780°

[Rumor] Date of Rise of the Tomb Raider for PlayStation 4 revealed

The site of the store GameStop Italy has been updated and it was added to the sale list the version for PlayStation 4 Rise of the Tomb Raider.

Read Full Story >>
translate.google.pt
Aloy-Boyfriend2993d ago (Edited 2993d ago )

Maybe it should be a PS+ gane like Garden Warfare after the timed exclusivity ran out. Either way, I'll check it out

Thatguy-3102992d ago

Pretty much. Second hand for me depending if I'm not too busy with the new upcoming releases.

UltimateMaster2992d ago

Who is buying this full price?

Iberius2992d ago

I was really disappointed when they announced this as an exclusive but now I am fairly ambivalent about it.

Until CD and SqE come out and actually talk about why I should be excited for this game one year later I'm not going to buy it. (And to those wondering, yes, I am petty enough to not buy this out of spite as stupid as that may be.)

OB1Biker2992d ago

That s not stupid at all. Look at it this way: they were not in a hurry to release it on PS4. Why would we be in a hurry to buy it at 'launch'? When it's already difficult to choose from so many games?
I sure can wait for a PS+ edition.

BattleAxe2992d ago

It all comes down to whether or not you're a fan of the series. It doesn't sound like you are, so don't buy it.

Kingthrash3602992d ago (Edited 2992d ago )

I'm a fan of the series and will buy it....but I do agree with him. Speaking with our wallets is our most powerful tool. I just got gamer sickness, I want to play this on ps4 to see if they improved it from xbo. I have it on xbo so I'll see first hand.

trooper_2991d ago

Agreed. Game should have been multiplat from the start.

Elimin82991d ago

I don't think you're petty. I concur.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2991d ago
seanpitt232992d ago

I don't do sloppy seconds will get this as cheap as possible or wait till psplus

seanpitt232991d ago (Edited 2991d ago )

If they price this as a new game of $60 then I will take it as a insult from SE and they can shove it where the sun dosnt shine.

The game is a year old it's not are fault they made it a timed exclusive and it bombed terrible Tomb raider has always been on PlayStation and what SE did is all for money and no loyalty and it backfired.

Hopefully all the PlayStation owners agree and make SE pay for what they did and not pay for this game at full retail price and wait till what it's really worth $30 max.

2pacalypsenow2991d ago

That's like saying GTA 5 on PC should of been 29.99

Aceman182992d ago

If it releases for 30 then I'll buy day one, if full price I'll wait till cheaper. I do have a lot of games I'm getting later in the year.

UltraNova2992d ago

No way dude SE is way too greedy. I expect it to be anywhere from 40-60. But if you can wait it will drop to 30 within a month or two for sure.

That said I ll play it like I did with all of them but when I m donw with some of the games i have in my list, spring if not summer 2017.

iliimaster2992d ago

Ur crazy uncharted fans give this game a chance and u might be pulled away from uncharted and it's non stop climbing

Goldby2991d ago

doesnt RoTTR start with Lara climbing a frozen mountain?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2991d ago
littlezizu2992d ago

30$ or will wait till 30$ to buy it. Expecting it to have major drop in price during Black friday.

bf0007779662992d ago (Edited 2992d ago )

so many exclusive to play at that time, don't waste your money, get it for 15$. I'm sure it will drop pretty soon after the Horizon is released.

IamTylerDurden12991d ago

Not buying it at full price.

We have Uncharted, TR doesn't even have mp.

It was greed by SE and it hurt the game and the franchise.

MasterCornholio2992d ago

I'll get it if the price is right.

ziggurcat2992d ago

it's a really good game. played it earlier this year, and enjoyed every second of it. if you liked the first reboot, you'll love this one for sure.

fallacious2992d ago

yeah no doubt i will but i still won't be paying full price after they screwed us over with the exclusivity deal.

MasterCornholio2991d ago

I did like the first reboot. However the game is a year old and it's worth less today that it was at launch. I'm willing to pay what the XB1 version costs for the vanilla version of the game. If the game is packed with DLC and extra content then I'll be willing to pay more for it.

Perjoss2991d ago

If people do not want to support the exclusivity crap that went down then I certainly will not criticize them for not buying this on PS4 launch day at full price. But its a really great game, well worth a launch day price, and this is coming from someone that doesn't particularly like MS and I only have an XB1 to play the odd exclusive.

TheColbertinator2992d ago

Worth getting at launch. Its a great game.

DragonDDark2992d ago (Edited 2992d ago )

For $60?

Edit: i dont know about you guys, but i'm not paying $60 for a 1 year old game..

Gaming_Cousin2992d ago

No for 120$ What do you think?

ziggurcat2992d ago

yes, for $60 - I can only assume that all (or most) of the DLC will be included, so it's worth it IMO.

InTheZoneAC2992d ago

explain your logic

the game hasn't been out a year on the ps4...how is it any different from any other new release on ps4?

rainslacker2992d ago (Edited 2992d ago )

@InTheZone

If it's worth $30 on the X1, then it is worth $30 on the PS4. Explain your logic that it should be worth $60 on the X1....because that's what you're saying. When you say, it's not worth that much because it's a year old game, then you'll have explained to yourself, what it is you're asking Dragon to explain to you.

Face it, SE knows this game isn't worth $60 anymore on the X1, so why should it be worth more on the PS4? Maybe some included DLC, but not everyone really values DLC that highly. Even if they did, GOTY editions of games with all the DLC routinely come in at $40....not $60, because they're typically year old games.

Pretty sure you were active in the comments on the article which specifically explored this topic, and all this was explained to you there, so why do you need further clarification?

2992d ago
KRUSSIDULL2992d ago

It is not a year old game on the PS4 it is a new game on that platform. It will probably include all the DLC as well and ROTR is worth the money as it is one of the best games this gen. You guys pay full price for "remasters" so I don't see the problem of paying full price of a new game that never been on Playstation.

yeahright22991d ago

Curious, I didn't see this kind of backlash when games like Divinity original sin and xcom 2 get relase dates on consoles months, sometimes over a year later. What's the difference? IS it because tomb raider is primarily associated with playstation? does PC exclusivity not count for some reason?

DragonKnight2991d ago

@KRUSSIDILL: A remaster had work put into it to make it better, ROTR will be exactly the same game as the XB1 version.

@Yeahright: No one cares about PC exclusivity. PC gamers port beg for console games, not vice versa.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 2991d ago
Stereotypical_gamer2991d ago

Would you buy bloodborne if it came out on Xbox and fromsoftware decided to charge you 60 for the Xbox version and 20 for the ps4 version? Unless mommy and daddy are the ones buying your games i'm gonna say that this situation might bother you a little bit and maybe you might consider waiting until the price drops. I don't know, call me crazy.

Show all comments (143)
100°

Unity shows what's possible in Unity 6 with the Time Ghost Demo

Unity has shared a new tech demo that showcases what's possible in the latest version of the Unity 6 Engine, called Time Ghost.

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
Jin_Sakai3d ago

You never see anything close to these tech demos in actual game releases. More fluff than anything.

Playstati0n1d 1h ago

How does it feel to not be in the sequel to your own franchise? Their virtue signal will cost them sales

Yi-Long3d ago

I think Unity exposed themselves last year, and IMO any developer should just stay away from them completely.

isarai3d ago

Exactly my thoughts, they killed so much interest in their engine since doing that. Godot looks like it's rising to take it's place as the indie darling game engine.

Palitera1d 14h ago (Edited 1d 14h ago )

In its current pace, Godot would need decades to reach Unity's current state. Almost no studios use it. For hobbyists, it's a valid option, though.
Gotta be real about it: Unity was and will continue as the market leader for small studios. There's no competition in this sense.

Palitera1d 14h ago

The thing is: there's nothing even remotely as good as Unity for small studios game development, even if you consider the company's disgraced trust.

So, sure, it's your opinion, but most professionals have not and will not leave Unity.

And Godot is a hobby project in comparison, not even an option.

victorMaje1d 13h ago (Edited 1d 13h ago )

The thing is: this is the kind of comment Unity was getting when it was up and coming.
I remember when I started learning Unity it was looked at with disregard, this is where Godot is now, remember this, in a few years, Godot will get there.

plmkoh22h ago

@victorMaje

I hope you realize how ridiculous your comments sounds when you suggest "Waiting for Godot" is an option.

It made me chuckle for a good 20 seconds.

victorMaje16h ago

@plmkoh

Haha I’m not suggesting to wait for it. I’m saying with all the updates (each one better than the previous one) Godot will get where it needs to, to be considered more than just a hobby engine.
In fact it can already do a lot, it’s all about how you approach the problem.

Palitera12h ago

PlayCanvas, Babylon, Defold, Cocos Creator etc.
This generic statement of "it's not as great as Unity YET" could be applied to any other engine (no offense to these mentioned great engines).

The fact is: it is a hobby engine, almost no studio is using it. As much as I'd like to see Unity fall, it's not happening at all. There's simply no competitor.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 12h ago
Sonyslave33d ago

You might see this type of graphics on ps 15.

60°

Steam breaks all-time user records thanks to Black Myth: Wukong waking the Chinese market

Steam's total player count hit an all time record recently, and it foretells the influence that Black Myth: Wukong and China is going to have on gaming.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
350°

Microsoft Reportedly Spends $1 Billion Annually To Get Third-Party Games On Game Pass

Uncover the spending behind Xbox's Game Pass subscription. Discover how Microsoft invests a billion dollars annually in securing third-party games for the service.

Read Full Story >>
gamersocialclub.ca
Obscure_Observer5d ago

Good.

Now that you´re releasing games and making big money from every gaming platform, you should double that amount and give us even more day one third party games!

Jin_Sakai5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

You’re delusional beyond belief. Businesses wise it doesn’t make sense and sooner or later they’ll be raising prices again to cover that billion they’re blowing every year.

outsider16245d ago

Lucky for xbox that papa microsoft is rich.

purple1015d ago (Edited 5d ago )

As someone else said earlier today, they are past the growth stage, it’s been stagnent for last 3 years, they are now in the money making stage, prepare to be goosed for as many dollars as possible for the least amount of content. It may not be bad now, (actually it is) but it will be soon (even worse) this year you got hellblade and starfirld and a load of other games that could be bought in bargain bins for about $5-30 and for that you pay them monthly

To add I honestly don’t know how you put up with the barrage of Xbox negativity (which is deserved). I put it down to:

A) you are being paid
B) you may have a problem thinking clearly
C) prefer rooting for the underdog, that’s a legit thing too. English people do it by default

Profchaos5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

Yeah Aussies also love an underdog as long as that underdog isn't Xbox as they were too of the game with the 360 then lost their minds

Chevalier5d ago

3 straight years of missing Gamepass targets. Some people are just blinded by their own idiocy. Will be interesting to see if COD does anything this fall

CosmicTurtle5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

He is a troll. Designed to stoke people up on here. We know this.

It’s quite funny.

Popsicle5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

Yet people still allow the troll to derail an entire topic. I don’t understand how moderation allows it.

I literally just skip the comment. This may be the best comment obscure ever made. I don’t know because I didn’t read it. I have read to many thread derailing post from this person to ever devote any time to reading another.

I wish everyone would ignore the trolls so we can have a genuine discussion. Stop feeding it and it will go away. Even just hitting the disagree button feeds it. Thats what it wants. This is the last post I will ever post about obscure because I am feeding them now.

Legit question to Mods. After such a long history of being a troll, how has this poster not been banned?

Profchaos4d ago

Is he though or does he just blindly love Xbox in the same way Sega fans loved the Dreamcast even though it was clearly dead they thought it could be redeemed

Ok yeah he's saracstic and does troll but I enjoy seeing what he comes out with it would be boring here if we never had conflicting opinions

Sonic18815d ago (Edited 5d ago )

Are you insane? You want them to double the amount when the Xbox is already struggling and losing money 🤔

Hofstaderman5d ago

Correction....XBOX is already dead.

Obscure_Observer5d ago

"Are you insane? You want them to double the amount when the Xbox is already struggling and losing money"

As long we get the games I couldn´t care less about a trillion dollar company losing money. That´s their business to worry about. I only care about the games.

And "struggling and losing money"? Really?

"Microsoft reports Xbox’s revenue is up 61% in Q4 FY24 thanks to Activision"

https://venturebeat.com/gam...

61% more revenue and BO6 is not even out yet.

MS will make a sh!t ton of money with that game alone in all platforms. So 2 Billion yearly invested in their *core* business is nothing!

So yeah, I want them to double the investments on Gamepass. Period.

Sonic18815d ago (Edited 5d ago )

"So yeah, I want them to double the investments on Gamepass. Period."

That ain't going to happen. Just because you want it 😂

fr0sty5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

They'll do that, after creating 4 more higher-priced tiers and making the one that currently includes everything only contain games that have been on the market for 4 years.

"Gamepass Ultra to the MAX: Now only $299 per year!"

MrNinosan3d ago

Already $240/year, so we're there within a year, without new tiers.

jznrpg3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

It will be 29.99$ a month eventually 360 a year

Profchaos5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

They are trying to get a return on abk and Bethesda they won't double day one we're lucky we are still getting them now that day one has been removed from base tiers

They want to make money not give it away

OlderGamer175d ago

Sorry O_O, I tought you where loosing it, but i now come to the conclusion that you realy lost it.
The coping from you is not on a stellarr level....

Flakegriffin4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Homie got 77 dislike and his brain rot will still help him think that he’s right.

4d ago
+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 3d ago
MrDead5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

I like how they twist cannibalising game sales into "invests".

No lifetime sales with MS, they'll F-up gaming the same as streaming services have done to the movie industry and it's workforce.

Fishy Fingers5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

Out of interest do you think those 3rd parties signing the deal are unhappy with the severence and have a gun to their head?

Bro probably has a PS+ sub and has library full of Epic launcher free games.

TheNamelessOne5d ago

lol

Pretty much. There's a lot of hate on this site for Gamepass, but put games on the different tiers of the PS subscription, and whenever they get that free day one release, it's an entirely different tune. No talk about how this choice is killing devs.

DarXyde5d ago

Do we think they're unhappy?

Umm...YES...?

They literally need to be paid up front to put games on the service. It's become a way to gain a foothold on the platform.

Do you think Atlus would launch on Game Pass otherwise?

MrDead4d ago

"Out of interest do you think those 3rd parties signing the deal are unhappy with the severence and have a gun to their head?"

I think you mean severance... and I've noticed you don't know what it means either, MS aren't firing the third-parties they're purchasing from.

"Bro probably has a PS+ sub and has library full of Epic launcher free games."

I'm not a console gamer, but yes I do have Epic with a library full of free games... but guess what Epic rotating free games every week doesn't do. It doesn't destroy lifetime sales and cut workers out of residuals. Then you bring up PS+ a service that also doesn't destroy lifetime sales as their model allows for new releases to earn.

DivineHand1255d ago

There are pros and cons to everything. Streaming services like Netflix is no different than cable tv except it is on demand. Services like Netflix has made it so that more studios can get a share in the profit where they can reach more consumers worldwide compared to the old days where the masses will only watch a few new titles per month.

The only negative about streaming services is that it no longer makes any sense to sell DVDs and Blu-rays though it can be argued that those persons may have moved on to building digital libraries for the sake of convenience.

The reason Xbox is doing so poorly is because they are not doing enough to be competitive. Their output of AA and AAA exclusive titles are extremely low compared to the competition and they haven't had a game of the year nominee in years.

Releasing their games the same date on PC is also hurting their console and it would have been more strategic for them to delay those releases by a year similar to what Sony does to maximize profits.

Gamepass alone is not to blame for Xbox's current position because it can be argued that if the service didn't exist and they had the same gaming output as they have now, they would be in an even worst spot.

MrDead4d ago

"Streaming services like Netflix is no different than cable tv except it is on demand."

It's nothing like cable. My comment isn't a guess lifetime sale of films has shrunk to a point it's almost gone and so has the revenue it generated, that is money from competing TV networks, cable/satellite and physical media sales.

Lack of revenue transparency with streaming has meant workers job security and pay has massively diminished, earnings from residuals is almost gone for example the writer for Squid Games because of streaming gets no royalties despite series earning $900 million for Netflix, before streaming he would have royalties form lifetime sales.
Or another example Willow the series was pulled and is no longer watchable here's why: “Willow” was one of nearly 50 titles that Disney+ pulled from its streaming library in May. Other titles included the series “The Mysterious Benedict Society” and the feature film “The One and Only Ivan.” Disney CFO Christine McCarthy explained that Disney was expecting to take a write-down in the June quarter of $1.5 billion-$1.8 billion by removing content from its streaming platforms. By writing down the value of the content assets, Disney can remove that from its balance sheet and reduce its tax bill." Also when you pull a show you no longer need to pay residuals to the workers.

Have you also noticed the drop in quality on sfx or thought some older films look so much better then they do now? This is because the industry now relies on cheap labour for sfx outsourcing abroad, more green screen instead of location shooting and a lot less real extras bring life to a scene.

Streaming in gaming is going to be far worse as we've seen with MS consolidating a massive part of the industry to try and make the service sustainable, lifetime sales being cannibalised by gamespass and a work force that has no unions like SAG is already paying the price.

All streaming does is remove income transparency, cuts the workers from the money and sets flat rates and removes consumer ownership... but CEO's and shareholders will still be ok as they benefit from the industry consolidation.

Huey_My_D_Long4d ago

MrDead is absolutely on fire with the post.

Nothing else I have to add other than that.

DivineHand1254d ago

@MrDead like I said pros and cons. Some of those issues can alleviated with alleviated with regulatory intervention to give more transparency to the industry but unlikely anytime soon with all the lobbying going on.

The issue with the squid game's writer can be attributed to the terms and conditions he agreed to. It happens often in business as no one really knows how popular something will be until you catch that lightning in a bottle. I remember reading about how Nintendo hardly made anything off Pokemon Go dispite Niantic making Billions.

I don't blame streaming services for studios finding was to reduce the cost of making films. That stuff would have happened regardless because of the greed of these corporations. We see that same cost reduction happening in every industry from food to Aerospace.

shadowT5d ago ShowReplies(2)
CrimsonGuardVII5d ago

@badz148 its not, it just straight lied.

gold_drake5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

we know this, we have known this since last year.

this is not new or news.

Show all comments (73)