Gc writes, "After having time with the PlayStation’s Cross-Controller feature we can confirm that this is a decent little feature and one that we hope will build on the promising potential. We would love to say that Cross-Controller would become a staple to feature to PS3 games but we have serious doubts that it will even feature in games on a regular basis."
BLG writes, "Some of the most popular games have had a rough start, with some of them being downright unplayable.
Despite that, developers have managed to turn it around for them and make their game worth playing. Here are some games that had a rough start but were pretty great."
Sea of Thieves... I'm not disagreeing that the game has improved in terms of content. But I feel that the most significant change between now and its release is actually the public perception. Nowadays, most people are aware that the game is a multiplayer PvP-focused experience first and foremost, and not "Black Flag made by Rare". Consequently, people dismissing the whole experience because the single-player aspect is lacking or the story is plain are much less common.
Days gone! By the end of the game I couldn't drop it down! I went around so many hours killing zombies! It was addictive by the end.
Richard writes: "Now was the right time to release the Fallout 4 Xbox Series X|S update. It just could have been more."
They aren't going to give more. We are talking about a company that has rereleased an 13 year old game at least 5 times.
Things are heating up in May a bit with Senua's Saga: Hellblade II, the Paper Mario TTYD remake, and a ton of promising indies. We pick the most interesting May games, from AAA to indie, so you can make sense of everything coming out.
Doesn't seem to be that bad of a month. Got a bit of something for everyone.
Please do not support braid anniversary edition. Don't support Phil phish, he's a very despicable person, a a cry baby.
One example
https://youtu.be/yKUGwlFJAH...
So one of the worst idea for video games Sony ps3 doesn't do as well as the wii u. A feature that will take focus away from the tv continuously keeping the player from being immersed in a game is a distraction. Its a silly idea with bad technology in the first place. Learning to use a game controller without looking down at the buttons is something gamers strives to do when they started playing games so forcing someone to do that is silly.
Hot-keys have been in gaming a while where gamers can assign certain actions to specific buttons so the wii u idea is a step back in gaming like the wiimote. Wiimote is an inaccurate controller that mamajority % of Wii games worse to play and now this gimmick the wii u pad is another bad idea that can be solved by using hot-keys. The vita has a way better touchscreen and higher resolution screen than the wii u pad which is silly on Nintendos part for adding shoddy parts on their systems like always.
I know a lot Wii u buyers are beginning to realize what a silly idea it is to constantly look on the wii u pad to interact with the game and press the screen. The expensive screen controller is just a gimmick that siphoned resources that could have made the wii u more powerful. The expensive controller shouldnt be expensive either because the tech in it are old from 10years ago.Wii u is rubbish
it's different...
wii u = dual screen control
ps 3 = has handheld as cross controller..
"We are not saying that one experience is better than the other..."
Name of article:
"PlayStation’s Cross-Controller is good but Wii U does it better"
I well would hope the WiiU does this better than the Vita/PS3 as that's what it was built for!