CRank: 5Score: 24540

Everytime i read an incredible stupid comment on N4G, there is a high chance that it's a comment by you. It's getting comical.

2446d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I think he is talking about Battlefield 1 tanker being able to heal the tank from inside and those instant repair abilities that some of the tanks have in BF1. Which are bullshit and kill a good chunk of team work in BF1. While i think both BF3 and BF4 were great games, i think BF1 was pretty bad. I just can't stand those bullet spread mechanics that make shooting weapons too random and not satisfying. Over all i think BF1 is a simplified version of Battlefield formula and as a long time ...

2446d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment


Good lucl finding out. You can search for an answer for your whole lifz.

2449d ago 7 agree1 disagreeView comment

Exactly. Bethesda did show very little of the game before launch, so i bought F4 because i loved 3 and New Vegas. I could have never known how toned down all the RPG elements were or how shitty the quest design was. I have very little hope for a good Bethesda Fallout RPG in the future.

2458d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

You have to build the game for competitive gaming in mind, not having it as an after thought. Try making skill based shooting mechanics and vehicles, before trying to be a competitive game. BF1 is the most casual Battlefield to date and they are trying to shoe horn it to an e-sport. Even BF4 would be a better candidate.

2487d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

The learning curve is pretty insane, but in a way it's also the reason why (atleast for me) the game has stayed fresh. But it takes like 100 hours just learn all the maps some what, then 100 hours to start understanding how to defend/attack every bomb site on every map. And even then you will find new defence strats that you've never seen before. Destructible and complicated maps, with loads of different operators is just an endless pool of entertainment. Every round is truly a differ...

2514d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

60ish percent of PC players play through Uplay so they don't show on steamcharts. And if you compare Siege numbers to CS:GO numbers when CS:GO was released, they both have pretty similar growth. While i think Siege will never reach current CS:GO numbers, you really can't deny that Siege has had a steady growth. Next season the devs are taking Siege into a more competitive route with some of the changes (Ranked will have pro league map pool etc.), so i'm interested to see how far S...

2514d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Modern betas are just demos labeled as betas, so they have an excuse if shit hits the fan. Compare modern alphas and betas to for example Bad Company 2's alpha and beta. Alpha was almost a year before release and beta was like 6 months before release. And they lasted like a month each. In that time you can collect a ton of feedback and have time to make changes in the game.

2548d ago 7 agree2 disagreeView comment

I have played both Overwatch and Lawbreakers beta. I really can't understand why people compare them with each other. Gameplay wise they are completely different games.

2548d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

People here are even more stupid than i previously thought. They can't even read articles.

2553d ago 15 agree2 disagreeView comment

I really don't understand these kind of skill trees. I mean what's the point. IMO skill trees should mould your character into something in the end. You are good at something and bad at something. Or you don't shine on anything but are jack of all traits. Also these trees are paper thin. Maybe 1/4 of the skills are actually desirable and rest are useless junk that you open randomly after you've had everything worthwile unlocked.

2553d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I was excited for this until i saw the multiplayer footage. Every gun has zero recoil. CoD 4 did not have a ton of recoil, but it had enough to make every gun feel different to use and made full auto sprays harder to do when shooting longer distance. Call of Duty has gone so overly casual that i think i will never go back to playing them. Oh well, there are multiple better FPS games around anyway.

2558d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Shitty marketing i would say. I follow game related stuff everyday, yet i didn't know there was an open beta going on until the last day. Seemed like a pretty fun game, but there are some horrible balance issues.

2559d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

They already explained why it's only coming to PC and PS first. They are a small studio and they don't have manpower to make multiple versions at the same time.

2559d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

I honestly think Vanquish was the best pure 3rd person shooter last gen (all about gameplay). When you played the harder difficulties and found combos like slide to melee triggered the slo-mo jump into the air etc. was just so much fun.

2595d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

I've finished only one game since december because i started playing Siege back then. Everyday at work i only think about playing Siege, new strats for different ops on different maps etc. I'm so glad i gave it a chance a year after the release.

2612d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Trust yourself. I've been playing Prey and i don't agree with most of the critic scores with it. I agree more with Steam user reviews that has given it 89% positive reviews and people understanding what kind of game Prey is.

2619d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Fear the old blood!

2629d ago 12 agree0 disagreeView comment

And add recoil to weapons again. Weapons with zero recoil are so boring to use and everything feels the same.

2633d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

What the hell are you talking about? Why people should be concerned about Bethesda Game Studios glitchy reputation, when we are talking about Arkane Studios and Bethesda Softworks (publisher). Bethesda Game Studios don't have anything to do with this game.

2635d ago 6 agree2 disagreeView comment