cash grab? The answer may not surprise you in today's review from JDR.

Read Full Story >>
jumpdashroll.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community545d ago