150°

Joe Danger dev: 'Don't ever piss off PlayStation fans'

Fans of the 2010 racing-platformer Joe Danger were happy to receive a sequel, Joe Danger 2, a couple weeks back. That is to say, Xbox fans - after months of silence, not a single detail on the PlayStation 3 version was dropped by indie developer Hello Games, and the game's Xbox release date came and went with nary a peep on when PlayStation fans would receive the same content.

maniacmayhem4227d ago

"Let's just say if there's a piece of advice I would now give to every developer in the world, it's don't ever piss off PlayStation fans," he proclaimed. "They are a force to be reckoned with!"

I believe it!

darthv724227d ago

especially considering the original came to PSN first. The idea of a sequel NOT coming to PSN would just be stupid.

guitarded774227d ago

I went to their Facebook page to ask about the game a while back, and there were so many comments asking if the game was coming to PSN. I bought Joe Danger the first day it was released on PSN, and was kinda let down when JD2 was only coming to XBOX. I mean, I have two XBOX's, so it's not like I couldn't just play it on XBOX, but sometimes you play a game on a console, and it just becomes associated with that console or PC to you. I know that's not the case for everyone, but it is for me. I was also initially upset that Hello Games was not supporting the gamers who supported them with Joe Danger on PS3. In the end, it's good that the game will be on both... However, I'm really getting sick of this timed exclusive crap. If something is exclusive, it should remain exclusive... not all this keeping secrets BS. It creates distrust between devs and gamers.

Megaton4227d ago

So it sounds like they sold out to Microsoft and now they're gonna come crawling back to the platform that made them.

darthv724227d ago (Edited 4227d ago )

not so much. Just 360 got it first. It happens on both sides of the track.

PSN got the original first. The sequel comes to live first. Either way both sides get a version so...move along.

edit: you got me. Like i said, the game is coming to both. I got the first one on PSN I can get the second as well once it comes out.

I'm not one to hold a grudge because a game from series I like come out on another platform. As it turns out....I more than likely have that platform.

Megaton4227d ago (Edited 4227d ago )

When's the last time the PSN got timed exclusivity on a sequel to a game that was originally a timed (18 months) exclusive to XBL? Just curious, since it sounds like you're trying to push false equivalency.

That would be like the PSN receiving timed exclusivity on a Braid sequel. Would that not also strike you as quite absurd?

Blankman854227d ago

SONY probably wanted to own rights to the game if it published first on PSN. All Microsoft seemed to have asked for is timed exclusivity and silence about it for a couple of weeks and they get to keep rights to their IP.

killerhog4227d ago (Edited 4227d ago )

It's actually the other-way-around with more like: If a game is multiplatform, ms wants the better or equal version compared to the other consoles. If a game is released on another console first, then ms version better be better or come with more content. I believe ms only funds if their (developer) game is exclusive to their console only. There's other effed up things you must do/agree too, to be on ms console.

moodgamer4227d ago

Hello Games, owns the IP rights. Sony, allows many developers, to produce their games on PS3 first, and then do whatever they want. But it would be very bad, if the second one didnt came to PSN.

kikizoo4227d ago

" If a game is multiplatform, ms wants the better or equal version compared to the other consoles."

XD

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4227d ago
fermcr4227d ago (Edited 4227d ago )

"Joe Danger dev: 'Don't ever piss off PlayStation fans'"

I agree. They tend to be the worst and most annoying fanboys.

When the Wii\X360\PC losses a exclusive, i don't see fanboys making a fuss about it (at least not many). When a PS3 looses a exclusive, it's the end of the world. I still remember all the fuss when FF13 went multi.

smashcrashbash4227d ago (Edited 4227d ago )

You mean like the Nintendo fanboys who sent death threats to the guy who gave Twilight Princess a bad score. Or threatened the doctor that said the 3DS could be bad for your eyes? Or want to cut your throat if you say anything negative about Nintendo? Or the Microsoft fans who were the head of the PS3 is going to fail bandwagon? Or who spent several months claiming and begging that MGS4 come to the 360? Or who are still in denial that RROD was a bad thing? Or went on the 'exclusives don't matter' campaign and tried to put down Infamous using Prototype every second they had? Or the constant and endless claims about how Alan Wake would beat both Heavy Rain and Uncharted 2?

Just shut up. All sides have annoying fanboys. No fanboy is worse then the other. Right now I am listening to several annoying Nintendo fanboys who won't shut up about how much of a clone PASBR is and how SSB is the best and how PASBR can never beat it that are pissing me off. So don't start with the who is the worse fanboy $hit all over again.

BlackTar1874227d ago (Edited 4227d ago )

I guess the fact that the game FF was changed and cut to crap has no bearing on your point?

Your post almost proves the opposite of your point. Anyone who thinks that one set of fanboys is worse then the other is almost certainly a fanboy of which ever one they aren't accusing.

maniacmayhem4227d ago

"I guess the fact that the game FF was changed and cut to crap has no bearing on your point?"

That had nothing to do with the 360.

yesmynameissumo4227d ago

I think it's mainly because there aren't 6000 articles on how Wii\360\PC are doomed because an exclusive goes multiplatform. If you remember the FF13 fuss, you should be able to recall the negative media blitz I'm referring to.

DigitalRaptor4227d ago (Edited 4227d ago )

I can basically attest to what smashcrashbash and yesmynameissumo because I was a victim (yes I said it, sue me) of supporting the PS3 in its early days.

Brosy - you call us crybabies, but is that really surprising coming from an undeniable 360 fanboy troll who's sole purpose is to spout BS to get a reaction from said fans so that you have something to complain about?

Which console/company has been the most senselessly and unjustifiably bashed this generation? There's your damn answer. Sony fans have to work to defend Sony because most things that were claimed by the rest of the fanboys turned out to be nothing but sensationalist utter bull crap, made up by people who love to hate, or ones that didn't want to pay $599, even though their mommy bought their 360 or Wii for them for Xmas. Probably an XBL Gold sub too.

So yeah, it turns out that in 2006-2008 it was Blu-ray and PS3 that were doomed. Of course, try telling most people you actually know that PS3 will be fine and that it has great games... they just didn't want to know. Always the 'fingers in the ear' treatment.

Now that what we all KNEW wasn't true actually ISN'T TRUE, according to the media, Sony is definitely doomed and even though they are a multi-billion dollar company who's PlayStation division is actually turning a profit, and are currently undergoing re-structure to perform better in their other departments.

So there we have it 'fanboys of wanting Sony to fail'. Simply put, we're sick of the utter lack of common sense biased BS, which seems to be aimed at Sony more than any other console manufacturer this gen. It still happens and the fact that people laugh off the accusations of bias from the mass media and small time mainstream CoD, Gears, Halo-head bloggers is even more disturbing.

I am a fanboy of many a machine but most of all, of cutting the crap.

Godmars2904227d ago (Edited 4227d ago )

Sorry, but people complained about not getting this?

If anything I'd expect 360 owners who bought it might be upset at getting less content at the same cost.

Avernus4227d ago

Oh like the PS3 owners got less content in JD 1?

Godmars2904227d ago

Did they?

If so then these guys deserve no, much less need to bring up, anything about loyalty. Should have just put out the same game at the same time.

What's going on now is starting to sound like an attempt to agitate fanboys to promote sales.

Skate-AK4227d ago

Microsoft and Sony both have policys that make it to where if a game launches on a competitors system first it has to have extra content to launch on XBLA or PSN. I worded it kinda weird so hopefully you can understand that.

Lyr1c4227d ago

Pretty sure that's only Microsoft.

chukamachine4227d ago

Don't ever piss off 360 owners, they will buy you a 360 to prove that the system doesn't break down. grrrrr

Show all comments (29)
50°

Sean Murray was "always a bit skeptical" about bringing No Man's Sky to Switch

From Games Radar: "What would you do if you were President of the United States of America for just one day? Hello Games' managing director would want to ask one question, and it's extremely on brand: "What's the story with the aliens?" Sean Murray told me this after revealing that he had some trepidation about bringing the ever-ambitious No Man's Sky to Switch, and after I wondered whether he had considered holding out for the long-rumored Nintendo Switch Pro – given the difficulties inherent to bringing the space sim to such a small system. Just as Murray has questions about Area 51 for his stint as President, he had similarly large, unanswerable questions for Nintendo when the collaboration began: "But, like, really, what's going on?"

Read Full Story >>
gamesradar.com
410°

Xbox Live Gold Subscribers Can Claim These Three Additional Free Games

Microsoft is offering three additional free games for all Xbox Live Gold subscribers in addition to the regular lineup of games this month.

Read Full Story >>
novicegamerguides.com
darthv72724d ago

Joe Danger is hella fun. Nice bonus from GwG.

deleted724d ago

I enjoyed Joe Danger back in the day, it's pretty fun. What's amazing is how Hello Games went from a few of these rather simple games to the ultra-ambitious No Man's Sky!

724d ago Replies(1)
Orchard724d ago

I would love a sequel to JD - although I do realize that Hello Games have kinda grown beyond that scope of game.

Godmars290724d ago

And still the contradiction of getting something for "free" from a service you pay for continues.

CrimsonWing69724d ago

But isn’t the service for online multiplayer? So, technically it’s “free games” included with your online subscription? I mean, what was the point of Xbox Live? To get free games?

Godmars290724d ago

Only, after they tried doubling the price of another online service, some similar nonsense, isn't Xbox online multiplayer suppose to be free?

darthv72724d ago

"isn't Xbox online multiplayer suppose to be free?" No, it was always been a paid premium on console. The free games was not related to the rumored price hike. They were giving them away long before that.

If there was a service for free online multiplayer on console, it was PSN. Until the PS4 came out.

Jericho1337724d ago

How would you have worded it then? I’d say ‘subscribers claiming free games’ is about as clear as it gets.

Godmars290724d ago

"As part of", "In addition to", "As an extra bonus". Anything better than, "Get this with no strings attached or requirements" which is what "free" implies.

Jericho1337724d ago

That’s like saying ‘buy one get one free’ doesn’t apply because it’s not technically ‘free’. Stop trying to find a problem with something when there isn’t one.

gangsta_red724d ago

** "Get this with no strings attached or requirements" which is what "free" implies.**

No, it actually doesn't, it's just like when you get a free refill of soda after you purchased your first cup.

I think we are well enough into these console gens to stop bringing up this tired argument

CrimsonWing69724d ago

You always had to pay for Xbox Live to
play online multiplayer… this was the case way back during the original Xbox when it was released.

I don’t understand what you’re hung up about when plenty of subscription services give free things as a perk or benefit to a user who subscribes to a service.

Hell, Nintendo Power gave me a “Free” Strategy Guide of my choosing for paying for their magazine subscription way back in the day.

You’re getting the games that you’d need to pay for regardless of the subscription for free, bottom-line. The service you’re paying for is the online multiplayer service Xbox Live. You aren’t paying for Xbox Live and paying for the game you were handed out for free, you’re still just paying for the online service and nothing more. Hence, why the game in itself is free for Xbox Live subscribers.

sinspirit724d ago

It was originally just for online access. It had updated and began monthly game releases to compete with PS Plus. Monthly games have been a part of Live for many years. It is more recently that the releases are getting worse and worse.

Godmars290724d ago

Its been a majoritively dismissed point as DLC, MTs and now subscriptions became things. Failed protest against policies meant ultimately to strip consumers of ownership rights over media in general.

Still, may as well keep pointing it out.

sinspirit723d ago (Edited 723d ago )

@Godmars290

I guess people are just missing the point. And, now we got people thinking Live is still just an online sub and games are a generous inclusion like it's not a feature of the paid service lol.

Live officially on Microsofts site lists, "Free games every month. Now that’s Gold.
Get 2 free games a month, including backward compatible Xbox 360 games".

But, many are starting to say that Live payment is still just for the online access. Which, if that's what they're believing then I'm worried about why they'd pay just for online access. Paying for it back in the day was already a ripoff since they didn't even host dedicated servers to ensure the best quality connection. You'd pay for it just to host it on the internet provider that you also pay for lol.

I do think it's great to offer extra games on top of the existing ones. However, Live has repeatedly offered very lacking games, has listed the same games more than once, and even listed the same game two months in a row one time. They need to have a solid consistent history of delivering quality monthly releases.

traumadisaster723d ago

And still the contradiction of bringing up a decade old tired complaint knowing we’ve all moved in but you. We all agree it would better if the author was accurate but this argument is so old now, move on.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 723d ago
Father__Merrin724d ago

https://www.xbox.com/ja-jp/...

I've just redeemed knights quest needs GP/gold membership etc

723d ago
220°

Sean Murray Says No Man's Sky Isn't Finished 'By a Long Shot'

No Man's Sky creator Sean Murray says his galaxy-spanning sandbox isn't close to being finished, despite receiving its 19th major update today.

MadLad797d ago

I hear a lot of things from this guy.
You have to determine what the lies are.

Ryushaa797d ago

You have to up your game man. Such a weak jab. This must be one of the weakest bait I ever saw. Lol

LordoftheCritics797d ago

The game is 10x or 20x bigger than what it used to be for the same price if not half the price.

Biggest turn around I have ever seen in the history of video gaming.

_Decadent_Descent797d ago (Edited 797d ago )

@LordoftheCritics This and FFXIV.

neutralgamer1992797d ago

This studio has done what most multi billion dollar companies don't do. Look at EA and post mass effect support, look at anthem and it's support, look at marvel avengers

Yes what they did at launch was absolutely wrong. But that's a amazing redemption story. This was a 5 man studio who's studio got flooded. He came into sunshine and wasn't ready for the spot light especially with Sony promoting it

Yes at launch they deserved all the negative press but 19 post launch expansions with major changes and updates

Now if they can add an interesting 15-20 hour story and quests that would be a complete package

IanTH797d ago (Edited 797d ago )

Yeah, I think people really underestimate the whole "small time dev, shoots into spotlight to the point of going on to Late Night TV talk shows for interviews", and the fact he was doing PR as someone also actively developing the game.

He was probably routinely working on things he thought would get in but didn't. Or would be asked in the moment, want to please the interviewer, doing on the fly calculation for what he thought were feasible adds. I'm not saying he was not in the wrong. But I'm saying I think we can find it easier to believe these were true mistakes, rather than malicious lies to peddle his wares. Especially when compared to a game made by a 300 person development studio making a $100+ million dollar game where everything said is vetted & calculated well in advance by a team of PR people.

These updates, I think, show his character. That's he's a good dude who made just made mistakes. And he's learned, not even teasing updates at this point. He's letting the content do the talking now, and there isn't a much better degree of honesty than that.

Retroman797d ago (Edited 797d ago )

Sean Murray "HAD" to make those updates and expansion packs.if not to this day No man Sky would be the Worse game Ever!!! made. and used as a example how not to make a video game joke.

neutralgamer1992797d ago (Edited 797d ago )

Retroman

I agree and he and his studio won't have much future in gaming. But let's not act like they have gones above and beyond and the price of this game has went way up. This is what CDPR needs to look at. Their studio got flooded so they lost a lot of work but because there was such a hype train behind this they didn't want to delay. Other billions dollar companies simply give up and move on to other projects. Mass effect Andromeda is such a true example, EA gave up on the game and said there will be no more updated when the developers were clearly making improvements with patches and could have done some dlc

And btw mass effect Andromeda made over 100 million dollars so it's not like it lost EA money. With NMS I believe they have found their Minecraft and they can keep adding more and more to make this game more fun

Like a said have some interesting factions
Have a solid story
Have fun side quests
Improve base building
Better NPC characters

Yes they lied at launch but I don't think the studio was ready for all the PR but instead of giving up they stuck with it and now keep on making improvements

Let's keep one thing in mind NMS made a lot of money at launch so they could have taken it and left but instead this game is selling for $60 most of the times and $25-30 on sale

To add next generation support
VR support

Keep it going and take the gamers feed back and keep on improving. Honestly it wouldn't surprise me if Sony bought them out and this is their Minecraft available on all platforms. Provide a bigger team with more resources

northpaws797d ago

@TheRealTedCruz

6 years since launch and you are still crying about it?

Rimeskeem797d ago

I haven't heard much from him ever since he grinded his game and made it into what he promised before.

IanTH797d ago

If what Sean/HG has done after literally 5 years at this point hasn't helped to redeem themselves in your eyes, I guess nothing will. I hope you never make a mistake. Or rather, I guess I hope your family or friends never make a mistake with you since even a 5 year long mea culpa appears to not be enough lol.

Babadook7797d ago

He’s turning out to be a stellar game director.

porkChop797d ago

Look. I used to shit on NMS and Sean Murray as much as anyone else, and I'll never forget what they did. But they've paid their dues. They endured one of the worst backlashes this industry has seen. They've learned their lesson, and have done tremendous work building on NMS. It's time to move on from the negativity and just let them be.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 797d ago
mastershredder797d ago

I dunno, "Isn't Finished 'By a Long Shot'" may be the most honest thing he has ever said.

-Foxtrot797d ago

Just a shame he didn't say it before the game launched

Could have saved myself the money

Fishy Fingers797d ago (Edited 797d ago )

Still bitter over $60 from 2016....

mixelon797d ago

But people who bought it at launch are still playing and enjoying it years later? He did always say they would support it post release..

Rimeskeem797d ago

I say teh same thing about the Xbox One I had. I they stated the whole PC thing before I bought my xbox I wouldn't have spent the money.

But that was also from 2015 and since then I have learned to grow the fuck up.

Lionsguard797d ago

It is billions of years into the future and the sun is running out of Hydrogen to burn, swelling up into a super red giant and about to incinerate the Earth. In other news, No Man's Sky is releasing it's 58372996322nd free update and Sean Murray expresses, "I'm not even half way finished". Also Star Citizen teases alpha build 5829187857829.02 and crosses over 46 quintillion dollars. "We're not a scam! claims devs".

Terry_B797d ago

Looking forward to the No Man's Fury Update that adds Mai and Geese. OKAY!

Leathersoup797d ago

That's funny. Usually people wait until a game's finished before going gold.

Rimeskeem797d ago

I hope you never played Fortnite, Minecraft, Apex, Overwatch, Warzone, Halo Infinite, or any other game that keeps getting updated.

Or else you would be a hypocrite for not complaining about any of those games that have been updated since release :)

King_Noctis796d ago

Usually? Say hello to recently released games such as Crossfire X, Battlefield 2042, GTA Trilogy “Definitive” Edition, and eFootball 22.

Show all comments (38)