Here's a review Sleeping Dogs, an open world game set in Hong Kong. How does it stack up compared to other sandbox games like Saints Row and Grand Theft Auto? Find out in this gameplay video review.
Huzaifah from eXputer: "Sleeping Dogs from the early 2010s is one of the best open-world games out there but in dire need of a resurgence."
You say "yet" as if it's even possible anymore. United Front Games is gone, along with anyone that made this game what it is
That’s what happens when games sell poorly. And I’ve seen people wonder why people cry when a game sells badly… this is your answer.
Majority of the time it's true but if a company/publisher is big (in terms of money), they can take a hit or 2. e.g. I am not worried about Rebirth sales as Square will make Remake 3 anyway but if FF 17 doesn't sell then Square might need to look for alternative. <-- my humble opinion
Oh okay, Activision owned True Crime, but when that didn’t sell as intended it was canceled. Six months later Square Enix bought the rights and changed the title to Sleeping Dogs.*
*As per Wikipedia
Sleeping Dogs was a sleeper hit back then. It was fantastic. It actually still is. Would love a sequel to this, or at least a revive of True Crime series.
The past few years have seen some excellent open-world titles on top of the existing classics. Here are some of the very best that you should play.
watching the video is better then going through 31 pages of gamingbolt.
Do they explain in the video why there are two numbers 3? Starfield and Tears of the Kingdom?
GF365: "Here are eight games that need sequels. These games are ones that players would love to experience another time, bigger and better."
Bloodborne is a game I still restart and play every few months. I would welcome just a re release in 60fps with a visual upgrade. It's a perfect game. If I was king for a day I would include the randomizer mods because then it would be a kind of rogue like and I could play it forever.
Yes
Smaller than gta4, more restricting than gta4, doesn't look all that much better than gta4, but it's better? Yeah okay lol. Gta4 also came out years ago and still sets the bar.
Umm, its a decent game but let's not play the "cool to hate on the big dog game". Gta5 eats this game for breakfast. Not even close. Nice try though.
Well, i can without a doubt say i had a shitload more fun in this than in GTA 4. It may not offer as much as GTA 4, but for a first game in a series, being the second only game made by the studio, a studio who is very small in comparison to most, in an engine built from scratch from the ground up, i say this was amazingly impressive, Saints Row 1 didn't even have this much love and effort put into it, and that was made by a highly funded acclaimed studio with a massive staff.
GTA 5 probably not. But I am having more fun with SD than I did with GTA 4, I love hand to hand combat, love all the side missions (some of those are funny- taking pictures of a sunset with a character trying to be in the picture). gunplay is cool. Has awesome radio soundtrack, excellent story. Really I am sure they are just happy that people are putting them up as one of the top sandbox games like GTA especially considering their smaller team and much lower budget.