From the review: "When Steel Battalion Heavy Armor was announced some time ago, I was looking forward to seeing how the game would translate over to this generation. However, as I have found with the few Kinect games I have played, I left disappointed and incredibly frustrated."
Eurogamer:
"Heavy Armor might be the perfect Kinect game, or at least, the most honest, because it reveals how interesting life can be when technology gets in your way. Green-lighted way back when Kinect was known as Project Natal, the game posits a near-future in which a silicon-guzzling microbe has devoured every computer on the planet, setting back the science of combat to roundabouts the close of the first world war. Deprived of GPS, drones and other decadent trappings of 21st century warfare, the Earth's nations are obliged to duke it out in gas-powered mechs or "vertical tanks" that handle as elegantly as elephants in high heels."
And the reason that it was one of From Soft's worst games is that it was tied to poor game accessory.
As much as I like From's Souls games, I'm hoping they release another Armored Core at some point.
...just had to throw that out there
It always seems like the video game industry can’t go a single week without handling death threats of some sort. At this point, they almost come with the territory for game developers, critics, or anyone else a select few people don’t like. However, the only way a person who receives death threats can combat them is by doing absolutely nothing.
MWEB GameZone writes: "The things that you love the most, are also the things that can hurt you the most. Which is just an unnecessarily complicated way of saying that there are really, really bad video games out there and they'll make you feel bad.
We've compiled a list of these aberrations so that you don't ever have to play them yourself."
I really thought the picture of the horse was a real game. Not even sure why I'm disappointed it isn't ;/ Also, Survivor? What's the real aim of the game? Survive the opening credits?
duke nukem forever should of made the list, a game 10yrs in developement and ended up looking like a 2000 title.
So the games' reviewer says it's broken("even basic kinect controls") and gives it a score of 7?
Makes sense.
*shakes head*
@LostDjinn
Wait, so his opinion of the game doesn't count but yours does....lol....
reviewers seriously need to take more time with kinect games because there obviously rushing through it and over all don't understand how to make the kinect work for them. The demo works great for me but not for reviewers who are getting paid to take there time and play a motion game ? its just crazy, take a look at angry joe has say a good 60-100,000 subscribers of people who are basically listen to every word he says but when you look at his gameplay video hes not even trying to play the game at the optical conditions there's a flipping table in between him and the kinect hes sitting on a couch when hes supposed to be in a chair and hes also slouching forward when hes supposed to be sitting up straight and blames the game and not his stupidity. So now we actully have a real hardcore kinect title that people wanted being bashed by reviewers who cant figure out how to use a simple control scheme or setup.